WHO: Clean Ocean Action, Rumson Environmental Commission, Rally for the Two Rivers Alliance partners, local environmental organizations, local businesses
SPONSORS: Sea Bright Solar, Bayshore Family of Companies, Mazza Recycling
WHAT: Rally for the Two Rivers Eco-Fest: an environmental celebration of the Navesink and Shrewsbury Rivers
WHEN: Saturday, June 5, 9am – 12:30pm (Rain date: June 6)
Rumson, NJ – Attendees of this free event will enjoy hands-on educational activities, kids’ crafts, face painting, river seining, learn to row, music, story time, and more.
“We are thrilled that the Eco-Fest can return this year. After a challenging year with the COVID-19 pandemic, we’re sure it’s going to be a much-needed, fun-filled day celebrating our beautiful rivers with something for everyone!” said Alison Jones, Watershed Program Coordinator, Clean Ocean Action.
Children will be able to dive into the fun by getting their Environmental Passport stamped after visiting various activity stations throughout the park. Once an Environmental Passport is complete, it is eligible for kids to redeem for Passport Rewards, which are eco-friendly treats and special discounts from participating local businesses.
Clean Ocean Action and Rumson Environmental Commission will be joined by: American Littoral Society, Bayshore Recycling, Fair Haven Green Team, Garden Club of Fair Haven, Little Silver Environmental Commission, Master Gardeners of Monmouth County, Mazza Recycling, Mission Milkweed, Monmouth County Parks System, Monmouth Museum, Navesink Maritime Heritage Association, New Jersey Audubon Society, NY/NJ Baykeeper, Oceanport Water Watch Committee, RFH Rowing, River Rats Sailing, Rumson-Fair Haven Regional High School, Rumson Department of Public Works, Rumson Garden Club, Rumson Junior Green Team, Rumson Shade Tree Commission, Sea Bright Solar, WATERSPIRIT, and more.
Clean Ocean Action is proud to be the coordinator of “Rally for the Two Rivers,” a coalition of groups dedicated to improving and maintaining water quality in the Navesink and Shrewsbury River watersheds through research, education and policy. Rally for the Two Rivers Alliance partners include: American Littoral Society, Bayshore Anglers Association, Bayshore Regional Watershed Council, Conserve Claypit Creek, Hartshorne Woods Association, Monmouth Boat Club, Monmouth Conservation Foundation, Navesink Business Group, Navesink Maritime Heritage Association and River Rangers, Navesink Shrewsbury River Fishing Club, Navesink River Municipalities Committee, Navesink River Rowing Club, NJ Friends of Clearwater, NY/NJ Baykeeper, Oceanport Water Watch Committee, Oceanic Free Library, Pirates Care, Recreational Fishing Alliance, Red Bank Business Alliance, River Rats, Riverview Medical Center, Rumson Environmental Commission, Rumson Garden Club, Shrewsbury Sailing & Yacht Club, Sierra Club, Shore Group, Surfrider-Jersey Shore Chapter, WATERSPIRIT, and growing.
The following bills had actions yesterday in Trenton:
A5194 – Establishes ranking criteria for certain nonpoint source pollution control grants issued by DEP. 06/03/2021 Passed in Assembly 45-24-2
A1653 – Encourages development of zero-emission vehicle fueling and charging infrastructure in redevelopment projects. 06/03/2021 Substituted for S-2142 (1R) 06/03/2021 Passed in Senate and sent to Governor 33-2
A2070 – Restricts use of neonicotinoid pesticides. 06/03/2021 Amended on Assembly floor, 2nd reading in Assembly (Johnson)
A2152 – Authorizes DCA, DEP, DOT, and municipalities, to provide priority consideration to permit applications for green building projects. 06/03/2021 Amended on Assembly floor, 2nd reading in Assembly (Johnson)
A2360 – Requires electric public utility to charge residential rate for service used by residential customer for electric vehicle charging at charging stations within certain designated parking spaces. 06/03/2021 Passed in Assembly 68-4-0
A2783 – Directs DEP to develop guidelines concerning State and local government purchase of goods made from recycled material. 06/03/2021 Amended on Assembly floor, 2nd reading in Assembly (Johnson)
A3352 – Requires all newly constructed warehouses to be solar-ready buildings. 06/03/2021 Passed in Assembly 47-22-1 06/03/2021 Received in Senate w/o committee reference, 2nd reading in Senate 06/03/2021 Substituted for S-3504 06/03/2021 Passed in Senate and sent to Governor 25-13
A4933 – Requires builders to offer unit concrete products that utilize carbon footprint-reducing technology as an option in new construction; establishes tax incentives, and State and local purchasing requirements, for unit concrete products that utilize carbon foot 06/03/2021 Substituted by S-3091 (3R)
S830 – Requires public water systems to offer drinking water tests to customers in certain circumstances. 06/03/2021 Passed in Senate 38-0
S955 – Authorizes counties to reduce greenhead fly populations; appropriates $50,000. 06/03/2021 Passed in Senate 38-0
S1016– Restricts use of neonicotinoid pesticides. 06/03/2021 Amended on Assembly floor, 2nd reading in Assembly (Johnson)
S2142 – Encourages development of zero-emission vehicle fueling and charging infrastructure in redevelopment projects. 06/03/2021 Substituted by A-1653 (1R)
S3091 – Requires builders to offer unit concrete products that utilize carbon footprint-reducing technology as an option in new construction; establishes tax incentives, and State and local purchasing requirements, for unit concrete products that utilize carbon foot 06/03/2021 Substituted for A-4933 (2R) 06/03/2021 Passed in Assembly and sent to Governor 57-13-1
S3618 – Makes supplemental appropriation of $10 million for grants for certain lake management activities for recreation and conservation purposes. 06/03/2021 Passed in Senate 36-0
SR102 – Urges U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list the monarch butterfly as threatened species. 06/03/2021 Passed nad filed by voice vote
In addition to comprehensive coverage of energy and environment news, Monday through Thursday, subscribers to our daily EnviroPolitics newsletter receive a Weekend Legislative Edition that tracks similar legislation from introduction to enactment in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. If you’re not already a subscriber, try a free, no-obligation, 30-day trial.
South eastern Africa is the heart of the Verreaux’s eagle range
South Africa’s Verreaux’s eagles have a problem. The very landscapes they favour, where the air currents along vast ridges carry them as they soar, are prime locations for wind farm developers – who want to make use of exactly the same resource.
“At least 24 carcasses have been picked up under wind turbines,” says Dr Megan Murgatroyd, from Hawkwatch International. “For this species in particular, it seems to be quite a conflict.”
Sometimes the birds die when they collide with the swiftly spinning blades of the turbines, which are difficult for them to see. Or, they get electrocuted by power lines at the wind farms.
Around the world, wind energy on and offshore is gathering momentum. In May, the International Energy Agency announced that the amount of wind energy capacity added worldwide in 2020, 114 GW, was nearly double the additions made in 2019.
But many worry that not enough is being done to prevent the deaths of thousands of animals, even though the rise of renewables is generally seen as good news in the fight against climate change.
That was underlined just days ago when a bearded vulture, released into the wild last year in southern France, was killed by a wind turbine after it ranged north into the Netherlands.
To help Dr Murgatroyd and her colleagues have come up with a commercial tool that tells developers where Verreaux’s eagles are most likely to fly within a given area so that the firms can position their wind turbines away from those places.
It’s based on tracking data she collected after fitting GPS devices to more than a dozen eagles. The tool also needs to consider where eagle nests are located, so surveys to plot these must be carried out in and around any land earmarked for new wind turbines.
We’re always looking for information that might benefit our readers. If you come across something that cries out to be shared, please send it to editor@enviropolitics.com If we agree, you’ll see it here soon.
To try and validate the tool’s recommendations, Dr Murgatroyd has used it to analyse the locations of wind turbines that were built before the technology was available. This revealed that many eagle fatalities associated with those turbines occurred in places that the model would correctly have labelled as high risk.
“If the model had been used, up to 79% of [those deaths] could have been avoided,” she says.
An eagle’s flight track
Not all wind farm developers in South Africa are using the software but she hopes that those who do will end up recording fewer bird deaths on their properties. She also plans to expand the technology so it can evaluate the risks facing other bird species, including the critically endangered black harrier.
Estimates of how many bird or bat deaths are caused by wind turbines each year vary, though they are certainly in the many thousands, if not more.
However, among those who think we shouldn’t dismiss the impact of spinning blades is Dr Christian Voigt at the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research in Berlin.
He occasionally visits wind farms to see if dead bats are present on the ground.
“I actually find carcasses quite often,” he says. “That tells me something’s going wrong here.”
Dr Voigt and his colleagues have studied the effectiveness of existing technologies used to monitor the presence of bats on wind farms. This is usually done by placing a single, downward-facing microphone at the central point where a turbine’s blades meet.
i
Dr Christian Voigt says he finds bat carcasses “quite often” at wind farms
In Germany, surveys that detect bats in this way are used to establish the weather conditions associated with bat activity around newly built turbines. That way, the turbines can be halted – curtailed – when those same conditions arise in the future, to protect any bats that might come by.
Yet this approach could be fundamentally flawed, says Dr Voigt. It turns out that the individual microphone, which picks up bats’ ultrasonic calls, can’t detect the creatures as comprehensively as hoped. Some bats have particularly quiet, high frequency calls that don’t travel very far.
Dr Voigt estimates that, on average, each wind turbine kills about 10 bats every year.
“There is a clash between protecting biodiversity and protecting the climate,” he says.
If you liked this post you’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics.It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.
Per the fiscal year 2022 budget proposed on Friday, SWIFR will “build innovation in the recycling industry” and focus on “improving solid waste management infrastructure and post-consumer materials management,” with climate change mitigation described as a “cornerstone” of the program.
Separately, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) also announced last week up to $14.5 million in research and development funding for “projects to develop economically viable solutions for converting plastic films to more valuable materials and design new plastics that are more recyclable and biodegradable.”
Heading into 2021, a wide range of stakeholders in the recycling and plastics sectors were cautiously optimistic about the Biden administration paying greater attention to related issues. While the Trump administration received credit for convening a range of public and private sector leaders to discuss recycling via the EPA, it was also criticized for repeatedly attempting to cut that agency’s budget.
As is the case with presidential budget proposals, the final details can often change considerably through the Congressional appropriations process.
Biden’s proposed budget for EPA includes a number of relevant items around Superfund sites, PFAS and environmental justice. This includes a potential new assistant administrator focused on environmental justice.
The administration is proposing $1.22 million in additional funding for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act programs compared to enacted levels for the current fiscal year. This includes an increase for waste minimization and recycling work, which the previous administration singled out for significant cuts. EPA budget documents indicate the agency’s longstanding work on sustainable materials management and food waste will continue, including implementation of a national recycling strategy and possible “additional actions needed to support a circular economy.”
If you liked this post you’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics.It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.
As the world’s oil and gas giants face increasing pressure to reduce their fossil fuel emissions, small, privately held drilling companies are becoming the country’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases, often by buying up the industry’s high-polluting assets.
According to a new analysis of the latest emissions data disclosed to the Environmental Protection Agency, five of the industry’s top ten emitters of methane, a particularly potent planet-warming gas, are little-known oil and gas producers, some backed by obscure investment firms, whose environmental footprints are wildly large relative to their production.
In some cases, the companies are buying up high-polluting assets directly from the largest oil and gas corporations, like ConocoPhillips and BP; in other cases, private equity firms acquire risky oil and gas properties, develop them, and sell them quickly for maximum profits.
The largest emitter, Hilcorp Energy, reported almost 50 percent more methane emissions from its operations than the nation’s largest fossil fuel producer, Exxon Mobil, despite pumping far less oil and gas. Four other relatively unknown companies — Terra Energy Partners, Flywheel Energy, Blackbeard Operating and Scout Energy — each reported emitting more of the gas than many industry heavyweights.
These companies have largely escaped public scrutiny, even as they have become major polluters.
“It’s amazing how the small operators manage to constitute a very large part of the problem,” said Andrew Logan, senior director of oil and gas at Ceres, a nonprofit investor network that commissioned the study together with the Clean Air Task Force, an environmental group. “There’s just no pressure on them to do things better. And being a clean operator, unfortunately, isn’t a priority in this business model.”
Nick Piatek, a spokesman for Hilcorp, said the company “spends substantial capital retrofitting and refurbishing aging equipment” at its newly-acquired sites and that its investments would eventually bring down emissions while extending the life of those assets. “We inherit those emissions,” he said.
A BP pipeline and workers in the Prudhoe Bay oil field in 2006. Last year, Hilcorp Energy bought BP’s oil and gas business in Alaska.Credit…Al Grillo/Associated Press
The analysis, carried out by the energy consultancy M.J. Bradley & Associates using data that companies are required to submit to the E.P.A. Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, highlights the climate consequences of methane.
The main component of natural gas, methane can warm the planet more than 80 times as much as the same amount of carbon dioxide over a 20-year period if it escapes into the atmosphere before being burned. A recent United Nations report singled out the oil and gas industry as holding the greatest potential to cut its emissions from methane, and the Biden administration is in the process of reinstating methane regulations relaxed by President Donald J. Trump.
If you liked this post you’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics.It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.