The plans to build coastal wind farms animated fierce debate among residents and visitors alike.

By Amy S. Rosenberg, Philadelphia Inquirer
The plot lines of the ocean wind energy drama in New Jersey were never boring. Dead whales drove initial opposition, then, after a long battle, a change in the White House got the whole thing canceled.
In New Jersey, the plans to build coastal wind farms animated fierce debate among residents and visitors alike. Were the wind farms necessary to help stave off climate change, which would threaten coastal communities? Would fields of turbines ruin the Shore for visitors?
Did it matter what they looked like? Was the construction of fields of enormous turbines itself an assault on the environment?

Despite generous tax breaks and the full-throated support of New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, the biggest New Jersey projects are now off the table, with the two remaining unlikely to proceed with President Donald Trump’s pause in the leasing of federal land within the Offshore Continental Shelf.
Under Murphy’s guidance, the state had sunk $1 billion into building the New Jersey Wind Port in Salem County and support for a monopile facility built at the Paulsboro Marine Terminal in Gloucester County. Monopiles serve as the foundations for turbines. Murphy was counting on the wind industry injecting $4.7 billion into the state’s economy and creating nearly 10,000 jobs.
The first blow came on Halloween night 2023, when Danish company Ørsted suddenly backed out of both its projects, which would have had the capacity to produce 2.2 gigawatts of renewable energy, enough to power over 1.5 million homes.
If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

