If you are a company or attorney fighting a Natural Resource Damages claim brought by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), you may take heart in an appeals court ruling that denied the DEP $8 million it was seeking under the Spill Act.
In a bulletin to clients, Cole Schotz environmental attorney explains the background to the NJDEP v. Essex Chemical Corp case that the Department was appealing, why the appellate court ruled against the DEP, and what the decision could mean for others subject to similar environmental damage claims.
You can read Mr. Eilender’s summary here.
Have an insight you’d like to share? Use the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comments’ link
Our most recent posts:
Top 2 environmental news stories for PA & NJ – 4/12/12
EPA grants for hotels, restaurants, markets in NY & NJ
Christie Administration redefining ‘Smart Growth’ in NJ
No green light on fracking in NY, but gearing up for jobs
Excess energy: The Northeast would love such a problem
***********************************************************************************************************
Like this post? You’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics
Try it free for 30 days! No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click
***********************************************************************************************************