Will NRG save Bluewater’s wind projects?

Princeton-based NRG Energy Inc. is reported to be discussing the financial rescue of Bluewater Wind, the company that hopes to build the nation’s first wind-energy farm off the coast of Delaware and has similar plans for New Jersey.

Bluewater has been mostly dead in the water since its primary Australian financier, Babcock and Brown, was waylaid by the international economic tailspin triggered by the U.S. banking industry implosion.

Bluewater’s president Peter Mandelstam said in September that he was confident that a deal with a new ownership investor would be completed within 60 days and that Babcock and Brown will be out
of the project by the end of the year.

The (Wilmington) News Journal reports today that unnamed sources familiar with the plan say that Bluewater is in serious negotiations to sell to NRG Energy Inc.

Rob Propes, Bluewater’s project director for its planned Delaware wind farm, declined to comment about the identity of companies the firm is talking to about the sale of a “fully controlled interest,” reports the News Journal’s Aaron Nathans.

“A sale would include all of the projects in Bluewater’s development pipeline, among them the planned wind farm off Rehoboth Beach, a similar venture planned in New Jersey and proposals in other states, he said. Propes said Bluewater expects to announce a deal in the coming weeks.”

There are two ironic twists to the story. Nathans notes that:

“Such a deal, if culminated, would pair Delaware’s most prominent clean energy project with one of the state’s most prominent polluters. NRG…owns the coal-fired Indian River Power Plant, which long has ranked among the state’s major air-pollution sources.

But he also reports that NRG earlier this month received “final approval for the largest air-pollution control effort in state history. The $500 million project will cut some smog-forming and toxic emissions at Indian River by 75 to 90 percent. The effort includes shutting down the two oldest units at the four-unit facility.”

The second irony is that NRG and Bluewater were competitors at one point and NRG did its best at that time to denigrate Bluewater’s Delaware wind plans.

Nathan explains:

“The Bluewater project was a response to a 2006 state request for proposals for new, in-state generation to stabilize electricity prices and increase reliability on the Delmarva Peninsula. At the time, few Americans had given much thought to offshore wind farms, which made the Bluewater proposal novel. It picked up substantial public support as company officials toured the state.

“But Bluewater had competition from NRG, which was proposing a coal gasification plant, known in some circles as “clean coal,” and many believed NRG had the inside track. A third competitor, Conectiv, proposed a natural gas-fired plant.

“During the competition, NRG officials were critical of the Bluewater project, raising questions about the wind company’s ability to provide electricity during the hottest summer days, when winds are light. Bluewater ultimately won the competition, and state agencies, lawmakers and eventually Delmarva agreed on a power purchase agreement.”

Bluewater’s offshore Delaware project envisions the installation of least 79 turbines about 14 miles off the coast of Rehoboth Beach. They are expected to generate enough electricity to power 55,000 homes

In New Jersey, Bluewater has received a $4 million state grant for an offshore meteorological tower and hopes eventually to develop a 350 MW wind project some 16 miles off the coast of Atlantic City.

The U.S. Department of the Interior recently released rules governing offshore wind farms, which developers say will speed construction of such projects.

Related:
TOMMYWONK Blog: Will NRG Buy Bluewater Wind?
Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm
Wind energy out to hook fishing industry support
We should all be in the solar and wind business
Will TX beat NJ and NY to offshore wind energy?
New York plans U.S.’s largest offshore wind farm
NJ’s offshore wind energy pick is lobbying large

Our latest posts:
Like to fish & float? Have we got a gig for you
Will NJDEP’s new water plan wipe out your development?
EPA developing remediation goals for dioxin
NJ’s Governor Candidates on ‘Smart Growth’

Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

Will NRG save Bluewater’s wind projects? Read More »

Like to fish & float? Have we got a gig for you

The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission is searching for a new executive director to replace Douglas Austen, a man the commission has been trying to cast overboard for the last 18 months.

Commission members voted in January 2008 to fire Austen but the Patriot-News reports that they reversed themselves a week later “under threat of removal as commissioners by Gov. Ed Rendell’s administration.”

Apparently, the 10-member group now has a green light from the front office. It announced on Monday that it was conducting a nationwide search for Austen’s replacement. The commission’s news release described the move as “a transition in leadership of the organization.”

Required qualifications include “upper level management or policy-making experience in a fisheries, wildlife, conservation, or natural resources organization and minimum of a bachelor’s degree from a college or university.”

In addition to directing the operations and activities of the agency, the executive director serves as the agency’s chief law enforcement officer, and is a member of the Environmental Quality Board, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, the Mid-Atlantic States Fisheries Management Council and an ex-officio member of the PFBC Boating Advisory Board.

Interested individuals should submit a résumé by Dec. 1, 2009 to: Executive Director – Search Committee, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, C/O Human Resource Office, 1601 Elmerton Ave., P.O. Box 67000, Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000

Related:
Search is on for new head of Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission
Fish and Boat Commission Launches Search for Executive Director
PA Fish and Boat Commission search within agency

Our most recent posts:
Will NJDEP’s new water quality plan wipe out your development?
EPA developing remediation goals for dioxin
Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm
Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race
NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues

—————————————————————————–
Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

Like to fish & float? Have we got a gig for you Read More »

Will NJDEP’s new water quality plan wipe out your development?

NJBIZ reports that “the value and development potential of some real estate properties in New Jersey could take a hit as county and municipal governments prepare new wastewater management plans and redraw sewer service area boundaries.

“And despite the potentially devastating impact of such changes, many property owners are unaware they may be affected.”

The business publication’s Evelyn Lee explains:

“Last year, the state Department of Environmental Protection amended its Water Quality Management Planning rule, making county and municipal governments responsible for updating their wastewater management plans.

“The amended rule removes environmentally sensitive features — such as wetlands and endangered species — from sewer service areas, which encompass properties served by wastewater treatment systems. In amending the rule, the department came up with a draft map of sewer service areas to reflect the rule change, and guide counties and municipalities in developing their own sewer service area maps.

“The new maps could reassign properties currently within a sewer service area to a non-service area, said Ellen Radow Sadat, a partner at the Princeton office of law firm Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLP.

This could significantly reduce the value of the site by eliminating future development, she said, as “without sewer service, it’s very difficult for development to occur.”

Radow Sadat is calling for projects already underway to be grandfathered into the state’s new sewer service areas: “People have invested their money in the land, with the prospect of potentially growing and expanding in New Jersey.”

See the entire NJBIZ story here.

Care to share your knowledge or opinion on this topic? Use the comment box below. If one isn’t visible, activate it by clicking
on the tiny ‘comments’ line below
.

Related:

Our most recent posts:
EPA developing remediation goals for dioxin
Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm
Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race
NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues
Hate development surprises? Read this

—————————————————————————–
Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

Will NJDEP’s new water quality plan wipe out your development? Read More »

EPA developing remediation goals for dioxin

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is seeking public comment on a plan to develop interim preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) for dioxin in soil at contaminated sites.

The plan includes a review of current dioxin cleanup guidance that has been established by the EPA, states and other countries, including the latest fully peer-reviewed dioxin toxicity assessments.

EPA will release the draft interim PRGs for public comment in December 2009, and anticipates issuing the final interim PRGs in June 2010.

The agency is currently undertaking a reassessment of dioxin, the results of which are expected to be released by the end of 2010.

More information on the plan and how to comment: www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/remedy/sfremedy/remedies/dioxininterimplan.html


Our most recent posts:
Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm
Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race
NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues
Hate development surprises? Read this.

Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

EPA developing remediation goals for dioxin Read More »

Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm

Plans to build the first offshore wind farm in Rhode Island have suffered a setback after the developer, Hoboken, New Jersey-based Deepwater Wind, failed to reach an agreement to sell electricity to the state’s largest electric utility, National Grid.

The Providence Journal reports: “National Grid this week rejected a proposal to purchase energy from a small wind farm that Deepwater Wind plans to build off Block Island. In documents filed with the state Public Utilities Commission Thursday, National Grid says that negotiations with Deepwater have so far failed to yield a “commercially reasonable” power-purchase agreement, mainly because the projected cost of electricity generated by the wind farm would be three times the price of energy from traditional sources.

“The [agreement], in pure financial terms, is uneconomic by a significant margin for Rhode Island customers for the entire term,” wrote National Grid attorney Ronald T. Gerwatowski.

The filing, submitted late Thursday afternoon to meet a deadline set by a new state law, does not signal an end to talks between the two sides. It is, however, a blow to Deepwater, which until now had encountered no significant obstacles in its race with other companies to install the first offshore wind turbines in the United States.

The New Jersey-based start-up company needs a contract not just because it would guarantee a buyer for its electricity, but also because such an agreement would help attract additional financing for its two projects in Rhode Island that will cost a total of $1.5 billion.

Deepwater first plans to install up to eight turbines three miles off the Block Island coast by 2012 and would follow that demonstration project with a much larger wind farm consisting of approximately 100 turbines at least 15 miles from the Rhode Island shore.

There is more to the story which continues here

Related:
With little precedent, cost of wind power up in the air
Maine pulls in $8M for floating offshore wind farm
DOE Awards $24 Million for Wind Energy Research
America’s Offshore Wind Race is On
New York plans U.S.’s largest offshore wind farm

NJ’s offshore wind energy pick is lobbying large

Our most recent posts:
Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race
NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues
Hate development surprises? Read this.
NJ enviro group backs Christie for governor

Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm Read More »

NJ’s Governor Candidates on ‘Smart Growth’


New Jersey Future asked the state’s three leading candidates for governor to respond to a questionnaire about smart growth.

The organization reports today that the responses given to six questions posed offered “many similarities-along with some nuanced differences.”

Here’s how New Jersey Future summarized the answers:

Democrat Gov. Jon Corzine, the incumbent, emphasizes steps his administration has taken, from the Global Warming Response Act to the Economic Redevelopment and Growth Grant Program, as evidence of his commitment to promote both a strong economy and a healthy environment. In a second term, he pledges that his Policy Office “will convene a State Plan cabinet working group to align state agency actions with State Plan objectives.”

Republican Christopher Christie criticizes the Governor’s failure in his first term “to coordinate and focus the efforts of multiple departments” in redevelopment activities and land-use management. He touts his own “Bringing Back Our Cities” plan, which includes tax incentives aimed at revitalizing urban areas, adding, “The Office of State Planning needs to be restored to a leadership role” in carrying out the State Plan.

Independent Christopher Daggett proposes to promote smart growth by expanding transfer-of-development-rights (TDR) programs statewide and restoring Regional Contribution Agreements (RCA) as a tool for producing new affordable-housing units in receiving municipalities. He also pledges to “reconvene state and local government officials, builders, environmentalists, business leaders and housing advocates to re-examine the State Plan.”

Read the candidates’ full answers to all six questions here.

Our most recent posts:
Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race
NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues
Hate development surprises? Read this.
NJ enviro group backs Christie for governor
Want to participate in the next RGGI auction?

Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

NJ’s Governor Candidates on ‘Smart Growth’ Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights