Will NJDEP’s new water quality plan wipe out your development?

NJBIZ reports that “the value and development potential of some real estate properties in New Jersey could take a hit as county and municipal governments prepare new wastewater management plans and redraw sewer service area boundaries.

“And despite the potentially devastating impact of such changes, many property owners are unaware they may be affected.”

The business publication’s Evelyn Lee explains:

“Last year, the state Department of Environmental Protection amended its Water Quality Management Planning rule, making county and municipal governments responsible for updating their wastewater management plans.

“The amended rule removes environmentally sensitive features — such as wetlands and endangered species — from sewer service areas, which encompass properties served by wastewater treatment systems. In amending the rule, the department came up with a draft map of sewer service areas to reflect the rule change, and guide counties and municipalities in developing their own sewer service area maps.

“The new maps could reassign properties currently within a sewer service area to a non-service area, said Ellen Radow Sadat, a partner at the Princeton office of law firm Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLP.

This could significantly reduce the value of the site by eliminating future development, she said, as “without sewer service, it’s very difficult for development to occur.”

Radow Sadat is calling for projects already underway to be grandfathered into the state’s new sewer service areas: “People have invested their money in the land, with the prospect of potentially growing and expanding in New Jersey.”

See the entire NJBIZ story here.

Care to share your knowledge or opinion on this topic? Use the comment box below. If one isn’t visible, activate it by clicking
on the tiny ‘comments’ line below.

Related:

Our most recent posts:
EPA developing remediation goals for dioxin
Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm
Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race
NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues
Hate development surprises? Read this

—————————————————————————–
Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

Will NJDEP’s new water quality plan wipe out your development? Read More »

EPA developing remediation goals for dioxin

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is seeking public comment on a plan to develop interim preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) for dioxin in soil at contaminated sites.

The plan includes a review of current dioxin cleanup guidance that has been established by the EPA, states and other countries, including the latest fully peer-reviewed dioxin toxicity assessments.

EPA will release the draft interim PRGs for public comment in December 2009, and anticipates issuing the final interim PRGs in June 2010.

The agency is currently undertaking a reassessment of dioxin, the results of which are expected to be released by the end of 2010.

More information on the plan and how to comment: www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/remedy/sfremedy/remedies/dioxininterimplan.html


Our most recent posts:
Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm
Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race
NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues
Hate development surprises? Read this.

Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

EPA developing remediation goals for dioxin Read More »

Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm

Plans to build the first offshore wind farm in Rhode Island have suffered a setback after the developer, Hoboken, New Jersey-based Deepwater Wind, failed to reach an agreement to sell electricity to the state’s largest electric utility, National Grid.

The Providence Journal reports: “National Grid this week rejected a proposal to purchase energy from a small wind farm that Deepwater Wind plans to build off Block Island. In documents filed with the state Public Utilities Commission Thursday, National Grid says that negotiations with Deepwater have so far failed to yield a “commercially reasonable” power-purchase agreement, mainly because the projected cost of electricity generated by the wind farm would be three times the price of energy from traditional sources.

“The [agreement], in pure financial terms, is uneconomic by a significant margin for Rhode Island customers for the entire term,” wrote National Grid attorney Ronald T. Gerwatowski.

The filing, submitted late Thursday afternoon to meet a deadline set by a new state law, does not signal an end to talks between the two sides. It is, however, a blow to Deepwater, which until now had encountered no significant obstacles in its race with other companies to install the first offshore wind turbines in the United States.

The New Jersey-based start-up company needs a contract not just because it would guarantee a buyer for its electricity, but also because such an agreement would help attract additional financing for its two projects in Rhode Island that will cost a total of $1.5 billion.

Deepwater first plans to install up to eight turbines three miles off the Block Island coast by 2012 and would follow that demonstration project with a much larger wind farm consisting of approximately 100 turbines at least 15 miles from the Rhode Island shore.

There is more to the story which continues here

Related:
With little precedent, cost of wind power up in the air
Maine pulls in $8M for floating offshore wind farm
DOE Awards $24 Million for Wind Energy Research
America’s Offshore Wind Race is On
New York plans U.S.’s largest offshore wind farm
NJ’s offshore wind energy pick is lobbying large

Our most recent posts:
Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race
NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues
Hate development surprises? Read this.
NJ enviro group backs Christie for governor

Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

Offshore Rhode Island wind power at a dead calm Read More »

NJ’s Governor Candidates on ‘Smart Growth’


New Jersey Future asked the state’s three leading candidates for governor to respond to a questionnaire about smart growth.

The organization reports today that the responses given to six questions posed offered “many similarities-along with some nuanced differences.”

Here’s how New Jersey Future summarized the answers:

Democrat Gov. Jon Corzine, the incumbent, emphasizes steps his administration has taken, from the Global Warming Response Act to the Economic Redevelopment and Growth Grant Program, as evidence of his commitment to promote both a strong economy and a healthy environment. In a second term, he pledges that his Policy Office “will convene a State Plan cabinet working group to align state agency actions with State Plan objectives.”

Republican Christopher Christie criticizes the Governor’s failure in his first term “to coordinate and focus the efforts of multiple departments” in redevelopment activities and land-use management. He touts his own “Bringing Back Our Cities” plan, which includes tax incentives aimed at revitalizing urban areas, adding, “The Office of State Planning needs to be restored to a leadership role” in carrying out the State Plan.

Independent Christopher Daggett proposes to promote smart growth by expanding transfer-of-development-rights (TDR) programs statewide and restoring Regional Contribution Agreements (RCA) as a tool for producing new affordable-housing units in receiving municipalities. He also pledges to “reconvene state and local government officials, builders, environmentalists, business leaders and housing advocates to re-examine the State Plan.”

Read the candidates’ full answers to all six questions here.

Our most recent posts:
Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race
NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues
Hate development surprises? Read this.
NJ enviro group backs Christie for governor
Want to participate in the next RGGI auction?

Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

NJ’s Governor Candidates on ‘Smart Growth’ Read More »

Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race

In New Jersey, races for governor run the same predictable course.

Democrats and Republicans each choose a candidate. The Democrat gets the support of the teachers, construction unions and enviro groups. The Republican wins the blessing of major business organizations and each gets the editorial endorsements of some of the state’s daily newspapers.

Sure, there are other candidates on the ballot but they represent groups so far out on the fringe that even their relatives have a tough time pulling their lever.

This year is different. Voters will get to select from three credible candidates–Democrat Jon Corzine, Republican Chris Christie, and the Independent Chris Daggett.

And this time, the Independent is not some guy in a tin foil hat. Mr. Daggett has solid experience in government–both at the state and federal level–and has not only won the support of one of the state’s largest environmental organizations, the Sierra Club, but, in a real shocker, also was endorsed over the weekend by the state’s largest newspaper–the Star-Ledger.

An Independent endorsed by the Star-Ledger? Whoa, now that’s big.

Why? Because Independents don’t have a chance of winning.

Why? Because:

1. Voters are most influenced by television ad campaigns.
2. Television ad campaigns are very, very expensive.
3. Independents can’t rely on interest groups to fund ad buys.

The Star-Ledger understands all this, so why would they back the Independent?

Here’s their explanation:

The newspaper’s decision is less a rejection of Gov. Jon Corzine and Republican Chris Christie than a repudiation of the parties they represent, both of which have forfeited any claim to the trust and confidence of the people of New Jersey. They share responsibility for the state’s current plight.

Only by breaking the hold of the Democratic and Republican mandarins on the governor’s office and putting a rein on their power will the state have any hope for the kind of change needed to halt its downward economic, political and ethical spiral.

New Jersey needs radical change in Trenton. Neither of the major parties is likely to provide it. Daggett’s election would send shock waves through New Jersey’s ossified political system and, we believe, provide a start in a new direction.

It would signal the entrenched leadership of both parties — and the interest groups they regularly represent — that an ill-served and angry electorate demands something better.

The lamentable fact is that the two parties are, themselves, little more than narrow special interests. Their competition for short-term political and/or monetary gain has jeopardized the state’s long-term economic health and left it with a tarnished national reputation.

Where the major parties have differed, their differences have been inconsequential. Where they’ve been the same, their similarities have been destructive.

They have contributed equally to gross overspending in Trenton by consistently pandering to the pay, pension and retirement policies demanded by powerful public employee unions. Democrats have financed the spree with tax hikes, Republicans with borrowed money, and both with pension-fund raids.

How do we now signal them that this has got to stop if not by rejecting their anointed candidates? How if not by electing Chris Daggett?

Agree? Disagree? Tell us what do you think in the comment box below. If you don’t see one, click on the tiny ‘comments’ line to open it.

Independent shaking up Jersey’s Governor’s race Read More »

NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues

The (Newark) Star-Ledger got the the state’s three gubernatorial candidates to answer questions on a number of important environmental issues today–from open-space funding and site cleanups to nuclear energy and bear hunts.

Several of the answers are refreshingly specific. You might even find a surprise or two. For example, Republican Chris Christie is the only one of the three to dismiss nuclear energy as a part of New Jersey’s energy-growth picture.

You’ll find the entire Star-Ledger interview here.

As always, we encourage you to share your point of view. Use the comment box below. If one doesn’t appear, click the tiny ‘comments’ line to activate it.

Our most recent posts:

Hate development surprises? Read this.
NJ enviro group backs Christie for governor
Want to participate in the next RGGI auction?
’60 Minutes’ on the problems with coal waste

Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day.
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation

Sign up now – No-obligation, 30 full days Free Trial

NJ governor hopefuls on key environmental issues Read More »