EPA’s own adviser finds Trump’s rollback of car rules could cost jobs


 BY DINO GRANDONI with Paulina Firozi
THE LIGHTBULB (Washington Post)

Highway traffic into Los Angeles. (Reuters/Mike Blake)

An environmental adviser to the Trump administration projects that its attempt to reverse Obama-era fuel-efficiency standards could have a steep long-term toll on the U.S. economy and eventually cost the country hundreds of thousands of jobs.

The research by an outside adviser picked by former Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt — and funded by grants from the auto industry — is sure to fuel critics of the Trump administration’s attempts to stall rules meant to reduce the amount of climate-warming and illness-causing pollution produced by the nation’s automobiles. 

While cutting the car regulations would give the U.S. economy a short-term jolt, it would in the long run forestall job-creating automotive innovation while putting less money in the wallets of motorists who would have to spend more on gasoline, according to the adviser John D. Graham, who is dean of Indiana University’s School of Public and Environmental Affairs, and his four colleagues. 

The Trump administration’s proposal to freeze standards on tailpipe emissions for new cars and light trucks at 2020 levels, or otherwise watering down their stringency, would create 236,000 fewer jobs by 2035 than if the Obama-era standards stayed intact, according to the paper published late last month in the peer-reviewed Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.

“The final result of our paper is that the possible Trump administration changes to the standard will reduce the short-term loss but it will also significantly reduce the long-term benefit,” said co-author Sanya Carley, associate professor at Indiana University. 

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

EPA’s own adviser finds Trump’s rollback of car rules could cost jobs Read More »

Crain’s rates the NY budget’s winners, losers

Will Bredderman reports for Crain’s New York Business

The ritual struggle over the state’s fiscal plan ended this weekend—with a $175 billion result.

Who budged on the budget, and who’s in the money? Read on.

WINNERS

1. Campaign consultants: That giant “cha-ching” heard Sunday morning from Buffalo to Montauk was the sound of dollar signs popping into the eyes of political strategists, pollsters and palm-card wizards. The budget committed $100 million annually toward public financing of state elections, devolving responsibility for designing such a system on an as-yet unnamed commission. Presumably the panel will create something like the city’s program, which matches every dollar from small contributors with $8 from taxpayers.

The argument for matching funds is that it reduces the influence of the rich and allows for outsiders to upset the status quo. What it seems to actually do is encourage hopeless or spurious candidacies and enrich political professionals without shaking the power of entrenched incumbents.

Recall this year’s 17-candidate dogpile of public advocate hopefuls. No more than four contenders were viable; the remainder were vanity campaigns or opportunities for the ambitious to build name recognition for future races at public expense. The Campaign Finance Board ladled out $7.1 million in matching funds, much of which fed the lobbyist-consultant-adviser-strategist complex that operates out of the average voter’s sight.ADVERTISING

The all-but lawless state races are nobody’s democratic ideal, but last year saw more than a dozen legislators defeated in either primary or general elections. By contrast, in 2017—when every city office went up for bid—just one sitting official lost her job to an upstart challenger. It seems the public finance system does not compensate for the structural advantages of incumbency.

It’s possible matching funds have reduced the influence of deep-pocketed interests. But the past decade of city politics has also witnessed the astounding expansion of independent expenditures, which let unions and business interests spend unlimited amounts on materials promoting the candidate of their choosing. These IEs too require an internal infrastructure of experts and advisers, and thus also help pay for the summer homes and college savings accounts of the consultant class.

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Crain’s rates the NY budget’s winners, losers Read More »

Pregnant whale washes up in Italian tourist spot with 22 kilograms of plastic in its stomach

By Gianluca Mezzofiore, CNN
Updated 0954 GMT (1754 HKT) April 1, 2019

The sperm whale was found washed up on the Italian island of Sardinia.

(CNN)The carcass of a pregnant sperm whale that washed up in Sardinia, Italy, last week had 22 kilograms (49 pounds) of plastic in its stomach, and was carrying a dead fetus, the country’s environment minister and a marine life non-profit organization said.Luca Bittau, president of the SeaMe group, told CNN the beached mammal’s remains contained “garbage bags … fishing nets, lines, tubes, the bag of a washing machine liquid still identifiable, with brand and barcode … and other objects no longer identifiable.

She was pregnant and had almost certainly aborted before (she) beached,” he said. “The fetus was in an advanced state of composition.”

The whale had 22 kilograms (49 pounds) of plastic in its stomach.

The whale had 22 kilograms (49 pounds) of plastic in its stomach.The dead animal, which was eight meters (26 feet) long, washed up on a beach in the Sardinian tourist hotspot of Porto Cervo.Bittau said the cause of death would be known after histological and toxicological examinations carried out by veterinarians in Padua, northern Italy.

Sergio Costa, Italy’s environment minister, said in a Facebook post: “Are there still people who say these are not important problems? For me they are, and they are priorities.”

The dead animal was found in waters off the Sardinian tourist hotspot of Porto Cervo.

The dead animal was found in waters off the Sardinian tourist hotspot of Porto Cervo.

“We’ve used the ‘comfort’ of disposable objects in a lighthearted way in the past years and now we are paying the consequences. Indeed the animals, above all, are the ones paying them,” he continued.

Costa also referred to the recent approval by the European Parliament of a law banning a wide-range of single-use plastic items, such as straws, cotton buds and cutlery, by 2021.

“Italy will be one of the first countries to implement it,” he promised. “The war on disposable plastic has begun. And we won’t stop here.”

Last month, a young whale was found dead in the Philippines with 40 kilograms (88 pounds) of plastic bags in its stomach.

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Pregnant whale washes up in Italian tourist spot with 22 kilograms of plastic in its stomach Read More »

Federal judge in Alaska blocks Trump’s arctic offshore drilling expansion as lawyers ramp up legal challenges

The ruling restores Obama’s orders putting large parts of the Arctic off-limits to offshore drilling and throws Trump’s oil and gas lease sale plans into question.

Arctic oil drilling. Credit: Sergey Anisimov/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Environmental lawyers are challenging several Trump administration efforts to expand oil and gas drilling, especially in the Arctic. Many of those involve concerns about climate change. Credit: Sergey Anisimov/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
The government’s pell-mell race to open up new areas for oil and gas drilling on public lands and waters is running into legal obstacles mounted by conservationists and climate advocates.
Through litigation and procedural maneuvers, opponents of fossil fuel expansion are hoping to overturn key elements of the no-holds-barred oil and gas boom that President Donald Trump and his cabinet have pressed for from the moment they took office.
In the latest case, a federal judge in Alaska sided with environmental groups in a lawsuit over offshore drilling late Friday. The Arctic offshore areas in question—parts of the Outer Continental Shelf in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas—had been protected from fossil fuel drilling by an executive order issued by President Barack Obama. Trump had overturned that order in 2017, and the administration was hurtling toward a lease sale there that it hoped to hold later this year.
The judge determined that Trump didn’t have the authority to revoke Obama’s decisions to withdraw those areas from leasing, or an area of canyons Obama withdrew from leasing in the Atlantic Ocean. That would require action by Congress, the judge wrote.

Read the full story

Federal judge in Alaska blocks Trump’s arctic offshore drilling expansion as lawyers ramp up legal challenges Read More »

Federal judge in Alaska blocks Trump’s arctic offshore drilling expansion as lawyers ramp up legal challenges

The ruling restores Obama’s orders putting large parts of the Arctic off-limits to offshore drilling and throws Trump’s oil and gas lease sale plans into question.

SABRINA SHANKMAN REPORTS FOR INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS

MAR 30, 2019

Arctic oil drilling. Credit: Sergey Anisimov/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
Environmental lawyers are challenging several Trump administration efforts to expand oil and gas drilling, especially in the Arctic. Many of those involve concerns about climate change. Credit: Sergey Anisimov/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

The government’s pell-mell race to open up new areas for oil and gas drilling on public lands and waters is running into legal obstacles mounted by conservationists and climate advocates.

Through litigation and procedural maneuvers, opponents of fossil fuel expansion are hoping to overturn key elements of the no-holds-barred oil and gas boom that President Donald Trump and his cabinet have pressed for from the moment they took office.

In the latest case, a federal judge in Alaska sided with environmental groups in a lawsuit over offshore drilling late Friday. The Arctic offshore areas in question—parts of the Outer Continental Shelf in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas—had been protected from fossil fuel drilling by an executive order issued by President Barack Obama. Trump had overturned that order in 2017, and the administration was hurtling toward a lease sale there that it hoped to hold later this year.

The judge determined that Trump didn’t have the authority to revoke Obama’s decisions to withdraw those areas from leasing, or an area of canyons Obama withdrew from leasing in the Atlantic Ocean. That would require action by Congress, the judge wrote.

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Federal judge in Alaska blocks Trump’s arctic offshore drilling expansion as lawyers ramp up legal challenges Read More »