J. Seward Johnson Jr., Sculptor of the Hyper-Real, Dies at 89

His works often caught passers-by unawares. One was so lifelike that, after 9/11, firefighters are said to have tried to rescue it.

J. Seward Johnson Jr.’s sculpture “Double Check” survived the destruction of the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. His lifelike creations were often displayed in public settings.
J. Seward Johnson Jr.’s sculpture “Double Check” survived the destruction of the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. His lifelike creations were often displayed in public settings.
Credit…Susan Meiseles/Magnum Photos

By Neil Genzlinger of the New York Times

J. Seward Johnson Jr., a sculptor who may be responsible for more double takes than anyone in history thanks to his countless lifelike creations in public places — a businessman in downtown Manhattan, surfers at a Florida beach, a student eating a sandwich on a curb in Princeton, N.J. — died on Tuesday at his home in Key West, Fla. He was 89.

His family said through a spokesman that the cause was cancer.

Mr. Johnson had another distinction besides his art. As a member of the family that founded Johnson & Johnson, the pharmaceutical and consumer products giant, he was one of six siblings who, in a high-profile court case in the 1980s, sought to overturn his father’s will, which left his vast fortune to a former maid, Barbara Piasecka Johnson, whom the senior Mr. Johnson had married late in life. A settlement was reached just before the case went to the jury, giving the children a share of the estate but leaving most of it to Mrs. Johnson.

But more enduring were the sculptures, which often caught passers-by unawares; many would pause for a closer look and, in the cellphone age, a picture. One sculpture in particular became something more than a curiosity. It was a work Mr. Johnson called “Double Check”: a seated businessman reviewing the contents of his briefcase.

The sculpture was in Liberty Park near the World Trade Center when the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, left the area in ruins. Many other artworks in the buildings and outside were destroyed that day, but the man with the briefcase, though knocked off his perch, survived, covered in debris.

The sculpture is so lifelike that firefighters are said to have tried to rescue it. It became a makeshift memorial — a symbol of endurance to some, a reminder of the bodies never recovered to others. In 2006 it was installed in the newly named Zuccotti Park, not far from its original spot.

“I thought of him as a businessman Everyman — with his briefcase — getting ready for his next appointment, and people identified with him,” Mr. Johnson told The New York Times in 2005. “So when he survived, it was as if he was one of them — surviving as well.”

Mr. Johnson at work on his first sculpture, “Stainless Girl.” It won a contest sponsored by U.S. Steel.
Mr. Johnson at work on his first sculpture, “Stainless Girl.” It won a contest sponsored by U.S. Steel.Credit…The Seward Johnson Atelier, Inc.

John Seward Johnson Jr. was born on April 16, 1930, in New Brunswick, N.J. His father was the son of one of the founders of Johnson & Johnson. His mother, Ruth Dill Johnson, was a native of Bermuda whose father had been Bermuda’s attorney general.

Mr. Johnson, by his own admission a poor student, was sent to the Forman School in Litchfield, Conn.

“It was a place for dyslexics,” he told The Times in 2002, “although we weren’t called that then.”

He tried college at the University of Maine, where he studied poultry husbandry. (“It was the only thing they’d let me into,” he said.) Then, in 1951, he joined the Navy.

After leaving the Navy in 1955 he took a management job in the family company, but a troubled first marriage, to Barbara Kline, proved distracting. He is said to have hired private detectives to raid his own house in the middle of the night hoping to catch her in an indiscretion; she was alone, thought the detectives were intruders and shot one of them, injuring him.

Soon after their divorce in 1964, Mr. Johnson married Cecelia Joyce Horton, who got him interested in art. Sometimes they would paint together, although he wasn’t very good at it.

“I didn’t like what I could do with paint,” he told The Times, “so my wife suggested sculpture because I had some mechanical ability.”

He took some classes and made his first piece, in stainless steel. It won a contest sponsored by U.S. Steel.

One of Mr. Seward’s many lifelike sculptures, “Gotcha” (1993).
One of Mr. Seward’s many lifelike sculptures, “Gotcha” (1993).Credit…Carl Deal III

“I thought, oh gee, this is great, maybe sculpture isn’t so bad after all,” Mr. Johnson told the newspaper U.S. 1 in 2002. “I never won anything after that.”

Read the full story

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates 

J. Seward Johnson Jr., Sculptor of the Hyper-Real, Dies at 89 Read More »

Washington legislature passes bills on single-use bags and PCR requirements

Washington State Capitol – Jenny Lee Silver photo

E.A. Crunden@eacrunden reports for WasteDive

UPDATE: March 11, 2020: A bill banning single-use plastic bags (SB 5323) has been sent to Gov. Jay Inslee for final approval. If he signs it, which is considered likely, Washington will become the ninth state with some form of bag policy. Another bill setting post-consumer recycled content standards (HB 2722) has also passed both chambers of the state legislature, following final amendments, and is also off to Inslee for consideration. 

Dive Brief:

  • Washington state is considering establishing minimum post-consumer recycled content (PCR) standards for plastic beverage containers (HB 2722), banning single-use plastic bags that do not meet minimum content standards (SB 5323), and banning expanded polystyrene products (SB 6213).
  • The first bill has passed the state House and the latter two have passed the state Senate, with further committee hearings scheduled this week. But it is unclear how each might ultimately fare. A prior version of the bag ban, for example, passed the Senate last year before stalling in the House. 
  • Groups like Zero Waste Washington are supportive of these bills and other waste-centric legislation. Heather Trim, the organization’s executive director, told Waste Dive the uptick reflects a growing national trend. “I think there’s going to be a lot of plastics-related legislation across the United States because there’s so much public interest,” she said.

Read the full story

Washington legislature passes bills on single-use bags and PCR requirements Read More »

New Jersey organics bill awaits governor’s signature as opponents still angle for landfill exemption

New Jersey could become the ninth site with a food waste diversion policy. Yet a multi-year debate over whether landfills with gas capture should count as organics recycling may continue.

Starr from Gilbert

Cole Rosengren reports for WasteDive

What actually counts as food waste recycling, and who controls the infrastructure behind it, remains a topic of intense debate in New Jersey even after a potentially decisive vote last week.

The New Jersey Senate passed the latest version of a long-fought organics diversion bill (A2371) on Thursday. If signed by Gov. Phil Murphy, it would require establishments generating one ton or more of food waste per week to arrange for separate recycling if an authorized processing facility is within 25 road miles. Additionally, the bill would designate food waste recycling facilities as “Class I renewable energy” and establish a Food Waste Recycling Market Development Council. It would also direct state agencies to use compost and soil products in transportation projects when feasible.

Murphy’s office told Waste Dive it does not comment on pending legislation. The bill’s proponents are optimistic because the language aligns with the conditional veto of a prior version, in which Murphy said landfills with gas-to-energy systems (LGTE) and incinerators should not be counted as authorized organics recycling options. LGTE backers still believe they have a path forward even if the bill is signed.

While a discussion over LGTE versus anaerobic digestion or composting has been playing out in the broader waste industry for years, it has been especially relevant in New Jersey where many counties own and operate disposal sites. All of this has made for one of the more unique and contentious state organics policy debates in the country.

If enacted, A2371’s requirements would take effect within 18 months. New Jersey would join California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont in having some form of organics recycling policy.

Years in the making

Following multiple stalled attempts in recent years, the New Jersey legislature passed a version of this bill for the first time last spring only to see it vetoed by Murphy over the exemption issues. A new bill without the exemptions advanced in December, but failed to pass before the previous legislative session ended in January.

Sen. Bob Smith vowed to bring the bill back and he maneuvered it to the Senate floor without going through a committee vote after it passed the Assembly in February. Sen. Paul Sarlo, chair of the budget committee that was skipped over, called it a “very, very silly bill and not practical” before unsuccessfully attempting to pass a floor amendment reinstating the LGTE exemption.

“Change is hard,” said Smith from the floor, pushing back on critiques from Sarlo and others. “We have to do everything we possibly can to turn around the global climate change that’s rushing at us now.”

One concern that came up during the debate was where new facilities might be sited, with Smith recognizing there are environmental justice factors and Senate President Steve Sweeney agreeing to take up a related bill at a later date. A2371 ultimately passed by a vote of 22-17.

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates 

 “Many senators rose today to ensure that environmental justice is considered as the organics industry expands investments in green jobs and facilities within the state. We support that goal and hope to work with them to make that a reality,” said New Jersey Composting Council President Jairo Gonzalez in a celebratory email to supporters following the vote.

Other groups also heralded its passage, touting expected environmental benefits.

“Governor Murphy must sign this bill quickly. As we move toward getting to zero carbon, we need to move towards getting to zero food waste,” said New Jersey Sierra Club Director Jeff Tittel in a statement that also questioned classifying biogas from digesters as renewable.

Patrick Serfass, executive director of the American Biogas Council, pushed back on that notion, telling Waste Dive that “organic material is renewable and will be perpetually produced,” while also noting the potential for expanded infrastructure to help avert emissions from farming and agricultural sources.

New Jersey currently has a handful of commercial-scale food waste processing facilities – including the Trenton Biogas digester, Waste Management CORe pre-processing site and AgChoice windrow composting operation. Supporters hope this bill will attract further development.

Serfass pointed to the increasing number of states with organics recycling policies as a sign this was part of a trend. As for whether LGTE should be considered equivalent to digestion, he emphasized that biogas from landfills is important but generally disagreed with the characterization.

“[T]he highest and best use of organic material like food waste is digesting it, because you’re going to have a more complete conversion to biogas and you’re also going to be able to recycle your nutrients and create a soil product as a result.”

Opponents do not agree, largely because many New Jersey counties rely on landfill tip fee revenues and have also invested in LGTE systems.

An opposition letter from New Jersey Association of Counties Executive Director John Donnadio cited concern “that without the LGTE exemption, this legislation would divert critical volumes of decomposing organic food waste from county LGTE facilities, which would adversely affect the quantity and quality of gas relied upon and ultimately jeopardize their economic viability.”

Read the full story

New Jersey organics bill awaits governor’s signature as opponents still angle for landfill exemption Read More »

Honolulu Sues Petroleum Companies For Climate Change Damages to City

The city’s lawsuit cites the industry’s concealing of science that predicted catastrophic consequences for the continued burning of fossil fuels.

Honolulu is Already Feeling the Effects of Climate Change
At Mike Leary’s Island Demo’s equipment yard, more frequent tidal flooding from rising seas has inundated the property in recent years. Credit: Mike Leary

Honolulu city officials, lashing out at the fossil fuel industry in a climate change lawsuit filed Monday, accused oil producers of concealing the dangers that greenhouse gas emissions from petroleum products would create, while reaping billions in profits. 

The lawsuit, against eight oil companies, says climate change already is having damaging effects on the city’s coastline, and lays out a litany of catastrophic public nuisances—including sea level rise, heat waves, flooding and drought caused by the burning of fossil fuels—that are costing the city billions, and putting its residents and property at risk.

“We are seeing in real time coastal erosion and the consequences,” Josh Stanbro, chief resilience officer and executive director for the City and County of Honolulu Office of Climate Change, Sustainability and Resiliency, told InsideClimate News. “It’s an existential threat for what the future looks like for islanders.”

The lawsuit puts it simply: The industry has known for decades that those impacts could be catastrophic, yet did nothing.

Fossil fuel companies have “promoted and profited from a massive increase in the extraction and consumption of oil, coal, and natural gas, which has in turn caused an enormous, foreseeable, and avoidable increase in global greenhouse gas pollution,” the suit states.

“Defendants had actual knowledge that their products were defective and dangerous and were and are causing and contributing to the nuisance complained of, and acted with conscious disregard for the probable dangerous consequences of their conduct’s and products’ foreseeable impact upon the rights of others, including the City and its residents,” according to the 119 page lawsuit filed in in the First Circuit Court of Hawaii.

Hawaii's Economic Costs as Sea Level Rises

The lawsuit seeks to hold fossil companies, including Exxon, Shell, Chevron and Phillips 66, accountable for the costs and damages caused by misleadingly promoting and selling products that their own scientists and experts warned could impose “severe” or even “catastrophic” consequences.

Read the full story

Honolulu Sues Petroleum Companies For Climate Change Damages to City Read More »

Energy bill stalled amid amendment gridlock

Energy bill stalled amid amendment gridlock
Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), one of the bill’s prime sponsors. © Greg Nash

By Rebecca Beitsch and Jordain Carney, The Hill

A mammoth energy policy bill hit a roadblock in the Senate on Monday night with a stalemate over amendments threatening to derail the legislation entirely. 

Lawmakers voted against closing debate on an updated version of the bill that included a package of noncontroversial amendments forwarded by its sponsors, a sign lawmakers are still eager to push for some of the 191 amendments that have been proposed for the bill.

The path forward for the bill, which had been expected to pass as soon as Tuesday, is now unclear. Senate Majority Leader McConnell (R-Ky.) did vote against it, a procedural tactic that could allow him to try to end debate for a second time if he’s able to reach a deal. 

Senate Majority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) said negotiations had stalled on a path forward on amendments. 

“We’ll probably end up having to pivot something else, until we figure out if there’s a way we can get this back on track,” Thune told The Hill. 

The American Energy Innovation Act, sponsored by Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) would spur research and development into a number of types of energy, the first major package on the topic in more than a decade.

Democrats have been fighting to add amendments that would phase down the use of heat-trapping hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) used in refrigerators and air conditioners, as well as another that could push to make new homes more energy efficient.

The White House and a few senators have expressed opposition to the HFCs amendment, arguing that federal standards should supersede any passed by the states.

But Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) threatened to filibuster the bill hours ahead of Monday night’s votes, accusing McConnell of blocking an otherwise popular amendment from Sens. John Kennedy (R-La.) and Tom Carper (D-Del.) that could help fight climate change.

Read the full story

Energy bill stalled amid amendment gridlock Read More »

NJDEP fines municipality of Princeton $35,000 for operating illegal dump at sewer facility

By Krystal Knapp, Princeton Planet

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection fined the municipality of Princeton $35,000 for operating a dump without proper permits, public records show.

Employees at the River Road facility in the northeast corner of Princeton allegedly took bribes to allow private contractors to dump waste at the sewer department site located at 290-298 River Road, which is adjacent to the former town landfill and the Stony Brook Regional Sewerage Authority. State officials inspected the site in June after receiving complaints from residents who read Planet Princeton’s stories about the alleged dumping at the site. Planet Princeton had received tips from a whistleblower about the illegal dumping by contractors. At least one contractor was also using municipal employees and town equipment for private jobs. Four employees were fired as a result of the investigative series, and three people were charged with second-degree bribery.

According to public records obtained by Planet Princeton, a representative from the NJDEP had flagged issues at the River Road site back in the winter when she inspected the old landfill, but no one from the NJDEP followed up on her complaint.

State officials sent three billing notices to the municipality for the fines related to operating a dump without a permit. The municipality has not paid the bill yet, according to state records. The charge is listed as open, but also as suspended.

The Princeton Council is slated to hire a law firm Monday night to defend itself against solid waste enforcement actions by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and to deal with other legal environmental issues related to the River Road site. The town is hiring Lyndhurst- based lawyer John Scagnelli of Scarinci & Hollenbeck for costs up to $50,000. The agreement is retroactive to Jan. 1.

Potential costs for the cleanup of the site have not been made public. The sewer department was closed down after the scandal.

NJDEP fines municipality of Princeton $35,000 for operating illegal dump at sewer facility Read More »