MIT’s liquid battery–the answer for renewable energy?

As several panelists noted at last week’s Solar Energy Symposium in New Jersey, solar and wind energy will become a true alternative (or, at least, a greater complement) to fossil-fuel generation only when their intermittent supply limitations can be offset by large-scale and affordable storage capacity.

MIT Professor Donald Sadoway and
Research Affiliate David Bradwell

A new generation of batteries to capture wind power at night (when a utility’s demand is low) or to utilize solar energy to power air conditioning units during heat waves (even on cloudy days when soar panels are producing fewer watts) is the holy grail of alternative energy research.

Today, there is promising environmental news from scientists at MIT who are working on a new type of ‘liquid battery’ that they believe could provide that storage at far lower
cost and with greater longevity than other methods

The high-temperature battery’s liquid components, like some novelty
cocktails, naturally settle into distinct layers because of their
different densities.

The three molten materials form the positive and negative poles of the
battery, as well as a layer of electrolyte — a material that charged
particles cross through as the battery is being charged or discharged —
in between. 

The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.

This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.

The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.

This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.

The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.

This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.

The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.

This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.

The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.

This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.

The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.

The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.

The negative electrode (anode) in the top layer is made of magnesium. The middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride, and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.

The system would operate at a temperature of 700 degrees Celsius, or 1,292 degrees Fahrenheit.

This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.

This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.

All three layers are composed of materials that are abundant
and inexpensive, according to Donald Sadoway, the John F. Elliott Professor
of Materials Chemistry at MIT and the senior author of the new paper reported in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Like this post? You’ll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics 
Try it free for 30 days!
No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

The inspiration for the concept came from Sadoway’s earlier work on the
electrochemistry of aluminum smelting, which is conducted in
electrochemical cells that operate at similarly high temperatures. Many
decades of operation have proved that such systems can operate reliably
over long periods of time at an industrial scale, producing metal at
very low cost. In effect, he says, what he figured out was “a way to run
the smelter in reverse.”

Over the last three years, Sadoway and
his team — including MIT Materials Processing Center Research Affiliate
David Bradwell MEng ’06, PhD ’11, the lead author of the new paper —
have gradually scaled up their experiments.

Their initial tests used
batteries the size of a shot glass; they then progressed to cells the
size of a hockey puck, three inches in diameter and an inch thick. Now,
they have started tests on a six-inch-wide version, with 200 times the
power-storage capacity of the initial version.

Read more about the MIT liquid battery research
Liquid batteries could level the load
MIT: Liquid Batteries Have Huge Potential

 

MIT’s liquid battery–the answer for renewable energy? Read More »

What’s in store for New Jersey’s solar-energy industry?

Panel discussion at NJBIZ Solar Energy Symposium 2012
[Updated on 2/19/12 to add two new related stories]

[Be sure to see our video interview below with Al Matos
of PSE&G and Assemblyman
Upendra Chivukula]

Generous federal credits and supportive state policies have helped to create a thriving solar-energy industry in New Jersey–evident today at a Solar Energy Symposium sponsored by NJBIZ that attracted a crowd of more than 500 in Somerset County.

Looking out at the SRO crowd at one of the morning forums on which he was a panelist, Sun Farm Network‘s Mark Warner joked that, just a few years ago, he could get together with all of the state’s solar energy business leaders, share a single pizza, and still have a few slices left over.

Today, New Jersey has even surpassed sunny California in the number of some installed solar systems and many companies here are aggressively pursuing commercial and residential clients. Several dozen of them–and related services like law firms, accountants and construction companies–were behind the booth at exhibits today promoting their businesses.

But troubling clouds are gathering and many of the public questions and private conversations today reflected a sense of industry insecurity and anxiety.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Like this post? You’ll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics 
Try it free for 30 days! No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click
————————————————————————————————————————————————————

What’s troubling New Jersey’s booming solar energy industry?

Among the factors that keep industry members awake at night are these:

  • Federal subsidies are about to end and the value of credits paid for solar energy is plunging.
  • The state has a new Energy Management Plan and an unfamiliar new man, Bob Hanna, at
    the helm at the Board of Public Utilities (BPU), the agency that sets
    policy for energy and regulates all energy providers.
  • The state legislature, the BPU, and the administration of Governor Chris Christie are not yet on the same page when it comes to the degree of support the state should provide to alternative energy providers like solar and offshore wind.
  • Businesses with large energy demands are rebelling against government mandates that encourage solar but, in so doing, increase their cost of  electricity. 

While the forums at today’s event may not have supplied many definitive answers about the industry’s future, they did help to define the challenges that lie ahead.  Bottom line: It’s a complex business. Positions are evolving. Stay tuned.

EnviroPolitics had a few questions for two NJBIZ event panelists, PSE&G‘s Al Matos and Assemblyman Upendra Chivukula. Their answers contained some interesting details. Click on the arrow in the center of the photo below to view the video interview.

 

Related:
Solar Growth Spurt: Good News — At Least for Now

BPU chief says he’s trying to stabilize ‘overheated’ solar sector
SREC Market Trades Below $200 for the first time since September 15, 2011

Our most recent posts:
Environmental bills in New Jersey Legislature – Feb 16

Tougher standards lie ahead for dry cleaning fluid PERC

NJ Senator challenges critics to fix his state forest bill 

********************************************************************************************************
For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania,
try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter
EnviroPolitics. It tracks all energy and environmental legislation–from introduction to enactment. 

********************************************************************************************************

What’s in store for New Jersey’s solar-energy industry? Read More »

Environmental bills in New Jersey Legislature – Feb 16

The Senate Economic Growth Committee will take up S-1351 (Lesniak) which requires state licensing–including personal disclosures and background checks–for all businesses owners, sales people and key employees offering recycling services in New Jersey.
Also to be considered is S-1566  (Lesniak) which establishes the New Jersey Residential Foreclosure Transformation Act, providing a expedited process for foreclosing abandoned  residential proprieties..

The committee will meet at 10:30  a.m. in Room 1 on the first floor of the State House Annex in Trenton.

 


The Assembly will meet at 1 p. m. for a voting session. 

Among the bills to be considered are:

A-733  Eustace, T.J. (D-38); Schepisi, H. (R-39)
Prohibits health care institutions from discharging
prescription medications into sewer or septic systems.

A-1998  McKeon, J.F. (D-27); Chivukula, U.J. (D-17)
Clarifies intent of P.L.2007, c.340 regarding NJ’s
required participation in Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). The bill was released from the Assembly Environment and Solid Waste Committee on February 2 following lengthy and interesting testimony from business and environmental representatives.
You can hear the entire session here. 

********************************************************************************************************
For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter
EnviroPolitics.  We track environmental/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.
********************************************************************************************************

 

Environmental bills in New Jersey Legislature – Feb 16 Read More »

Tougher standards lie ahead for dry cleaning fluid PERC


The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) likely will be tightening standards for a solvent widely used in the dry cleaning industry following the release Friday of a final agency assessment that characterizes PERC as a
“likely human carcinogen.” 
The assessment provides estimates for both
cancer and non-cancer effects associated with exposure to Perchloroethlene (PERC)
over a
lifetime.

While the EPA
said it does not believe that wearing clothes dry cleaned with PERC will result in
exposures which pose a risk of concern, the agency already is requiring
that use of the solvent be phased-out dry cleaners in residential buildings by
December 21, 2020. 
The solvent is used by about 85% of U.S. dry cleaners. It also is used as a metal
degreaser and in the production of many other chemicals.


Areas where the assessment could lead to tighter regulation include:


  • Establishing
    cleanup levels at the hundreds of Superfund sites where PERC is a
    contaminant
  • Revising
    EPA’s Maximum Contaminant Level for perc as part
    of the carcinogenic volatile organic
    compounds group in drinking water
    , as described in the agency’s
    drinking water strategy 

  • Evaluating whether to propose additional
    limits on the emissions of PERC into the atmosphere
    , since PERC is
    considered a hazardous air pollutant under the Clean Air Act

National Academy of Sciences backs EPA findings 
In 2008, the EPA suggested that PERC be
classified as a “likely human carcinogen.” Moreover, it found that PERC’s
most dangerous noncancer toxicity is brain and nervous system damage — and set
safe exposure levels well below levels that cause such damage.


But rather than finalize the ruling, which was criticized by chemical industry manufacturers, the EPA asked the respected National
Academy of Sciences to review it’s PERC risk analysis and to tell the EPA if
it’s system for analyzing chemical risk was correct.


Now the expert panel appointed by the National Academy of Sciences says
the EPA was basically correct. The panel agreed that:


  • PERC is a “likely human carcinogen.” This means that while there’s no
    definitive proof that the chemical causes cancer in humans, there’s strong
    evidence it does — and there’s proof that the chemical causes various cancers
    in animals.
  • PERC’s most dangerous non-cancer effect is nerve and brain damage. Safe
    exposure levels for drinking water and air quality should be set well above
    levels that can cause such damage.
  • The EPA’s system for evaluating chemical risk is basically sound, although
    procedures for evaluating the strength of relevant studies need to be
    strengthened.


**We invite your comments in the opinion box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comment’ link, also below**

Related:
EPA Releases Final Health Assessment for Tetrachloroethylene

National Academy of Sciences Panel Agrees With EPA Analysis of the Risks of PERC

Our most recent posts:
NJ energy & environment bills in committee this week

NY Supreme Court rules on ‘how clean is clean’ question


********************************************************************************************************
For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania,
try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter
EnviroPolitics. It tracks all energy and environmental legislation–from introduction to enactment. 

********************************************************************************************************

Tougher standards lie ahead for dry cleaning fluid PERC Read More »

NJ energy & environment bills in committee this week

The New Jersey Senate’s Economic Growth Committee is scheduled to take up a bill today that would require recycling operations and their key officials, salespeople and consultants to be licensed under the same regulatory framework currently required of persons operating solid waste companies in the state.

S-1351, which won’t be formally introduced until today, is sponsored by the committee’s chairman, Raymond Lesniak (D-Middlesex). It is based on the findings of a report issued in December, 2011 by the State Commission of Investigation alleging that organized crime has re-established a foothold in New Jersey’s garbage industry and also was making inroads into recycling.

The committee, which will be meeting at 10:30 a.m. in Room 1 of the Statehouse Annex, also will consider two other bills. They are:


S-658  (Stack) Prohibits imposition of sewerage service connection fee
by regional sewerage authorities and public utilities upon certain
municipalities and boards of education; and
S-1209  (Whelan) Permits NJ boat manufacturers to qualify for EDA loans
for renewable energy technology, equipment, or systems.



[UPDATED at 12:50 p.m.  — The committee took testimony this morning on S-1351 but postponed a vote until its next meeting which currently is scheduled for February 16]

More energy and environment legislation in committee on Thursday

On Thursday (February 9), the Senate Environment and Energy Committee will consider the following energy and environment bills:


S-178
 
(Connors) Establishes Hooked on Fishing-Not on Drugs Program in
DEP and appropriates $200,000 therefor from Drug Enforcement and Demand
Reduction Fund. Related Bill: A-638
 
S-246  (Gordon) Prohibits drilling technique of hydraulic fracturing. [See related story below]
Related Bill: A-567
    
S-822  (Smith) Revises “Electronic Waste Management Act.”
Related Bill: A-1459
     
S-831  (Smith) Establishes notification requirements for combined
sewer overflows.
      
S-1083  (Smith) Establishes certain apprentice hunting licenses.
Related Bill: A-1544
      
S-1177  (Smith) Prohibits the use of certain fishing gear on artificial
reefs.
Related Bill: A-1343
     
S-1460  (Sweeney) Requires deposit of property tax refunds for certain
industrial sites under federal or State orders for remediation with
commissioner of environmental protection to help ensure compliance.
********************************************************************************************************
For
thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and
regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily
newsletter
EnviroPolitics. It tracks all energy and environmental legislation–from introduction to enactment. 

********************************************************************************************************

NJ energy & environment bills in committee this week Read More »

NY Supreme Court rules on ‘how clean is clean’ question

NY Supreme Court rules on ‘how clean is clean’ question Read More »