N.J. coronavirus outbreak hits 6,876 cases with 81 deaths. Another 2,492 positive tests in huge single-day increase.

By Matt Arco | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

New Jersey’s total known cases of the coronavirus increased to at least 6,876 with 81 deaths as officials announced another 2,492 new positive test results Thursday, by far the largest single-day increase since the outbreak.

“Sadly the number of lost lives is going up,” Gov. Phil Murphy said at the Trenton War Memorial during the latest press briefing. “That’s partly due to some community spread.”

Murphy announced 19 new deaths from coronavirus. The details were not immediately available. New Jersey ranks second in the nation for coronavirus cases after New York.

Of the 2,492 new cases reported Thursday, Murphy said 436 came directly from the two state-run mass testing sites at Bergen Community College and the PNC Bank Arts Center in Monmouth County

LOCATIONCASESDEATHS
New Jersey6,87681
New York State37,258385
New York City20,000280
Pennsylvania1,12711
Philadelphia3421
United States69,2461,046
Worldwide492,60022,184

Note: Data includes confirmed and presumptive positive cases of COVID-19 reported by the CDC, state health officials and other health agencies since Jan. 21. Updated: March 26 at 2:05 p.m..Table: Len Melisurgo  Source: Johns Hopkins Univ., Gov. Cuomo, NBC4, State Health Departments in NJ, NY, PAGet the data

The figures come a day after state Health Commissioner Judith Persichilli said hospitals in Bergen, Essex and Hudson counties were already feeling the strain of cases and the state continues to work on models predicting when the peak will occur. She said the coronavirus peak in those hard-hit New Jersey counties could be three weeks away.

“We’ve asked the hospitals and the health care providers in those counties to just be aware,” Persichilli said on Wednesday.

Don’t miss stories like this Click for free updates

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, meanwhile, has said he expects the peak of his state’s cases to be the next 14 to 21 days. Persichilli said northern New Jersey counties are slightly behind but following that trend.

“There’s a good a possibility that they’re going to see a peak after that — probably 21 too, it could be 60 days even,” Persichilli said Wednesday. “Our exponential growth rate based on the number of positive cases reported daily is similar in northern New Jersey.”

New Jersey officials have not released the number of residents who have recovered from the COVID-19, the illness caused by the virus. It’s also possible many people who haven’t been tested are infected.

In an effort to slow the spread of coronavirus, Murphy has closed all schools in the state, ordered people to stay at home except for necessary travel, banned social gatherings, and ordered non-essential retail businesses to close until further notice. Officials have promised to prosecute those who violate the orders.

Though some commentators are pushing to restart the U.S. economy, Murphy has vowed to keep New Jersey’s restrictions in place here until science shows it’s safe.

“If we go too early, I’m fearful we will throw gasoline on the fire, and we’ll have a much bigger challenge on our hands,” he said Thursday morning during an appearance on MSNBC.

Murphy has also announced a way for workers to report companies where people who are able to do their jobs from home were told by their employers to report to the office. The governor said New Jersey employers should not be forcing their workers to go to offices if those people are able to do their jobs remotely, per his executive order.

Not receiving our free updates?

As of Thursday morning, the virus has infected more than 487,000 people and killed more than 22,000 people across the globe, according to a running tally by Johns Hopkins University. Of those cases, more than 117,00 people have recovered.

Matt Arco may be reached at marco@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @MatthewArco or Facebook.

EnviroPolitics Blog is working to keep you informed about all aspects of the coronavirus — the status of confirmed cases, disease spread, death toll–and also how Americans are coping. Like this story, for instance. If you like what we are doing, Click to receive free EP Blog updates and please tell your friends.


N.J. coronavirus outbreak hits 6,876 cases with 81 deaths. Another 2,492 positive tests in huge single-day increase. Read More »

Hotels in Pa volunteer to make room for patients as state braces for possible coronavirus surge

WALLACE MCKELVEY PennLive | The Patriot-News 
MAR 26, 2020 9:30 AM

This story was produced as part of a joint effort among Spotlight PALNP Media GroupPennLivePA Post, and WITF to cover how Pennsylvania state government is responding to the coronavirus. Sign up for Spotlight PA’s newsletter.

HARRISBURG — With the number of COVID-19 cases in Pennsylvania projected to rise sharply in the coming weeks, state officials are looking at all possible solutions to an expected shortage of hospital beds, including making use of hotels and convention centers.

Medical facilities statewide reported about 3,400 intensive care beds at last count. But a recent Harvard Global Health Institute study found the state would need from 2.5 to 7 times that number depending on how effective social distancing efforts are in avoiding a spike in patients.

