- Does not lower any cleanup standards and, in fact, strengthens DEP’s enforcement capabilities
- Provides greater protections for schools, child care facilities and residential housing
- Furthers DEP’s ability to require cleanups to unrestricted standards
- Does not privitize, does not deregulate and does not eliminate DEP enforcement or limit the Department’s review to 10 percent of all cleanup project submittals
- Insures DEP review of all documents (not done today)
- Provides for the toughest requirements at “recalcitrant” sites (those where responsible parties try to evade or postpone cleanup)
- Reinforces and strengthens the ‘polluter pays’ concept
- Holds licensed site professionals (LSPs) to a higher standard of performance, makes them accountable for their work, requires their licensure, and provides significant penalties, including criminal prosecution, against any LSP who violates cleanup rules and law
Newspaper coverage of the hearing can be found at:
Contaminated sites bill progresses after two-year debate (Bergen Record)
Trenton puts cleanups on a fast track (Star-Ledger)You can listed to a tape of the entire hearing here.A number of readers have appended interesting comments on the LSP issue to our most recent post on the subject at NJ Licensed Site Professional bill’s encore. If you’d like to add your two-cents worth, we suggest that you comment at that post so all reaction can be found at one location. If you’re the type who prefers to color outside the lines, feel free to add your opinion to this post by clicking on the ‘comment’ line below.
************************************************************
Try our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics, free for 30 days
************************************************************