Court documents reveal a $3 million settlement for homeowners in a long-fought Pa. fracking contamination suit

  • Reid Frazier reports for State Impact Pennsylvania

Range Resources and other defendants agreed to pay $3 million to settle a lawsuit last year with three Washington County families who alleged the natural gas drilling company contaminated their properties and made them sick, according to a court document obtained by The Allegheny Front and StateImpact Pennsylvania.

In a separate release, Range revealed that the company’s insurance carrier paid $1.88 million to the plaintiffs to settle the case. “We have voluntarily released the settlement agreement that resolved prior litigation with eight landowners in Washington County. We believe this additional transparency resolves any outstanding questions on this topic,” Range spokesman Mark Windle said in an emailed statement.

The settlement, agreed to in January 2018, remains sealed, though much of its contents are now public. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is suing to have the agreement made public.

Terms of the settlement were spelled out in a court order dated Aug. 31, 2018 and signed by Washington County Court of Common Pleas Judge Katherine B. Emery. The order was issued under seal but was publicly available over the course of at least two days, May 28 and May 29, on the Washington County Prothonotary’s Public Case File Database.

Washington County Prothonotary Joy Ranko said on May 30 that the order had not been uploaded into a public-facing database where the county stores its court records. She later told the Washington Observer-Reporter that the document was public because of a computer error.

On May 30, after learning that The Allegheny Front and StateImpact had obtained the record, Emery issued an injunction against the news organizations, barring them from reporting on its contents, and setting a hearing date for Tuesday.

At the hearing Tuesday in Washington County common pleas court, Range told Emery it would publicly release settlement terms that apply to Range, and did not ask Emery to continue her order for the injunction. They said the company was seeking “peace” in the matter.

Read the full story

Court documents reveal a $3 million settlement for homeowners in a long-fought Pa. fracking contamination suit Read More »

Provision slipped into defense bill could delay or even sink offshore wind farms

Block Island Wind Farm is seen off the coast of Rhode Island. Photo credit: Dennis Schroeder/NREL
Offshore wind projects could be delayed because of legislative language in a spending bill. The Block Island Wind Farm is seen off the coast of Rhode Island. 

Benjamin Storrow and David Iaconangelo, E&E News reporters Climatewire: Friday, May 24, 2019

Offshore wind developers are up in arms over a provision inserted into the Defense appropriations bill earlier this week requiring the Pentagon to study the impact of turbines on military radar and sonar.

The American Wind Energy Association labeled the study “duplicative” in a statement yesterday, while the National Ocean Industries Association warned that it “threatens to derail” the nascent industry.

The outcry follows the House Appropriations Committee’s passage of a nearly $690 billion Defense spending bill Tuesday. Included in the legislation was a requirement that the secretary of Defense submit a study of “any potential national security concerns with respect to the construction of offshore wind arrays, to include an examination of legacy and new turbines, and any appropriate mitigation measures that should be implemented to address these concerns.”

An amendment carrying the language said, “The Committee recognizes that wind turbine structures, particularly when arranged in large arrays, may cause interference to standards and that vibrations generated by the operation of turbines may cause sonic interference to underwater sonar.”

Like this? Click to receive free updates

The origin of the language wasn’t entirely clear. The Defense Department did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for the committee’s chairwoman, Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.), said the committee doesn’t “discuss the origin of report language.”

“This is report language that requires the Defense Department to submit a report and does not have any effect on ongoing offshore wind development,” said Evan Hollander, a spokesman for the committee.

Wind industry officials said they suspected that Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) was the provision’s author. Harris, a member of the Appropriations Committee, represents Maryland’s Eastern Shore and has emerged as an outspoken opponent of offshore wind development in recent years.

In a statement, the congressman did not claim responsibility for the provision but said, “I agree with the Committee Report language — we need to be absolutely certain we are not impairing defense capabilities as we consider the advisability of further development of offshore wind in the Mid-Atlantic area. Several reports and studies indicate there may be serious national security concerns.”

A spokesperson for Harris did not respond to follow-up questions.

Supporters of offshore wind expressed surprise at the budget language and promised to fight it.

“All proposed offshore wind developments must already consider any national security implications, and to date, none have been raised as New England begins to build turbines off of our coast that can power homes and employ a new generation of workers,” said Rep. Joe Kennedy III, a Massachusetts Democrat who has championed the industry. “Any effort to delay the permitting process and deployment of offshore wind turbines is deeply troubling and I will work with my colleagues to address those concerns.”

The offshore wind industry has emerged as a central tenet of Northeastern states’ attempt to green their power sectors, meet their climate goals and drive new investments in aging ports in recent years.

