Jersey company helps save FL desalination plant

The Tampa Bay Water Desalination Plant, the largest facility of its kind in the nation, had its second grand opening Friday, Jan. 25, in Tampa, Florida.

It’s first took place in 2003, but early design problems led to clogging of the plant’s reverse-osmosis membranes that were supposed to strain salt from bay water to make drinking water. Developer bankruptcies followed and the plant was closed within two years.

The New Jersey-headquartered American Water, through its joint-venture subsidiary American Water-Pridesa, was contracted to fix the problem. The solution came primarily through the addition of pretreatment techniques similar to those employed to remove sediment from river and lake water used as potable sources. The company will continue to operate the plant under an 18-year agreement.

The desalination plant is expected to cover at least 10 percent of the drinking water needs of the more than 2.4 million people in the Tampa Bay area and it has built-in expansion capacity which may come in handy if the area’s drought conditions, which stretch back to 2006, persist or worsen.

The 25-million-gallon-per-day facility, originally expected to cost $110 million, topped out at $158 million. That amount could have been far higher had the plant not been co-located with with Tampa Electric’s Big Bend power plant. The newly refurbished plant uses warm water from Tampa Electric, which has already gone through the power plant’s condensers, so it takes less energy to desalt it.

For more on the project, check out:
Desalination Plant Has Formal Opening Ceremony
Tampa Bay desalination plant rises again
New Water Plant To Improve Supply

Jersey company helps save FL desalination plant Read More »

NJ lawmakers plug into alternative energy bills

If you’re a fan of alternative energy, you would have enjoyed today’s meeting of the New Jersey Assembly’s Environment and Solid Waste Committee.

The committee released legislation combining three bills–A1612, A385 and A1781–that exempt from local property taxes any equipment added to a residence, commercial or industrial property, or mixed-use building if the equipment produces renewable energy for the building’s heating, cooling or general energy needs.

To qualify for the exemption, the property owner would make written application to his/her municipal construction code official who would issue a certification and could inspect the equipment to make sure that the application is valid.

One committee member objected on grounds that residents who cannot afford to install alternative energy systems should not be required to shoulder the taxation burden that is avoided by those who can afford the installations.

Also released was A-1559 which authorizes municipal planning boards to adopt a green buildings and environmental sustainability element in their municipal master plans which, among other things, would promote the installation of renewable energy systems.

Finally, the committee reported A-1629 which authorizes the Commissioner of Community Affairs to amend the Uniform Construction Code’s energy subcode to establish enhanced energy-saving construction requirements, the added cost of which may reasonably be expected to be recovered through energy conservation over a period of not more than seven years.

NJ lawmakers plug into alternative energy bills Read More »

Inspect me, Jersey DEP, please!

Until now, the sudden appearance of a DEP inspector on your business doorstep was about as welcome as a social disease. But now, at least for some in New Jersey, that’s about to change in a radically welcome way.

Long known for its strict (some might prefer the term ‘aggressive’?) enforcement tactics, the state Department of Environmental Protection is adopting a kinder and gentler approach when its inspectors, failing to find violations, actually encounter businesses making an extra effort to be good environmental citizens.

“The concept of an environmental cop on the beat has always been strong in New Jersey,” says DEP Commissioner Lisa Jackson. “What is also strong is the spirit of innovation at the DEP. We are leading the country again, this time by defining and measuring the incredible amount of environmental good that exists in our state.”

How are they planning to do this?

The Department is implementing an Environmental Stewardship Program to publicly recognize businesses that go beyond minimum environmental requirements. The goal, they say, is to encourage all businesses to evaluate their current facility operations and integrate stewardship initiatives into their operations.

In other words, the carrot instead of the stick.

How will DEP inspectors go about the job? The following is directly from a DEP news release:

“The companies will be asked, among other things, whether they have broadly adopted stewardship activities, whether they have a comprehensive written environmental policy, whether they operate under an Environmental Management System designed to reduce environmental impacts, and whether they publish an annual environmental report. The companies also will be asked whether they have documented their greenhouse gas emissions, whether they employ environmentally friendly purchasing policies, whether they operate certified green buildings, and whether they have employee trip reduction programs.The inspector may review certain documents, processes and operating procedures to verify stewardship activities.”

Does that sound just a tad bureaucratic to you? Maybe, but remember, this is state government we’re talking about. At least they’re trying. And besides, how would you like to be the DEP supervisor who explains the new program to Inspector Callahan?

For more, here’s DEP’s news release and a link to its Stewardship program.

Inspect me, Jersey DEP, please! Read More »

States’ tailpipe suit gets new bite at media apple

Earlier this month, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Connecticut and Maryland were joined by 10 other states in an environmental law suit challenging the Bush administration’s conclusion that states have no business setting vehicle emission standards.

The long-expected suit was filed after EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson on Dec. 19 denied California a waiver it needs under the federal Clean Air Act to enforce its own law which sets tougher tailpipe standards than those established by the EPA.

New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania have all passed similar versions of the “California Car” law, claiming they were forced to act because of environmental foot-dragging in Washington under President Bush’s watch.

On Tuesday, Jan. 22, Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell plans to testify on Capitol Hill about greenhouse gases. The Patriot-News headline? Rendell to Gore it up on Capitol Hill.

States’ tailpipe suit gets new bite at media apple Read More »

Who but Corzine will sell his toll hike plan?

After unveiling for the state legislature last week his long-awaited plan reduce New Jersey’s massive debt while also generating new funds for roads, bridges, tunnels and mass transit, Governor Corzine has taken to the public stump. He’s holding town meetings across the state, working earnestly to to sell the toll-hike plan to wary state residents.

It’s a Sisyphean endeavor. The public is disheartened and distrustful. Property taxes are viewed as crushing. Recent census figures validate the conventional wisdom that many families with substantial incomes are leaving the state. Business leaders say New Jersey is no longer viewed as a good place in which to invest and signs of a looming national recession and endless spending for a war in a far-off and hostile nation only deepens the gloom.

It’s still early in the debate, but so far the governor doesn’t seem to be getting much political cover from his fellow Democrats in the Legislature or from members of the traditional Democratic power base among the trade unions, teachers, public employees, urban mayors, social-program advocates, environmentalists and others. In fact, the only public figure to announce that he’ll be working to gain support for the plan is a Republican–former NJ Assemblyman and Congressman Bob Franks. Strange bedfellows indeed.

It may be that traditional Democratic interests are, like everyone else, still numb after hearing Corzine’s analysis of just how bad things are (“more than $30 billion in debt and staggering unfunded pension and health care liabilities”). Or maybe they’re worried about the implications of his one-year spending freeze. Or they’re cautiously monitoring the mood of the electorate, waiting for signs of moderation or even begrudging acceptance of the plan.

New Jersey Future, an organization committed to ‘smart growth,’ is one of the first public policy groups to venture into the discussion. On January 17, its twice-monthly e-publication Future Facts provided a litany of economic factors that support Corzine’s approach, but the overall tone of the piece is fairly dispassionate and, while it offers no objections to the Corzine tolls, it raises some questions for public debate, including:

How do toll increases compare, in terms of fairness, equity and progressivity, with raising other potential sources of revenue: the gas tax, the income tax, the sales tax? Would it make sense to raise the gas tax along with the tolls, thus spreading the cost across all motorists, not just those who drive on toll roads?

You can read the Future Facts piece here. The governor’s “State of the State” speech is here.

Care to share your opinion on the governor’s plan? Just click on the “comment” line in the tiny type below and give us your two-cent’s worth.

Who but Corzine will sell his toll hike plan? Read More »

Reed Smith’s Princeton enviro group jumps ship

Former NJ-Department of Environmental Protection Assistant Commissioner Steven J. Picco, who for years in private practice has advised such prominent industry clients as the New Jersey Chemistry Council, recently headed up what LAW.COM describes as:

a five-lawyer defection from the Princeton, N.J., office of international giant Reed Smith to the cozier confines of 250-lawyer regional firm Saul Ewing.”

Taking the 2.1-mile trip with Picco, from Reed Smith’s Princeton offices on Route One’s Forrestal Village to Saul Ewing’s digs at 750 College Road East, were fellow environmental lawyers Andrea Lipuma, Tom Burns and Cristina Stummer and insurance lawyer Paige Berry.

The move doesn’t exactly wipe out Reed Smith’s Princeton office. They still have 50 attorneys there and the firm, overall, has been growing by leaps and bounds. In 1999, Reed Smith was a Pittsburgh-based regional firm with 510 lawyers pulling in $165 million annually. Since then, the firm has more than doubled in size while expanding to 18 offices around the globe.

For more on this and other environmental business stories, check out our EnviroBusiness News page.

Reed Smith’s Princeton enviro group jumps ship Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights