North Atlantic Right Whales face extinction–not due to wind farms

By Star-Ledger Guest Columnist Sue Russell

In early February, a chronically entangled female North Atlantic right whale calf died in lobster trap-pot lines near Martha’s Vineyard. Authorities said that she had suffered “for a prolonged period of time. ” Later in February, another female was found off the Georgia coast.

The gentle North Atlantic right whale is so near extinction it cannot spare one death per year. Since December, five of the whales have been found dead. Scientists warn that the whale will be functionally extinct by 2035.

The chief causes of death for the right whales are the usual suspects: entanglement in fishing gear and vessel strikes. The whale’s Atlantic Coast migratory route is an obstacle course of recreational and commercial vessels; tantamount to crossing the Jersey Turnpike at rush hour.

The U.S. government is enabling the right whale’s tragic slide to extinction. Greasing the way, in fact. The riddle is why the Biden Administration’s National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, known as NOAA, continues to sit on life-saving rules.

The answer is politics, beginning with Congress’s use of FY federal budgets for an end-run around the pesky Endangered Species Act. And let’s not forget pandering.

Susan Collins (R-ME) led the Maine delegation in amending the FY 2023 omnibus budget bill to block NOAA from issuing improved rules to prevent entanglement until 2028, withholding protection for six years from a whale that will be extinct in eleven.

Congress denied protection as scientists warned that current U.S. and Canadian policies allow at least five times the rate of entanglement the right whale can survive. Earning the sobriquet, “Extinction Democrat,” Senate leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) inserted the language.

Related whale news:
Ship Strikes: collisions between whales and vessels
The threat from vessel strikes – Whale and Dolphin Conservation
New technology helps avoid whale-ship collisions (Video report)

Now, a ban on NOAA vessel strike rules is buried in the pending FY 2024 omnibus. Completing the circle, it would tie NOAA’s hands in expanding the 10-knot speed limit to vessels 35 feet and above. The proposed rule defines and expands high-risk zones, mostly at off-season times of the year. For cover, the sport fishing industry says NOAA cannot act until locator technology that does not exist is “fully” deployed. That’s years of research and development for a whale that is out of time.

The blocked vessel strike rule is enormously important: Oceana studies show that 90 percent of vessels exceed speed limits in place to protect whales and that reduced speed may cut fatalities by 80 to 90 percent.

Read the full essay here


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

North Atlantic Right Whales face extinction–not due to wind farms Read More »

Federal infrastructure funds to help clean three NJ Superfund sites

Roebling Steel Company Superfund Site on the Delaware River in Florence Township, NJ


From the Environmental Protection Agency

In today’s environmental news, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that three New Jersey Superfund sites are among the over 100 sites across the country getting more than $1 billion for cleanup projects as part of President Biden’s Investing in America agenda. This funding is made possible by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and will launch new cleanup projects at 25 Superfund sites and continue other cleanups at over 85 Superfund sites.😊😊

The New Jersey Superfund sites included are the Matlack, Inc. site in Woolwich, the Raritan Bay Slag site in Old Bridge Township, and the Roebling Steel site in Florence Township. 

The Matlack, Inc. site is a 79-acre property along Route 322 in Woolwich, New Jersey. From 1962 to 2001, the site was used for cleaning trucks and tankers that transported various hazardous substances, including flammable and corrosive liquids. The contaminated cleaning solution was put in an unlined lagoon behind the terminal building until 1976. In addition to the lagoon, EPA found contamination was coming from the Drum Disposal Area of the site. Primary contaminants of concern are volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including Trichloroethylene (TCE) and Tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and various chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs).   

The EPA BIL funding will be used to clean up the Drum Disposal Area of the Matlack site using a thermal treatment technique that will extract contaminant vapors from soil and groundwater. As part of the cleanup, samples will be taken of the soil and groundwater to confirm the treatment worked. This work is estimated to be worth about $30 million. 

The Raritan Bay Slag site is in the Townships of Old Bridge and Sayreville in New Jersey and includes about 1.5 miles of the waterfront of Raritan Bay. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, lead-containing waste slag was deposited along the seawall and jetty sectors of the site. In 2007, elevated concentrations of lead and other metals were identified in soil, water, and sediment. The site is organized into three sectors, which are the Seawall Sector, the Jetty Sector, and the Margaret’s Creek Sector. EPA completed a full cleanup of the Margaret’s Creek Sector in September 2018, including restoration of impacted wetland areas. 

The EPA BIL funding will be used to do initial, preparatory, and contracting work associated with the Seawall Sector of the Raritan Bay Slag site. The estimated value of this work is $1 million. The future work that the BIL-funded preparation work supports will include excavation of all source materials and contaminated soil and sediment, sampling, and restoration of the areas. 

The 200-acre Roebling Steel Company site, which is next to the Delaware River in Florence Township, New Jersey, was used to manufacture steel products. The site included two inactive sludge lagoons and an abandoned landfill. The soil was contaminated with heavy metals like lead, chromium, and cadmium. The nearby river, creek, and wetland sediment were also contaminated with lead, chromium, copper, and hazardous oils and tars. EPA has been cleaning up the site in stages since 1991. EPA has worked to address contaminated structures, soils, sediments, groundwater, and slag-contaminated areas across the site. 

In 2022, EPA used BIL funding to monitor groundwater, cap a portion of the site, and decontaminate, demolish, and conduct historic mitigation of remaining buildings on site. The funds announced today will be applied to cap the remaining 100 acres of the site, including a slag area. The cap will include stormwater drainage and an access road for maintenance. EPA will apply approximately $2 million to initiate the new phase of work.  


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Federal infrastructure funds to help clean three NJ Superfund sites Read More »

Senate Environment Committee releases March 4 agenda

In today’s environmental news, The Senate Environment and Energy Committee will meet at 10 a.m. on March 4, 2 2024 in Committee Room 6, 1st Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ



BillSynopsisSponsorStatusLDOA
S198Prohibits investment by the State of pension and annuity funds in, and requires divestment from, the 200 largest publicly traded fossil fuel companies.Smith, Bob +9SEN2/5/2024
S2594Appropriates $28,670,924 in 2003 and 1992 bond act monies for loans for dam restoration and repair projects and inland waters projects.Bucco, Anthony M.SEN2/8/2024
S2816Requires electric public utilities to submit to BPU and implement electric infrastructure improvement plans.Smith, Bob/McKeon, John F.SEN2/22/2024
SCR11Amends Constitution to prohibit construction of new fossil fuel power plants.Smith, Bob /McKeon, John F.SEN1/9/2024
SCR58Urges New Jersey State Park Service to establish visitor’s center at Princeton Battlefield State Park.Zwicker, AndrewSEN1/9/2024

If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Senate Environment Committee releases March 4 agenda Read More »

Lawmakers feeling the heat of California’s rising green energy costs

Workers install solar power modules for producing heat on the roof of a house in Wessling, Germany.
Workers install solar power modules for producing heat on the roof of a house Oct. 15, 2011, in Wessling, Germany. | Alexandra Beier/Getty Images
By REBEKAH ALVEY, Politico’s Power Switch

In today’s environmental news, California’s efforts to meet ambitious climate goals are increasing the daily cost of life, testing the state’s political will to quickly transition away from fossil fuels while it copes with the ravages of rising temperatures

Some Californians’ electric bills have more than doubled in the past decade, as utilities bury power lines to reduce wildfire risk and build out transmission for renewables, writes Wes Venteicher. And, as Anne Mulkern reports, a proposal to boost low-carbon fuels in the state could increase gasoline prices by almost 50 cents a gallon next year.

The result: sticker shock that has some Democratic politicians reconsidering the state’s approach, particularly in an election year.“Californians are fed up,” said Democratic state Assemblymember Marc Berman at a recent news conference on the utility bills. “My constituents are pissed off. I know because they told me over and over again at every community coffee that I had in the fall and in the winter.”

California is not alone. Other Democratic states like New York and Massachusetts are grappling with how to transition from fossil fuels without adding financial burdens for ratepayers

Two climate proposals are now up in the air in California. One would restructure utility bills so that the wealthy pay the most; at least 20 Democratic state lawmakers now want to repeal it after voting for it two years ago. (Though the bill passed, a state agency has yet to put it into a regulation.)

The other is a proposed overhaul of the state’s low-carbon fuel standard. The California Air Resources Board says a rewrite of the standard would push more Californians to switch to electric vehicles and help the state meet its goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2045.

Read the full story here

If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.



Lawmakers feeling the heat of California’s rising green energy costs Read More »

DEP asks for comment on its draft 2024 statewide water supply plan

Plan for First Time Assesses Challenges Presented by Climate Change

In today’s environmental news, The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection today released its draft 2024 New Jersey Statewide Water Supply Plan, which for the first time assesses water supply challenges resulting from climate change and offers climate resilience solutions.

The draft plan concludes that, under normal conditions and in most regions, New Jersey has adequate volumes of source water supply and is well-positioned to address water supply challenges as long as the state continues to take actions to mitigate the threats of climate change, aging infrastructure, and emerging contaminants.

draft water supply

Consistent with the state’s comprehensive approach to making New Jersey resilient to the worsening impacts of climate change, the 2024 draft plan seeks to assess the threats of climate change to the state’s water supply.

Of particular concern are temperature, precipitation, and sea-level changes, which will significantly impact water quantity, where and when it is available, and its quality. The draft plan also examines how emerging contaminants may impact water supply.

A 60-day public comment period is now open. The DEP will schedule two public meetings (one in-person and one virtual) and will review and incorporate comments before finalizing the plan, which is available at NJDEP| Water Supply Plan | HomeClick here to submit comments.

Water Supply Planning

The Water Supply Management Act (N.J.S.A. 58:1A-13) directs the DEP to prepare the New Jersey Statewide Water Supply Plan, analyze water supply data, examine associated risks, study projections, and make recommendations for effective management of the state’s water supplies. The initial version of the plan was adopted in 1982 and updated in 1983, 1985, 1987, 1991, and 1993. Major revisions occurred in 1996 and 2017. The 2024 draft plan will be updated again in five years, but some aspects may be revised sooner.
If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

DEP asks for comment on its draft 2024 statewide water supply plan Read More »

BILLYPENNGRAM – Feb 25, 2024

#BILLYPENNGRAM OF THE DAY
Science skyward at the Franklin Institute
(Photo by @Photolope)
Want to see your photo here? Tag #billypenngram on Instagram
If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

BILLYPENNGRAM – Feb 25, 2024 Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights