NJ Assembly voting on ‘waiver’ bill and a gas from past

NJ Assembly Chamber – Tony Kurdzuk (Star Ledger)

New Jersey environmental groups are pushing hard for passage today of two bills in the state Assembly. The first would force the NJDEP to rewrite or withdraw its controversial ‘waiver’ rule. The second would invalidate Governor Chris Christie’s removal of the state from RGGI, a regional greenhouse gas compact.

Waiver rule: A common sense tool or environmental protection threat?

Commissioner Bob Martin describes the Department of Environmental Protection’s new
waiver rule, effective
Aug. 1, as a common sense move, providing the agency with flexibility
to
modify compliance with development rules in circumstances that do not compromise environmental protections.

Martin argues that the waiver process will be transparent, with all applications and actions posted prominently on the DEP’s web site.

To be approved, a developer would have to demonstrate at least one of four criteria:

  • Public Emergency — There is a public emergency that has been formally declared.
  • Conflicting Rules — Conflicting rules (between federal and state
    agencies, or between state agencies) are adversely impacting a project
    or activity from proceeding.
  • Net Environmental Benefit — A net environmental benefit would be achieved.
  • Undue Hardship — Undue hardship is being imposed by the rule requirements.

“A lack of flexibility can sometimes produce unreasonable, unfair or
unintended results that actually undermine the goal the rule or
requirement was intended to attain,” Martin said.

Are both sides talking about the same rule?

In dramatic contrast, environmental groups see the rule as “one of the biggest threats to the environment in the history of the
Department of Environmental Protection,” according to Sierra Club President Jeff
Tittel whose organization has joined with others in a law suit to block it.

“The waiver rule is an egregious affront to the laws that protect New Jersey’s environment and our health,” echoed the Raritan Headwaters Association.

“Under the guise of improving the environment, DEP’s waiver rule actually reduces the environmental protection that each and every New Jersey citizen is entitled to, and in adopting a blanket waiver rule DEP has unconstitutionally exceeded the authority granted to it by the legislature,” stated Michael Pisauro of the New Jersey Environmental Lobby.

Resolution would amend or kill DEP’s waiver rule

Set for a vote today in the Assembly is ACR 37 (Barnes). It declares the waiver rule to be inconsistent with legislative intent and orders it to be rewritten or withdrawn within 30 days.

Business groups like the NJ Chamber of Commerce, NJ Business and Industry Association and the NJ Builders Association oppose the resolution.

Look for a party line vote, with Republicans siding with the Christie Administration. 

RGGI Redux

Two bills also scheduled for Assembly votes today (A-1998/McKeon and S-1322/Sweeney) intend to put New Jersey back into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (pronounced “Reggie”) which Republican Governor Chris Christie declared to be environmentally ineffective and too costly to business when he ended the state’s participation in 2011.

If the legislation looks familiar, it’s because the Legislature passed a similar measure at the end of in the previous session. Governor Christie, as he had promised, vetoed it.

There’s no reason to suspect that the outcome will be any different this time around.
(See: Enviros pushing lawmakers to get NJ back into RGGI)

Other energy and environmental bills up for Assembly votes today

A-1459 Gusciora, R. (D-15); McKeon, J.F. (D-27); Barnes III, P.J. (D-18)
Revises “Electronic Waste Management Act.”  Related Bill: S-822

A-1527 Burzichelli, J.J. (D-3); Quijano, A. (D-20)
Concerns Watershed Property Review Board in DEP. Related Bill: S-525

A-1534 Burzichelli, J.J. (D-3); Quijano, A. (D-20)
Requires DEP to conduct analysis of “Pollution Prevention Act.”

A-2316 Chivukula, U.J. (D-17); McKeon, J.F. (D-27)
Authorizes certain municipalities and rural electric cooperatives to establish a municipal shared services energy authority. Related Bill: S-1389

A-2504 Prieto, V. (D-32); Vainieri Huttle, V. (D-37)
Provides for voluntary contributions by taxpayers on gross income tax returns for the Meadowlands Conservation Trust.

A-2584 Ramos Jr., R.J. (D-33); Caputo, R.R. (D-28); Amodeo, J.F. (R-2); Burzichelli, J.J. (D-3)
Requires DEP to allow for correction of technical and administrative permit application violations; and subjects adoption of DEP technical manuals to Administrative Procedure Act.”

************************************************************************************************************

For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter
EnviroPolitics. We track environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.
***********************************************************************************************************

NJ Assembly voting on ‘waiver’ bill and a gas from past Read More »

After 25 years, how’s recycling doing in NJ? – Part 1

On the 25th anniversary of New Jersey’s mandatory recycling law, L. Grace Spencer, chairwoman of the state Assembly’s Environment and Solid Waste Committee called together state agencies and public and private recycling interest on Monday to ask the question: How’s New Jersey doing?

The disappointing news is that the 1987 Recycling Act’s goal of recycling 50 percent of all municipal solid waste by 1995 is still only a goal today.

The good news is that, despite backsliding from a high of 42.8 percent in 1997 to a range in the low-to-mid 30s through much of the past decade, recycling numbers again are on the upswing.

The amount of municipal solid waste recycled in the state reached 40 percent in 2010–the latest year for which total statistics are available–a three percent increase over 2009 totals. 

Why recycling rates are improving

Advances in technology have allowed numerous counties and towns to combine what used to be separate recycling containers (cans and bottles in one–newspaper in another) into a single household recycling receptacle.

Called ‘single-stream,’ this approach is proving to increase per-household recycling. It also is credited with lowering municipal and county collection costs (although sometimes requiring a substantial investment to modify sorting and processing  facilities).

The state’s recycling numbers also have been boosted by a more recent law requiring the recycling of so-called ‘e-waste’–worn out electronic equipment like computers, monitors, printers and TV sets that previously would have gone to landfills.

DEP’s Assistant Commissioner Jane Kozinski told the committee that some 20,000 tons of e-waste was accepted at 520 sites in New Jersey last year.

Kozinski reeled off some discouraging facts and statistics: 

  • Only one county (Gloucester) reached a 50% recycling rate in 2010.
  • A third of all municipalities recycled less than 25% of their waste, while 16 percent reached 50%
  • Many commercial businesses, offices and institutions still do not know that recycling is mandatory.
  • The capacity of recycling containers can be an impediment–recycling stops when the can is full. 
  • Some towns do not have curbside pickups and their drop off centers are not conveniently located, or have limited hours of operation, or may not be available to commercial residents. 


And some positives, too: 

  • A recycling fee, imposed on solid waste disposed of in New Jersey, generated $19 million last year.
  • Municipalities reaped $13.5 million of the total in the form of grants to fund their recycling programs.
  • Counties received $5.5 million to support their recycling efforts, with the balance going to university research on recycling and to the  DEP for program administration costs.   
  • The additional 364,000 tons of material recycled in 2010 (over 2009) saved $26 million in disposal costs and generated $45.5 million in sales of recyclable material.
  • Some 31,000 jobs were supported in 2010 by New Jersey recycling.
  • If the state can increase its rate to 50 percent, another 10,000 jobs could be created inside and outside the state


NEXT: In
Part 2 of our report, other recycling participants tell their stories

Have a suggestion on how New Jersey can reach or exceed its 50% recycling goal?  Care to share a notable recycling success? Or failure? You don’t have to politely wait for us to finish this topic before you chime in. Tell us what you think about recycling right now in the opinion box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comments’ line.  

************************************************************************************************************

For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter
EnviroPolitics. We track environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.
***********************************************************************************************************

If Newark gets new power plant, do residents get shaft?

