Drilling industry paying Penn State to train regulators

Chesapeake Energy drilling site above  Susquehanna River – Patriot News

The natural gas industry has valuable technological knowledge
to share, but should it be entrusted with training Pennsylvania
environmental regulators who oversee drilling operations?

Between 2000 and 2010, industry participants donated more than $3.4 million to influence elected Pennsylvania officials. Now it is paying to train policy makers and regulators who oversee industry operations in the state’s Marcellus Shale region.

The (Harrisburg) Patriot-News
reports that
ExxonMobil and GE will be investing $1 million each to establish new
training programs at Penn State and two other universities–
the University of Texas at Austin and the Colorado School of Mines

A Penn State press release says that the new training programs will “ensure that regulators and policymakers have access to the latest
technological and operational expertise to assist in their oversight of
shale development.” 

Penn State’s Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research
will offer a new “Shale Gas Regulators Training Program” to provide
“best-practices training” to people who oversee the drilling industry.

Is this good news for the environment?

The center’s co-director, Tom Murphy, said in a press release the
program will “offer new regulators the chance to learn the latest
science-based concepts related to geology, petroleum technology and
environmental quality.” 

While acknowledging that the program was sponsored with industry cash,
Murphy insists that the Marcellus Center “is definitely not funded by
industry.” 

What do you think? Use the comment box below.  If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comments’ link.

Drilling industry paying Penn State to train regulators Read More »

Enviros say Christie’s giving Highlands exec the shove

Eileen Swan

An environmental group that monitors New Jersey’s Highlands Council claims that Gov. Chris Christie is is trying to push the council’s executive director Eileen Swan out the door in favor of a Morris County freeholder.

Julia Somers, executive director of the Highlands Coalition, says the plan is to put Gene Feyl, a Morris County
freeholder, into Swan’s position.  

Morris County Freeholder Gene Feyl

A press release from the coalition said Feyl “needs one more year to
qualify for a full state pension,” noting the $120,000 per year job with
the council would create “a significant increase in his pension in
addition to the other benefits derived from completing 20 years in the
pension system.”

Asked to respond, Governor Christie’s press secretary Michael Drewniak said “I don’t have any
comment, except to note that the Highlands Coalition’s press release was
hysterical and overwrought.”

The New Jersey Herald has the details in Highlands Coalition says Christie is trying to push out director

Trying to blow some offshore wind into NJ’s energy sails
Offshore wind blowing into NJ Legislature-March 5 2012

RGGI revival legislation clears NJ Senate committee


Enviros say Christie’s giving Highlands exec the shove Read More »

NJ energy & environment bills up for vote – Mar 8 2012

Ten pieces of energy and environmental legislation are
up for discussion and votes today in five Senate and 
Assembly committees meeting in Trenton.
 
Here’s the lineup: 

SENATE ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY

03/08/12 10:00 AM
Committee Room 10, 3rd Floor State House Annex, Trenton, NJ
S-1085  Smith, B. (D-17); Norcross, D. (D-5)
Establishes forest harvest program on State-owned land.
—————————————————————————————————————–
     
SENATE TRANSPORTATION
03/08/12 10:30 AM
Committee Room 7, 2nd Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ


SJR-15
  Pennacchio, J. (R-26); Doherty, M.J. (R-23)
Creates “Passenger Rail System Study
Commission.”
    
—————————————————————————————————————–
SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS
03/08/12 01:00 PM
Committee Room 4, 1st Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ
S-743  Sarlo, P.A. (D-36); Oroho, S.V. (R-24)
Extends expiration date of certain permits pursuant to
the “Permit Extension Act of 2008.”
Related Bill: A-1338
    
S-822  Smith, B. (D-17); Bateman, C. (R-16)
Revises “Electronic Waste Management Act.”
Related Bill: A-1459
      
S-1566  Lesniak, R.J. (D-20); Buono, B. (D-18)
Establishes the “New Jersey Residential
Foreclosure Transformation Act”;
provides expedited process for
foreclosing abandoned residential properties.
Related Bill: A-2168
—————————————————————————————————————–
ASSEMBLY ENVIRONMENT AND SOLID WASTE
03/08/12 02:00 PM
Committee Room 9, 3rd Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ

The committee will hear testimony from the Department of Environmental
Protection
and other stakeholders regarding State park services.
A-1151  Lampitt, P.R. (D-6); Vainieri Huttle, V.
(D-37); Chivukula, U.J. (D-17)
Authorizes State and local governments to enter into
group purchasing agreement
for alternative fueled vehicles.
Related Bill: S-371
      
A-1459  Gusciora, R. (D-15); McKeon, J.F. (D-27);
Barnes III, P.J. (D-18)
Revises “Electronic Waste Management Act.”
Related Bill: S-822
     
A-2294  Greenwald, L.D. (D-6); Burzichelli, J.J.
(D-3); Riley, C.M. (D-3)
Requires deposit of property tax refunds for certain
industrial sites under federal
or State orders for remediation with
commissioner of environmental protection
to help ensure compliance.
Related Bill: S-1460
     
A-2395  Coughlin, C.J. (D-19); Coutinho, A. (D-29)
Authorizes zero-interest loans to local governments for
certain brownfield remediations;
changes priorities for financial assistance
from Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Fund.
Related Bill: S-1246
     
A-2641  Spencer, L.G. (D-29)
Authorizes creation of stormwater utilities for certain
local government entities.
Related Bill: S-1557
     
—————————————————————————————————————–

ASSEMBLY HOMELAND SECURITY AND STATE PREPAREDNESS
03/08/12 02:00 PM
Committee Room 12, 4th Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ
A-266  Schroeder, R. (R-39)
Requires identifying emblems on certain structures to
notify firefighters of solar panels;
requires exterior disconnection for solar
panels.
Related Bill: S-507
************************************************************************************************************
For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation 
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter 
EnviroPolitics. We track environmental/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.
***********************************************************************************************************

NJ energy & environment bills up for vote – Mar 8 2012 Read More »

In NJ–and abroad–moves to throttle solar energy

Faced with a crisis in plunging values for credits paid to businesses managers and homeowners who install solar energy systems, New Jersey regulators are recommending an extension of long-term, utility-sponsored programs but at a rate that critics say is inadequate.

A straw proposal being recommended to the Board of Public Utilities by the Office of Clean Energy would providing for an additional 120 megawatts of solar capacity over three
years.

That would amount to about 40 megawatts each year, less than half
of what was installed last month (84 megawatts) in New Jersey’s
overheated solar sector, reports NJ Spotlight.

“It’s not enough to do anything to prevent a collapse in the solar
market,” said Lyle Rawlings  of Advanced Solar Products, Inc., a
Flemington-based solar developer. “We’re extremely concerned.”

Rawlings said the 120-megawatt expansion recommended by the straw
proposal falls far short of what is necessary to soak up the oversupply
of solar credits. “We believe a minimum of 450 megawatts is needed, and
even that doesn’t close the gap between supply and demand,” he said.

The straw proposal is also unclear whether the state will ramp up the
requirement that power suppliers provide more of their electricity from
solar projects, Rawlings said.

“If they are only proposing to expand utility programs another 120
megawatts, a lot of homeowners, schools, towns and churches will be
unable to pay off the bonds for their solar systems,” he said.

Division of Rate Counsel Director Stefanie Brand, however, described
the straw proposal as reasonable. “It’s not too much,” said Brand, whose
division has been wary about expanding solar programs because the solar
credits are ultimately paid off by ratepayers.

“It’s a better solution than some of the things that have been
proposed,” she said, referring to a couple of industry-recommended
compromises. “Ratepayer subsidies never have been intended to subsidize
this industry for the long term. That wasn’t the deal.”


[Editor’s Note: See yesterday’s video interviews with Stefanie Brand and other key players in the debate over the future of offshore wind energy projects in NJ] 

Solar energy also making environmental news in Europe

Political tension over energy policy, particularly government incentives to promote solar, wind, and other alternative energy providers, is growing–not only in the United States but also in Europe.

In Germany, solar-energy advocates and several major trade unions are accusing the center-right government of undermining Germany’s historic Energiewende, or energy transition, according to a report in Renewable Energy World

In the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster, the government shut down half of its nuclear power plants and pledged to accelerate the country’s transition to renewable energies.

 Yet, nearly a year down the road, there is still no overreaching
strategy for Germany to meet the ambitious targets it set for itself,
including having 36 percent of its electricity generated by green
sources in 2020. Moreover, in recent weeks the government announced a
draft law that includes hefty reduction in the subsidies that solar
power receives from its Feed-in Tariff.

A second element in the draft
law shifts responsibility for the amount of renewable electricity
eligible for support from parliament to the ministries. This has Energiewende proponents worried that investors will be subject to short-term
ministry decisions that will undermine security of planning and
financing of projects.


What do you think about government’s role in encouraging solar, wind, biomass and other alternative energy developers? Let us know in the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comment’ line.’

In NJ–and abroad–moves to throttle solar energy Read More »

Trying to blow some offshore wind into NJ’s energy sails


With a state consultant recommending the rejection of public funding for a demonstration project off Atlantic City, larger offshore projects undergoing a lugubriously slow federal approval process, federal credits drying up, and cheaper natural gas energy flowing into the regional market, New Jersey’s hope of becoming the home of the nation’s first offshore energy wind farm is losing momentum.  

At an Assembly hearing yesterday in Trenton, offshore wind energy advocates tried to pump some wind into the industry’s sagging sails.

Assemblyman Jim Whelan talked about the expected tourism and maritime benefits that Atlantic City expects to reap from the Fishermen’s Energy project. Environmentalists stressed that reducing pollution from fossil-fuel energy plants is a worthwhile tradeoff for wind energy’s higher, short-term costs, and Telecommunications and Utilities Committee Chairman Upendra Chivukula noted that developing a source of homegrown renewable energy would lessen the nation’s dependence on foreign supplies.

We have video interviews with three of the key participants in yesterday’s hearing: Stefanie Brand, Director of the NJ Division of Rate Counsel, Fishermen’s Energy President Daniel Cohen, and  Committee Chairman Upendra Chivukula.

We recommend that you check out yesterday’s post that provided background to the hearing Offshore wind blowing into NJ Legislature-March 5 2012.

NJ Spotlight’s Tom Johnson did a nice job summarizing the hearing today in The Tough Task of Making Offshore Wind Pay

Blue Jersey (as they are wont to do) finds a way to blame it all on Governor Chris Christie and the Koch brothers in Is Chris Christie the Third Koch Brother? (video)

What’s your take on the status of offshore wind energy?  Use the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comments’ line. 


Trying to blow some offshore wind into NJ’s energy sails Read More »

Offshore wind blowing into NJ Legislature-March 5 2012

The U.S. Department of
Energy announced on Thursday that it plans to pump a record $180M into offshore projects over six years,
including an initial commitment of $20M in fiscal year 2012. 

That should be great news for the offshore wind industry, for alternative energy, and particularly
for New Jersey. 

Why New Jersey?  
Because:
  1. The U.S.
    Department of Interior has declared that the greatest offshore wind energy potential–some 1,000 gigawatts of electricity, or one
    quarter of national demand–
    lies off the Atlantic Coast
  2. In 2010, New Jersey adopted a robust
    package of financial incentives for offshore wind development, setting a target
    of a minimum of 1,100 MW of wind generation off the state’s  with a more
    ambitious goal of attaining 3000 MW by 2020, and
  3. Those financial incentives encouraged several major developers to propose plans for wind farms off the state’s coast.
But ill winds are blowing through New Jersey offshore wind energy’s prospects
Despite the encouraging news above, the prospects for construction of wind energy farms off the Jersey coast appear less certain today than they did when the legislation was enacted.
Some primary reasons: 
  1. The cost of the energy that the projects would deliver to the regional grid appear to be much higher than expected.
  2. The booming development of the Marcellus Shale natural gas play in neighboring Pennsylvania (and perhaps some day in New York) promises a competing source of energy at lower prices than what currently planned offshore wind farms can deliver.
  3. The Administration of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, who championed offshore wind energy earlier in his tenure, is sounding less enthusiastic about it today. New Jersey businesses pay some of the highest energy rates in the country and public subsidies for offshore wind would drive those prices even higher. Christie’s mission is to offer business reasons to stay in New Jersey. Even higher rates for electricity undercuts that mission.

Two recent consulting studies undertaken for the state raise serious questions about the project furthest along in the competition for state financial support– Fishermen’s Atlantic City Windfarm (FACW).

The most damaging of the two, prepared for the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel by Acadian Consulting Group, recommended that the state turn down the project. It includes the chart below addressing Fishermen’s projected electric rates and economic effects.

Page  4 of Arcadian Study Group evaluates economic impact of energy rates

A second study, prepared by Boston Pacific, a Washington D.C.-based firm and OutSmart,
a Dutch firm
specializing in offshore wind farms, did not recommend that the project
be rejected, but questioned a number of assumptions made by
the developers.

Assembly Committee will meet tomorrow to test the winds

Assembly
Telecommunications and Utilities Committee
Chairman Upendra J. Chivukula will take testimony from wind energy developers and other interested parties at a hearing scheduled for 10 a.m. Monday, March 5, in Trenton.


Presenters will include: Stephanie A.
Brand
, Director of N.J. Division of Rate Counsel; Matt Elliott, Global Warming
and Clean Energy Associate for Environment New Jersey; Robert Gibbs, Vice
President, Garden Shore Offshore Energy and Manager, Development Renewable
Energy for PSEG; Daniel Cohen, President of Fisherman’s Energy; Stephanie McClellan,
Director of Strategic Initiatives Outreach for Atlantic Wind Connection, and
David Roncinske of Local 454 Wharf and Dock Builders.

In light of the chilling effect that the two studies likely had in the investment community, the hearing will be an important opportunity for offshore wind advocates to balance the picture. As a prime sponsor of the Offshore Wind and Economic Development Act, Chairman Chivukula is among them. 

In a news release announcing the hearing, he said:


“Wind power needs to be a vital part of our
energy portfolio as we explore all possible domestic renewable sources to
compete in the growing global marketplace for clean energy. We welcome the Obama
Administration’s new initiative of substantially increasing investment in
this emerging industry by jump starting lower cost high technologies that will
generate long-term savings for the industry and benefit ratepayers.”

You can listen to the hearing live by clicking here.  After the meeting is over, a recording will be available by going here and then clicking on the Assembly Telecommunications and Utilities link.

Our most recent posts:
RGGI revival legislation clears NJ Senate committee

NJ energy & environment bills up for votes today-2/27/12

Republicans don’t want to hear from scientists on climate


Offshore wind blowing into NJ Legislature-March 5 2012 Read More »