Pa governor’s home torched as he and family slept inside

By Philadelphia Channel 10

State Police officials announced that they have begun an arson investigation after a fire was reported at the Governor’s Residence in Harrisburg in the early hours of Sunday, April 13, 2025.

According to police, members of the Harrisburg Bureau of Fire were dispatched to Governor’s Residence, located on North Front Street in Harrisburg, at about 2 a.m. on a report of a fire.

Crews were able to extinguish the fire, but, officials said, it caused “a significant amount of damage” to a portion of the home.

Police officials said that, when the fire occurred, Pa. Governor Josh Shapiro and his family were present at the home. However, they were all evacuated and no one was injured, officials said.

On Sunday morning, police officials said the incident is being investigated as an arson.

In a statement on the fire, Shapiro said he was grateful for first responders’ help in keeping his family safe.

“Last night at about 2 a.m., my family and I woke up to bangs on the door from the Pennsylvania State Police after an arsonist set fire to the Governor’s Residence in Harrisburg. The Harrisburg Bureau of Fire was on the scene and while they worked to put out the fire, we were evacuated from the Residence safely by Pennsylvania State Police and assisted by Capitol Police,” Shapiro wrote in a statement. “Thank God no one was injured and the fire was extinguished. Every day, we stand with the law enforcement and first responders who run towards danger to protect our communities. Last night, they did so for our family – and Lori and I are eternally grateful to them for keeping us safe. Pennsylvania State Police is on the scene leading this investigation and will keep the public updated.”


If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

Pa governor’s home torched as he and family slept inside Read More »

How the Trump tariffs could impact recycled plastic markets

Recycling industry analysts say high-level trends affecting markets and manufacturing will affect recyclers as trade war uncertainties continue.

By Megan Quinn, Senior Reporter, WASTEDIVE, April 9, 2025

Uncertainty around the operational and market impacts of the Trump administration’s latest round of tariffs is expected to continue in the near future as plastics recyclers and related industries wait for ripple effects on global trade and domestic markets. 

On April 2, President Donald Trump enacted baseline 10% tariffs on goods from most other nations, plus a range of additional country-specific duties. Numerous trade partners then responded in recent days with retaliatory tariffs. On Wednesday, Trump announced a 90-day pause on the country-specific tariffs but said a near-universal 10% tariff would stay in place. Canada and Mexico will still be subject to a 25% tariff for certain goods not covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the White House later clarified.  However, China which will now face a tariff rate of 125%.

The status of these tariffs is ever-changing, and recyclers expect the frequent changes will result in numerous consequences for commodities markets, as well as costs for equipment and infrastructure projects.

Here are some facets of the plastics recycling industry they’re monitoring in the early days of the trade war.  

Read the full story here


If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

How the Trump tariffs could impact recycled plastic markets Read More »

Philly region transit system in crisis. Public reacts to proposed cuts

The transit agency says it’s looking at dramatic service cuts and fare hikes if it doesn’t get more help from the state.

By Carmen Russell-Sluchansky, WHYY

Hundreds gathered at Dilworth Plaza Friday morning for the “We’re Not Getting There Without SEPTA” rally, voicing their opposition to proposed cuts and fare increases by the public transit agency.

State Sen. Nikil Saval, D-Philadelphia, led the group in a chant: “No cuts. No way. We ride SEPTA every day.”

“We are clear-eyed about what brings us together today,” Saval told the crowd under the north arch of City Hall. “The future of our communities, of our city, of our entire region, are dependent on SEPTA. We stand at the edge of service cuts and fair hikes that will tumble into a cascading death spiral that advocates and officials have warned about for so long.”

The rally, occurring just one day after SEPTA announced what many are calling a “doomsday” budget, brought together a coalition of transit workers, elected officials and riders facing what Saval described as “the deadly seriousness” of a crisis that threatens to reshape life in America’s sixth-largest city.

On Thursday, SEPTA unveiled a budget proposal to address a $213 million deficit, which includes a 45% reduction in service and a 21.5% fare increase. The plan would eliminate dozens of bus routes, shut down five Regional Rail lines and stop service at 9 p.m. on all rail services starting Jan. 1, 2026. Disabled riders would also be significantly affected, with 40,000 annual trips no longer served by SEPTA ACCESS and fares increased by 35%.

The rally underscored the role SEPTA, which serves nearly 800,000 riders daily, plays in the region’s economy and daily life. Speakers highlighted the disproportionate impact the proposed cuts would have on working-class communities, people with disabilities and those without alternative transportation options.

Read the full story here

Related:
SEPTA’s proposed cuts are ‘catastrophic,’ say Philly leaders
What services would be affected by SEPTA’s proposed cuts?
Under intense budget squeeze, SEPTA may end 5 Regional Rail Lines
Many passengers could be left without a ride

Philly region transit system in crisis. Public reacts to proposed cuts Read More »

Trump’s attorney comes out hard against NJ Gov., AG

President Trump named Alina Habba the interim U.S. attorney for New Jersey last month. She previously represented Mr. Trump in civil lawsuits.Credit…Kenny Holston/The New York Times

By Tracey Tully, New York Times

The top federal prosecutor in New Jersey said she had directed lawyers in her office to investigate the state’s Democratic governor and attorney general over a statewide policy that limits how much help local police can provide federal immigration officers.

The prosecutor, Alina Habba, called the inquiry a “warning for everybody” in announcing it late Thursday during an appearance on Fox News. She said she was singling out Philip D. Murphy, the governor, and Matthew J. Platkin, the attorney general, for scrutiny.

Anybody who gets “in the way” of President Trump’s efforts to deport migrants will be charged “for obstruction, for concealment,” Ms. Habba, the interim U.S. attorney in New Jersey, warned.

“I will come after them hard,” she said.

The move is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump, a Republican, to use the Justice Department to punish Democratic state and city officials who refuse to help carry out the administration’s immigration agenda and to quash so-called sanctuary policies.

Read the full story here

If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

Trump’s attorney comes out hard against NJ Gov., AG Read More »

Trump yanks funds from Princeton, claims research scares students

(Alex Mirchuk/Patch)

By Sarah Salvadore, Patch Staff

PRINCETON, NJ — The Department of Commerce has announced the withdrawal of approximately $4 million in funding from Princeton University’s climate research programs.

According to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, the university’s programs contributed to “climate anxiety,” among students and young people.

The cut to funding was made after a “detailed, careful, and thorough review of the Department’s financial assistance programs against National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (“NOAA”) current program objectives.”

The White House said it considered the University’s research topics like sea level rise, coastal flooding and global warming to be “exaggerated and implausible climate threats.”

Related: Harvard Professors Sue Trump Administration Over Threat to Cut Funding

“Its focus on alarming climate scenarios fosters fear rather than rational, balanced discussion. Additionally, the use of federal funds to support these narratives, including educational initiatives aimed at K-12 students, is misaligned with the administration’s priorities,” the U.S. Department of Commerce said.

Three programs will lose their federal funding effective June 30:

  • Cooperative Institute for Modeling the Earth System
  • Climate Risks and Interactive Sub-seasonal to Seasonal Predictability
  • Advancing Prediction

Among the faculty of the Cooperative Institute for Modeling the Earth System I, is noted meteorologist Syukuro Manabe, who won the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics for his groundbreaking work in predicting climate change.

The second program impacted by DOC cuts is Climate Risk which suggests that the Earth will have a significant fluctuation in its water availability as a result of global warming.

The third and final project, Advancing Prediction, assesses risks associated with climate change, including alleged changes to precipitation patterns and sea-level rise.

Read the full story here


If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

Trump yanks funds from Princeton, claims research scares students Read More »

Trump’s out to cripple states’ climate interests

trump-signs-energy-order

By Kathryn Krawczyk, Canary Media Weekly

This week, Trump signed several more executive orders meant to advance his pro–fossil fuel, “energy dominance” agenda. Among them was a directive to Attorney General Pam Bondi to “identify and take action against state laws and policies that burden the use of domestic energy resources.”

That could be a big problem for climate progress in the U.S., because under Trump, states and cities have become the country’s most promising venues for clean energy action.

Trump named some of those state policies as prime targets in the executive order. That includes  New York and Vermont’s climate “Superfund” laws, which require oil and gas companies to pay for damages caused by fossil fuel burning. New York taxpayers paid about $2.2 billion for climate-related repairs and projects in 2023, an analysis by the New York Public Interest Research Group found — costs the state’s Superfund could help cover. Trump referred to these policies as “extortion laws.” 

California’s expansive cap-and-trade program was also called out in Trump’s order. Under the policy, entities like power plants and large manufacturers that are responsible for most of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions have to either reduce their climate impacts or pay for emissions “allowances.” Available allowances drop every year — and so have the state’s emissions. Other states and multistate coalitions have adopted or are considering similar cap-and-invest programs.

Trump’s order goes on to demand action against policies that mention “climate change,” “environmental justice,” and “greenhouse gas” emissions, effectively putting hundreds of state climate laws and clean-electricity targets in the Justice Department’s crosshairs.

Legal experts are skeptical that Trump can cast such a wide net. Michael Gerrard, faculty director of Columbia University’s Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, told E&E News that the order is “toothless” and that state judges likely wouldn’t support its implementation. TD Cowen Washington Research Group meanwhile said it sees “no real constitutional or preemption risk” to state clean-electricity standards, carbon trading programs, or low-carbon fuel standards.

But climate-minded state leaders and environmental advocates are still taking the threat seriously. A bipartisan coalition of 24 governors pledged in a statement to defend their state policies against federal overreach. And as Evergreen Action advocate Justin Balik told E&E News, it’s hard not to be worried when the country’s best hope at climate action is at stake.


If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

Trump’s out to cripple states’ climate interests Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights