NJ Gov. signs bill giving wind power developer Orsted big tax break


By BRENDA FLANAGAN, SENIOR CORRESPONDENT, NJ Spotlight News 

“This is a momentous day for the state because we are creating jobs for the future right now,” said Gov. Phil Murphy as he stood between massive steel supports and praised an agreement to boost financial support for a Paulsboro plant that builds monopiles for offshore wind turbines. The Paulsboro plant is scheduled to supply 98 of the gigantic 400-foot-long pylons for developer Ørsted’s first wind farm off the South Jersey coast. A new law Murphy signed Thursday guarantees that Ørsted will get federal tax credits and in return put up $200 million for South Jersey wind manufacturing facilities.

“They’re making this huge investment, and we’re doing it to capture manufacturing jobs which we would have lost to other states if this hadn’t been done,” said former Senate President Steve Sweeney. His think tank published a report, warning that fierce competition for wind industry business threatened to blow New Jersey away. Ørsted, which underwrites NJ Spotlight News, claimed rising costs threatened to cripple the project.

“The reality is, steel doubled in price, interest rates went up, so at the end of the day, we had to do something,” Sweeney said.

But if Ørsted gets federal tax credits, why not New Jersey’s other major offshore wind energy developer? Atlantic Shores said it wants the same deal that Ørsted got, stating, “We need an industry-wide solution, one that stabilizes all current projects, including Atlantic Shores Project 1.” That project sits right beside Ørsted’s two wind farm tracts. Murphy said, “We’re open-minded, absolutely open-minded. We want to make sure taxpayers get a good deal, jobs are created, that the corporates do what they say they’re going to do. Are we open-minded trying to figure out some common ground with the other offshore sequences? Absolutely.”

Republican responds to Murphy’s bailout of foreign wind company

There’s backlash as Republicans call this a bailout. And some coastal towns object, worried that wind farms will harm marine mammals and spoil their view. New Jersey’s Division of Rate Counsel is also concerned because Ørsted will be optioning tax credits that otherwise would have gone to ratepayers. But environmental advocates emphasized that offshore wind energy helps address the climate crisis.

Ørsted also just received final federal approval for the project with construction slated to begin this fall.

If you like this post you’ll love our environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

NJ Gov. signs bill giving wind power developer Orsted big tax break Read More »

Opinion: Is the Nestlé plant closure just the first environmental justice casualty in New Jersey?

By Ray Cantor, NJ Buriness and Industry Association

The pending closure of the Nestlé manufacturing plant, after 75 years in Freehold, is indeed a difficult time for the more than 220 workers it employs and bad news for the state and local economy.

Sadly, New Jersey may see further loss of legacy manufacturers like Nestlé given the extremes of the state’s recently adopted Environmental Justice rules.

Due to the expansive provisions of these new rules, the Nestlé plant is defined as being “disproportionately impacted” in an overburdened community. In fact, two-thirds of the state are now defined as being in an overburdened community under the new EJ law.

The Nestlé plant on Jerseyville Avenue in Freehold Borough is shown Tuesday, May 2, 2023.

What we know about Nestlé is the company was considering closing the plant because its facility is “outdated.” We also know that Nestlé has a Title V air permit from the state Department of Environmental Protection and is thus subject to the EJ rules.

Related:
Nestlé sets closing date for Freehold plant after 75 years
Oh yeah…Sniff it while you can

And we know that to comply with the EJ law, Nestlé would have to make substantial upgrades and perhaps meet other criteria that the rules do not even specify, but would be imposed during the permitting process. There would be no certainty in timing, process, standards, or outcomes. These are not ideal conditions to operate a plant.

During the two-year process that went into formalizing the EJ rules, we repeatedly warned that the proposed — and now final — regulations well exceeded legislative intent in their breadth, had no balance whatsoever for the business community and failed to recognize the benefits of the good-paying jobs and the economy.

Read the full story here

Ray Cantor is deputy chief government affairs officer at the New Jersey Business and Industry Association.

Opinion: Is the Nestlé plant closure just the first environmental justice casualty in New Jersey? Read More »

Some catalytic converter theft victims offered chance to recover loss

The Bucks County District Attorney said Friday that victims can call or fill out a form to possibly recoup their losses from the Dino Ciliberti, Patch Stafftheft ring.

The Bucks County District Attorney's Office has created a hotline for victims of the catalytic converter theft ring that was dismantled earlier this week.
The Bucks County District Attorney’s Office has created a hotline for victims of the catalytic converter theft ring that was dismantled earlier this week. (The Bucks County District Attorney’s Office)


By Dino Ciliberti, Patch Staff

The investigation resulted in charges against a Philadelphia tow yard, 10 adults, and one juvenile, authorities said.

“If you believe you were a victim of this corrupt organization, we want to hear from you,” the District Attorney’s Office said.

The investigation resulted in charges against a Philadelphia tow yard, 10 adults, and one juvenile, authorities said.

“If you believe you were a victim of this corrupt organization, we want to hear from you,” the District Attorney’s Office said.

Read the full story here

f you liked this post, you will love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation

Some catalytic converter theft victims offered chance to recover loss Read More »

Editorial: NJ’s ‘forever chemical’ settlement is big, but big enough?


By South Jersey Times Editorial Board

Settlements of big environmental damage cases in New Jersey can boomerang for victims — all of us, really — of poisoned air, soil and water.

The foul taste of the “pennies-on-the-dollar” 2015 agreement between the state Department of Environmental Protection and ExxonMobil Corp. for a wide range of contamination across the state continues to linger.

DEP analysts claimed the company and its predecessors caused $8.9 billion in damages, but the settlement, brokered by the Christie administration, had the energy giant pay just $225 million to make the litigation disappear. It’s a rounding error in ExxonMobil’s profits, which were $11.4 billion in the first quarter of 2023.     

Pragmatically, it’s likely DEP never could have proven the $8.9 billion figure, but the paltry settlement called into question the ability to remediate pollution linked to the former Mobil refinery in Greenwich Township and a neighboring storage site in Paulsboro. State experts put that cost at $80 million — more than a third of the entire state settlement. (Separately, ExxonMobil reached a $9.5 million settlement in 2019 to pay for pollution at a 1950s dumpsite in Paulsboro and East Greenwich Township.)

So, what to make of last week’s settlement in another case involving roughly the same stomping grounds as ExxonMobil’s in Gloucester County? Solvay Specialty Polymers, with a plant in West Deptford, will pay $393 million to deal with contamination from so-called “forever chemicals” that the facility formerly

Read the full editorial here


If you like this post you’ll love our environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Editorial: NJ’s ‘forever chemical’ settlement is big, but big enough? Read More »

Ireland Considers Killing 200,000 Cows To Fight Climate Change

In the latest effort to reduce emissions from agriculture, Ireland said it may kill 200,000 cows. Meanwhile, climate activists have American farms and ranches in the crosshairs.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: A thoughtful reader (thank you) sent us this interesting story. If you come across something you’d like to share, email it to: editor@enviropolitics.com]

By Kevin Killough, Cowboy State Daily

Climate activists are coming for livestock producers and farmers. 

European governments have been targeting the agriculture industry for several years. The Telegraph reports that Ireland’s government may need to reduce that country’s cattle herds by 200,000 cows over the next three years to meet climate targets. 

In an effort to reduce nitrogen pollution, Reuters reported the European Union last month approved a $1.6 billion Dutch plan to buy out livestock farmers. 

Now the Biden administration is targeting American agriculture. 

Special President Envoy For Climate John Kerry recently warned at a climate summit for the U.S. Department of Agriculture that the human race’s need to produce food to survive creates 33% of the world’s total greenhouse gasses. 

“We can’t get to net-zero. We don’t get this job done unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution,” Kerry said. 

Microsoft Billionaire Bill Gates also is obsessing about cattle emissions, providing financial support to companies that are developing seaweed supplements and gas masks for cows. 

Read the full story here

Don’t miss environmental news like this Click for free updates

Ireland Considers Killing 200,000 Cows To Fight Climate Change Read More »

Licensing snags delays Showboat Atlantic City’s waterpark opening

062423-pac-nws-waterpark
It was all waterslides and mermaids on June 22, 2023, in Atlantic City, at the private-invitaion opening of the Showboat Island Water Park. But the expected public opening was halted by a permit snafu. Matthew Strabuk photo

By Eric Conklin, Atlantic City Press

Showboat’s highly anticipated waterpark, which was set to open on Friday, will remain closed due to a licensing issue, a spokesperson for the resort said on Friday.

The $100 million waterpark was built by Showboat owner Bart Blatstein as a part of improvements he’s made to the former casino hotel, which his company, Tower Investments, purchased from Stockton University in 2015.

The waterpark was unable to obtain a state license in time for Friday’s opening, said Lisa Johnson, who handles public relations for Bartstein’s business endeavors.

Blatstein later annonced that the The 120,000-square-foot attraction attached to the Showboat Hotel will open to the public June 30. Day passes are priced at $89

Related:
Bart Blatstein offers a first look inside ‘grandiose’ Island Waterpark
Atlantic City’s two newest casinos celebrate fifth anniversaries 

Don’t miss business news like this Click for free updates

Licensing snags delays Showboat Atlantic City’s waterpark opening Read More »