Pollution impact on communities is the focus of Environmental Justice hearing in Newark, NJ

By TOM WIEDMANN, TapIntoNewark

NEWARK, NJ — Environmental justice rules that community leaders across New Jersey have fought for more than a decade to secure sent a clear message during a meeting hosted Wednesday in Newark by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) that they will not let polluting facilities burden their communities anymore.

“This is bare minimum protection. You shouldn’t have three power plants in a four-square-mile community that’s surrounded by a Superfund site,” Ironbound Community Corporation (ICC) Deputy Director of Organizing and Advocacy Maria Lopez-Nuñez told a panel of DEP representatives during the meeting. “You have to look at the multitude of people you’re protecting. That is your job.”

Lopez-Nuñez was one of more than dozens of people who spoke out in support of new draft rules proposed by the department that would require facilities seeking certain permits in overburdened communities to prepare an environmental justice impact statement. The draft rules also propose to increase public input and participation in the permitting process.

The meeting, which was held at the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), was hosted by the DEP to gather public comment on the proposed rules. The meeting came after Gov. Phil Murphy in September 2020 signed Environmental Justice Law (S232), which gives the DEP the authority to deny permits to polluting facilities that would exacerbate overburdened communities across the state. Overburdened communities include municipalities with at least 35% of households that qualify as low-income and at least 40% of residents identify as minority or as members of a state-recognized tribal community.

The proposed rules would impact environmental justice communities like Newark, where many of its low-income residents and underserved communities have been disproportionately impacted by pollution for decades. The city is located at the center of major transportation hubs for air travel, trucking, and rails, plus a seaport. 

Due to Newark’s long history of industrialization and being located in proximity to several major transportation hubs, residents have been subject to high levels of air and water pollution for decades. Ironbound residents are currently in the midst of an ongoing battle to stop the construction of a proposed standby power generation facility in their neighborhood that would run on natural gas – a fossil fuel. Residents have also experienced increased rates of asthma, maternal health issues, and other health complications as a result of pollution.

“I used to be a camp counselor at a program right in [Newark’s] Ironbound section, and what I know now, I didn’t know then. I didn’t realize all of the things that were in that environment was impacting those young children,” said Marcus Sibley, chairman of the New Jersey State Conference NAACP Environmental and Climate Justice Committee. “The point of this rule and the point of all of us being here today is to ensure that these young people have a chance. There shouldn’t be anything that prevents our young, beautiful future leaders from being able to achieve their highest goals.”

One youngster’s sign in the audience pleaded for the most essential childhood right.

“We need clean air so we can play!” the sign read.

Although environmental advocates turned out in droves to voice their support for legislation that they hope will better protect their communities, industry officials from organizations such as the New Jersey Business & Industry Association (NJBIA) have called for more regulatory flexibility and certain economic exemptions to be included in the rules.

“The proposal misses the mark by only focusing on the potential or presumed negative impacts, as it doesn’t measure actual emissions, but only sources,” NJBIA Vice President of Government Affairs Ray Cantor said in a statement.“The rule does not, at all, account for the jobs and positive economic impacts these facilities have in these communities.”

Read the full story here

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Pollution impact on communities is the focus of Environmental Justice hearing in Newark, NJ Read More »

A nasty old Meadowlands site may be coming off the Superfund list and open for new uses

Ted Goldberg reports for NJ Spotlight News

One of New Jersey’s oldest Superfund sites is a big step closer to being deemed cleaned up. The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing an end to work to clean polluted groundwater at the Universal Oil Products site in East Rutherford, where toxic chemicals contaminated the soil and sediment dating back to 1930.

Related environmental news story:
Remediation coming to a close for a part of the Universal Oil Products Superfund Site

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

A nasty old Meadowlands site may be coming off the Superfund list and open for new uses Read More »

NJ fishing community wary of feds’ national sanctuary plan for the Hudson Canyon

This visual is for reference only and does not represent an official boundary proposal from NOAA.

By Jon Hurdle, NJ Spotlight

An undersea canyon 100 miles from the Statue of Liberty could become a national marine sanctuary if a federal proposal becomes a reality, but New Jersey’s fishing community fears that the designation could lead to more regulation that will hinder their livelihoods.

Federal officials say they are not planning to add new rules to cover the ecologically important Hudson Canyon, and that fishing there would still be allowed under the plan to designate the area a protected sanctuary, as it is in almost all of the 15 sanctuaries that already exist off the U.S. coast.

But representatives of commercial and recreational fishing don’t trust the assurances that their access to the area would not be curbed if the sanctuary is created.

Don’t miss environmental news like this Click for free updates

“We’re being given assurances that we will be able to fish commercially and recreationally in the canyon but that could change,” said John Toth, president of the Jersey Coast Anglers Association, a recreational fishing group. “Once it’s a sanctuary, they don’t have to abide by some of the regulations; they could say overnight ‘this type of fishing can’t go into the canyon.’”

Toth spoke after a public meeting last week at which federal officials outlined their plans for the canyon and heard comments that will help to inform an official report on the environmental impacts of creating a sanctuary. The two-month public-comment period ends Aug. 8, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration expects to make a final decision on the proposal in two to three years’ time.

Abundant and diverse

The agency calls the two-mile-deep canyon an “ecological hotspot” because of the abundance and diversity of its marine wildlife. It says a sanctuary designation would help conserve species, habitats and cultural resources including historic connections that indigenous people have to the area.

The proposal to create a sanctuary was first made in 2016 by a group of environmental advocates including the Wildlife Conservation Society, a nongovernmental organization that manages the New York Aquarium and four zoos in the New York area.

Read the full story here

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

NJ fishing community wary of feds’ national sanctuary plan for the Hudson Canyon Read More »

9/11 families grieve anew as Saudi LIV tournament gets underway at Trump’s New Jersey golf course

By Mike Kelly, NorthJersey.com

BEDMINSTER, New Jersey — After nearly 21 years and what seems to be an endless river of pain, this is what the 9/11 story has come to.

Three relatives of victims of America’s deadliest terror attack — a wife who lost her husband; a mother who lost her son; a son who lost his father — stood Tuesday on a patch of grass by the local public library in this community of rolling hills and horse pastures. Two miles away sat a golf course owned by former President Donald Trump.

It was 9:20 a.m. The humidity and 90-degree temperatures of recent days had softened. But tempers still steamed over Trump’s decision to host a golf tournament financed by Saudi Arabia despite new declassified FBI files with evidence that at least a dozen Saudi officials provided financial and logistical support to the team of Islamists who pulled off the Sept. 11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.

The LIV Golf tournament, at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, begins Thursday with a one-day pro-am competition, followed on Friday by a three-day, 54-hole tournament featuring such stars as Phil Mickelson, Bryson DeChambeau, Brooks Koepka, and Patrick Reed.

The LIV Golf series, which features several tournaments in the coming months, culminating at Trump’s Doral course in Miami, describes itself as “golf as you’ve never seen it.” That may be one of the most prophetic understatements of sports — in this case, with the additional controversy of 9/11 and Saudi Arabia’s alleged links to Islamist terrorism lurking in the shadows.

Read the full story here

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

9/11 families grieve anew as Saudi LIV tournament gets underway at Trump’s New Jersey golf course Read More »

Climate change is chasing Maine lobsters north to colder waters. Some lobstermen turn to seaweed harvesting

Justin Papkee, a partner farmer with Atlantic Sea Farms, hauls up kelp lines with the help of his crew, Jim Ranaghan, and Chris Papkee, off Long Island, Maine, in 2021. (Nicole Wolf)

By Kathy Gunst, Washington Post

FALMOUTH, Maine — It’s harvest time on Casco Bay.

Briana Warner is dressed for this late spring morning in padded rubber overalls, raincoat, rubber boots, and neon yellow gloves that come up above her elbows. Just off the coast of Falmouth, she hangs off the side of a Zodiac boat and uses a gaff (hook) to hoist from the water a neon green buoy attached to a thick white rope. Warner struggles and finally gets her hands around the rope. The line drips with long, shimmering, translucent ribbons of green sugar kelp.

Seaweed: An unusual snack for cows, a powerful fix for the climate

Warner’s face lights up as she inspects the seaweed. “They’re ready for harvest,” she declares.

As the CEO and president of Atlantic Sea Farms, the 38-year-old Warner is using seaweed to quietly revolutionize Maine’s struggling fishing industry.

Up and down the Maine coast, thousands of lines like this have been planted by fishermen growing seaweed in partnership with her company. In the fall, the fishermen plant tiny kelp seeds on the 1,000-foot-long ropes, and by late spring, attached to each one is close to 6,000 pounds of fresh sugar kelp. The seaweed is harvested, flash frozen, and used to make kelp cubes for smoothies, as well as seaweed salad, seaweed kraut, and more.

Seaweed is Maine’s new cash crop.

Briana Warner, president, and chief executive of Atlantic Sea Farms, in Cumberland, Maine. (Nicole Wolf)

For generations, coastal Maine has been supported by a different underwater resource: the lobster. Lobstering is woven into virtually every aspect of life in coastal communities; tax revenue, jobs, and the state’s identity all depend on it. But as climate change causes Maine’s coastal waters to warm, underwater life, and the economy built around it, have shifted dramatically.

The Gulf of Maine is warming faster than 96 percent of the world’s oceans — increasing at a rate of 0.09 degrees per year. These warming temperatures have forced the lobster population to migrate north seeking colder waters, and the impact on Maine fishermen has been profound.

Seaweed is easy to grow, sustainable, and nutritious. But it’ll never be kale.

Jim Ranaghan, left, and Chris Papkee harvest kelp. (Nicole Wolf)

Keith Miller, 67, a second-generation lobsterman, has been lobstering for more than 50 years, fishing in Wheeler’s Bay between Spruce Head and Tenants Harbor. When he saw the dramatic impact of climate change on his industry he knew he had to plan for the six months of the year — between fall and spring — when he couldn’t fish for lobster. He heard about a program in Rockland, Maine, at the Island Institute (which helps coastal communities thrive) educating lobstermen about aquaculture.

Read the full story here

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Climate change is chasing Maine lobsters north to colder waters. Some lobstermen turn to seaweed harvesting Read More »

L..A. could soon put recycled water directly in residents’ tap. Please don’t call it ‘toilet to tap’

Two workers in a water filtration plant.
Trenton Guinta, left, and Bert Mantilla Jr., work at the filtration plant at the Water Replenishment District’s facility at Albert Robles Center in Pico Rivera.
(Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

BY JAIMIE DINGS, STAFF WRITER, Los Angeles Times 

Water has always been recycled. The water molecules in your shower or cup of coffee might just be the same molecules that rained on dinosaurs more than 65 million years ago.

With the technological advancements in water recycling, however, the water that went down your sink this morning might be back in your tap sooner than you think.

The city of Los Angeles and agencies across Southern California are looking into what’s known as “direct potable reuse,” which means putting purified recycled water directly back into our drinking water systems. This differs from indirect potable reuse, where water spends time in a substantial environmental barrier such as an underground aquifer or in a reservoir.

Water recycling experts shudder at the infamous phrase “toilet to tap,” an alliteration that became popular with politicians and headline writers alike in the late 1990s when projects for using recycled water for groundwater replenishment were beginning to take shape in the San Gabriel Valley and city of Los Angeles.

Miller Brewing Co. and community groups vigorously opposed the San Gabriel Valley project, even suing agencies involved over the environmental impact reports.

Today, recurring cycles of devastating drought as well as advancements in science have softened that view.

“There’s been a public health legacy where sanitary engineering practices and regulators considered sewage a waste, it was something to be avoided, something to be feared,” said Brad Coffey of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. “Now that we have the technology … the public, the regulators, and the scientific community– have much greater confidence in our ability to safely reuse that water supply.”

Their efforts hinge on the State Water Resources Control Board, which has been tasked by legislators to develop a set of uniform regulations on direct potable reuse by Dec. 31, 2023.

The city of Los Angeles is wasting no time in readying projects that can launch once the regulations are passed.

A water treatment facility's pumping station.
An influent pumping station at the Water Replenishment District’s advanced water treatment facility in Pico Rivera. (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

A direct potable reuse demonstration facility near the Headworks reservoir just north of Griffith Park probably will be the state’s first approved direct potable reuse project, said Jesus Gonzalez, manager of water recycling policy at the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. It will take advantage of recycled water produced by a facility in Glendale, but the water will not be added to the drinking water system just yet. However, it will serve as proof of concept, he said.

“This is going to be the future of L.A.’s water, the future of the state’s water supply,” Gonzalez said.

The Headworks project is scheduled to come online soon after the regulations are in place — tentatively within the next five years, Gonzalez said.

Two workers at a water filtration plant.
Trenton Guinta, left, and Bert Mantilla Jr., work at the Water Replenishment District facility in Pico Rivera. (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

But the Headworks project is just one part of the city’s ambitious plan to recycle 100% of its wastewater by 2035 — a pledge Mayor Eric Garcetti made several years ago.

Read the full story here

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

L..A. could soon put recycled water directly in residents’ tap. Please don’t call it ‘toilet to tap’ Read More »