Jersey Shore lawmakers scramble to fix unpopular rental tax law

Nicholas Pugliese reports for WHYY

In this file photo, a summer rental sign is seen in front of a home just one block from the ocean, in Belmar, N.J. (Mel Evans/AP Photo, file)
In this file photo, a summer rental sign is seen in front of a home just one block from the ocean, in Belmar, N.J. (Mel Evans/AP Photo, file)

New Jersey lawmakers are moving to exempt many Shore-goers from an unpopular new tax on home rentals, but it’s still unclear when the change would take effect — and who exactly it would help.

A vocal group of renters and owners has been pushing for the change since last year, when lawmakers worked with Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, to create a nearly 12% tax on short-term rentals.

The law was intended to make accommodations booked through online marketplaces such as Airbnb subject to the same taxes as hotels and motels.

But the way the “Airbnb tax” was written, it applies to all rentals lasting less than 90 days not booked through a real estate broker, including Shore properties filled with the help of yard signs, classified ads, Facebook groups or personal connections.

Like this? Click to receive free updates

The Assembly voted unanimously this week to approve a measure, A-4814, that would make the tax apply only to rentals arranged through marketplaces where bookings can be offered, reserved and paid.

That would spare renters who arrange their stays directly with property owners. The change would take effect immediately upon being signed into law by the governor, according to the bill.

But Sen. Vin Gopal, a Democrat from Monmouth County sponsoring a companion bill in the upper house, said he wants to amend the measure so the exemption applies more narrowly to owners with two or fewer units and their guests.

And under his bill, the change would not take effect “until the first day of the first calendar quarter beginning at least 60 days following the date of enactment” — meaning Oct. 1 at the earliest.

Asked which version would be the one eventually sent to the governor, Gopal said he didn’t know.

Read the full story

Jersey Shore lawmakers scramble to fix unpopular rental tax law Read More »

New at Jersey Shore beaches and boardwalks this summer

Tom Davis reports for Patch national staff

There’s something new on New Jersey beaches and boardwalks this year. And it may be why you’re breathing a little easier while sitting on the sand or waiting for your kid to get out of the arcade this Memorial Day weekend.

The bill that Gov. Phil Murphy signed that essentially bans smoking at all beaches and parks and on boardwalks has taken effect this year.

Here’s the hitch: You can still smoke in the parking lot, and municipalities can designate up to 15 percent of a beach for permitted smoking, according to the legislation.

The law charges violators a $250 fine for the first offense, $500 for the second offense and $1,000 for each subsequent offense, according to the legislation.

“This is a tremendous day,” Murphy said last year as he signed the legislation, declaring it an effort to “get the butts off the beach.”

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

New at Jersey Shore beaches and boardwalks this summer Read More »

Three appointments up for votes before NJ Senate Judiciary panel

The Senate Judiciary Committee will meet on Thursday, May 30, 2019, at 11:00 AM in Committee Room 4, 1st Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ.

The following nominations will be considered:

TO BE A MEMBER OF THE NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES:
Honorable Joseph L. Fiordaliso, of Livingston, to succeed himself, for the term prescribed by law.

TO BE A MEMBER OF THE PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSION:
Hector C. Lora, of Passaic, to replace Kenneth John Lucianin, resigned, for the term prescribed by law.

TO BE A MEMBER OF THE PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSION:
Brendan Murphy, of Totowa, to replace Scott M. Heck, for the term prescribed by law.

Three appointments up for votes before NJ Senate Judiciary panel Read More »

In Battle Between Big Oil and Big Corn, Ted Cruz Finally Called Out Trump

Cruz has studiously avoided confronting Trump. But when it came to helping oil refiners (including one in Philadelphia) get a bigger share of the EPA’s deregulatory spoils, the senator was more than willing to play hostage politics.

Ted Cruz
Ted Cruz JUSTIN MILLER

Justin Miller reports for the Texas Observer

Ted Cruz has finally found the courage to call out the Trump administration. He’s demanding that the president and his bureaucrats stop providing cover for the ethanol industry and stand up for fossil fuel rights.

Oil companies have long complained that the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), which requires refineries to blend ethanol into their gasoline, is killing their bottom line. Refiners that don’t have the capacity to blend ethanol are required to buy regulatory credits known as RINs from those that do. The industry wants the EPA to make it easier to wiggle out of compliance, which would save refiners hundreds of millions of dollars.

In February, Cruz and four other senators threatened in a letter to derail the confirmation of the EPA’s then-Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler if he didn’t acquiesce to their demands. Cruz has studiously avoided confronting Trump. Yet there he was playing hostage politics with his friends in the White House, acting as a tool of Big Oil in a high-stakes battle with King Cornover how Trump’s EPA should divvy up the spoils.

Ted Cruz
Ted Cruz speaking at CPAC 2015 in Washington, DC.  FLICKR/GAGE SKIDMORE

Cruz’s commitment to the cause is so deep that he’s joined forces with some unlikely allies.

A year before he sent the Wheeler letter, Cruz stood in front of hundreds of union workers at the Philadelphia Energy Solutions refinery and promised to save their jobs. The independent refinery had just filed for bankruptcy, and its owners blamed the cost of compliance with the RFS. Cruz claimed that powerful Wall Street firms were getting rich by shorting the RIN market and forcing plants to shutter. “The ones that would be put out of business are the speculators, who can go and speculate on something else,” Cruz declared.

In reality, a private equity giant had swooped in a few years back, stripped the refinery’s assets and left it saddled with hundreds of millions of dollars in debt. No matter. The ethanol mandate was a convenient scapegoat, and Cruz had a prepackaged message to deploy.

pollution, smog, refineries, environment
The Valero refinery in Three Rivers.  JEN REEL

For years, Valero Energy, a mega-refiner and one of Cruz’s staunchest political supporters, has led an astroturf lobbying campaign that uses sympathetic figures — mom-and-pop gas station owners and union refinery workers — to build support for overhauling the ethanol mandate. The tactic has worked: Last March, the EPA bailed out the Philadelphia refinery by forgiving much of its RIN debt, saving 1,100 jobs (though the company is on the brink of failure once again).

Cruz’s office insists his cause is noble and motivated purely by “jobs and economic freedom.”

“He doesn’t believe the government should be creating winners and losers,” a spokesperson said.

But it’s giants such as Valero, which spent nearly $1 billion in 2017 to comply with the RFS, that stand to gain the most. Even though Wheeler was ultimately confirmed, Cruz’s pressure campaign has worked. Wheeler’s EPA is handing out refinery exemptions like candy, and every time Cruz or another senator makes a threat, RIN investors get spooked, the cost of regulatory credits plummets and refiners save on compliance costs. Valero reported earlier this year that it saved $400 million in 2018 from lower RIN costs, and revenue from its refinery operations jumped 25 percent to $5 billion. Apparently standing up to Trump does pay.

In Battle Between Big Oil and Big Corn, Ted Cruz Finally Called Out Trump Read More »

Democrats suggest EPA chief misled on vehicle emissions rollback

Democrats suggest EPA chief misled on vehicle emissions rollback
Stefani Reynolds photo

Rebecca Beitsch reports for The Hill

Democrats are asking Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) head Andrew Wheeler to turn over documents tied to the agency’s proposal to roll back emissions standards for vehicles, suggesting he made misleading statements on the topic.

House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.) and Sen. Tom Carper (Del.), the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said the request was “in light of numerous comments from Administrator Wheeler, including statements made to Congress, that plainly contradict data presented to him by EPA’s own experts.”

“Despite the fact that you were briefed on these concerns before the rule was proposed, you have continued to make assertions about the proposal that you must know do not reflect the views of EPA’s expert staff,” the lawmakers wrote. 

The EPA’s controversial proposal would freeze emissions standards set by the Obama administration in 2020 rather than have them tighten into 2026. Vehicle manufacturers oppose the plan, and the proposal has sparked a lawsuit with California, with the state threatening to enact other tough measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

An EPA spokesperson told The Hill when asked to comment on the letter that the agency “will respond through the proper channels.”

In a letter to the agency, the Democrats homed in on one particular comment Wheeler made to Congress in April.

“I have been told by my staff that the CO2 reductions, the impact of the CO2 reductions are pretty similar to what the Obama administration proposal would have received under their — would have gotten under their proposal. Because the Obama proposal had a number of exemptions and off-ramps. And the car, automobile manufacturers aren’t complying with the Obama standards today,” Wheeler told the House Energy and Commerce Committee then.

The legislators said that was demonstrably false.

“These and other statements like it are remarkable since analysis in the proposed rule clearly demonstrates that carbon pollution will increase by 8 billion tons during this century if the Trump Administration proposal is finalized,” they wrote in the letter.

The Democrats argued that the only discernible purpose for the proposed rollback is to increase the profits of the oil industry and said the request for documents was to shed light on how outside groups may have influenced the agency.

Read the full story

Democrats suggest EPA chief misled on vehicle emissions rollback Read More »