New Jersey’s plan to reduce food waste by a dramatic 50 percent


By Frank Brill, EnviroPolitics Editor

In 2017, NJ Gov. Phil Murphy signed the Food Waste Reduction Act into law, establishing a goal to reduce the amount of food waste generated in the state by 50% by the year 2030 (the 50×30 Goal)d.

The law directs the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to develop a plan to guide the state toward achieving this goal.

Now, the Food Waste Reduction Plan has been published on the DEP’s website at https://www.nj.gov/dep/dshw/food-waste/food_waste_reduction_plan.html.

The 52-page document quantifies the amount of food waste generated in 2017 and sets forth actions the state intends to take to achieve the 50×30 Goal. The plan also includes a brief toolkit for food waste-generating sectors to take additional actions that support this goal.

New Jersey mirrors the federal government’s food-reduction goal

In 2017, NJ Gov. Phil Murphy signed the Food Waste Reduction Act into law, establishing a goal to reduce the amount of food waste generated in the state by 50% by the year 2030 (the 50×30 Goal). The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced this goal on September 16, 2015, making it the first-ever domestic goal to reduce food loss and waste.

The EPA estimates that 30 to 40 percent of the food supply in the U.S. is never eaten, wasting the resources used to produce it and creating many environmental impacts.

In addition to New Jersey, several states have implemented specific legislation to tackle the problem of food waste. These include tax incentives, liability protection for donations, and food waste bans. Some states have passed laws that restrict the amount of food waste going to landfills, such as California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont 


Facts about food waste

Top 15 states generating the most food waste by tonnage annually

RankStateAnnual Food Waste (Tons)
1California6,000,000
2Texas4,600,000
3Florida2,800,000
4New York2,700,000
5Pennsylvania2,500,000
6Illinois2,400,000
7Ohio2,300,000
8Michigan2,200,000
9North Carolina2,100,000
10Georgia2,000,000
11Virginia1,900,000
12New Jersey1,800,000
13Tennessee1,700,000
14Indiana1,600,000
15Arizona1,500,000


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

New Jersey’s plan to reduce food waste by a dramatic 50 percent Read More »

Why bank emissions numbers are so rosy


By Alastair Marsh, Bloomberg

On the surface, Deutsche Bank AG, Citigroup Inc., and Mizuho Financial Group Inc. all appear to be delivering on their promises to cut carbon emissions.

The three banks (along with most of their peers) have committed to eliminating financed emissions—the greenhouse gas pollution enabled by their lending and investing—starting with the most carbon-intensive areas of their balance sheets. And in sustainability reports published this year, all three banks said those numbers had come down—in some cases significantly.

Yet if you read the footnotes, one would discover that their emissions have fallen in large part due to technical factors outside of their control. 

Just last month, Deutsche Bank reported that emissions associated with its lending to oil and gas companies—the primary perpetrators of global warming—declined 29% from the prior year. As a result, the bank is much closer to its 2030 target for reducing financed emissions from the sector.

How did this happen? The war in Ukraine may have played a part. The German lender said the reduction was “predominantly explained” by three factors, the biggest of which being a decrease in the size of its loan books after ending relationships with Russian clients. But additional factors were changes in exchange rates and the increasing market value of its fossil-fuel clients.

Read the full story here


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Why bank emissions numbers are so rosy Read More »

Fear tactics fail Republicans in NJ, as Democrats hold fast

Editor’s Note – Veteran political writer Charles Stile analyzes what went wrong for Republicans in yesterday’s NJ legislative elections.

Charles Stile NorthJersey.com

New Jersey Republicans entered the legislative contests this fall buoyed by optimism. They held a shared hope that maybe — just maybe — their party could finally climb out of the wilderness and back into power for the first time in nearly two decades.

Or, at the very least, they hoped they could continue to weaken the Democratic Party’s iron grip on power in Trenton. GOP candidates wanted to build on the successes their party delivered in 2021 when Republicans stunned the political community by flipping seven seats and dethroned Senate President Stephen Sweeney at the hands of a little-known and underfunded truck driver, Ed Durr.

But optimism proved to be no match for the harsh reality of being Republican in a resolutely blue state. The GOP entered the race trailing in fundraising. The party once again fell far behind Democrats in the race for pre-election day voting, either by mail or early in-person voting.

And, at the end of the day, the party lacked a coherent message of hope. It didn’t articulate a vision of future Republican governance. The party sought to stir up its base with messages of fear.

The strategy failed.

The result: It was the Democrats, not the Republicans, who gained ground Tuesday night, winning back five seats.

Republicans hoped for a ‘common sense’ backlash that backfired

The Democrats will maintain their 25-15 edge in the state Senate, in part by defeating Durr, the truck driver in the 3rd Legislative District, which offset an expected loss in the 12th District in Monmouth and Middlesex counties. Sam Thompson, a long-time Republican who defected to the Democrats earlier this year, is retiring and the seat was expected to revert back to Republican hands. Owen Henry of Old Bridge will succeed him.

Throughout the fall campaign, Republicans believed they had a winning formula: Cast the Democrats as morally and politically bankrupt, advancing a series of radical, far-left policies that most middle-class and centrist voters find objectionable.

The party of liberal “King Phil” Murphy — as he was called during the pandemic — had run the table in Trenton far too long. Democrats had lost touch with a public clamoring “common sense,” a favorite GOP buzz phrase. Murphy’s was an administration, Republicans contended, that was banning gas stoves and killing whales by insisting on installing wind turbines off the Jersey Shore. Crime was running rampant in suburbia because of Murphy and the Democrats’ lax crime policies, GOP leaders claimed.

Read the full story here


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Fear tactics fail Republicans in NJ, as Democrats hold fast Read More »

After historic upset, firebrand NJ Sen. Ed Durr faces tough reelection

NJ State Sen. Edward Durr

By CLYDE HUGHES, NJ Spotlight

Truck driver Edward Durr made national headlines two years ago when he pulled off one of the biggest upsets in New Jersey politics ever — defeating Democratic incumbent and longtime Senate President Steve Sweeney in South Jersey’s 3rd Legislative District. 

The victory over Sweeney, considered one of the most powerful figures in New Jersey politics, highlighted a Republican “red wave” that saw the GOP close gaps in the state Senate and Assembly while nearly capturing the governorship. 

Fast forward two years: Durr is now fighting for his short political life, with Democrats and progressive political action committees targeting the man who funded his campaign last time around with credit cards. 

Durr is facing former 10-term Democratic 3rd District Assemblyman John Burzichelli, whom Durr helped sweep out of office in 2021. Durr is also facing his own ultra-conservative record in a district that had been leaning moderately Democrat before Durr’s victory. 

Watch our video interview with ‘Ed the trucker’ early after his astounding upset election

In the 3rd District Assembly race, the Republicans are running incumbent Bethanne McCarthy Patrick, an emergency medical technician in Salem County, and Thomas Tedesco Jr., a member of the Hopetown Township Committee. 

The Democratic candidates include Heather Simmons, the deputy director of the Gloucester County Board of Commissioners, and Woodstown nonprofit CEO Dave Bailey Jr. 

“This is a different election than it was two years ago,” said John Froonjian, executive director of the William J. Hughes Center for Public Policy at Stockton University. “Nobody expected Ed Durr to have a shot and were shocked when he upset Sweeney and the Democrats then. 

“Durr does not have the element of surprise this time. In fact, the Dems are fighting hard. Durr was an unknown then; this time, his controversial statements are well-known and not very popular,” Froonjian said. 

One of Durr’s social media statements related to abortion has become a Democratic battle cry in the race. In a knock on the “pro-choice” theme for abortion supporters, Durr was quoted as saying that they already have a choice, “keep her legs closed.” 

That comment was one of several that have brought out everyone from former Democratic Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg, who narrated an ad against Durr, to his own 2021 running mate Beth Sawyer, who ran against him in the Republican primary this year. 

Durr’s rhetoric has made some Republicans so nervous that they publicly distanced themselves from him. Earlier this fall, six Republican legislative candidates from South Jersey called Durr’s past social media posts about women “offensive and unacceptable.” 

The GOP candidates included  state Senate candidates Latham Tiver and Christopher Del Borrello, Assemblymen Michael Torrissi Jr., and Brandon Umba,  and Assembly candidates Matt Walker and Amanda Esposito. 

In defense, Durr has touted his support for the conservative so-called parental rights movement to give parents more of a say in the school curriculum. 

“There is nothing remotely political about elected officials and parents telling Governor Murphy and his activist administration to get out of the classroom,” Durr said in September in voicing his support for a parental rights notification bill. 

Read the full story here


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

After historic upset, firebrand NJ Sen. Ed Durr faces tough reelection Read More »

Hazardous Batteries cause Toyota to recall 1.8 million of its RAV4s

According to a press release issued on Wednesday, Nov. 1, some replacement 12-volt batteries of the size specified for 2013 to 2018 RAV4 models have smaller top dimensions than others.

“Toyota is currently preparing the remedy,” the statement reads. “When the remedy is available, Toyota dealers will replace the battery hold-down clamp, battery tray, and positive terminal cover with improved ones at no cost to owners. For all involved vehicles, Toyota will notify customers by late December 2023.”

To see if your vehicle is involved in a safety recall visit Toyota.com/recall or nhtsa.gov/recalls and enter your Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) or license plate information.

For any additional questions, Toyota customer support is also available by calling the Toyota Brand Engagement Center (at 1-800-331-4331).


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Hazardous Batteries cause Toyota to recall 1.8 million of its RAV4s Read More »

Federal Lawmakers Investigate Insurers Fleeing Risky Climate Areas

Senate Democrats are demanding that insurers tell them which places could be next.

An aerial view of houses including debris in the front yard.
Damage to Cedar Key, Fla., after Hurricane Idalia in August.Credit…Paul Ratje for The NY Times


By Christopher Flavelle, New York Times,
Nov. 1, 2023

Faced with growing losses from hurricanes, floods, and wildfires, major insurance companies are pulling out of California, Florida, and Louisiana — a shift that threatens to undermine the economies of those states.

Now Senate Democrats are demanding that insurers tell them which places could be next.

On Wednesday, the Senate Budget Committee sent letters to 40 insurance companies, seeking documents that show where in the country those insurers have begun dropping customers, or are considering it. The committee, which has subpoena power, has given the companies until Nov. 17 to respond.

“Climate-caused uninsurability has the potential to trigger cascading failures that undermine our entire economy,” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island and the committee chairman said in a statement. “With this investigation, we are seeking information about where the dominoes may fall next.”

Banks typically require insurance when writing a mortgage. If insurance becomes unavailable in a particular community, it becomes hard for most potential buyers to purchase a home, leading to a drop in real estate values.

Mr. Whitehouse compared the accelerating withdrawal of insurance companies with the 2008 housing crash, saying a broad insurer pullback “will have similarly grave economic effects.”

He said the investigation aims to give the public “advance warning” if insurers might leave their communities.

Read the full story here


If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Federal Lawmakers Investigate Insurers Fleeing Risky Climate Areas Read More »