Read the full story

Provision slipped into defense bill could delay or even sink offshore wind farms Read More »

Trump lifts the summer ban on E15 gas to help farmers hurt by China trade war

A gas pump selling E15, a gasoline with 15 percent of ethanol

Humeyra Pamuk, Jarrett Renshaw report for Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Trump administration on Friday lifted restrictions on the sale of higher ethanol blends of gasoline, keeping a campaign promise to farmers suffering from the trade war with China but drawing a legal threat from the oil industry.

The announcement will allow gasoline stations to sell blends containing up to 15 percent corn-based ethanol, called E15, year-round, ending a summertime ban that President Barack Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency imposed in 2011 to reduce smog pollution.

“As President Trump promised, EPA is approving the year-round sale of E15 in time for summer driving season,” EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler said in a press release.

In a nod to the oil industry, the agency also issued new rules to improve transparency in the market for biofuels credits that refiners must acquire under the nation’s biofuel law, but the steps stopped short of what many refiners were seeking.

The widely anticipated action on E15 is a win for the U.S. farm lobby, which has argued the restrictions on E15 hurt growers by limiting demand for corn-based fuel, without providing tangible air quality benefits. Recent research has found little difference in smog risk between E15 and E10, a 10 percent ethanol blend that is already available year-round.

“We estimate this one change will generate over a billion new gallons of ethanol demand in the next five years,” said Emily Skor, chief executive of biofuel trade group Growth Energy, adding it could also boost the market for American grain by some 2 billion bushels over time.

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Trump lifts the summer ban on E15 gas to help farmers hurt by China trade war Read More »

What keeps ethnic media strong in New Jersey (and beyond)

LINK: CENTERFORCOOPERATIVEMEDIA.ORG  
POSTED BY: CHRISTINE SCHMIDT   |   JUNE 3, 2019

What news outlets don’t really have a trust problem with audiences?

Ethnic media — media outlets that serve specific cultural, racial, ethnic, religious, geographic, or language communities — are pillars in their communities, often rooted for decades and telling the stories of immigration and American life on their own terms. A new report from the Center for Cooperative Media examines the state of ethnic media in and around New Jersey (that definition of ethnic media is theirs), highlighting the work the state’s 119 outlets have already done in building strong ties with their audiences, and the work the outlets need to do to survive in the future.

Authors Sarah Stonbely and Anthony Advincula write:

In a sense, the story of ethnic media is the story of immigration. Historically, the sector was established by and for immigrants, and the sustainability of the sector has largely depended on the immigrants that it serves. Ethnic outlets remain closer to immigrant communities than mainstream outlets both in physical proximity and because those communities serve as the sources of news and the audience. In the same way that local newspapers used to be deeply integrated with the towns they covered, local ethnic media have their fingers on the pulse of communities that were born of diaspora and/or are still welcoming newcomers to this country.

And ethnic media’s been doing the work the rest of the journalism industry is trying to jump on: “Ethnic media are in constant dialogue with their communities, canvassing them for stories by attending events at community centers and churches, speaking with community leaders and elected officials, and taking comments on the content they publish.”

Ethnic media isn’t the antithesis of mainstream media, but the two are often at odds in their treatment of ethnic communities. Stonbely and Advincula’s interviewees pointed out that mainstream media typically does negative coverage of the community, tied to crime, whereas ethnic media celebrates the community’s bonds and heritage more.

Here are some top findings from the report, which calls out the strengths and weaknesses of ethnic media. Again, this is from outlets that are based in New Jersey/New York/Pennsylvania but report for widespread communities: 71 percent of the 119 outlets did not do local New Jersey news.

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

What keeps ethnic media strong in New Jersey (and beyond) Read More »

Court orders NJ man who created a 7-story pile of waste to disclose what’s in the mini-mountain and clean it up

Joseph Wallace is accused of running an illegal dumping operation 

 

By Michael Sol Warren NJ.com

For years he dumped. Now he’s been ordered to clean up his mess.

A state Superior Court judge in Morristown ordered Monday that Joseph Wallace — the man who spent years building a seven-story-tall mountain of dirt and debris on his property in a quiet residential neighborhood in Vernon Township — to halt work and remediate the site.

Citing “clear and convincing evidence of irreparable harm,” Judge Maritza Berdote Byrne ordered Wallace to immediately halt the importation of all material to his property, turn over information about what exactly is in the pile and clean up any material that is considered solid waste.

“Our efforts to tackle the 75-foot soil pile in Vernon are part of our overall commitment to dropping the hammer on polluters across the state,” New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said.

“Today, we welcome the court order prohibiting the owner from receiving new material, and requiring the owner to test the site and remove all solid waste materials on that property. This is a positive step for the state and the residents of Vernon.”

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Neighbors worried about this massive dirt pile for years. Now chemicals linked to cancer have been found, tests show.

Court filings in an ongoing case over a massive dirt pile in North Jersey reveal a potential public health risk.

Since at least 2011, Wallace has had dump trucks bringing material from mostly unknown sources to his property on Silver Spruce Drive, a private road in a quiet residential neighborhood. NJ Advance Media detailed the activity in an in-depth report published in February.

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection took Wallace to court after determining in February that he used his property to run an illegal solid waste facility. A consent order with Wallace allowed state officials to come onto the property and test the pile in March.

Results of that testing, released in April, showed the pile to contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs,) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and the pesticide chemical chlordane all at levels above the state’s standard for residential soil.

Read the full story

 

Court orders NJ man who created a 7-story pile of waste to disclose what’s in the mini-mountain and clean it up Read More »

Leaks threaten safety — and success — of top liquefied natural gas exporter in the U.S.

An ongoing investigation at Cheniere Energy’s flagship export facility in Louisiana is raising red flags for the surging American gas industry.

Carrier of liquefied natural gas. Photo credit: Newsy/Kevin Clancy
A carrier of liquefied natural gas (LNG) is docked at Cheniere’s Sabine Pass terminal in Cameron Parish, La., on July 6, 2018. Cheniere was the first U.S. company to export LNG overseas in 2016. Newsy/Kevin Clancy

Jenny Mandel, E&E News reporter, and Jie Jenny Zou, Center for Public Integrity reporter Energywire: Thursday, May 30, 2019

In just three years, a 1,000-acre complex surrounded by Louisiana swampland has become the unlikely epicenter of America’s booming natural gas business.

Sabine Pass terminal is the crown jewel of Cheniere Energy Inc., a Houston company that had a virtual monopoly on U.S. exports of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, until last spring. In November, Cheniere opened a second terminal — eclipsing competitors racing to construct their first sites. The company is in talks to close its third deal with China, worth an estimated $18 billion.

But cracks in Cheniere’s runaway success story have started to show.

Last year gashes up to 6 feet long opened up in a massive steel storage tank at Sabine Pass, releasing super-chilled LNG that quickly vaporized into a cloud of flammable gas. Federal regulators worried the tank might give way, spilling the remainder of the fuel and setting off an uncontrollable fire. It wasn’t an isolated event: Another tank was leaking gas in 14 different places. Both tanks remain out of service over a year later.

Investigators soon discovered that Cheniere grappled with problems affecting at least four of the five tanks at the terminal over the past decade. And officials at the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, known as PHMSA, have found the company to be less than forthcoming in the ongoing investigation, noting Cheniere’s “reticence to share [its] sense of what might have gone wrong.”

The leaks are a red flag at a time of unprecedented expansion in the LNG industry, which promotes the fuel as not only safe but also a clean, more climate-friendly alternative to coal. The problem is that natural gas is made up mostly of methane, a greenhouse gas far more potent than carbon dioxide at warming the Earth’s atmosphere. Leaks erode the fuel’s climate advantage over coal.

Cheniere spokesman Eben Burnham-Snyder said workers and the public were never in danger, and last year’s leaks were about one hundredth of a percent of the facility’s permitted greenhouse gas emissions for the year. The tanks, he added, meet “all federal and state safety requirements.” But some other LNG export projects — including Cheniere’s newest terminal in Corpus Christi, Texas — have opted to use more expensive tank designs that offer greater protection against leaks and fires.

Sabine Pass was originally designed for imports. In 2012, Cheniere began converting the facility to handle exports instead, taking advantage of surging gas supplies from the shale drilling boom. The company upended the energy market when it began sending LNG overseas in 2016, quickly turning America into a top seller of the fossil fuel.

Over a dozen U.S. export projects are now in development, including a $10 billion project by Exxon Mobil Corp. and Qatar Petroleum on the Texas side of Sabine Pass. Federal regulations, though, haven’t kept pace. They were written for simpler import and gas-storage facilities, not complex, multibillion-dollar export facilities. In April, the White House directed regulators to update LNG safety rules. But it’s unclear what that will look like — or whether any new design requirements would apply to projects already in the works.

The industry trade group Center for Liquefied Natural Gas said its members — which include Cheniere — support the effort to revamp current regulations. That “goes hand in hand with our industry’s focus on continuous improvement,” spokeswoman Daphne Magnuson wrote in a statement. “We see a bright future for U.S. LNG and significant benefits to the planet at large.”

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Leaks threaten safety — and success — of top liquefied natural gas exporter in the U.S. Read More »