What killed Delaware’s offshore wind energy project?

What caused Princeton-based NRG Energy to mothball its plans for an energy wind farm off the coast of Delaware? [Big trouble for offshore wind energy project in Delaware]

Federal purse strings, yanked by a Republican-controlled Congress with a contemptuous view of “green” projects played a significant role. But, so too, did an unforeseen economic reversal that slowed the nation’s insatiable appetite for electric power and forced private investors to reexamine the potential payback from costly alternative energy projects. 

The News Journal‘s Aaron Nathans provides answers today in: Bluewater: What went wrong?

DFM News reporter John Hurdle poses similar questions in Dissecting what put Delaware’s offshore wind farm plan in peril

Hurdle also questions the effect of the project’s collapse on other leading Atlantic Ocean wind farm projects– Fisherman’s Energy
off New Jersey, the Deepwater Wind project off Block Island, NY, and
Cape Wind off Massachusetts.

Only time will tell, but the future looks gloomy for the U.S. wind industry, as AOL Energy’s Shifra Mincer reports in Wind Industry Nervous As Tax Credit Expiration Date Looms.

Renewable Energy World offers a more sanguine view in US Offshore Wind Project Updates   

What’s your take?  Tell us in the comment box below.  If one is not visible, click on the tiny ‘comments’ line.

Related:
New Jersey Developer Says It’s Giving Up on Offshore Wind
Editorial: Offshore wind farms still have Delaware potential  
NRG Energy dumps N.J. offshore wind farm plan

Our most recent blog posts:
Big trouble for offshore wind energy project in Delaware


In NJ, a clash over control of environmental regulations 

EPA report links fracking to groundwater contamination
Energy and environment bills in NJ Legislature on Dec 8 

Energy & environment legislation up in NJ Assembly

———————————————————————————————————————————-

Like this post? You’ll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics

Try it free for 30 days!
  No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click
 

What killed Delaware’s offshore wind energy project? Read More »

Big trouble for offshore wind energy project in Delaware

A  project which raised hopes for U.S. offshore wind energy when it was made public five years ago is now all but dead in the water.

Making big environmental news today is New Jersey-based NRG Energy‘s announcement that it will terminate its Bluewater Wind power-purchase contract with Delmarva Power at the end of this year.

The project captured the public’s imagination five years ago
as a utility-scale, carbon-free source of energy, 13 miles off the
Delaware coast. The turbines have been expected to provide 200 megawatts–enough to power about 54,000 homes.

“Our people have worked hard and we’ve made a considerable financial
investment in the wind park, but that effort cannot overcome the
difficult and unfortunate realities of the current market,” said David
Crane, NRG president and CEO.

The alternative energy publication Recharge said: that the decision “highlights the difficulties that even well-capitalized developers
such as NRG face in
financing offshore projects with long lead times, as they struggle to
navigate costly permitting and energy tax policy uncertainties at the
federal level.”

According to Recharge:

NRG said its decision was in response to Congress eliminating
funding for the Energy Department’s Section 1705 loan guarantee program,
and failure thus far to extend federal investment and production tax credits
(PTCs) for offshore wind that expire next year.

NRG says its Bluewater
Wind
subsidiary, which it acquired in November 2009, was in line for a
loan guarantee for the Delaware project before Congress earlier this year
removed some of the program’s funding as part of a broader spending
reduction.

Even so, NRG says it has supported the Delaware project with “significant
investments” in development, including design and engineering studies, state
and federal permitting and leasing fees, ecological assessments, and
professional and consulting fees.

“But Bluewater has been unable to find an investment partner, despite interest
from two dozen potential candidates and an attractive 25-year power purchase
deal with Delmarva Power & Light. That deal in June 2008 was the first
involving an offshore wind project. Delmarva would initially buy power for
between 13 cents and 14 cents per kWh, with a 2.5% annual increase for the
contract life.

