Will anti-frackers wreck Gov. Wolf's inauguration?

Groups demanding that fracking be banned plan a protest
at incoming Pa. Governor Tom Wolf’s inauguration today
in Harrisburg.

One of the groups is urging their members to ‘disrupt’ the event.

We have that story plus a rundown of the new governor’s green team–and an interview with one of them.

Listen to it all in Episode 10 of EnviroPolitics Podcast.

Will anti-frackers wreck Gov. Wolf's inauguration? Read More »

Divestment: A small but growing problem for fossil-fuel

 
"Inspired by global efforts to reduce carbon emissions, environmentally focused donors want institutions to divest themselves of investments in companies connected with fossil fuels like petroleum and coal," John F. Wasik reports in the New York Times.

"Momentum for divestment has been building for years, pushed primarily by the environmentalist Bill McKibben and his 350.org group. But the fossil-free campaign has attracted some prominent participants lately.

"In September, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the $860 million philanthropy built on John D. Rockefeller’s petroleum fortune, said it would join the divestment movement. It aligned with nearly 200 institutions, a number that has nearly doubled since the beginning of 2014, according to GoFossilFree.org, a divestment campaign.

"All told, groups managing an estimated $50 billion have joined the movement, and nearly $3 billion has been sold or pledged to be sold from individual portfolios. While that’s small change in the multitrillion-dollar world of institutional investing, the movement continues to grow.

“Fossil-free is the new apartheid,” says Thomas Nowak, a certified financial planner with Quantum Financial Planning who is based in Grayslake, Ill., and specializes in green investing. “This movement has legs. A large number of my clients are asking for fossil-free portfolios.”

Divestment: A small but growing problem for fossil-fuel Read More »

NJ Senate panel holds off vote on Gov.’s Pinelands pair

JPIPE27-F
                                           Inquirer photo: Akira Suwa
** Updated at 10:20 a.m. on Jan. 19, 2015**
** Updated at 1:20 p.m. on Jan. 17, 2015**

“Gov. Chris Christie’s nominees to the Pinelands Commission are in limbo after taking a hard line of questioning Thursday regarding a controversial pipeline proposal for the region.”

S. P. Sullivan reported for NJ.com that Dennis Roohr, the mayor of New Hanover Township, and Robert Barr, of Ocean City, were scrutinized by legislators during a two-hour hearing but did not receive an up or down vote from the state Senate Judiciary Committee.

The two men have been nominated by the Christie administration to replace Pinelands commissioners Robert Jackson and D’Arcy Rohan Green, both of whom voted against the pipeline proposal, which would allow South Jersey Gas to build a 22-mile natural gas pipeline through the region. It was rejected 7-7 with one abstention earlier this year, but could come up for a vote again.

Environmental advocates have accused Christie, who supports the pipeline, of attempting to pack the commission with allies who would give it the green light. Neither candidate would say for sure how they’d vote on the issue under repeated questioning. 

“To give an opinion on a hypothetical situation would be wrong,” Roohr told the committee, adding that he was not familiar with the particulars of the pipeline controversy, including the accusations that Christie’s office was seeking to replace its opponents on the commission. 

“Are there newspapers in your area?” state Sen. Loretta Weinberg (D-Bergen) asked Roohr, alluding to the high-profile debate that has played out in the press over the proposal. 

Roohr, a Burlington County farmer whose property sits at the edge of the Pinelands, said if appointed, he would thoroughly research the topic and reach a decision “made on facts.”

important graphic

NJ Senate panel holds off vote on Gov.’s Pinelands pair Read More »

Range Resources hit with second big fine by PA's DEP

The drilling company, Range Resources, has agreed to a $1.75 million settlement over concerns that the firm didn’t properly record how much water it drew from waterways to use when creating natural gas wells, Pennsylvania environmental officials said today.

It was the second massive fine in two years for Range which entered into a $4.15 million agreement with the PADEP in September, 2014. That fine was described by DEP as "the largest against an oil and gas operator in the state’s shale drilling era."

Under today’s deal, Canonsburg-based Range Resources-Appalachia will be fined $800,000 and will spend roughly $950,000 to help the state expand, repair and operate an abandoned mine-drainage (AMD) treatment project in Findlay Township, near Pittsburgh.  The project is unrelated to Range’s operations.

The DEP and Range both said the company has fixed procedural problems in how the company records its water usage.
DEP said it had approved the Hamilton AMD project in lieu of receiving additional penalties because the project will provide a substantial benefit to public health and the environment. The project also has strong local support
Record fine paid in 2014

In September, 2014, Range Resources agreed to pay $4.15 million to settle violations at six impoundments, or holding ponds, in Pennsylvania’s Washington County. The DEP ordered the company to shut down some sites and do repair and upgrade work at others.
The charges against Range Resources at that time included improper monitoring of leaks from a wastewater containment pond as well as releases of contaminants, such as leaking flow back, that has affected soil and groundwater.
Then DEP Secretary E. Christopher Abruzzo said that Range Resources had signed a consent order stipulating, among other things, that the company perform soil and groundwater investigations at each of the closed impoundments.
important graphic

Range Resources hit with second big fine by PA's DEP Read More »

Energy, environment bills in committee today in Trenton

An old political chestnut will be roasted for the umpteenth time today in the Assembly Environment and Solid Waste Committee (2 p.m., Room 9, State House Annex).

A-1763, sponsored by Assemblyman John McKeon, (D-Essex); and  its identical Senate counterpart, S-151, sponsored by Senate President Steve Sweeney (D-Gloucester), would clarify that a law passed in 2007 requires the state’s participation in the multistate, carbon-fighting compact called RGGI (pronounced Reggie, formally, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative).

Republican Chris Christie yanked New Jersey from RGGI early in his first administration and the Democratic-controlled Legislature has been crying foul ever since.

The bill has passed both houses on several occasions only to be vetoed by Christie who surely would veto it again were it to reach his desk.

Christie says RGGI serves little purpose other than to force an additional tax on New Jersey utilities and their customers. Democratic lawmakers, like McKeon and Sweeney, disagree, claiming RGGI has been helpful in reducing greenhouse gases and generating funds for green energy and other projects in participating states.


The rest of today’s lineup:
 
 A-2514  McKeon, J.F. (D-27)
Allows installation of solar arrays by municipalities on preserved open space in certain circumstances.
Related Bill: S-1138
    
A-3548  Schaer, G.S. (D-36); Spencer, L.G. (D-29); Simon, D.M. (R-16)
Requires local governments and authorities to obtain financing cost estimate required to be provided by NJ Environmental Infrastructure Trust for certain projects.
Related Bill: S-2354
      
A-3583  Eustace, T.J. (D-38)
Prohibits retrofitting diesel-powered vehicles to increase particulate emissions for the purpose of "coal rolling"; prohibits the practice of "coal rolling".
Related Bill: S-2418
    
S-1138  Codey, R.J. (D-27)
Allows installation of solar arrays by municipalities on preserved open space in certain circumstances.
Related Bill: A-2514
 
S-2418  Greenstein, L.R. (D-14); Gordon, R.M. (D-38)
Prohibits retrofitting diesel-powered vehicles to increase particulate emissions for the purpose of "coal rolling"; prohibits the practice of "coal rolling".
Related Bill: A-3583
 
 
Our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics, is not only packed with important news but also keeps
readers up to date on the progress of all energy and environment legislation in NJ and PA.
Try for free and with no obligation for 30 full days. Click here.
 

Energy, environment bills in committee today in Trenton Read More »

Is this cancer-cure research discovery the real deal?

 Wistar’s Maureen Murphy and Penn’s Donna George are working
with GlaxoSmithKline on an experimental cancer treatment.

How many times have stories like the one to follow raised our hopes
only later to let them down. Let’s hope this time might be different.

The headline in yesterday’s Philadelphia Business Journal reads:  
GSK, Penn, Wistar say they’ve found cancer’s ‘Achilles heel’ 

In the story, PBJ Senior Reporter John George writes:
 

A trio of scientists have started working with researchers at GlaxoSmithKline on a potential cure for cancer. In fact, they believe they’ve found the diseases’ “Achilles heel.” 
Last month, GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) selected a Wistar/Penn project for its 2014 Discovery Fast Track Challenge program, which was created to accelerate the development of new medicines.
The project was submitted by: Maureen Murphy, a Wistar professor and program leader of the institute’s molecular and cellular oncogenesis program; Donna George, a Penn associate professor of genetics; and Julie Leu, an assistant professor in genetics at Penn. It was the only research project involving Philadelphia-area scientists selected for GSK’s two-year-old Discovery Fast Track Challenge. GSK chose 14 research project proposals for the program from 428 entries from researchers in 26 countries.
Targeting cells cancer needs to survive
The Penn/Wistar scientists are looking to develop a drug that targets a stress-induced protein, called Heat Shock Protein 70 or HSP70, that’s found in low levels in normal cells, but is over-expressed in most tumor cells. 
“Normal cells don’t need HSP70 to survive, but cancer cells do,” Murphy said. It’s the Achilles heel of cancer.” 
The protein, Murphy explained, is linked to autophagy, which is the process through which the body in times of stress promotes survival by self-digestion. Cancer cells use the same process to survive. 
“If you limit autography, normal cells will live for a time,” Murphy said. “Cancer cells will die immediately. 

Is this cancer-cure research discovery the real deal? Read More »