NJDEP says no to DuPont cleanup modification request

 

The town of Pompton Lakes, with the DuPont plant site in the distance and Pompton Lake in the foreground.

                                                                                                                                         Record File Photo
The town of Pompton Lakes, with the DuPont plant site in the distance and Pompton Lake in the foreground.
New Jersey environmental officials said Tuesday they will not grant DuPont’s request to change its plan to deal with contaminated air inside Pompton Lakes homes sitting above polluted groundwater, The Record reports.


"Residents had been worried that if DuPont’s request to change its plan were granted, it would prevent some residents from getting vapor mitigation systems installed on their homes to remove the polluted air.

"Groundwater beneath the neighborhood of about 450 homes is contaminated with the cancer-causing solvents TCE and PCE, which had migrated for decades off of DuPont’s former munitions plant nearby. DuPont and state officials had known about the contamination since 1985, but never tried to clean it up because they thought it posed no hazard. In 2008, however, testing indicated that the solvents were vaporizing up through the soil and into some of the neighborhood’s basements.
 
"DuPont agreed to install vapor mitigation systems on homes in the plume at no cost to residents, even if air and soil testing showed no elevated levels in the homes. So far 329 homes have had systems installed.

When the state relaxed its residential screening levels for PCE gas in soils and in air last year, DuPont asked the DEP and federal Environmental Protection Agency to adjust its work plan to reflect the new levels.

That, the Record reports, generated dismay in the affected neighborhood, “because residents thought it might make it more difficult to obtain the vapor mitigation systems or even that they would be removed from some homes,”

”Some questioned whether changes might also shrink the size of the plume area and therefore the number of homes that qualified for the systems."

 

Read the full story here 

Read dozens of stories like this every day in EnviroPoliticsClick for free trial

Related environmental news stories:
DuPont wants cleanup eased
DuPont wants relaxed standards for cleanup of Pompton Lakes Superfund site
EPA joins probe of tainted wells
EPA Will Regulate Some TCE Uses Unless Industries Take Voluntary Action

Is information like this valuable to you? Click for free blog updates  


NJDEP says no to DuPont cleanup modification request Read More »

Can NY nuke plant afford to close for spawning fish?

“New York State is prepared to close 40 years of intermittent and costly legal wrangling over the annual destruction of billions of fish by the twin Indian Point nuclear power plants in the productive Hudson River estuary if the plant agrees to shut down during peak spawning and hatching seasons for the river’s major fish populations,” Roger Witherspoon writes in Energy Matters,

“But such a deal, if ratified, would mean the plants could be shut from 13 weeks to 32 weeks, an enforced idleness which could doom the already stressed financial position of Indian Point, which is having difficulty securing steady customers for its electricity due to increased competition, particularly from lower cost wind and natural gas.

“The maximum shut down, if required, would close the plant from February 15 through September 15, and would cut Indian Point’s revenues by about $9.5 billion over 20 years, or 57% of their revenue, according to an analysis prepared by Entergy, the plants’ owner, for ongoing hearings before a panel of Administrative Law Judges at the Department of Environmental Conservation.

“The panel will hold a public hearing on the proposed forced outages July 22 in Cortlandt Manor, about two miles from the power plant site.”




Can NY nuke plant afford to close for spawning fish? Read More »

DOE reports encouraging signs for U.S. wind energy

New Jersey might be dragging its heels on wind energy but other states are not.


According to the 2013 Wind Technologies Market Report, released yesterday by The Energy Department and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, after modest growth in 2013, total installed wind power capacity in the United States now stands at 61 gigawatts, which meets nearly 4.5 percent of electricity demand in an average year.


The report found that wind energy prices – particularly in the Interior region of the United States–are at an all-time low, with utilities selecting wind as a cost-saving option.


“With utility-scale turbines installed in more than 39 states and territories, the success of the U.S. wind industry has had a ripple effect on the American economy, spurring more than $500 million in exports and supporting jobs related to development, siting, manufacturing, transportation and other industries,” the report states.

State renewable portfolio standards policies, along with federal policy drivers such as the Production Tax Credit (PTC) and accelerated tax depreciation, are expected to help drive growth in the domestic wind power market for the next two years. 


Although the PTC expired last year (after fossil fuel interests in Congress defeated its renewal), projects that began construction by the end of 2013 were eligible for the tax credit; many of these projects will be commissioned over the next couple years.


The American Wind Energy Association says that more than 14,000 megawatts of wind power capacity were under construction in the second quarter of 2014.


Students involved. National competition winner was a local university

The prospects of a growing wind energy industry in the U.S. is encouraging college students like the ones interviewed in the following video who competed in a small, mobile, wind-turbine design competition. The winner was from our readership area. No spoiler here, you’ll have to watch for yourself.

What are your thoughts about wind energy? Let us know in the comment area below.

Is information like this valuable to you? Click for free updates  


DOE reports encouraging signs for U.S. wind energy Read More »

NJ green businesses losing out to annual budget raids

Energy-savings businesses are feeling the pinch

New Jersey environmentalists are frustrated by the millions of dollars in green program money that have been transferred each budget year by Gov. Chris Christie to non-environmental purposes.

But New Jersey’s governor is not alone in shunting green money to patch budget holes in other programs.

In the audio story below,WNYC’s Jessica Gould reports on the growing trend and interviews two New Jersey men whose green businesses have been hurt by the diversions. Still, one of them says he’d vote for Christie again.

  


Is information like this valuable to you? Click for free updates  


NJ green businesses losing out to annual budget raids Read More »

When temperatures soar so do profits for energy traders

                                                    Scientific American graphic
When summer temperatures soar, air conditioners get cranked up and so do profits for some who uses clever financial maneuvers tied to supply pressure on the electric grid.
 
The New York Times reports on how a Virginia-based company named DC Energy made made more than $1.5 million within 48 hours "by cashing in on so-called congestion contracts, complex financial instruments that gain value when the grid becomes overburdened."
 
Times reporters Julie Creswell and Robert Gebeloff write:
"Those profits are a small fraction of the fortune that traders at DC Energy and elsewhere have pocketed because of maneuvers involving the nation’s congested grid. Over the last decade, DC Energy has made about $180 million in New York State alone.
 
"Across the nation, investment funds and major banks are wagering billions on similar trades using computer algorithms and teams of Ph.D.s, as they chase profits in an arcane arena that rarely attracts attention."  
 

When temperatures soar so do profits for energy traders Read More »

Philadelphia law firm sues North Broad Street developer

Eric Blumenfeld of EB Management in front of the old Wilkie Buick building at 600
N. Broad. 640 N. Broad is in the background. Curt Hudson photo
















Philadelphia Business Journal reports that:

"A Philadelphia real estate developer who helped re-invigorate North Broad Street with an apartment conversion that included the restaurant Osteria and had ambitions of breathing new life into the Divine Lorraine has been sued by a law firm claiming it’s owed more than $700,000 in legal fees.
"Stradley Ronon Stevens and Young filed a lawsuit Aug. 12 in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia against Eric Blumenfeld, EB Realty Management Corp. and 11 other of its affiliated companies. Stradley Ronon said in court papers that it conducted work for the developer beginning in March 2012 until October 2013.

Read the full story at:
Stradley Ronon sues developer for $700K in allegedly unpaid legal fees

Is information like this valuable to you? Sign up for our free blog updates 


Recent blog posts: 


Philadelphia law firm sues North Broad Street developer Read More »