“There’s a substantial likelihood we are going to see a surge that might reflect the worst-case scenario,” said Jeremy Kahn, a professor of critical care medicine and health policy at the University of Pittsburgh. “I’d be hard-pressed to think of anything as too extreme.”

State officials have repeatedly declined to detail exactly what their planning entails, but they are likely to follow the example of other states that have taken significant steps.

In New York, now the epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak in the United States, officials are transforming the massive Jacob Javits Center to accommodate nearly 2,000 hospital beds. Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland, which has reported less than half of Pennsylvania’s number of confirmed cases, announced plans Monday to convert the Baltimore Convention Center and a nearby Hilton Hotel into field hospitals to add an additional 900 beds.

Dr. Kahn, a practicing doctor in the intensive care unit at UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital in Pittsburgh, said transforming these kinds of spaces into field hospitals is challenging.

Like this? Click to receive free EP Blog updates

Even rudimentary hospital rooms are usually equipped with oxygen, suction, lighting, and telemonitoring equipment to track a patient’s blood pressure and heart rate. All of that requires a stable electricity supply that may be difficult to add to a building not designed for it.

“Frankly, I’m a little skeptical this is the most efficient solution to meet the demand for this influx of patients,” he said.

The more likely solution, Dr. Kahn said, is that these makeshift hospitals would be used to care for less severe cases or those who are recovering and no longer need intensive care.

When asked about the possible bed shortage Wednesday, Pennsylvania Health Secretary Rachel Levine said, “We might use hotels or other spaces to have people convalesce with limited medical care that they might need.”

The best course the state could take, Dr. Kahn said, would be to move less severe cases to another facility before putting critically ill patients “in an ad-hoc ICU at a dorm or hotel.”

This would, in essence, require authorities to shift patients “downstream.” As patients with COVID-19 begin flooding the ICU, he said, less severe patients could be moved to other wards in the same hospital, while patients from those wards could move to skilled nursing homes and the patients from those nursing homes could move into the new makeshift hospitals in places like college dormitories, convention centers, and hotels.

Click to subscribe

John Longstreet, president of the Pennsylvania Restaurant and Lodging Association, said a number of hotels have volunteered their facilities through the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency’s sheltering task force. The coronavirus rendered most of them vacant, he said.

“It’s much more like a war setting than anything I’ve ever experienced,” said Mr. Longstreet, who’s been in the hotel business for five decades. “But I want to clarify: The hotels are not being commandeered. They’re willingly entering into relationships to help.”

PEMA spokesperson Ruth Miller said there are no plans to force hotels to serve as hospital space, noting “there are private sector partners that are volunteering space and resources.” As of Wednesday, the agency didn’t yet have details on how it would pay for such a move.

Lt. Gen. Todd Semonite, commanding general of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, announced a $1 million plan, funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, to convert some 10,000 rooms in hotels and college dormitories into hospital space to treat COVID-19 patients in New York City. The agency was looking at similar operations in California, New Jersey, and Washington state.

Lt. Gen. Semonite said such facilities would have to be sanitized and retrofitted in order to keep individual patients in isolation, according to a report by McClatchy. COVID-19 patients would also have to be separated from other ICU patients.

That involves using a hotel room’s air conditioning unit to create a “negative pressure room,” Lt. Gen. Semonite said, creating a vacuum that isolates that patient’s space from the rest of the facility.

The last step, he said, is “a big piece of plastic with a zipper on it” over the door. (Think the isolation units in Hollywood films like E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial or Outbreak.)

Just a few weeks ago, Heidi Howard coordinated events and meetings for the lodging association in Pennsylvania. That work evaporated with the spread of the coronavirus, and instead the trade group was asked by the Wolf administration to help with emergency preparations.

Ms. Howard’s job now includes passing along information about hotels willing to serve as field hospitals.

Read the full story

EnviroPolitics Blog is working to keep you informed about all aspects of the coronavirus — the status of confirmed cases, disease spread, death toll–and also how Americans are coping. Like this story, for instance. If you like what we are doing, Click to receive free EP Blog updates and please tell your friends.

Hotels in Pa volunteer to make room for patients as state braces for possible coronavirus surge Read More »

Former DEP commissioner Bob Martin joins Chris Christie’s lobbying firm

By Gabrielle Saulsbery, NJBIZ
March 26, 2020 9:00 am

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Bob-Martin-at-NJDEP.jpg
Bob Martin at NJDEP

Former New Jersey Commissioner of Environmental Protection Bob Martin has joined former Gov. Chris Christie’s lobbying firm, Christie 55 Solutions LLC, as managing partner.

“Bob brings a wealth of business, consulting and public policy experience to our firm. He has deep utility and energy knowledge and unparalleled environmental and regulatory expertise,” Christie said in a statement. “Bob is an important addition to the firm and will bring additional value to our clients.”

Former NJ Gov. Chris Christie

As commissioner of environmental protection from 2010 to 2018, Martin managed a multi-million dollar annual state budget and implemented DEP’s mission to protect New Jersey’s air, water, land, and natural and historic resources. His knowledge spans state and federal environmental and land use laws and regulations, and he has worked with numerous federal agencies and departments.

Prior to his position at the DEP, Martin was a partner at Accenture LLP  for more than 25 years. With extensive experience in all aspects of business and management consulting, he advised senior executives in a variety of industries.

His experience also includes business strategy and planning, business transformation and operations reengineering, IT strategy, systems implementation and change management.

Martin is the second Christie administration connection to join the firm since January, after Rich Bagger, Christie’s former chief of staff and a former global biopharmaceutical executive, joined in January.

Gabrielle Saulsbery, Albany native Gabrielle Saulsbery is a staff writer for NJBIZ and the newest thing in New Jersey. You can contact her at gsaulsbery@njbiz.com.

Don’t miss stories like this Click for free EP updates

Former DEP commissioner Bob Martin joins Chris Christie’s lobbying firm Read More »

NJ lawmaker wants gun stores reopened

The coronavirus has sent gun sales soaring

MICHELLE BRUNETTI POST, Atlantic City Press

State Sen. Michael Testa, R-Cape May, Cumberland, Atlantic, wants gun stores added to the list of essential retail businesses that are allowed to remain open during the COVID-19 crisis, citing self-protection as police officers become ill.

“People have a constitutional right to bear arms and to defend themselves and their families during these uncertain times,” Testa said in a news release Wednesday. “Gun stores should never have been closed in the first place.”

Gov. Phil Murphy adjusted the list of businesses that could stay open Tuesday, adding bike repair shops, mobile phone stores and garden centers as essential businesses like food stores and pharmacies.

People wait in a line to enter a gun store in Culver City, Calif., Sunday, March 15, 2020. Coronavirus concerns have led to consumer panic buying of grocery staples and now gun stores are seeing a similar run on weapons and ammunition as panic intensifies.
(AP Photo/Ringo H.W. Chiu)

“Now that more police departments are reporting officers sick with the coronavirus, it’s increasingly clear that understaffed law enforcement agencies may not have the ability to respond immediately when a family needs help,” Testa said. “Gov. Murphy can help protect New Jerseyans by opening gun stores and allowing citizens to protect themselves if needed.”

Pennsylvania has allowed gun stores to reopen, Testa said.

“It’s crazy that the governor thinks liquor stores are essential, but stores that enhance personal safety are not,” he said.

Testa also called on Murphy to restore the full functionality of the New Jersey National Instant Criminal Background System website to allow New Jersey firearms dealers to submit new requests to the system. The New Jersey State Police NICS Unit directed the vendor that operates the system to turn off the NICS Online Services for submitting NICS transactions Saturday.

Reopening the system “would also address the needs of customers who had transactions in the pipeline prior to the coronavirus crisis who have been stuck in limbo due to the governor’s executive orders,” Testa said

Related news stories:
How coronavirus has sent gun and ammo sales through the roof (CNN)
Are Guns ‘Essential’ in the Virus Era? Americans Stock Up as States Differ (New York Times)

What do YOU think? Click on the ‘comment’ line under the headline above and share your thoughts on reopening gun shops.

NJ lawmaker wants gun stores reopened Read More »

See how coronavirus pandemic is spreading in NJ

By Nick Devlin  and Disha Raychaudhuri for NJ.com

The total number of coronavirus cases in New Jersey stands at 4,402 as of Wednesday with the death toll now at 62.

Among the 18 new deaths linked to coronavirus were four in Ocean County, three in Essex, two in Monmouth, and one in each of Bergen, Burlington, Cumberland, Hudson, Middlesex, Morris, Passaic, Somerset, and Union counties. They included seven women and 11 men and ranged in age from 52 to 93.

Gov. Phil Murphy said more cases are expected and the state continues to work toward expanding hospital capacity for what he called an oncoming “surge.”

“We have known that we will need to increase hospital capacity,” Murphy said during his daily briefing. “We are in this fight to save lives.”

For the first time since the outbreak began, the number of cases without a known location exceeds the number of cases in any one county. The unknowns jumped to 933 on Wednesday, over 100 more than the county with the most cases, Bergen (819).

The spread of the virus is forcing accommodations to be made in every corner of life in N.J. In Woodbridge, all 79 residents of a nursing home were moved to a new facility on Wednesday. Few “essential” stores remain open, and while the ones that do are doing brisk business, they face the strain of asking employees to potentially risk their health to come in. Meanwhile in South Jersey, Ocean City became the latest popular beach destination to announce that it would be closing up shop.

Tell us your coronavirus stories, whether it’s a news tip, a topic you want us to cover, or a personal story you want to share.

Nick Devlin and Disha Raychaudhuri are reporters on the data & investigations team.

EnviroPolitics Blog is working to keep you informed about all aspects of the coronavirus — the status of confirmed cases, disease spread, death toll–and also how Americans are coping. Like this story, for instance. If you like what we are doing, Click to receive free EP Blog updates and please tell your friends.

See how coronavirus pandemic is spreading in NJ Read More »

EPA Announces Plan to Reduce TSCA Fees

From EPA Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

WASHINGTON (MARCH 25, 2020) — Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing its plan to consider a proposed rule that would look at potential exemptions to the TSCA Fees Rule in response to stakeholder concerns about implementation challenges. By considering a proposal to narrow the broad scope of the current requirements, the agency could significantly reduce burden on potentially thousands of businesses across the country while maintaining the ability to successfully implement the Lautenberg Act amendments to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to protect human health and the environment.

“Stakeholders are important partners in the work we do to ensure the safety of chemicals and seeking feedback from the public is a standard and valuable part of all our processes,” said EPA Assistant Administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Alexandra Dapolito Dunn. “After reviewing their input and concerns regarding the TSCA Fees Rule, we are taking action to continue evaluating potential risks from chemicals while ensuring our requirements are practical and realistic.”

The agency plans to initiate a new rulemaking process to consider proposing exemptions to the current rule’s self-identification requirements associated with EPA-initiated risk evaluations for manufacturers that:

  • Import the chemical substance in an article;
  • Produce the chemical substance as a byproduct; and
  • Produce or import the chemical substance as an impurity.

The agency may also consider proposing other changes to the rule during this process consistent with TSCA’s requirement to reevaluate the Fees Rule every three years.

EPA believes that considering exempting certain entities from self-identification requirements will not impede the ability to fully collect the necessary fees and will still allow the agency to achieve the ultimate objective of the TSCA Fees Rule and the statute – to defray a portion of EPA’s TSCA implementation costs. EPA intends to issue proposed amendments to the current fees rule later this year and with the goal of finalizing the amendments in 2021.

Additionally, in light of the extremely unusual circumstances of this situation and the undue hardship imposed on certain businesses who would be required to collect and report information under the TSCA Fees Rule, EPA issued a “no action assurance” for the three categories of manufacturers at this time. More specifically, EPA will exercise its enforcement discretion regarding the self-identification requirement for the three categories of manufacturers that the agency intends to propose an exemption from certain requirements in the TSCA Fee Rule.

For businesses that are erroneously on the preliminary lists of fee payers or fall into one of the three categories discussed above, see the agency’s FAQs for more information about how to certify as such to EPA and to avoid fee obligations. More information on today’s announcement, as well as a copy of the no-action assurance, can be found at https://www.epa.gov/tsca-fees/information-plan-reduce-tsca-fees-burden-and-no-action-assurance.

Background

In January, the agency published preliminary lists of businesses that manufacture (including import) the 20 chemicals designated as high-priority substances for risk evaluation in December of 2019 in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0677. 

Following the release of these lists, many stakeholders raised questions and concerns about the scope of the TSCA Fees Rule requirements for self-identifying and paying fees. Importers of articles have noted challenges in knowing with certainty whether high-priority substances are present in their imported articles and components. Manufacturers of chemicals as byproducts or impurities have noted similar challenges in knowing whether they are subject to the rule, given the coincidental or unintentional nature of these types of production.

The lack of exemptions in the current rule makes both the tracking of information and the obligation to self-identify very difficult, if not impossible for some stakeholders.

Earlier this month, the agency extended the comment period by 60 days for the preliminary lists of manufacturers (including importers) subject to fees associated with EPA-initiated risk evaluations under TSCA. As the agency continues to work through implementation issues associated with the current rule, stakeholders can expect more guidance on reporting requirements and expectations during this period.

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

EPA Announces Plan to Reduce TSCA Fees Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights