NJ Gov. Chris Christie’s Budget Remarks

Remarks of Governor Chris Christie to
the Special Session

of the New Jersey Legislature
Regarding the Budget for Fiscal Year 2010
February 11 2010

Mr. President, Madame Speaker, members of the Senate and Assembly, fellow citizens of New Jersey.

Twenty three days ago, I was honored to take the oath of office as your governor and promised you and the people of New Jersey a new direction.

The old ways of doing business have not served the people well, I said, and I asked for your help in bringing about change.

Today, I have called you together because it is time to take the first major – and urgent — step in delivering the change we promised, in the critically important area of the state budget.

New Jersey is in a state of financial crisis. Our state’s budget has been left in a shambles and requires immediate action to achieve balance. For the current fiscal year 2010, which has only four and one-half months left to go, the budget we have inherited has a two billion dollar gap.

The budget passed less than eight months ago, in June of last year, contained all of the same worn out tricks of the trade that have become common place in Trenton, that have driven our citizens to anger and frustration and our wonderful state to the edge of bankruptcy.

What do I mean exactly? This year’s budget projected 5.1 % growth in sales tax revenue and flat growth in corporate business tax revenues. In June of 2009, was there anyone in New Jersey, other than in the department of treasury, who actually believed any revenues would grow in 2009-2010? With spiraling unemployment heading over 10%, with a financial system in crisis and with consumers petrified to spend, only Trenton treasury officials could certify that kind of growth. In fact, sales tax revenue is not up 5%, it is down 5.5 %; and corporate business tax revenue is not flat, it is down 8%. Any wonder why we are in such big trouble? Any question why the people don’t trust their government anymore and demanded change in November? Today, we must make a pact with each other to end this reckless conduct with the people’s government. Today, we come to terms with the fact that we cannot spend money on everything we want. Today, the days of Alice in Wonderland budgeting in Trenton end.

The facts are that revenues are coming in $1.2 billion below what was projected last year, and over $800 million in additional spending was done by the previous administration on their way out the door.

Our Constitution requires a balanced budget. Our commitment requires us to begin the next fiscal year with a prudent opening balance. Our conscience and common sense require us to fix the problem in a way that does not raise taxes on the most overtaxed citizens in America. Our love for our children requires that we do not shove today’s problems under the rug only to be discovered again tomorrow. Our sense of decency must require that we stop using tricks that will make next year’s budget problem even worse.

So today, I am beginning the process of fiscal reform and discipline. Today, we are going to act swiftly to fix problems long ignored. Today, I begin to do what I promised the people of New Jersey I would do. Today, I begin to give them the change they voted for in November.

I take no joy in having to make these decisions. I know these judgments will affect fellow New Jerseyans and will hurt. This is not a happy moment. However, what choices do we have left? The defenders of the status quo will start chattering as soon as I leave this chamber. They’ll say the problems are not that bad; listen to me, I can spare you the pain and sacrifice. We know this is simply not true. New Jersey has been steaming toward financial disaster for years due to that kind of attitude. The people elected us to end the talk and to act decisively. Today is the day for the complaining to end and for statesmanship to begin.

Today, I am taking action to cut state spending to balance the budget this year.

This is the immediate action I am taking:

This morning, I signed an executive order freezing the necessary state spending to balance our budget.

We will freeze the spending of unspent technical balances across a wide array of state programs. This includes everything from unspent funds to upgrade energy systems in state facilities to those aimed at assisting local governments in their consolidation plans.

Not everything is painless. Some projects will be delayed or terminated, some services will be reduced. But in total, we can reduce spending by over $550 million this year by lapsing these unspent balances – by not spending these funds and applying them now towards our multi-billion dollar budget gap.

For example, our state’s special municipal aid program includes a balance of $3.2 million, mostly for overhead costs. This spending is not appropriate, not necessary and will not be done.

The “InvestNJ” program has a large unspent balance and a failed record in actually creating new jobs. We can save taxpayers $50 million by terminating this program now. Instead, I believe we should create, without significant public expense, a one stop shop to clear away obstacles and speed the path to job creation – the New Jersey partnership for action.

I will also take action to terminate or suspend programs to save another $70 million this year.

Some projects we can afford to delay until the state has the resources to pay for them. This list would include capital improvements to state buildings, correctional facilities, and state parks.

It includes items like the main street program which has both current and long term funds which have not been spent yet and will not realistically be spent this year. These funds should be returned to the general fund to help balance the budget.

In total, deferral of these long term projects and items to a less rainy day in New Jersey can reduce spending by $90 million in this fiscal year.

We can improve certain practices in the ways we use and collect revenues.

Two examples: we can accelerate our dispute resolution processes on taxation settlements and save $20 million.

And we can appropriately ask the urban enterprise zones to repay the general fund for its subsidy of the required contribution of these zones to property tax relief in years past.

By far the biggest category of spending we will need to cut, however, is that for programs which actually have merit, and in most cases make sense, but which we simply cannot afford at this time. Like any family, and like forty two other states with constitutionally required balanced budgets, we must live within our means. New Jersey does not have a revenue problem—we already have higher taxes than any other state in the union. We have gone down the road of ever higher taxes to pay for Trenton’s addiction to spending. What has it given us? 10.1 percent unemployment, a dormant economy and a failure of hope for growth in our future. Higher taxes is the road to ruin. We must, and we will, shrink our government.

That means making some tough choices. It means tightening our belts. It means making do with the resources we have. And it means charting the course to reform now so that our spending will be more effective in the future.

So today I am implementing over a billion dollars in reductions and reforms to programs that we simply cannot afford in the current economic environment and in our current fiscal state.

For example, the state cannot continue to subsidize New Jersey transit to the extent it does. So I am cutting that subsidy. New Jersey transit will have to improve the efficiency of its operations, revisit its rich union contracts, end the patronage hiring that has typified its past, and may also have to consider service reductions or fare increases. But the system needs to be made more efficient and effective.

The state cannot this year spend another $100 million contributing to a pension system that is desperately in need of reform. I am encouraged by the bi-partisan bills filed in the Senate this week to begin pension and benefit reform. I commend President Sweeney and Senator Kean for leading the way to begin this long overdue set of reforms. I am sure our Assembly colleagues will follow suit with the same kind of bi-partisan effort.

These bills must just mark the beginning, not the end, of our conversation and actions on pension and benefit reform. Because make no mistake about it, pensions and benefits are the major driver of our spending increases at all levels of government—state, county, municipal and school board. Also, don’t believe our citizens don’t know it and demand, finally, from their government real action and meaningful reform. The special interests have already begun to scream their favorite word, which, coincidentally, is my nine year old son’s favorite word when we are making him do something he knows is right but does not want to do—“unfair.”

Let’s tell our citizens the truth—today—right now—about what failing to do strong reforms costs them.

One state retiree, 49 years old, paid, over the course of his entire career, a total of $124,000 towards his retirement pension and health benefits. What will we pay him? $3.3 million in pension payments over his life and nearly $500,000 for health care benefits — a total of $3.8m on a $120,000 investment. Is that fair?

A retired teacher paid $62,000 towards her pension and nothing, yes nothing, for full family medical, dental and vision coverage over her entire career. What will we pay her? $1.4 million in pension benefits and another $215,000 in health care benefit premiums over her lifetime. Is it “fair” for all of us and our children to have to pay for this excess?

The total unfunded pension and medical benefit costs are $90 billion. We would have to pay $7 billion per year to make them current. We don’t have that money—you know it and I know it. What has been done to our citizens by offering a pension system we cannot afford and health benefits that are 41% more expensive than the average fortune 500 company’s costs is the truly unfair part of this equation.

The only principled path in light of these mountainous challenges is this—take these reform bills, make them even stronger and put them on my desk before I return here on March sixteenth for my budget address. And on this you have my pledge—unlike in the past, when you stood up and did what was right, this governor will not pull the rug out from underneath you—I will sign strong reform bills.

But until that reform is enacted, we cannot in good conscience fund a system that is out of control, bankrupting our state and its people, and making promises it cannot meet in the long term.

The biggest category of reductions will likely be the most controversial.

School aid is a large proportion of New Jersey’s budget – especially of the amount which has not yet been spent in FY 2010. So we cannot put our budget in balance without putting some school aid in reserve.

We are not alone in this; other states have been required to do the same.

The previous administration severely underestimated our budget gap, and it proposed to reserve some $230 million in school aid – yet it did not offer a legislative solution to achieve this number, and once again, left important business unfinished.

I am implementing a solution which insures that every school district has the resources to provide a thorough and efficient education to its students.

Our solution does not take one penny from an approved school instructional budget. Not one dime out of the classroom. Not one text book left unbought. Not one teacher laid off. Not one child’s education compromised for one minute. Not one dollar of new property taxes will be needed. The union protectors of the status quo will claim otherwise—once again, they will be proven to be self-interested and wrong.

Many school districts in New Jersey have surpluses that were not a part of their fiscal year 2010 budgets. This is because they were either not anticipated – so called excess surpluses – or were placed in a reserve account – so called reserve surpluses.

I am reducing school aid in a way that ensures that no district will have aid withheld in an amount that is greater than its surpluses.

To some, an across the board reduction of a fixed percentage of school aid may seem more fair. But because some districts rely so heavily on state aid, this may affect their ability to provide the required thorough and efficient education to their students. And this approach would likely throw some districts into a deficit situation. We have not reduced school aid with an axe—we have done it with a scalpel and with great care.

The total amount of aid to be withheld is $475 million. I know this solution will not be popular. More than 500 school districts will be affected, and more than 100 districts will lose all state aid for the remainder of the year.

But action is required. It is late in the fiscal year. The irresponsible budgeting of the past, coupled with failed tax policies which lie like a heavy, wet blanket suffocating tax revenues and job growth, have required these extraordinary steps. Despite this bold action, remember, we have not taken one dime from classroom instruction, not forced one penny of increase in our property taxes.

Let me repeat. Every dollar in every school budget approved in every school district across the state remains intact.

Suburban districts will sacrifice. Urban districts will sacrifice. Rural districts will sacrifice. Some, both inside and outside this chamber, will urge you to retreat to the corner and protect your own piece of turf. Our state is in crisis. Our people are hurting. Now is the time when we all must resist the traditional, selfish call to protect your own turf at the cost of our state. It is time to leave the corner, join the sacrifice, come to the center of the room and be part of the solution. I urge all of us to come to the center of the room voluntarily, to stand up to the special interests, to fix our broken state – together. For those who continue to defend the old ways of selfishly protecting turf, who stay in the corner defending parochial interests, please be on notice – people of good will who want a better, stronger New Jersey will band together to come into those corners and drag you to the center of the room to make our state the place we know it can be.

In total, I am cutting spending in 375 different state programs, from every corner of state government.

I doubt that many will be popular. I will use my executive authority to implement them now, because I must.

Taken as a package, they will achieve the required savings and eliminate our $2 billion budget gap.

I am not happy, but I am not afraid to make these decisions, either. It is what the people sent me here to do.

I ask of you in the legislature to show the same frankness and commitment. For inaction is not an option. That was the path taken for far too long.

The cuts I have outlined may sound dramatic. And they are. Some sound painful. And they will be.

But let me give you some context. As of the first of this month, about half of the budget was already spent. The state at January 31 had about $14 billion of unspent monies for the current fiscal year. Of that amount, $8 billion cannot be touched – by contract, as in the case of state employees or maintenance of effort for federal stimulus money; by constitutional requirement; by the terms of our bonds; or by law.

So upon arrival, my administration had $6 billion of balances to work with — $6 billion of balances from which to find $2 billion of savings. We had to cut 1/3 of our available funds with only 4 ½ months to go in the fiscal year.

We all were taught when we were young that it is not always easy to do the right thing.

We chose not to use gimmicks or band aids to hide the budget gap or defer it until next year, when it would be even worse. We refused to repeat the failures of the past.

We chose to confront the problem head on by reforming our spending habits, and laying the groundwork for reform so that we can repair a structural deficit that will be even larger – many times larger – in the next fiscal year, 2011.

So the cuts I am making today are not easy — but they are necessary.

And make no mistake: our priorities are to reduce and reform New Jersey’s habit of excessive government spending, to reduce taxes, to encourage job creation, to shrink our bloated government, and to fund our responsibilities on a pay-as-you-go basis and not leave them for future generations. In short, to make new jersey a home for growth instead of a fiscal basket case.

We have set out in a new direction – a direction dictated by the votes of the people of New Jersey – and I do not intend to turn back. I will not break faith with them or the mandate they have given me.

A great president, Ronald Reagan, once said that: “a leader, once convinced a particular course of action is the right one, must have the determination to stick with it and be undaunted when the going gets tough.”

In just over a month, I will come before you to lay out my plan for fiscal year 2011 and beyond. The challenge next year will be even greater. The cuts likely will be even deeper. The reforms will, of necessity, be even more dramatic.

But let us not make that problem even worse.

Let us begin the process of reform today.

Let us listen to the will of the people and proceed in a new, more responsible direction.

Let us live within the means the people are already providing us and not take more of their hard-earned wages and savings from their pockets.

Let us have the courage to make change; the fortitude to see it through; and the vision not only to craft a more sound and sustainable budget, but to build a better state that can grow once again.

Thank you very much. God bless America and may God continue to bless the great state of New Jersey.


NJ Gov. Chris Christie’s Budget Remarks Read More »

The natural gas land rush is on in NY and PA

A natural gas prospectors land rush is roaring through sections of southern New York and northern Pennsylvania.

Oil and gas companies–small, large and international–are racing to buy options from local property owners allowing the companies to sink drilling rigs into an enormous deposit of natural gas trapped in rock below the surface.

That deposit–the Marcellus Shale formation–stretches across southern New York and norther Pennsylvania.

Three recent developments highlight just how big the push is to extract energy riches from the Marcellus:

1. Hess Corporation, a multinational energy company working with Newfield Exploration, is expected to begin drilling later this year on 87,000 acres in Wayne and Susquehanna counties.

2. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Pennsylvania expects to review applications for 5,200 new permits to drill in the Marcellus Shale this year — nearly three times the number of permits issue in all of 2009.

3. The state of Pennsylvania has agreed to open up 32,000 acres of state forests to natural gas drilling companies.

The Press and Sun Bulletin, a daily Gannett newspaper in Binghamton, NY has produced a nifty interactive map showing the locations of six of the deals between gas companies and property owners in one section of the Marcellus region surrounding Binghamton.

Clicking on the red pins that mark the locations opens up information balloons detailing the names of the companies, number of landowners involved, number of acres leased, lease values, terms and royalties.

These six deals alone total more than $500 million and more than 156,000 acres.

As big as the current operations are, they may only be the beginning. Environmental concerns have slowed the pace of lease deals in New York State. Once the state has adopted regulations governing drilling operations (including the controversial hydrofracking method), the pace is likely to quicken.

We’ll be following the story and would be most interested in hearing from you along the way.

The Opinion Box below is your opportunity. If you don’t see one, click on the tiny ‘comments’ link and one should appear.

Related environmental news:
Coal operator expands into natural gas in Pennsylvania
New gas drilling rules, more staff for PA-DEP

Gas drilling meeting draws lots of interest

Drilling prompts DEP to get Scranton office
Fortuna fined for gas drilling violations
Energy firms pumped money into gas fight
Susquehanna residents wary of gas-drilling operation
Commission set to begin real-time water quality monitoring
Law firm trolling for Marcellus water cases

Radioactive news on Marcellus Shale water

New York proposes Marcellus Shale drilling rules

Bad economy? Not in the Marcellus Shale

USGS report drills into Marcellus Shale concerns


Our most recent posts:

Last call for comments on PA’s Marcellus rules

Week’s top environmental news in NJ, PA & NY
Sam Wolfe exits NJ-BPU for private sector
1600 more acres preserved in NJ Pinelands

———————————————————

Like this? You’ll love our daily newsletter,
EnviroPolitics – Try it free for 30 days

The natural gas land rush is on in NY and PA Read More »

Last call for comments on PA’s Marcellus rules

February 12 is the deadline to get your comments into Pennsylvania’s Environmental Quality Board on the proposed Marcellus wastewater regulations.

In an action alert to its members, the Clean Water Action says that the wastewater that results from drilling operations that tap into into the Marcellus Shale’s rich natural gas deposits :

“contains a mix of heavy metals including arsenic and lead, toxic chemicals such as benzene that can cause cancer, and salts. This wastewater is generally 3-6 times saltier than seawater, and already has changed fresh water streams in Pennsylvania into salt water environments!”

Currently, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has been allowing drillers to dump their wastewater with little treatment, and sometimes with none at all. However, the DEP has proposed new standards for Marcellus wastewater which would finally require real wastewater treatment prior to any discharges into our drinking water supply.

The natural gas industry, represented by the Marcellus Shale Coalition, released a Statement on Flowback Water Treatment which generally–but not specifically–addresses the proposed regulations.

A copy of the proposed new standards, and information on where to send your comments, can be found here.

Related:
Marcellus Shale tax: Time is right to begin revenue stream
The state’s gas pains: Taxing the new industry properly
Marcellus Shale proponents say tax could stunt industry’s growth
Family’s dilemma: Gas rights vs. black heritage

More state land may be offered to Marcellus drillers
Sumitomo considering Marcellus Shale purchase

Our most recent posts:
Week’s top environmental news in NJ, PA & NY

Sam Wolfe exits NJ-BPU for private sector
1600 more acres preserved in NJ Pinelands
NJ’s DEP needs radical change–yes or no?

———————————————————

Like this? You’ll love our daily newsletter,
EnviroPolitics – Try it free for 30 days

Last call for comments on PA’s Marcellus rules Read More »

Week’s top environmental news in NJ, PA & NY: February 1-5, 2010



Below are just a few of the environmental and political news stories for New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York and beyond that appeared in
EnviroPolitics during the week of February 1-5, 2010.



New Jersey Politics

Prosecution rests case in Jersey City corruption trial Federal prosecutors rested their case today in the corruption trial of a Jersey City deputy mayor after six days of testimony anchored by black-and-white videos secretly made by the informant at the center of last year’s massive FBI sting Star-Ledger

At corruption trial, ripping Solomon Dwek’s credibility After three days of combative exchanges, a lawyer for a Jersey City deputy mayor accused of bribe-taking ended his cross examination of the informant at the center of last year’s epic FBI sting today by trying to cast him as an unbridled huckster who once bilked $100 million from his own uncle Star-Ledger

N.J. residents take concerns to Statehouse hearings A favorite pastime among cranky New Jerseyans is grumbling about state government: it’s too expensive, it’s too corrupt and nobody listens. Today, residents had a chance to air their complaints directly to lawmakers Star-Ledger Inquirer SHB NJNR

Trial resumes with defense playing luncheonette video The federal corruption trial of Jersey City Mayor Jerramiah Healy’s campaign treasurer resumed this morning with the defense playing the March 13, 2009, video of government informant Solomon Dwek meeting with Healy, defendant Leona Beldini and others at a luncheonette Jersey Journal

> Dwek: A dozen politicians refused my bribes Star-Ledger

Christie comes out swinging If there has been a theme to Gov. Christie’s first two weeks in office, it has been this: Get ready for a fight, especially when it comes to money Inquirer

NJ loses billions as residents depart More than $70 billion in wealth left New Jersey between 2004 and 2008 as affluent residents moved elsewhere, according to a new report that marks a swift reversal of fortune for a state once considered the nation’s wealthiest Star-Ledger

New Jersey Environment

A change of course in Trenton on agriculture Two years ago, 500 angry farmers and their supporters paraded tractors and horses through the streets of Trenton to protest Gov. Corzine’s plan to eliminate New Jersey’s Agriculture Department. Now, Gov. Christie’s transition team makes recommendations to strengthen the department and hike Jersey Fresh marketing funds Inquirer

Gov says agency hired lobbyists to ‘tone down’ criticism The Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission regularly spends hundreds of thousands of dollars a year on lobbyists, and now Gov. Chris Christie says the agency is directing its paid advocates to get him to “tone down” his criticism of its spending SHB

Highlands preservation funds doubled in federal budget The federal budget unveiled this week includes $5M for Highlands preservation, double what was approved last year and halfway towards a hoped-for $11 million annual allocation Star-Ledger

N.J. Senate panel considers plan to transfer housing The state Senate began work today on a bill to transform the way affordable housing is handled in New Jersey, including transferring control to towns and abolishing a council that has been criticized as ineffective SHB Inquirer

> Opinion: Gut affordable housing? Gov. says whoa! S-L

Governor’s team report on DEP draws flack Supporters say it’s a badly needed overhaul of a troubled agency that acts as one of the biggest deterrents to economic growth. Enviros say it’s a giveaway to developers and polluters The Record EP Blog

Calls for stricter oversight ring out at Statehouse Gov. Chris Christie’s reaction to a report that the $313,000 annual salary of Bryan Christiansen, the director of the Passaic Valley Sewerage Authority, is outrageous, has led legislators to call for a state takeover of the operation NJNR

Pennsylvania Environment

Gas drilling meeting draws lots of interest Members of the gas-drilling industry acknowledged on Thursday evening a failure to inform the public about their procedures, and the audience at the WVIA call-in show reminded them of that often Times Leader

Penn State probe into climate-change researcher’s work Fearing erosion of public confidence in research climate-change scientist Michael Mann conducted, university officials say they will formally investigate the co-winner of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize Tribune-Review Gant Daily

>Groups blast PSU investigation of Mann Centre Daily Times

Drilling prompts DEP to get Scranton office For some time, local legislators and environmentalists have complained that local oversight of natural-gas drilling is too difficult because the closest inspectors are in Times Leader

Pa. among top in tackling waterway pollution An Environmental Protection Agency list has the state as second nationally in the sections of waterways that have been restored to health, behind only Tennessee. With seven separate waterways on the list, Pennsylvania is tied with Wyoming Times Leader

Fortuna fined for gas drilling violations in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection has fined Fortuna Energy of Big Flats $3,500 for violations discovered last year at three of the company’s natural gas wells in Troy Township, Bradford County Elmira Star-Gazette Williamsport Sun-Gazette

Energy firms pumped money into gas tax fight Energy companies spent at least $1 million on lobbying and contributed thousands of dollars to various state lawmakers last year, partly in an effort to extinguish a proposed tax on the natural gas extracted from the Marcellus Shale in rural PA, state records show Morning Call

Pennsylvania Politics

Bonusgate witness tried “to hide things” The star witness against former state Rep. Mike Veon admitted today that he once deleted files from his state computer “to hide things,” and used his clout to put a girlfriend in state job Inquirer

Through e-mails, witness links Veon to Bonusgate As star witness Michael Manzo wound down his testimony for prosecutors in the Bonusgate theft trial of his onetime role model yesterday, a ragged heap of papers grew behind witness stand Inquirer

Casino association’s not a lobby? For more than two hours, two dozen legislators grill veteran Philadelphia lawyer Richard A. Sprague, wanting to know just what his group – the Pennsylvania Casino Association – was up to Inquirer

Veon trial opens with DeWeese blamed for Bonusgate It was all Bill DeWeese’s fault. That was what a lawyer for former State Rep. Mike Veon, DeWeese’s longtime second-in-command, spent the better part of three hours telling jurors yesterday as Bonusgate trial got under way Inquirer

Former Pa. legislator to pay $10,000 in ethics case Matthew Wright, 51, a Republican who served in the House from 1991 to 2006, allegedly used legislative staffers, equipment, and material to help run three reelection campaigns Inquirer

New York Nation World

Activists want cleanser contents revealed Environmental advocates want to know, and they asked a court Thursday to use a 1971 New York State law to force such manufacturers as Procter & Gamble and Colgate-Palmolive to reveal just what makes up household staples like Ajax, Ivory soap and Tide AP

Judge says state must pay farmer’s legal fees State judge ruled that the Adirondack Park Agency will have to pay the legal fees and expenses of Salim B. Lewis, a former Wall Street executive who is one of the state’s largest organic farmers NYT

A boom in ‘distributed’ solar projects In recent weeks, some 1,300 megawatts’ worth of distributed solar deals and initiatives have been announced or approved NYT

Gov. Paterson vetoes ethics bill, saying it’s not reform NYT

High lead levels found in IBM water Kingston Freeman

Nike makes environmental strides A new report issued by the shoe and apparel manufacturer highlights the progress the company has made in reducing its environmental footprint NYT

Solar brokering firm assesses first year A co-founder of the San Francisco solar-purchasing brokerage One Block Off the Grid, or 1BOG, says his business model is proving effective NYT

Our most recent posts:

Sam Wolfe exits NJ-BPU for private sector

1600 more acres preserved in NJ Pinelands

NJ’s DEP needs radical change–yes or no?

Enviro-Events in NJ & PA – February 2010


Recycled tires: Where the rubber is the road




———————————————————

Like this? You’ll love our daily newsletter,

EnviroPolitics – Try it free for 30 days

Week’s top environmental news in NJ, PA & NY: February 1-5, 2010 Read More »

Sam Wolfe exits NJ-BPU for private sector


Viridity Energy, which bills itself as “a smart grid company that transforms large energy consumers into virtual energy generators,” today announced today that it has appointed Samuel A. Wolfe as Director of Legal & Regulatory Affairs.

Viridity said Wolfe will work with RTOs/ISOs, state and federal regulatory agencies and legislators, and key stakeholders to improve the energy market environment for customers who actively manage their energy needs.

Wolfe served since 2006 as the Chief Counsel to the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities where he advocated for the state’s energy interests and supported renewable energy and energy efficiency programs. He wrote parts of NJ Energy Master Plan on electric generation and worked with FERC/PJM/USDOE to link transmission planning with NJ energy & environmental goals.

He also worked with NJ energy utilities on $250 million investment in energy efficiency and economic stimulus, worked with PJM to include energy efficiency in PJM capacity market, and helped to develop regulations to transition BPU solar program from rebates to market-based incentives and to support long-term contracts for sale of solar RECs.

From 2002 to 2006, Wolfe was Assistant Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection where he managed Air Quality, Water Quality, and Environmental Safety programs.

He represented PSEG Services Corporation, from 1998 to 2002, as Environmental Policy Manager.

Wolfe has testified extensively on energy, climate change, and air pollution issues before the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, and state legislative committees.

He has a J.D. from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an A.B. from Cornell University.

Headquartered in Conshohocken, PA, Viridity Energy was founded in 2008 by former executives of PJM Interconnection.

Our most recent posts:
1600 more acres preserved in NJ Pinelands
NJ’s DEP needs radical change–yes or no?
Enviro-Events in NJ & PA – February 2010

Recycled tires: Where the rubber is the road

Could a revised State Plan save NJ money?


———————————————————

Like this? You’ll love our daily newsletter,
EnviroPolitics – Try it free for 30 days

Sam Wolfe exits NJ-BPU for private sector Read More »

1600 more acres preserved in NJ Pinelands


The New Jersey Pinelands Commission reports big environmental news today–the dedication of more than $1.9 million to preserve 1,612 acres in Atlantic, Burlington, Cape May and Ocean counties.

John Stokes, the commission’s executive director, said the purchases are for “outstanding natural resources such as habitat for rare Pinelands plants and animals, and they connect large, adjacent properties that also have been permanently preserved.”

The 13 properties purchased for preservation include:

* The Medford and Evesham Sub-regional Planning Area in Burlington County: (one property totaling 688 acres, up to $115,000 allocated to the Burlington County Farmland Preservation Program);

* The Toms River Sub-Regional Planning Area in Jackson Township, Ocean County: (two projects totaling 357 acres, up to $17,325 to the Ocean County Natural Lands Trust and up to $1,000,000 to the Trust for Public Land);

* The Forked River Mountain Area in Ocean Township (one project totaling 268 acres, up to $363,000 to the Ocean County Natural Lands Trust)

* The Preservation Area of Bass River Township, Burlington County: (three projects totaling 112 acres, and a total of up to $65,825 allocated to the New Jersey Conservation Foundation);

* The Special Agricultural Production and Infill Development areas of Woodland Township, Burlington County: (one project totaling 61 acres, up
to $74,250 allocated to the New Jersey Conservation Foundation; Requires concurrent approval by the Pinelands Commission);

* The Preservation Area of Woodland Township, Burlington County: (two projects totaling 56 acres, and a total of up to $67,500 allocated to the New Jersey Conservation Foundation);

* The Batsto River Headwaters in Shamong Township, Burlington County: (one project totaling 39 acres, up to $200,713 allocated to Shamong Township);

* The Forest Area of Dennis Township, Cape May County: (one project totaling 25 acres, up to $57,750 allocated to The Nature Conservancy); and

* The Forest Area of Estell Manor, Atlantic County: (one project totaling 5 acres, up to $5,445 allocated to The Nature Conservancy)

The 13 properties represent the fourth round of funding that the Commission’s Permanent Land Protection Committee has allocated for land acquisition. In the previous three rounds, 18 properties totaling 3,027 acres were allocated funding at a total fair market value of more than $18 million.

Funding for the purchases results from a 2004 agreement with the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities to permit the construction and upgrade of an electric transmission line through eastern portions of the Pinelands. Under the agreement, a special fund was established to further protect the unique resources of the Pinelands Area.

The utility that built the transmission lines, Atlantic City Electric (formerly Conectiv), provided $13 million to establish the Fund.

Our most recent posts:
NJ’s DEP needs radical change–yes or no?

Enviro-Events in NJ & PA – February 2010

Recycled tires: Where the rubber is the road

Could a revised State Plan save NJ money?

EPA setting new Nitrogen Dioxide air limit
Bad news for PSE&G power line foes in NJ

———————————————————

Like this? You’ll love our daily newsletter,
EnviroPolitics – Try it free for 30 days

1600 more acres preserved in NJ Pinelands Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights