DIY solar is all the rage in Europe. Why not here?

By Todd Woody in Bloomberg Green Daily

As electricity prices soar and rooftop solar subsidies vanish, some US renters and homeowners are surreptitiously installing solar panels on balconies and backyards without their utility’s permission. Legislation recently introduced in nearly two dozen states would legalize “plug-in solar” systems, jumpstarting a nascent market for an affordable renewable energy source.

Also called balcony solar, these systems typically consist of two to four solar panels connected to wall outlets. They typically cost $2,000 or more and generate enough electricity to power a refrigerator, electronics, and lights, potentially reducing utility bills by several hundred dollars a year. Some plug-in solar systems include batteries to store power for use during peak demand, when electricity rates spike, and during storms or heat waves that knock out the grid.

solar panels Source: Bright Saver

Millions of balcony solar systems have been deployed in countries like Germany, which regulates the technology. But only about 5,000 have been installed in the US, according to advocates, most without utility authorization. That’s because plug-in solar has remained in the shadows due to a lack of safety standards and often costly requirements imposed by utilities, but that’s changing. Utah in 2025 enacted a law allowing plug-in solar without utility approval, and other states are considering similar legislation, including New York and California, the nation’s largest solar market.

“The impact of California passing legislation would be huge and will get manufacturers to come into the market,” said Kevin Chou, cofounder and executive director of Bright Saver, a Bay Area nonprofit that sells do-it-yourself plug-in solar systems and has pushed to legalize the technology.

Under California legislation introduced in January, residents may install plug-in solar systems without utility authorization. But those systems couldn’t generate more than 1.2 kilowatts of electricity and must be certified by a nationally recognized testing lab. Legislation in other states contains similar requirements.

Utah’s Republican-dominated legislature unanimously approved a plug-in solar bill in 2025, and the state’s Republican governor signed it into law. Although pro-renewable energy Democrats hold a supermajority in the California legislature, the bill introduced by state Senator Scott Wiener, who is running to replace US Representative Nancy Pelosi, is likely to face opposition from some landlords, homeowner associations, and utilities, according to Chou.

Utilities have expressed concern about plug-in solar’s impact on grid balancing if systems feed excess electricity into the network without their knowledge. Landlords may worry about solar panels falling off balconies or how they change the look of a building, he said. Homeowners associations, which regulate everything from house colors to landscaping, may object to the aesthetics of backyard solar.

California’s three big investor-owned utilities currently require plug-in solar owners to apply and secure approval to interconnect to the grid, just as owners of rooftop solar must do.

Chou estimates that more than a thousand plug-in solar systems have been installed in California. But PG&E and San Diego Gas & Electric have not yet received any interconnection applications for the equipment, according to spokespeople.

If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it. Try it free for a whole month

DIY solar is all the rage in Europe. Why not here? Read More »

Trump’s EPA to institute ‘not-good neighbor’ policy

By MATTHEW DALY, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Wednesday took a step toward rolling back a rule that limits smokestack emissions that burden areas in neighboring states downwind.

The so-called “good neighbor” rule is one of dozens of regulations that Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin has targeted for reconsideration or repeal. The Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that the EPA could not enforce the rule, which is intended to block coal-fired power plants and other industrial sites from adding significantly to air pollution across state lines.

The EPA said Wednesday it is proposing to approve plans by eight states to regulate ozone air pollution as they see fit. If finalized, the states “would no longer need to worry about another ‘Good Neighbor Plan’” subject to approval by the federal government, the agency said.

The affected states are Alabama, Arizona, Kentucky, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, and Tennessee. Under President Joe Biden, the EPA disapproved or proposed disapproval of ozone plans submitted by all those states. The state-specific plans did not sufficiently control cross-state ozone emissions, the Biden-era agency said.

Read the full story

If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it. Try it free for a whole month

Trump’s EPA to institute ‘not-good neighbor’ policy Read More »

It’s cold in the U.S. Here’s why some buildings turned down the heat.

Washington on Sunday evening. The weekend storm dumped a foot or more of snow in at least 17 states from New Mexico to New Hampshire. Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

By Claire Brown, The New York Times

It’s cold in the U.S. Here’s why some buildings turned down the heat.

And they’ll get paid for it.

It’s part of a strategy called demand response, used by power grid operators during peak energy use, such as cold snaps and heat waves. The idea is to reduce power demand when supply is tight by incentivizing big electricity customers to use less.

That could mean a bitcoin mine shuts down for a few hours. Or a hospital might switch on a backup power generator, reducing the amount of electricity it pulls from the grid. Big box stores might adjust the thermostat, refrigeration, or lighting to save energy.

In theory, if enough large power customers signed up for demand response, an alert from the grid operator would swiftly trigger a significant, voluntary drop in regional electricity use, freeing up power to heat homes and avoid blackouts.

Think of it as subtracting a power plant’s worth of demand instead of adding a power plant’s worth of supply. The companies coordinating all that subtraction are known as virtual power plants.

Read the full story

If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it. Try it free for a whole month

It’s cold in the U.S. Here’s why some buildings turned down the heat. Read More »

Dead livestock, lost farms all due to PFAS in toxic sludge

Screenshot 2026-01-22 091420.png

Maine farmer, Fred Stone, lost his livelihood after he says he had to euthanize most of his herd of dairy cows because of the levels of PFAS in their milk.

by LISA FLETCHER, ANDREA NEJMAN & NATHAN AARON | SPOTLIGHT ON AMERICA

VIEW ALL PHOTOS

WASHINGTON (SOA) — America’s farmland may be facing a growing contamination crisis — one that farmers, environmental groups, and some lawmakers now say can no longer be ignored.

What was once considered a safe, low-cost fertilizer is now being linked to dead livestock, lost livelihoods, and families caught in the fallout of toxic “forever chemicals” spreading through agricultural land. It’s a story we’ve been following for years – that’s coming to a head in states that are dealing with the fallout of toxic PFAS.

“This should have been taken care of decades ago,” said attorney Laura Dumais, as she explained to me some of the nuanced language being used by the EPA to shield itself from responsibility for regulating PFAS. For years, farmers across the country have spread biosolid sludge — made from treated human waste — on their fields. The material was promoted as fertilizer. But mounting evidence shows it can contain dangerous levels of PFAS, a class of chemicals tied to cancer, reproductive harm, and developmental problems in children.

This past year, our series of investigations into PFAS contamination in farmland and food systems has examined how chemicals in sludge can move from soil to animals, food, and people.

Dumais, with the advocacy group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, or PEER, is leading a lawsuit accusing the Environmental Protection Agency of failing to protect farmers in Texas who say PFAS contamination destroyed their farms.

The allegations echo what happened in Maine, where farmer Fred Stone says he unknowingly poisoned his family — and lost both his livestock and livelihood — after PFAS-contaminated sludge was spread on his land.

“This is as real as it gets, folks,” said Stone as he stood inside a near-empty barn on his family farm.

Stone says the PFAS-contaminated sludge that he spread on his farm destroyed the life he built for his family. State testing found PFAS levels on his farm so high that he was forced to shut down operations, leaving him unable to sell his milk or continue farming.

Read the full story here

Dead livestock, lost farms all due to PFAS in toxic sludge Read More »

Is Trump losing his war against wind power?

By Jake Spring, Washington Post

The White House suffered three court losses last week, and the oil industry has grown alarmed by the president’s vendetta against the offshore wind industry.

And in recent months, an informal coalition of companies across the energy industry, including oil and clean energy firms, has emerged to push for an end to the targeting of wind energy, fearing they could fall prey to the same tactics in the future.

“We know what administrations can do to our projects when they have opposition to building pipelines or other energy infrastructure. This has never just been about wind,” said Mike Sommers, president of the American Petroleum Institute lobby group.

The blocked wind projects have become inextricably linked to a push in Congress to overhaul the system for permitting infrastructure projects, a top legislative objective for oil firms. While a bill passed in the House, Senate debate broke down after the administration’s Dec. 22 stop-work orders for all five offshore wind projects under construction on the East Coast. Negotiations remain on hold.

“It’s time for both sides to put their weapons downand let’s work on getting comprehensive permitting reform done in this Congress,” Sommers said.

Still, analysts agree that Trump’s personal preferences are driving the anti-wind policy. More than a decade ago, he unsuccessfully sued to stop offshore wind turbines built near a Scottish golf course he owned and has apparently nursed a grudge ever since. The mounting court losses and industry pressure may not change his mind.

Read the full story

If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it. Try it free for a whole month

Is Trump losing his war against wind power? Read More »