After 25 years, how’s recycling doing in NJ? – Part 1 Read More »

In Pa, a supreme court justice is hit with felony charges

Pa. Justice Joan Orie Melvin, center, makes a statement to the media on Friday
after pleading not guilty to felony charges relating to the use of  court staffers
for political campaign work. Photo: Heidi Murrin
| Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

Joan Orie Melvin is proving to be an argument in favor of the appointment (as in New Jersey), rather than the election, of state supreme court justices. 

On Friday, in Pittsburgh, Melvin pleaded not guilty to nine criminal charges filed by Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr., including four felonies, based on a 75-page grand jury
presentment.

Melvin, 56, is charged with using her former Superior
Court legal staff to campaign on her behalf in 2003, when she
unsuccessfully ran for the state’s highest court and in 2009 when she
won a Supreme Court seat.

Prosecutors say it was a family affair. Melvin’s two sisters earlier were charged with similar offenses.

Former state Sen. Jane Orie, 50, a Republican from McCandless, was convicted by a jury in March of misusing her state staff for campaign work and knowingly introducing forged documents as evidence during a trial. She resigned her Senate seat today and is scheduled for sentencing on June 4.

Janine Orie, 57, who worked on Melvin’s court staff, is scheduled for trial in August on
similar charges. Prosecutors said they might seek to join her case with
Melvin’s.

Yesterday, a Philadelphia Inquirer editorial concluded:

Similar to the Bonusgate scandal, which has led to the jailing of a
number of former state lawmakers and aides, the allegations against
Melvin and her sisters portray politicians as all too willing to break
the rules to get elected.

That’s always a risk in politics, which
is why Pennsylvania should end partisan judicial elections that require
candidates to amass campaign war chests. The Melvin case has become
Exhibit No. 1 on the need to enact the judicial merit-selection
legislation pending in Harrisburg.

Related:
Convicted Pa. Sen. Orie submits resignation
State Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin hit with four felonies 


************************************************************************************************************

For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter
EnviroPolitics. We track environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.
***********************************************************************************************************

If Newark gets new power plant, do residents get shaft?
Over coffee and pastry, talk about Pa’s gas-drilling law


In Pa, a supreme court justice is hit with felony charges Read More »

Solar energy industry rescue bill advances in New Jersey

At the top of yesterday’s Senate Environment and Energy Committee meeting addressing a bill to rescue New Jersey’s collapsing solar energy industry, committee chairman (and bill sponsor) Bob Smith explained:

We are a victim of our own success. We’ve had so much solar built in New Jersey and so many SRECs available that the market for these Solar Renewable Energy Credits (once selling at $600 and now  under $100 per credit) has crashed and there are lots of unintended consequences.”

Among those unintended consequences:

1. Public entities caught in a squeeze – Counties and municipalities contracting for the installation of solar energy projects are finding that the SREC prices are not high enough to repay the public bonds floated to finance the projects. If a project already is under way, taxpayers are stuck with the bill for the shortfall. If a project has not yet started, it likely will never get off the ground.

2. Negative future for private projects – Bankers often look at SRECs as collateral, providing them with the confidence to lend money for construction. If the fluctuating value of the solar credit cannot be relied upon to remain sufficiently high over the life of the loan, banks won’t take the risk.

The bottom line is what Smith describes as a “crisis.”  Without a prompt legislative solution to stabilize solar credits, the market will dry up and scores of solar-installation companies will fail and jobs will be lost.

That point was underscored yesterday by the attendance of dozens of solar employees who jammed the hearing room and listened throughout three hours of testimony.

Rescue bill gets general support from solar industry participants
Industry members, unions, and businesses that have saved energy costs through solar systems (including the North Jersey Media Group, news publisher of The Record) were supportive of the legislation (S-1925), although numerous changes were recommended.

The legislation seeks to bolster the value of solar energy credits by requiring utilities to obtain more
of the power they sell to customers from solar sources, capping the size of large-scale solar farm developments, and giving the state Board of Public Utilities review authority over large projects.

Major business organizations worried about costs
Representatives of  general business organizations, however, like the NJ Business and Industry Association, NJ Chamber of Commerce, and the Chemistry Council of NJ, cautioned against additional government mandates that would drive New Jersey’s already high energy prices even higher.

Noting that the program will reach $190 million by 2016–and that the state’s largest employers will bear 60 percent of that cost–the Chemistry Council’s Hal Bozarth said:

“At some point the Legislature has to say to the solar industry: we’re cutting you loose.”

Bill released from committee but what happens next?
The bill was released, but it’s not clear whether it or a similar measure in the Assembly can be passed and sent to the governor before the Legislature takes its summer recess at the end of June.

One  positive note for solar panel installers is that the Republican governor’s office appears
to be working with the legislature’s Democratic majority on details of the bills as they move along.

At the end of the last session, similar legislation passed both houses only to be vetoed by the governor.  Gov. Christie Proposes Alternative To Solar Energy Legislation In N.J].

Read more details about the legislation in:
Can the State Save New Jersey’s Solar Sector? 

NJ Senate panel OKs solar boost

Solar power industry feeling strain of dramatic fall in energy prices

NJ looking to rescue ailing solar industry
Smith, Sweeney bill to stabilize NJ energy market advances

************************************************************************************************************

For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation 
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter
 
EnviroPolitics. We track environmental/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.
***********************************************************************************************************

If Newark gets new power plant, do residents get shaft?
Over coffee and pastry, talk about Pa’s gas-drilling law


Did you miss NJ’s LSRP site cleanup program deadline?

Solar energy industry rescue bill advances in New Jersey Read More »

Legislation to save solar energy in NJ gets hearing today

On Monday, NJ Spotlight’s Tom Johnson asked: Can Legislators Prevent Solar Sector From Flaming Out?

The answer may be provided today in Trenton where the New Jersey Senate’s Environment and Energy Committee, at 10 a.m., takes up legislation that some believe will be the solar-energy ilndustry’s last chance to salvage its previously booming New Jersey market.

Committee Chairman Bob Smith’s new bill, S-1925, has been the subject of intense negotiation among often disagreeing parties within the solar industry, including solar equipment installers, utilities, unions and financial interests. 

Johnson wrote on Monday:

The widely diverse solar sector has a range of problems with the bill
… mostly dealing with
whether the measure [S-1925] could stabilize the market so that it can continue
to grow and create thousands of jobs in the state, second only to
California in the number of solar installations.

For the first time this year, the price owners of solar systems get
for the electricity their units produced traded for less than $100 last
month, a steep drop from the more than $600 the so-called solar
renewable energy certificates were earning last summer.

If New Jersey’s solar sector is going to continue to grow, many
industry advocates say the price of the certificates needs to approach
$250 at the least. How to achieve that goal, however, remains a major
source of contention.

The bill up for discussion this week tries to stabilize the market by a
number of means, including accelerating over the next three years the
amount of electricity power suppliers must buy from solar systems. 


Flett Exchange
, a company that maintains a public auction for solar energy credits, weighed in with a bulletin 
stating that the bill “addresses the recent overbuilding in solar in New Jersey and
attempts to bring the SREC market back into equilibrium.” 

“It also
increases the amount of solar development for the next few years to
provide a robust labor market for the solar installation community. The
fine levels that power companies used to have to pay have been ratcheted
down to $350 from the previous $600+ range. The reduced cost of solar
in the past few years has enabled the NJ program to reduce SACP levels
AND increase the amount of solar installed in the short term. Depending
upon the final numbers, ratepayers will realize over 3.5 billion dollars
in savings, or over 1 billion dollars in NPV.(8.37%) during the course
of the program out to year 2028.”

Flett provided the following summary of the environmental legislation’s main points 

1.Increase the RPS starting in Energy Year 2014. (this is the amount of SRECs that the power companies are required to purchase)

2. Lower the SACP (this is the fine that power companies must pay if they cannot purchase SRECs.)

3. Switch the RPS to a percentage from a fixed number. (this makes it easier for power companies to plan SREC purchases and also protects ratepayers in case overall power consumption drops statewide in the future)

4. Limit solar farm (grid connected solar) development to 100mw per year for 3 years.

5. Requirement for solar farms to obtain BPU approval to receive SRECs in the future. (this will help prevent large solar farms from overbuilding and give latitude to the BPU to approve projects that meet certain criteria)

6.Introduction of net-metering for schools and municipalities. (this allows for these public entities to site solar in a 3 square mile radius from buildings and net-meter)

7. Establishes a Solar Registration Program for new projects. (this will
provide a much needed insight   into the pipeline of solar projects in
development)         


Are you following all that? Yeah, we know, solar is a complicated business.

Another way to follow the issue and the arguments is to listen to today’s committee hearing. You can hear it live on the state legislature’s website   A recording also will be available when the meeting concludes.


Do you have an interest in the solar industry and/or the outcome of today’s debate? Share our thoughts or concerns in the opinion box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comments’ link.

************************************************************************************************************
For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation 
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter
 
EnviroPolitics. We track environmental/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.
***********************************************************************************************************

If Newark gets new power plant, do residents get shaft?
Over coffee and pastry, talk about Pa’s gas-drilling law

Did you miss NJ’s LSRP site cleanup program deadline?
Ford’s latest recycling idea: Outfit new cars with old cash 

Legislation to save solar energy in NJ gets hearing today Read More »

NJ energy & environment bills in committee on May 17

The Senate Environment and Energy Committee has posted an ambitious agenda
of nine bills for consideration on Thursday.

Topics of the legislation range from proposed changes to the state’s farmland assessment law and the use of flags to mark pesticide applications to loans for brownfield remediations and exemptions from the state’s Noise Control Act for beach bars.
You think Snooki will testify?


Forest harvesting and solar energy are the headliners


A bill to allow trees to be taken for logging in state forests under certain circumstances (S-1085) drew heavy opposition from environmental organizations in the last session.
It has been modified and will make its 2012 debut before the committee..

Legislation viewed by some as the last chance to save New Jersey’s formerly high-flying solar-energy industry from a disastrous year also will be put to a committee vote (S-1925).

Starting at 10 a.m. in Room 11 on the fourth floor of the State House Annex, the committee will consider:

A-2395 Coughlin, C.J. (D-19); Coutinho, A. (D-29); Benson, D.R. (D-14)
Changes priorities for financial assistance from Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Fund.
Related Bill: S-1246

S-589 Beck, J. (R-11); Sweeney, S.M. (D-3)
Revises certain provisions of farmland assessment law.

S-755 Scutari, N.P. (D-22)
Requires use of uniform silver flags to mark certain pesticide applications.

S-1085 Smith, B. (D-17); Norcross, D. (D-5)
Establishes forest harvest program on State-owned land.

S-1246 Vitale, J.F. (D-19)
Authorizes zero-interest loans to local governments for certain brownfield remediations; changes priorities for financial assistance from Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Fund.


S-1754
Whelan, J. (D-2)
Eliminates requirement that a beach bar must have been in existence prior to August 31, 2011 for purposes of qualifying for exemption from “Noise Control Act of 1971.”

S-1925 Smith, B. (D-17); Sweeney, S.M. (D-3)
Revises certain solar renewable energy programs and requirements; provides for aggregating net metering of Class I renewable energy production on certain contiguous and non-contiguous properties owned by local government units and school districts.

SCR-59 Buono, B. (D-18); Gordon, R.M. (D-38)
Determines that proposed DEP rules and regulations establishing procedure for waiver of DEP rules are inconsistent with legislative intent.

Up for discussion only (no vote) is:

S-368 Beach, J. (D-6); Singer, R.W. (R-30)
Authorizes prescribed burning in certain circumstances. 

************************************************************************************************************
For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation 
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter 
EnviroPolitics. We track environmental/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.
***********************************************************************************************************

NJ energy & environment bills in committee on May 17 Read More »