The News Journal  today reports: 

NRG still expects to receive federal approval for a lease to build
offshore wind turbines off the Delaware coast, said David Gaier, NRG
spokesman. The company would hold onto this lease as an asset, unless
NRG finds a buyer for Bluewater, he said.

Even
absent the contract, NRG could re-enter the offshore wind business in
the future if market conditions are good enough, Gaier said. Or it could
sell Bluewater at a later date, he said.

All in all, it’s a sad day when the U.S., in such dramatic fashion, continues to fall behind Europe and China in the development of a source of energy as clean and plentiful as offshore wind.

Related:
NRG Energy places US offshore wind project plans on hold
Wind project in jeopardy as NRG drops contract
Will NRG save Bluewater’s wind projects? 

Offshore wind turbine goes really, really big
Top brass briefed on giant offshore wind farm scheme 

Care to add your opinion on the issue? Use the comment box below.  If one is not visible, click on the tiny ‘comment’ line.

Our most recent blog posts:

In NJ, a clash over control of environmental regulations 
EPA report links fracking to groundwater contamination
Energy and environment bills in NJ Legislature on Dec 8 

Energy & environment legislation up in NJ Assembly
Shale gas fracking gets a new black eye: Illegal dumping






———————————————————————————————————————————-

Like this post? You’ll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics

Try it free for 30 days!
  No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click
 

Big trouble for offshore wind energy project in Delaware Read More »

Top 2 environmental news stories for PA & NJ – 12/12/11

Business, government and environmental leaders who subscribe
to EnviroPolitics accessed full versions of the environmental news
stories below in today’s edition

and dozens more!

In Pennsylvania


Similar pipes, different rules
When the owners of the Tennessee natural gas pipeline
decided to expand the pipe in the Marcellus Shale region of Pennsylvania’s
northern tier, the federal safety rules they had to follow filled a book.
Chesapeake Energy is building a pipeline in Bradford County, the same size as
the Tennessee line, 24 inches in diameter and it’s designed to operate at even
higher pressure – up to 1,440 pounds per square inch. But for this line, in
this rural section of shale country, there are no safety rules at all
Inquirer



Sunoco Refinery workers playing a
waiting game
In
September, Sunoco Inc. Chairman and CEO Lynn Elsenhans announced she would
close the Marcus Hook and Philadelphia refineries by July if a buyer for the
facilities wasn’t found. Now,  the
deadline has been extended Daily Local




In New Jersey



Can urban transit hubs help revitalize
cities?
Ambitious $1.5B 
tax credit program hopes to attract development, jobs, and pedestrians
to downtown mass transit centers NJ Spotlight 





Legislation pushes logging on state-owned lands Supporters of
the estimated $2.7 million program say it would help the state nurse its
800,000 acres of land back to health by removing trees and allowing sunlight to
feed new growth  Statehouse Bureau 






Top 2 environmental news stories for PA & NJ – 12/12/11 Read More »

In NJ, a clash over control of environmental regulations

NJDEP Building in Trenton, NJ

Making environmental news today is an interesting piece in PolitickerNJ, where Jim Hooker, the former anchorman for the now defunct NJ Nightly News, asks:

Who’s the boss when it comes to regulating developers and the projects they propose. 

The Democrat-controlled Assembly Regulatory Oversight and Gaming
Committee on Thursday approved along party lines a measure that
basically says the state Department of Environmental Protection is
overstepping its bounds with waiver rules it wants for developers and
projects.

But Democrats and environmental allies say those rules
are set down by statute and the DEP can’t set them aside in favor of a
different set of rules drawn up by the administration.

Republicans
and a number of business and other groups argue it’s the DEP’s purview
to develop its rules and to craft them so they don’t run business out of
the state.

“We have a history of over-regulating those who want
to grow jobs and the economy,” Michael Egenton, a lobbyist for the state
Chamber of Commerce, told the committee. As a result, he added, “we’ve
lost businesses and jobs to other states.”

But environmentalists also came out in force to argue against giving
the DEP what they say is too much leeway to aid development and
business, with threats to environmental safeguards being the fallout.

“We
think the department has enough discretion as it is,” said Dave Pringle
of the New Jersey Environmental Federation. “While it doesn’t guarantee
mischief,” he added of the rules change proposal, “it does provide the
opportunity for mischief.”

See: Who’s the boss? Tug of war in Legislature between executive and legislative powers

Care to add your opinion on the issue? Use the comment box below.  If one is not visible, click on the tiny ‘comment’ line.

Our most recent blog posts:

EPA report links fracking to groundwater contamination

Energy and environment bills in NJ Legislature on Dec 8 

Top 2 environmental news stories for PA & NJ – 12/7/11
 

Energy & environment legislation up in NJ Assembly
Shale gas fracking gets a new black eye: Illegal dumping




———————————————————————————————————————————-

Like this post? You’ll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics

Try it free for 30 days!
  No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click
  

In NJ, a clash over control of environmental regulations Read More »

EPA report links fracking to groundwater contamination

** Updated at 10:16 p.m. on 12/11/11 to add Newsy video report**

For the first time, the federal government is linking the controversial natural gas extraction process known as fracking to contaminated drinking water.

In a draft report that has not yet undergone scientific peer review, an EPA study found that compounds likely associated with fracking chemicals had been
detected in the groundwater beneath a Wyoming community where residents
say their well water reeks of chemicals. 

The report is likely to heighten the already heated debate in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey and elsewhere over the adequacy of state and regional regulations governing the location and operation of fracking wells.

The gas industry has long held that there is no possible link between fracking and drinking water supplies since fracking takes place at much lower depths.

The EPA report provoked immediate criticism from Senator James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma).

“This announcement is part of President Obama’s war on fossil fuels and
his determination to shut down natural gas production,” Inhofe said. “It
is irresponsible for EPA to release such an explosive announcement
without objective peer review.”


Fracking has become a politically and emotionally charged environmental issue in several of the states overlying the Marcellus Shale–a natural gas formation extending from New York, through Pennsylvania, and into portions of Maryland, Ohio and West Virginia.

A December 3 post on this blog [Shale gas fracking gets a new black eye: Illegal dumping] has draw more than a dozen responses from readers–some who condemn fracking, some who condemn those who condemn it, and some taking a less polarized approach.

Feel free to add your views at the bottom of that post or in the comment box below.

Related:
Investigation of Ground Water Contamination near Pavillion, Wyoming
EPA implicates fracking in causing pollution

Fracking likely linked to groundwater pollution in U.S.

Inhofe demands rigorous peer review for EPA fracking report

Anti-fracking bill clears NJ environmental committee

Anti-fracking bill before NJ Assembly committee today

Fracking foes celebrate a win but cannot declare victory

 
Our most recent blog posts:

Energy and environment bills in NJ Legislature on Dec 8 

Top 2 environmental news stories for PA & NJ – 12/7/11
 

Energy & environment legislation up in NJ Assembly
Shale gas fracking gets a new black eye: Illegal dumping



———————————————————————————————————————————-

Like this post? You’ll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics

Try it free for 30 days!
  No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click

EPA report links fracking to groundwater contamination Read More »

Energy and environment bills in NJ Legislature on Dec 8

Here’s the schedule for top energy and environmental legislation to be considered in committees of the New Jersey Legislature on Thursday, Dec. 8, 2011.

SENATE COMMUNITY AND URBAN AFFAIRS

12/08/11 10:00 AM – Committee Room 1, 1st Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, New Jersey


A-4114
  Coughlin, C.J. (D-19); Wagner, C. (D-38);
Wisniewski, J.S. (D-19)
Allows all municipalities to sell and lease unneeded
public property for “urban” farming and gardening purposes. 
Related Bill: S-2956
    
S-2618  Rice, R.L. (D-28); Cunningham, S.B. (D-31)
Codifies responsible contractor requirements for
contractors bidding for work through the Weatherization Assistance Program.
     
S-2646  Cunningham, S.B. (D-31)
Authorizes incinerator authorities to perform
sanitation, public works, and environmental services.
     
S-2949  Van Drew, J. (D-1); Stack, B.P. (D-33)
Requires municipalities to submit economic growth plans
to DCA for approval of continued participation in the urban enterprise zone
program.
     
S-2956  Vitale, J.F. (D-19); Rice, R.L. (D-28)
Allows all municipalities to sell and lease unneeded
public property for “urban” farming and gardening purposes. 
Related Bill: A-4114
    

SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS
12/08/11 1 PM – Committee Room 4, 1st Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ

A-3167  Coughlin, C.J. (D-19); Wagner, C. (D-38);
Conners, J. (D-7); Prieto, V. (D-32)
Authorizes zero-interest loans to local governments for
certain brownfield remediations; changes priorities for financial assistance
from Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Fund. 
Related Bill: S-2278
   
S-1954  Smith, B. (D-17)
Establishes forest harvest program on State-owned land.
     
S-2278  Vitale, J.F. (D-19); Whelan, J. (D-2)
Authorizes zero-interest loans to local governments for
certain brownfield remediations; changes priorities for financial assistance
from Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Fund.
Related Bill: A-3167
        
S-2445  Vitale, J.F. (D-19)
Appropriates $1.047 million in 2003 bond act monies for
Sayreville flood control project.
Related Bill: A-3138
    

SENATE LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY
12/08/11 1 PM – Committee Room 10, 3rd Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ
S-735  Sacco, N.J. (D-32); Madden, F.H. (D-4)
Removes geographic restrictions on where United States
Park Police are authorized to make arrests for certain crimes and offenses.
   

ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATIONS
12/08/11 2 PM – Committee Room 11, 4th Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ


A-2502
  Chivukula, U.J. (D-17); DeAngelo, W.P.
(D-14); Lampitt, P.R. (D-6)
Establishes “New Jersey Property Assessment Clean
Energy (NJ PACE) Municipal Financing Program.” 
Related Bill: S-1406

    
A-4358  McKeon, J.F. (D-27)
Establishes forest harvest program on State-owned land.
     
S-1406  Smith, B. (D-17); Bateman, C. (R-16)
Establishes “New Jersey Property Assessment Clean
Energy (NJ PACE) Municipal Financing Program.”
Related Bill: A-2502
     

ASSEMBLY HOUSING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

12/08/11 2 PM – Committee Room 16, 4th Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ.


A-4422
  Greenwald, L.D. (D-6); DeCroce, A. (R-26);
Green, J. (D-22)
Extends expiration date of certain permits pursuant to
the “Permit Extension Act of 2008.”
    
ASSEMBLY REGULATORY OVERSIGHT AND GAMING

12/08/11 2 PM – Committee Room 13, 4th Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ
ACR-206  Barnes III, P.J. (D-18); McKeon, J.F. (D-27);
Gusciora, R. (D-15)
Determines that proposed DEP rules and regulations establishing
procedure for waiver of DEP rules are inconsistent with legislative intent.
Related Bill: SCR-239 

For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, subscribe to our daily
newsletter
EnviroPolitics. It tracks all energy and environmental legislation–from introduction to enactment.  

Try it now for 30 days without cost or obligation.
 


Our most recent blog posts:

Top 2 environmental news stories for PA & NJ – 12/7/11
 

Energy & environment legislation up in NJ Assembly
Shale gas fracking gets a new black eye: Illegal dumping



———————————————————————————————————————————-

Like this post? You’ll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics

Try it free for 30 days!
  No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click
 

    

Energy and environment bills in NJ Legislature on Dec 8 Read More »