Oregon rules on what is recyclable and what’s not

In addition to standardizing what can be collected curbside and through special programs, the new rules define “responsible” end markets and require PROs to manage materials accordingly.

Two workers in yellow hard hats stand over a conveyor belt full of recyclable materials, primarily plastics, in an industrial facility
Workers sort paper and plastic waste at Far West Recycling on Oct. 30, 2017, in Hillsboro, Oregon. Natalie Behring via Getty Images

By Megan Quinn, Waste Dive

Oregon’s Environmental Quality Commission has adopted a statewide list of items accepted for recycling and defined “responsible end markets” for such materials. These are major steps in implementing the state’s sweeping extended producer responsibility for packaging law passed in 2021.

The commission, a rulemaking board of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, also approved numerous other rules related to the EPR law, known as the Recycling Modernization Act, on Nov. 16. Many of these rules, such as obligations for producer responsibility organizations and collection targets for specific materials, go into effect in 2025 or later.

DEQ still has plenty to do before the law can be fully implemented. A future round of rulemaking in 2024 will determine more details such as how to establish a “livable wage” for MRF employees and how to determine new operating and performance requirements for MRFs, among other details.

Oregon DEQ has been hashing out details of how to implement the state’s multifaceted EPR law since 2022. The law calls for most packaging producers to become members of a producer responsibility organization by 2025. Local governments will be able to use producer funding for improvements such as collection services and facility upgrades.

One part of the law is to create a statewide list of materials accepted for recycling, which is meant to reduce confusion about what can and cannot be recycled, DEQ has said. The approved list has several parts: One is comprised of items that local governments must collect, either through collection routes or at depots, while another part indicates the types of items for which producer responsibility organizations will need to arrange separate collection strategies. Some of the items on these sub-lists are allowed to be collected commingled.

The list was finalized after months of stakeholder meetings and hundreds of public comment submissions. Items that local governments will be required to collect curbside or at collection depots include cardboard, aluminum cans, most kinds of plastic bottles and tubs, and steel cans. The list also includes scrap metal, polycoated cartons, molded pulp packaging, and other items.

PROs will be required to provide separate recycling services for some other types of items, such as aerosol packaging, blocks of white expanded polystyrene foam, larger HDPE pails, PE film, and single-use liquid fuel canisters.

PROs will be able to suggest other materials to be added to these lists as part of the program plan. PROs will need to provide evidence that proposed materials meet the requirements of the law, or it could show how a PRO’s investment or other actions could help that material meet the requirements, said David Allaway, senior policy analyst with Oregon DEQ. 

Read the full story here


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.


Oregon rules on what is recyclable and what’s not Read More »

All 12 N.J. representatives vote to expel George Santos

By Joey Fox, New Jersey Globe

Controversial Rep. George Santos (R-New York) has been expelled from Congress, with a two-thirds bipartisan majority of the House concluding that his ethics violations and criminal indictments warranted his ouster. He is the first member of Congress to be formally expelled since 2002, and the first without a criminal conviction since the Civil War.

All 12 of New Jersey’s U.S. House members voted in support of the expulsion resolution, including three – Reps. Rob Menendez (D-Jersey City), Jeff Van Drew (R-Dennis), and Chris Smith (R-Manchester) – who voted against a previous expulsion effort last month. A fourth, Rep. Donald Norcross (D-Camden), had voted “present” on that earlier resolution.

Asked what changed in the month since then, Norcross’s answer was simple: the scathing House Ethics Committee report that was released on November 16 finding that there was “substantial evidence” Santos had committed campaign finance violations and other improper acts.

“Certainly, the recommendation from the bipartisan chairman and the ranking member, and the facts that were laid out, [changed things],” Norcross said. “We were waiting for that report or a conviction to come in, and this one came first.”

Read the full story here


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

All 12 N.J. representatives vote to expel George Santos Read More »

Bill promoting renewable natural gas stalls in NJ Assembly

Sponsor of measure promoting renewable gas to heat homes says bill needs work

Assemblyman Robert Karabinchak (D-Middlesex)

By Tom Johnson, NJ Spotlight

A bill aimed at promoting the use of renewable gas failed to win approval from a legislative committee on Thursday after hours of debate over whether it would advance the state’s clean energy agenda. 

The legislation (A-577), kicked around by lawmakers over the past few years, is viewed by proponents as a way to diversify energy supplies as New Jersey moves to transition away from fossil fuels, and still retain the value of billions of dollars invested in utility infrastructure. 

But clean energy advocates and others argued the bill would extend the use of natural gas at a time when the climate crisis is worsening, expose the public to increased health risks, and boost energy bills to customers. The Legislature also is engaged in a push to pass a bill requiring renewable energy to produce all of the state’s electricity by 2035. 

Assemblyman Robert Karabinchak (D-Middlesex), sponsor of the bill, acknowledged the measure needed more work at the beginning of the Assembly Environment and Solid Waste Committee. Although neither testified publicly, both the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities and state Division of Rate Counsel voiced concerns in letters that asked the committee to hold the bill. 

“This is what we need whether it is a permanent energy source, or just an interim source,’’ Karabinchak said, echoing arguments made by labor and business interests, as well as utility executives. The state’s gas utilities are exploring using renewable natural gas from sewage treatment plants, landfills, and agricultural activities as a source of biogas. 

Read the full story here


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Bill promoting renewable natural gas stalls in NJ Assembly Read More »

Biden’s EPA accelerating program to remove 100% of lead pipes across the nation, focusing on underserved communities

About 800 of the 18,000 lead service lines in Newark have been replaced this year. Credit…Bryan Anselm for The New York Times

WASHINGTON (Nov. 30, 2023) – Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a proposal to strengthen its Lead and Copper Rule that would require water systems across the country to replace lead service lines within 10 years. EPA is also proposing improvements to protect public health, such as lowering the lead action level and improving sampling protocols utilized by water systems.

“The Biden-Harris Administration is using every tool available, the EPA says, “to help communities and water systems Get the Lead Out—including investing a historic $15 billion through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to replace lead service lines, providing technical assistance to communities and supporting the development of a national inventory of lead service lines. ”

“Lead in drinking water is a generational public health issue, and EPA’s proposal will accelerate progress towards President Biden’s goal of replacing every lead pipe across America once and for all,” said EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan. “With collaboration and the focused actions proposed today, EPA is delivering on our charge to protect all Americans, especially communities of color, that are disproportionately harmed by lead in drinking water systems.”

Related lead pipe replacement news:
To protect kids, EPA wants total removal of lead pipes for the first time (W-Post)
Cities must replace harmful lead pipes within 10 years (Portland Press)
Newark is racing to Replace Lead Pipes in Under 3 Years (New York Times)
EPA rule changes would accelerate lead pipe replacement (WBAL TV)

“EPA’s proposed Lead and Copper rule is grounded in the best available science and successful practices utilized by drinking water systems to protect children and adults from lead in drinking water,” said EPA Assistant Administrator for Water Radhika Fox. “Cities like Newark, New Jersey, Benton Harbor, Michigan, and Green Bay, Wisconsin, have all successfully gotten the lead out of their water systems. Our proposed rule applies the lessons learned to scale these successes to every corner of the country.”

“Here in Newark, New Jersey, our community persevered through a lead crisis and I’m proud of the work we did removing all 23,000 lead pipes in the city in under three years,” said Kareem Adeem, Director of the Newark Department of Water and Sewer Utilities. “EPA’s new proposed rule will prompt more communities across the country to reduce exposure to lead in drinking water. This action is commendable and represents a positive step forward toward safeguarding the health and well-being of current and future generations.”

The proposed Lead and Copper Rule Improvements are a major advancement in protecting children and adults from these significant, and irreversible, health effects from lead in drinking water. Key provisions in the proposal include:

  • Achieving 100% Lead Pipe Replacement within 10 years.
  • Locating legacy lead pipes.
  • Improving tap sampling.
  • Lowering the Lead Action Level.
  • Strengthening protections to reduce exposure.

If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Biden’s EPA accelerating program to remove 100% of lead pipes across the nation, focusing on underserved communities Read More »

Day 1 at COP28: Nations begin coughing up pledges

BY JOEL KIRKLAND, Power Switch

The United Nations climate summit, COP 28, in Dubai, began with a parade of wealthy nations offering big cash pledges to help poorer countries cope with global warming.

Related:
COP28 Talks Reach Deal on Much-Debated Climate-Damage Fund (WSJ)
COP28 kicks off with climate disaster fund victory (Reuters)
COP28 Climate Talks Come to Oil Country (Bloomberg News)

That could put pressure on China, the world’s biggest climate polluter, to contribute money to the cause after nearly 200 nations agreed today to a framework for a new global fund meant to help vulnerable people.

Right off the bat, the United Arab Emirates pledged $100 million for the fund, write Zia Weise and Sara Schonhardt. The pledge seemed aimed at defusing critics who question whether the oil-rich country hosting the climate conference can be an honest broker.

Germany pried open its checkbook and added another $100 million pledge. The European Union promised almost $250 million.

Then there came the United States, with a $17.5 million pledge.

As tiny as it was, the U.S. pledge was notable because the Biden administration — and pretty much every administration before it — has resisted the creation of a “loss and damage” fund (in U.N. jargon). President Joe Biden’s support came only after other nations agreed that contributions would be voluntary and couldn’t require something akin to climate reparations for the damage done over a century of U.S. industrial growth.

Continue reading


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Day 1 at COP28: Nations begin coughing up pledges Read More »

EPA Awards $387M for Water Infrastructure Upgrades in Pa.


PHILADELPHIA (November 29, 2023)
 – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has awarded Pennsylvania $386,932,000 to support clean water efforts and to better deliver safe drinking water across the state. Most of this funding, $340,612,000, came from President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) which is the largest federal investment in water infrastructure in our nation’s history. This BIL funding will supplement the $46,320,000 in FY 2023 funding appropriated to Pennsylvania’s Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (SRFs).  

“These awards show that EPA is not just a regulator – but is a funder and partner,” said EPA’s Mid-Atlantic Regional Administrator Adam Ortiz. “The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law ensures communities most in need and those grappling with emerging contaminants such as PFAS have access to funding that will deliver cleaner and safer water for generations to come.” 

EPA awards grants to states annually to capitalize the State Revolving Funds (SRFs) which provide low or no-interest loans for water infrastructure projects. Pennsylvania will use this money to help communities across the state fund necessary water projects that some borrowers may not have been able to afford otherwise.  

“Pennsylvania’s water will always be a top priority for the PA Department of Environmental Protection,” said DEP Interim Acting Secretary Jessica Shirley.  “This funding will support infrastructure projects that enhance clean water efforts across the state, further providing recreation opportunities and protecting drinking water.” 

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law delivers more than $50 billion to EPA to improve our nation’s drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure – the single largest investment in water that the federal government has ever made. Learn more about the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.  


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

EPA Awards $387M for Water Infrastructure Upgrades in Pa. Read More »