How Dubai plans to grow food in a desert

Dubai, a desert city, needs to import nearly all its food

Getty Images


By Zainab Fattah, Bloomberg Green

Dubai will build a new business park to host specialized agricultural firms as the Middle East’s business hub pushes for food security.

The first phase of the project, dubbed “Food Tech Valley,” will include headquarters, research and development facilities, innovation center, smart food logistics hub and areas for vertical farming, according to a tweet by Dubai’s ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid.

UAE to Grow More Food in the Desert as Pandemic Disrupts Imports

Dubai, a desert city that needs to import nearly all its food, has been seeking to secure food supplies along with other sheikdoms in the United Arab Emirates federation. A global surge in food prices and the disruption to supply chains caused by the pandemic pushed the country to accelerate plans to grow more crops and farm more livestock. The oil-rich UAE currently imports about 90% of its food needs.

“The UAE’s food trade exceeds 100 billion ($27 billion) annually,” Dubai’s ruler, who’s also prime minister of the UAE, said in the tweet. “Our country is a global food logistics hub, and we will work to create a nurturing environment for agribusinesses to develop new farming technologies and enhance our future food security.”

Don’t miss environmental news stories like this Click for Blog updates

How Dubai plans to grow food in a desert Read More »

Start your new week–and month–off right

With a free copy EnviroPolitics

How do the top regional attorneys, consultants, businesses, and trade associations stay on top of crucial environment and energy news and trends in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, and Delaware?

They start their day with a nourishing issue of EnviroPolitics.

Click for your free copy of today’s edition.

Can you imagine how valuable it would be for your business, career, or organization to access the fresh, targeted information that EnviroPolitics, provides? 

Now you can–free for an entire month.

Get your free, 30-day, no-obligation subscription here.

Questions?  Email us at: Editor@EnviroPolitics.com or call 215-295-9339

Start your new week–and month–off right Read More »

This carbon-pricing bill could be the nation’s most far-reaching

Container trucks that run on diesel fuel line up at the Port of Seattle, which seeks to reach net zero emissions by 2050. Under cap-and-invest legislation, Washington refiners of this fuel will have to steadily reduce their carbon emissions, and almost eliminate them by 2050. ( Elaine Thompson / The Associated Press, 2015)
Container trucks that run on diesel fuel line up at the Port of Seattle, which seeks to reach net zero emissions… ( Elaine Thompson / The Associated Press, 2015)


By Hal Bernton, Seattle Times staff reporter

Washington state’s recently passed carbon-pricing legislation appears to be the nation’s most far-reaching state-level attempt to clamp down on greenhouse gas emissions.

It’s also likely to turn the state into a global testing ground for policy to combat climate change.

State Senate Bill 5126, headed to Gov. Jay Inslee’s desk for signing, is designed to help drive down pollution from 2018 levels of about 100 million metric tons to net zero emissions by 2050. That would require huge reductions in the use of fossil fuels in industries, as well as a near phaseout of gasoline and diesel fuel for cars and trucks. Much of the natural gas now used to heat many buildings would likely have to go.

The legislation is the culmination of a yearslong struggle by climate activists who often were not in agreement on how to proceed. The coalition that helped pass it eventually included not only many environmental groups but also powerful corporate players such as Puget Sound Energy and Microsoft, as well as BP, the state’s largest oil refiner, and some tribal governments.

Democrats used their majority control of the Legislature to pass the measure during an intense and historic finale to the 2021 session. Republicans, noting that Washington due to hydropower already has a relatively low-carbon profile, have fought a long-running battle to try to forestall what they view as laws that will unnecessarily push up the cost of energy for Washingtonians.

Rep. J.T. Wilcox, the Republican House minority leader from Yelm, calls it a “regressive tax and crushing blow to working families.”

Related:
Carbon Tax vs. Cap-and-Trade: What’s a Better Policy to Cut Emissions?

The legislation, dubbed “cap and invest” by Democrats and “cap and tax” by Republicans, would require the state’s 100 largest emitters, including refiners, gas utilities and Boeing, to reduce pollution. Some of the emitters would have to pay for the right to release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

The bill is forecast to raise at least $460 million in the fiscal year that starts July 1, 2023, and at least $580 million annually by 2040. The money would be invested in a broad range of activities that include restoration of marine and freshwaters, forest health, renewable energy, and public transportation. A portion of the money is set aside to assist workers and low-income people transition to a clean-energy economy, and some could be used to help fund the state’s working families’ tax rebate.

Read the full story

Don’t miss environmental news stories like this Click for Blog updates

This carbon-pricing bill could be the nation’s most far-reaching Read More »

In England, the sale of coal and wet wood is restricted

Curbs on the sale of house coal and wet wood for household burning in England have come into force under new rules aimed at cutting air pollution.

A log being put into a wood burning stove


By Justin Rowlatt
, Chief environment correspondent, BBC News

People will still be able to use stoves and open fires but they will need to burn cleaner alternatives.

These are the first restrictions on what people can burn in their homes since the clean air acts of the 1950s.

The UK’s air is far cleaner now, but in recent years pollution from log burners has increased dramatically.

Only 8% of households use them, but they are now the biggest source of the tiny pollution particles that are most damaging to health, according to government data.

It shows domestic wood burning in both closed stoves and open fires was responsible for 38% of pollution particles under 2.5 microns in size, three times more than road traffic.

These tiny particles can enter the bloodstream and lodge in lungs and other organs, the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) warns, and have been identified by the World Health Organization as the most serious air pollutant for human health.

What is wet wood? Read the full story

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

In England, the sale of coal and wet wood is restricted Read More »