NJ Shellfish Industry Gets Backing for Aquaculture Law Change

By John Reitmeyer, Budget/Finance Writer, NJ Spotlight, Sept. 28, 2026

Just as farmers use barns to shelter livestock or to store equipment, many of New Jersey’s clam and oyster growers rely on land facilities to support their operations.

These hatcheries, processing areas and other structures, though, are not legally considered to be part of a shellfish grower’s business under what’s known as aquaculture laws.

Industry experts say that holds back investment and generally makes life more difficult for the shellfish farmers operating in a multimillion-dollar sector of the state economy.

“It is really important to the industry,” said Scot Mackey, executive director of the Garden State Seafood Association.

Many miles from the New Jersey tidal flats and marshes where clam and oyster farmers are growing their products, lawmakers in Trenton are working on a bipartisan basis to provide some relief. Legislation approved by the state Assembly last week would rewrite the state’s definition of aquaculture to ensure it incorporates land facilities.

Bivalve farms

The measure is part of a package of bills drafted by lawmakers in response to concerns raised by New Jersey shellfish growers. More than 60 bivalve farms are located up and down New Jersey’s Atlantic coast and along the Delaware Bay, lawmakers said.

As part of this effort, lawmakers convened at the State House this month to hear directly from industry experts, including those growing Eastern oysters and hard clams in New Jersey. Mackey and others testified during the more than hourlong hearing.

Read the full story here

____________________________________________________
Daily energy and environment updates. Free 30-day subscription

NJ Shellfish Industry Gets Backing for Aquaculture Law Change Read More »

NJIT study finds lesser-known ‘forever chemicals’ in water, drinks

NJIT study finds lesser-known ‘forever chemicals’ in water, drinks Read More »

Trump’s Interior Department trots out another move against wind energy

The administration is seeking to reevaluate a key permit for Revolution Wind, a $6.2B project that is already generating power for the energy-hungry Northeast.

Wind turbines stacked on construction equipment against a cloudy sky
Offshore turbine components are staged at the State Pier in New London, Connecticut, on Aug. 25, 2025. (Tyler Russell/Connecticut Public via Getty Images)


By Maria
Gallucci,  Canary Media, 13 October 2026

After halting construction on offshore wind farms and canceling leases for future projects, the Trump administration just took another step to erode America’s troubled offshore wind industry.

The Interior Department wants to reevaluate a key approval for Revolution Wind — a $6.2 billion project that is already producing power off the coasts of Connecticut and Rhode Island. The wind farm began generating electricity in March, and its developer Ørsted installed the last of 65 turbines in September.

On Friday, Interior asked a federal court for permission to remand the agency’s 2023 approval of a construction and operations plan for the 704-megawatt wind farm. Experts say the move doesn’t immediately affect the project’s activities and is part of a longer legal process that could drag on into early next year.

Even so, the new filing ​“injects uncertainty into a nearly completed offshore wind project that electricity planners and consumers in the Northeast are counting on,” Hillary Bright, executive director of the offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward, said in an emailed statement.

At full operation, Revolution Wind will generate enough clean electricity to power over 350,000 homes and is expected to play an important role in reducing the region’s grid stress during heat waves and winter cold spells.

 

Trump’s Interior Department trots out another move against wind energy Read More »

Opinion: NJ Gov. Sherrill risks turning a housing crisis into a sprawl program

By Jeff Tittel, The Jersey Vindicator, Oct. 13, 2026

I grew up believing affordable housing and environmental protection belong in the same sentence.

I was born in Newark and raised on the Newark-Hillside border in federally built workers’ housing. My father was a union factory worker and civil rights activist. My grandparents were labor radicals who held rent parties to help neighbors facing eviction. Housing was not an academic issue. It was about whether working people could keep a roof over their heads.

But I also learned what happens when working people get housing without environmental protection. Our home was down the street from an operating foundry. The pollution was so thick you could write your name in the soot on cars. The local stream was contaminated with industrial pollution. I remember that throwing a match into the water could make it flare.

Then I spent summers at Camp Midvale in Ringwood. It was a different world. You could breathe the air, swim in the streams, and drink the water. The camp brought together trade unionists, civil rights activists, farmworkers and conservationists. People including James Baldwin, Cesar Chavez, Joan Baez and Ossie Davis came through.

That contrast shaped my environmental philosophy: Working people should never have to choose between affordable housing and a healthy environment. I was also a founder of the Coalition for Affordable Housing and the Environment, which sought to advance both goals.

The New Jersey Developers’ great land rush

That is why I am concerned about Gov. Mikie Sherrill’s housing plan. New Jersey desperately needs affordable homes. But the governor’s September 2026 plan risks turning a housing crisis into a land rush for developers.

Read the full post here 

____________________________________________________
Daily energy and environment updates. Free 30-day subscription

 

 

 

Opinion: NJ Gov. Sherrill risks turning a housing crisis into a sprawl program Read More »

Solar researchers might give the U.S. a chance to catch up with China

Producers of solar panels in the United States say they are on the cusp of a technological breakthrough that could upend the industry and even threaten China’s grip on it.

The manufacturers are racing to develop new kinds of panels that can generate 25 percent more energy than most such devices available today. If they are successful, the advance will allow the world to meet the rapidly rising demand for electricity with less land and roof area.

The new technology, known as tandem solar, involves adding second and third layers of material, like a layer cake, to allow panels to convert more of the sun’s radiance into electricity.

Researchers have been working to perfect tandem panels for many years, but now several companies, including Tandem PV, First Solar and Hanwha Qcells, say they are preparing to sell such panels commercially soon, after successfully testing the devices and obtaining certifications from technical bodies.

“It is the next frontier,” said Mike Carr, executive director of the Solar Energy Manufacturers for America Coalition. He acknowledged that Chinese companies were also working on tandem solar but said their technology “is not better than ours and maybe even behind us.”

Read the full story here

____________________________________________________
Daily energy and environment updates. Free 30-day subscription

Solar researchers might give the U.S. a chance to catch up with China Read More »

A Supreme Court Battle Over Climate Change Begins

The justices are about to hear a lawsuit that could determine whether the oil industry faces billions of dollars in liability for damages caused by global warming.

A tangle of towering refinery pipes and scaffolding stands against a cloudy blue sky behind several yellow flowers.

 

Boulder has sued Exxon and Suncor saying they should help pay for the damage caused by global warming in the state. A Suncor refinery in Colorado last month.Credit…Mark Makela for The New York Times

By Karen Zraick, The New York Times Updated Oct. 5, 2026

Nearly a decade ago, the outdoorsy, liberal enclave of Boulder, Colo., sued two oil companies over their role in climate change. Now, the Supreme Court will consider whether the groundbreaking lawsuit can ever go to trial.

Its decision will resonate far beyond the Rockies.

A win for Boulder would likely clear the way for dozens of similar lawsuits nationwide aiming to extract billions of dollars from the fossil fuel industry to fight global warming. But if the court kills Boulder’s case, that could doom the others, handing a major victory to oil companies.

Boulder’s lawsuit says the two oil companies, Exxon Mobil and Suncor Energy, should help pay for the damage to the state of Colorado — such as worsening heat waves and wildfires — caused by climate change, which is driven by the burning of fossil fuels. The companies say Boulder’s lawsuit should be thrown out because it was filed under state law, when federal law should have precedence.

Read the full story here

____________________________________________________
Daily energy and environment updates. Free 30-day subscription

A Supreme Court Battle Over Climate Change Begins Read More »