K&L Gates moving toward merger with Australian firm

K&L Gates, a law firm with roots in Pittsburgh, Pa. and active environmental practices in Newark, New York and Harrisburg, is in merger talks with Australian firm, Middletons. The combination would create a firm of more than 2,000
lawyers in 45 offices throughout Australia, North and South America,
Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.

“Our leadership teams believe that the client-driven consolidation and
globalization evident in the market for legal services will continue
unabated and the potential synergies that would arise from the
combination of our firms deserve (and are receiving) serious
consideration,” said K&L Gates Chairman and Global Managing Partner
Peter J. Kalis and Middletons National Managing Partner Nick Nichola in a news release.

The firms say they have been in discussions for several months and expect formal
proposals to be presented to both partnerships later in 2012.

A company that has grown through mergers

Pittsburgh-based Kirkpatrick & Lockhart was founded in 1946, and
merged with London-based
Nicholson Graham & Jones Ltd. in 2005 to become
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham.

On January 1, 2007,
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham merged with Seattle-based Preston Gates & Ellis to form Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis. The name was later shortened to simply K&L Gates.

In January 2008, K&L Gates combined with Hughes & Luce, a Dallas-based firm of 150 attorneys with offices in Austin, Dallas and Fort Worth.

In July 2008 K&L Gates combined with Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman LLP, a North Carolina-based firm of 200 attorneys with offices in Charlotte, Raleigh and Research Triangle Park.

On March 1, 2009, K&L Gates merged with Bell, Boyd & Lloyd, a Chicago based firm with approximately 215 attorneys with offices in Chicago, San Diego and Washington, D.C.

Former Pennsylvania Governor Dick Thornburgh is of counsel to the firm’s Washington office.


*********************************************************************************************************
For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a 
FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment
**********************************************************************************************************

K&L Gates moving toward merger with Australian firm Read More »

Judge suspension may affect Pa fracking law challenge

In July, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court struck down key provisions of a new law
(Act 13) that permits gas fracking companies to drill just about anywhere–including residential zones.

The Administration of Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, which has displayed unwavering
loyalty to gas industry interests, appealed the decision to the state’s supreme court.

Yesterday, Penn Future explained why the suspension of one of the top court’s jurists provides hope to those who would like to see the decision upheld.

See: In This Case a Tie Does Not Result In a “Push

**********************************************************************************************************
For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a 
FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment

**********************************************************************************************************

 Our most recent posts:  

Judge suspension may affect Pa fracking law challenge Read More »

NJ’s largest paper wants more action on Barnegat Bay

Photo credit: 
Andy Mills/The Star-Ledger

The editorial board of New Jersey’s most influential newspaper, The Star-Leger, today declared that it is time for drastic action to reverse the environmental deterioration of Barnegat Bay.

The editorial appeared two days after a state legislative hearing in Lavallette at which Rutgers research professor Michael Kennish reported on a multi-year study that found pollution spreading southward from more densely populated areas adjacent to the bay’s northern reaches.

“…after the most comprehensive testing of the bay to date, a Rutgers scientist says pollution has spread through its waters over the past few decades ‘like a human cancer,’” the editorial said.

The newspaper calls for the federal Environmental Protection Agency to step in, under the Clean Water Act, to set strict limits on nutrient pollution entering in the bay.  


**********************************************************************************************************
For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a 
FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment

**********************************************************************************************************

Although the Star-Ledger has been a frequent critics of the administration of Republican Governor Chris Christie, its editorial board credited the governor with taking 
the problem more seriously than his predecessors and making “some good efforts” including winning an agreement “to hasten the closure of the Oyster Creek nuclear plant, which was built before cooling towers were required and spews huge quantities of heated water into the bay, accelerating its decline.” 


Even the New Jersey Sierra Club, which generally appears inclined to blame Christie for every environmental malady stretching back to Noah’s flood, was less hostile on Monday when we asked its director, Jeff Tittel, about the Rutgers study.

See: Rutgers prof warns: Action needed to save Barnegat Bay

What do you think should be done about Barnegat Bay? Should Governor Christie do more? Should the EPA step in? Or is this just a bunch of liberal hysteria like Global Warming? (Yes, we are kidding). Let us know in the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comments’ line.
  

NJ’s largest paper wants more action on Barnegat Bay Read More »

Groups extend Delaware Bay oysters a warmer welcome

 Oyster shells on “picking belt’ from Delaware Bay. Photo:Cody Glenn  

A shift in ocean conditions is creating warmer temperatures and higher salinity in Delaware Bay, making oyster beds off Salem County, NJ the beds of the future, according to the Partnership for the Delaware Estuary.

To take advantage of those conditions and to help restore flood damaged beds, several organizations yesterday launched an experimental restoration project. It involves moving “seed oysters,” or shells with baby oysters attached,
from the Cape May County area of Delaware Bay to storm-damaged oyster beds off
Salem County.

Floods resulting from several consecutive storms, including
Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee, devastated oysters on the northernmost
beds of Delaware Bay last year.

The impact was worse than any other storm in
almost 60 years, killing about half of the oysters in the beds that comprise some 35 percent of the oysters supporting the fishery.


“This project is a partnership between the New Jersey Chapter
of The Nature Conservancy and several members of the Delaware Bay Oyster
Restoration Task Force,” said Jennifer Adkins, executive director of the
Partnership for the Delaware Estuary. 

The partnership and Conservancy are providing $55,000 for the experimental project.
Replanting involves strategically placing shells along the
Cape Shore region, where lots of baby oysters “recruit,” or attach to shells,
but few survive unless protected from predators. These shells are then picked
up and moved to the northern beds, where the attached oysters can grow over
time.

Oysters on these northern beds are protected from predators and disease,
but they grow slower and produce fewer babies than beds to the south. That is
why, in some years in the past, oysters from these beds were moved south to
quickly grow bigger and be harvested as part of the quota set each
year.

In photo at left, Dr. Danielle Kreeger, science director of the Partnership for the Delaware
Estuary, holds a planted clam shell with juvenile oysters growing on it. The “spat” will be replanted off
Hope Creek in Salem County to restore storm-damaged oyster beds.

“Shell planting is the single most important action we can
take to rebuild and revitalize the oyster beds of Delaware Bay,” said Dr. David
Bushek, director of Rutgers University’s Haskin Shellfish Research Laboratory.
“Shell planting enhances oyster habitat, giving them a leg up on survival so we
can continue to reap both the ecological and economical benefits they
provide.”

Bob Martin, commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection, said the annual oyster harvest generates over $3.5 million for
oystermen and pumps some $20 million into the bay region’s economy. 
James Hearon, a state Fish and Game Commission representative, said 16,000 bushels of shell fragments were planted about a month ago off Reed’s Beach off Cape May County. Those shell fragments, hopefully now bearing juvenile oysters known as “spat,” will be replanted.
Hearon said estimated that up to 80 percent of the 16,000 bushels should be successfully replanted. “We’ve seen as high as 1,800 spat per bushel,” he said.

Congressman Frank LoBiondo underscored the financial return from oyster bed maintenance, putting it at almost $40 per every $1 spent.

“Who wouldn’t do that over, over and over again?” he asked.


Related environmental news stories:

Aw, shucks; program protects oyster industryOrganizations partner to save Delaware Bay oyster beds, promote sustainability 

See our latest posts:  
Rutgers prof warns: Action needed to save Barnegat Bay

Art vs Nature: Should NJDEP junk sculpture garden?
NY making the Adirondacks purchase of the century
NJDEP’s waiver rule takes effect; Armageddon at hand?
Is NJ’s Christie breaking with GOP’s anti-solar ranks? 

Groups extend Delaware Bay oysters a warmer welcome Read More »

Rutgers prof warns: Action needed to save Barnegat Bay

Press of Atlantic City graphic


The declining health of Barnegat Bay has been the focus for several years of a joint summer meeting held by the environmental committees of New Jersey’s Senate and Assembly.

At the 2012 session, conducted yesterday before a standing-room-only audience in the Ocean County shore town of Lavallette, a Rutgers University researcher told committee members that the bay continues to deteriorate and that corrective action is needed quickly
on several fronts.


Based on a recently conducted study that stretched over several years, Michael Kennish, a research professor at the Rutgers University Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, warned against inaction:

“ We really need to ramp it up. We’re nowhere near where we need to be in order to fix it.”


Outside the hearing, Kennish summarized the problem for reporters. (Click arrow for video)

Kennish urged the state to set Total Maximum Discharge Limits (TMDLs) to restrict the amounts of  nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous, that flow into the bay in runoff from roads and other paved surfaces. Similar standards have been implemented to deal with pollution problems in Chesapeake Bay.

He also recommended that more action be taken to upgrade some 2,700 storm water basins throughout Ocean County–many of which are malfunctioning and, during heavy rainstorms, fail to hold back polluted runoff that streams into the bay.


Ultimate, Kennish said that the problem of land use (development and population) would have to be addressed if the bay is to be saved.

**********************************************************************************************************
For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a 
FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment
 
**********************************************************************************************************

Senate Environment and Energy Committee Chairman Bob Smith tells reporters below that he believes Governor Chris Christie would sign legislation to implement stormwater basin repairs if Ocean County’s Republican freeholders, who have balked at the expensive proposition, get behind the idea.

NJ Sierra Club Director Jeff Tittel acknowledges that solutions to Barnegat Bay’s problem present political challenges for any governor.


 
Your thoughts on Barnegat Bay and efforts to reverse its deterioration?
Use the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking
on the tiny ‘comments’ line.  Signed comments are appreciated but
anonymous responses also are accepted.

Related environmental news stories:
Latest Study of Barnegat Bay Shows Conditions Worsening for Tarnished ‘Jewel’ 
New research shows Barnegat Bay could be declared legally ‘impaired’
 
Study says Barnegat Bay ecosystem will continue to decline unless development, runoff decreases

See our latest posts:
Art vs Nature: Should NJDEP junk sculpture garden? |
NJ enviro groups awarded CRI ‘Back to Nature’ grants
 
NY making the Adirondacks purchase of the century
 
NJDEP’s waiver rule takes effect; Armageddon at hand?
 
Is NJ’s Christie breaking with GOP’s anti-solar ranks?
 

Rutgers prof warns: Action needed to save Barnegat Bay Read More »

Art vs Nature: Should NJDEP junk sculpture garden?

Maybe it’s just a sign of how little hard news is generated in August, but a lot of attention is being paid to plans by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to rip out an outdoor sculpture that has been a fixture at its Trenton headquarters since the mid 1980s.

Credit: Athena Tacha, courtesy The Cultural Landscape Foundation

Charles A. Birnbaum, president of The Cultural Landscape Foundation writes that Green Acres, the work of respected Greek-American artist Athena Tacha,

” features crescent shaped planters with stepped seating that ring its edges. It also contains 46 slabs of green granite onto which photographs of state landscapes, plants and animals (many of them endangered species) have been sandblasted. The work, considered one of Tacha’s most important, has been praised by museum directors and art historians, is included in Meredith Bzdak’s Public Sculpture in New Jersey and is documented in the Contemporary Landscape Design Collection of Dumbarton Oaks in Washington, D.C.  a site-specific.”

Annie Knox reports in NJ Spotlight that  

“…the state sponsored the sculpture’s $417,000 construction after choosing it as the winner in a State Council on the Arts competition to honor the Green Acres land preservation program. That contest was one of 50 public arts competitions Tacha has won across the country. About 40 of those designs turned up in parks and other public spaces nationwide, she said, including Franklin Town Park in Philadelphia.” 

Praised by the arts community it may be, but the work is showing its age. Some of its slate slabs have settled unevenly, causing what the DEP claims is a risk to people walking across it (or fleeing across it should the building catch fire or a denied permit petitioner calls in a bomb threat).

The Department says it will be replaced by something less impervious, apparently something “greener” than Green Acres.

“We’re looking to take out the brick and install a rain garden… It’s the type of model that we’ve been preaching to urban communities across the state,” says NJDEP spokesman, Larry Ragonese. 


    Credit: Athena Tacha, courtesy The Cultural Landscape Foundation


The decision has triggered a rare clash between two liberal communities–artists and environmentalists. Think of it as intellectual mud wrestling for lefties.  
 

The Cultural Landscape Foundation 
wants it saved and is urging like-minded folk to sign a petition 

A Trenton Times editorial agrees, arguing “a work considered worthy to be on the National Register of Historic Places, ought to stay.”


But our friend, Wayne DeFeo, an environmental consultant, is waving goodbye to it in his blog, GreenLight:

“The problem is that the space is typical of the arrogance of the landscape architect community from that era. Put in hardscape at the expense of the living plant community.”

What do we think?

We’ve been to the DEP building dozens of times and never paid much attention to the landscape. With our philistine credentials thus well established, we won’t enter the art vs nature debate. But as a longtime observer New Jersey’s political culture, we wonder:

  1. Who gets the contract to replace the work?
  2. Will DEP invoke its new waiver rule to expedite the demo permit?
  3. How long will it take the Sierra Club to link the decision to the Koch Brothers?

What do you think?  Let us know in the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comments’ link.

Related news stories:

Without review, NJ DEP plans to dump a commissioned work of art  DEP’s plan to replace Trenton sculptural plaza with ‘rain garden’ met with furor from arts groups


See our latest posts:  

NJ enviro groups awarded CRI ‘Back to Nature’ grants

NY making the Adirondacks purchase of the century
NJDEP’s waiver rule takes effect; Armageddon at hand?
  
Is NJ’s Christie breaking with GOP’s anti-solar ranks?   
Another PSEG solar farm breaks ground; more coming   


For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a 
FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment. 

Art vs Nature: Should NJDEP junk sculpture garden? Read More »