Old manufactured-gas site in NY town added to Superfund


Jason Subik reports for the Daily Gazette:

GLOVERSVILLE (NY)— The state Department of Environmental Conservation will hold a public meeting Feb. 21 at Gloversville City Hall to discuss the proposed $18.2 million remediation plan for the former Niagara Mohawk Hill Street manufactured gas plant located at 20 Hill St.

The former gas plant site has been designated for remediation under the state’s Superfund program, which identifies inactive hazardous waste disposal sites that pose a significant threat to public health.

Acting Mayor Vince DeSantis said he encourages members of the public to attend the meeting and to provide questions and comments to state officials about the process. He said remediation of sites like 20 Hill St. is an important part of revitalizing the city.

“Every old industrial city has these sites, which were real job creators and wealth creators in the past, and now they need to be cleaned up, so it’s appropriate that the state and federal government is helping with that,” he said.

The 20 Hill St. site joins approximately 87 other Superfund sites in the state. The only other current Superfund site in Fulton County is the old Johnstown City Landfill.


DeSantis said Gloversville recently filed an application for a $300,000 federal grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to help identify all of the potential Superfund sites in the city.

The proposed remediation plan for the site is available at the Gloversville Public Library at 58 East Fulton St.

Some of the highlights of the remediation plan include:


  • Excavating and disposing of off-site of approximately 21,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil associated with the past manufactured gas plant (MGP) operations at the site
  • Constructing a subsurface barrier wall to prevent further off-site migration of coal tar
  • Installing recovery wells to remove potentially mobile coal tar
  • Continued operation of on-site groundwater and stormwater collection and treatment systems
Part of the reason for the Superfund designation for the site is that contamination has been found downstream in the soil along the banks of the Cayadutta Creek.


Old manufactured-gas site in NY town added to Superfund Read More »

Why engineers use different barriers to protect NJ coast

Sandbags are used to slow the erosion of the bank along the Delaware River.l
Bill Barlow reports for WHYY:

New Jersey’s East Point Lighthouse at the mouth of the Maurice River has survived pelting winds, driving storms and long periods of neglect in its 170 years.
Before the end of this year, a state project could help protect the historic building on the Delaware Bay from eroding land and rising seas.
The state plans to install 900 feet of Geotube, made of flexible material filled with sand, to protect the lighthouse and its sandy bayfront parking lot from tide-driven floods.
The bids will go out soon, with the work to begin in late summer, said Larry Hajna, a Department of Environmental Protection spokesman. That will avoid interference with breeding horseshoe crabs or the migrating birds that depend on their eggs. Once completed, the Geotube will be covered with sand to resemble a dune, Hajna said.
“Basically, it’s a big Christmas stocking which you stuff full of sand,” said Stewart Farrell, the director and founder of the Coastal Research Center at Stockton University in Pomona.
But what’s right for the Delaware Bay may not always be what’s right for a town facing the ocean.
“The East Point Lighthouse is in an entirely different environment than, say, Atlantic City’s Boardwalk,” Farrell said. “What would be fine for the lighthouse would be a complete waste of money out on the oceanfront. Are you trying to stop a runaway freight train? Or are you trying to stop a kid on a bicycle?”
Several factors determine waves. The strength of wind blowing across the water and the area of water surface over which that wind blows — known as fetch. It’s a little over 22 miles across the Delaware Bay from the lighthouse to the small town of Bowers, Delaware.
“In the Delaware Bay, the fetch is limited,” Farrell said. “And so there’s a very finite wave size that you will see, no matter what kind of storm you have. That means the fabric material to be put in place will likely work fine. You’re not going to see 15-foot breakers.”
Engineers have to determine the best way to protect the coastlines — and that means using different barriers to get the job done. Here are a few approaches that you may have seen used in New Jersey.

Geotubes

Geotube, a brand name for a kind of long sandbag, was trademarked by the Netherlands in 1994. Farrell uses the more generic name of geotextiles. Sand and water are pumped into a large synthetic fabric sleeve. The water drains off, leaving the sand contained.
“The sand doesn’t move away so readily. But it’s not such a hard structure that it can’t be removed. You can cut the thing open and pull the fabric away,” leaving the sand in place, Farrell said. They can range from 3 feet wide by 12 feet long to hundreds of feet long and 10 to 12 feet wide.
“The biggest one I’ve seen put in place in New Jersey was in Sea Isle City,” he said. That one was about 2,400 feet long.
Sunlight is a weakness for this style of shore protection, he said. Manufacturers continue to improve the product, but UV rays can break down the fabric over time. Often, Geotubes are covered in sand, both as protection and to make them look more like dunes.
That’s the DEP’s plan at the East Point Lighthouse, and what was done along Ocean Drive in northern Sea Isle City and southern Strathmere. A portion of the Geotube was exposed there after Hurricane Sandy but was reburied as part of a beach replenishment since then.

Sand replenishment

Cape May lighthouse in Cape May, New Jersey. (Dale Gerhard, The Press of Atlantic City/AP Photo)

When sand disappears from beaches, the obvious solution is to put it back. The process has been going on for decades, even before the Army Corps of Engineers began a 50-year commitment to protect Cape May’s beaches in 1991.
That set the standard for future projects. From Seaside Heights to Avalon, and for most of New Jersey’s beach towns, a huge dredge pumping sand from offshore to rebuild eroded beaches has become a routine sight.
Even before Hurricane Sandy brought a flurry of federal spending to beaches, the cost of beach replenishment in New Jersey had topped $1 billion, with no end in sight.
Farrell said there is little choice in the matter.
“If you want to have a recreational facility, you’re kind of limited to beach fills,” he said. “In other words, you bring in material and replace it as it moves elsewhere, or bring it back from where it moves to.”
The replenished beach will protect properties from future storms and keep the summer visitors happy.
Farrell said the sand moves in predictable ways.
“After a beach fill, that sand doesn’t melt,” he said. “It goes somewhere else.”
Aside from pumping sand in from the inlets offshore, he said, towns could also gather the sand that washed to other areas and return it to the eroded section. He said the next step is to get approvals from regulators. But he predicts resistance.
“It will require some convincing of the folks in that area. They say, ‘You’re not taking my sand.’ Well, first of all, it’s not your sand,” he said.
For instance, North Wildwood’s beaches are extensively eroded, while the beaches in Wildwood and Wildwood Crest to the south on the same barrier island have grown over 20 years, he said.
“It’s real cheap compared to pumping material from offshore,” he said.
The Army Corps of Engineers has made dunes a key component of beach projects. The dunes can block storm-driven waves and serve as a reserve of sand as the ocean removes beach. There has been controversy there, too, with Margate opposing the construction of dunes as part of a 2017 beach project.

Why engineers use different barriers to protect NJ coast Read More »

NJ Assembly committee to consider energy bills on Jan. 7



The New Jersey’s Assembly Telecommunications and Utilities Committee will meet on Thursday, February 7, 2019, at 10:00 AM in Committee Room 9, 3rd Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, NJ.

The following bills will be considered:

A2469 (DeAngelo / Mukherji) – Concerns installation and maintenance of solar panels in common interest communities.

A3315 (Vainieri Huttle) – Requires electric, gas, and water public utilities to provide bill credits to volunteer fire companies, first aid, rescue, and emergency squads, and nonprofit homeless and domestic violence assistance organizations.

A4010 / S604 (Pinkin / Smith) – Provides that electric power supplier license issued by BPU may be renewed without expiring if certain conditions are met.

A4012 / S605 (Pinkin / Smith) – Provides that natural gas supplier license issued by BPU may be renewed without expiring if certain conditions are met.

AR107 (Dancer) – Affirms the importance of modernizing and replacing certain natural gas pipelines in this State.



Like this? Click to receive free updates

NJ Assembly committee to consider energy bills on Jan. 7 Read More »

Trump wall opponents await bulldozers in a cemetery

Environmentalists, veterans of the Standing Rock protests and Carrizo/Comecrudo tribal members are vowing to stare down the president’s bulldozers.

Activists raise their fists atop the levee overlooking the Eli Jackson Cemetery, the exact location of Trump's impending border wall.
Activists raise their fists atop the levee overlooking the Eli Jackson Cemetery, the exact
location of Trump’s impending border wall.



The 154-year-old Eli Jackson Cemetery sits about a mile from the Rio Grande, south of the Hidalgo County town of San Juan. Encompassing just a single acre, it hosts the remains of some 150 South Texans. Just a few feet north rises a sloped earthen river levee, which the Trump administration soon plans to transform into a 30-foot concrete and steel border wall. South of the wall, the feds plan to clear a 150-foot “enforcement zone,” raising fears that bodies will be exhumed, and most of the cemetery razed. But the dead have new company: a small group of Native American activists and allies who say they’ll stand in front of the bulldozers and refuse to move.

On Wednesday, about 15 people milled about a makeshift campsite at the cemetery where they’d recently erected 10 tents. Over the last three weeks, they’d cleared out Johnson grass and other weeds that had overgrown many of the graves. As I approached the site, Juan Mancias, a long-time environmental and Native American rights activist, came out to welcome me to what he called “Yalui Village.” Mancias, 64, is the tribal chair of the Carrizo/Comecrudo, a group Indigenous to South Texas and Northern Mexico that claims about 1,500 members but isn’t recognized by the federal government. “Yalui” means “butterfly” in the Carrizo/Comecrudo language.
Eli Jackson Cemetery
Juan Mancias during a prayer song at the Eli Jackson Cemetery.  GUS BOVA

Last month, Mancias met with descendants of those buried in the cemetery and hatched the encampment idea. Now, he’s leading a coalition of Carrizo-Comecrudo members, Valley residents and allies hailing from South Dakota, Colorado and Missouri in a last-minute bid to stop the border wall. Mancias, who grew up in North Texas but whose family is from the Valley, believes that unmarked graves of Native Americans would be unearthed during wall construction. He’s also a distant descendant of some buried in the cemetery. Around seven people are currently camping overnight at the site, while more come during the day. The group has pledged to engage in civil disobedience if necessary. “We’re here, ready to protect the environment and our rights as the original people of this land,” Mancias said. “What are they gonna do? Run us over?”

Some of the activists are veterans of the Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. One Lakota/Dakota activist, DuWayne Redwater, came from South Dakota to join the Texas encampment. On Wednesday, Redwater led the group twice in prayer songs. Asked why he traveled so far, he rebuffed the question. “Being from where I’m from, it’s kind of our job,” he said, “to be landlords and caretakers of this land.” Others are locals, like Patricia Rubio, who works as a plant nursery technician at the nearby National Butterfly Center, which is also threatened by the wall. Rubio said she plans to grow plants near the cemetery to attract bees and butterflies. The group also plans to set up camps on other properties in the area, depending on how wall construction advances.



Trump wall opponents await bulldozers in a cemetery Read More »

Governor Murphy signs funding, other environmental bills


     TRENTON – Today, Governor Phil Murphy signed the following environmental bills into law:

     A2732 (Andrzejczak, Dancer / Van Drew) – Clarifies that use of propane-powered noise making device is allowed as a non-lethal method of wildlife control on farmland.

     A4579 (Lopez, Pinkin / Sweeney, Oroho) – Appropriates $28,883,557 in 2003 and 1992 bond act monies for loans for dam restoration and repair projects and inland waters projects.

     A4733 (Taliaferro, Houghtaling, Downey / Gopal, Cruz-Perez) – Appropriates $15,000,000 from constitutionally dedicated CBT revenues to State Agriculture Development Committee for municipal planning incentive grants for farmland preservation purposes.

     A4735 (Houghtaling, Verrelli, Taliaferro / Cruz-Perez, Gopal) – Appropriates $1,591,000 from constitutionally dedicated CBT revenues to State Agriculture Development Committee for grants to certain nonprofit organizations for farmland preservation purposes.

     A4736 (Armato, Freiman, Murphy / Oroho, Gopal) – Appropriates $8,896,229 to State Agriculture Development Committee for farmland preservation purposes.

     A4748 (Pintor Marin, Chiaravalloti, Quijano / Greenstein, Bateman) – Authorizes NJ Infrastructure Bank to expend additional sums to make loans for environmental infrastructure projects for FY2019.

     A4751 (Freiman, Tully, Murphy / Codey, Bateman) – Appropriates $15.696 million from constitutionally dedicated CBT revenues to DEP for State acquisition of lands for recreation and conservation purposes, including Blue Acres projects.

    S679 (Bateman, Smith / DeAngelo, Mukherji, Danielsen) – Increases civil penalties for certain natural gas or hazardous liquid facility safety violations.

     S3186 (Codey / Mukherji, McKnight, Schaer) – Amends list of environmental infrastructure projects approved for long-term funding for FY2019 to include new projects and remove certain projects.



Like this? Click to receive free updates

     

Governor Murphy signs funding, other environmental bills Read More »

Nearly $570,000 announced in NY Ocean Research Grants

Image result for new york state coastline

DEC and New York Sea Grant Announce Nearly $570,000 in New York Ocean Research Grants

In partnership with New York Sea Grant (NYSG), the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) today announced nearly $570,000 in ocean research grants awarded to investigative teams at Stony Brook University (SBU), CUNY York College, and the Wildlife Conservation Society. 

The teams will work to identify the biodiversity of the offshore ecosystem of the New York Bight and investigate the species and uses of New York’s ocean environment.

“The ocean research grants announced today support the research work necessary to better understand of the impacts of climate change to marine resources, including ocean acidification and rising sea temperatures,” said DEC Commissioner Basil Seggos. “It is vital that we work together with our partner agencies, researchers, and investigators to proactively protect our natural resources from changing ocean chemistry and safeguard the long-term sustainability of our fisheries.”


Through New York State’s 10-year Ocean Action Plan (OAP), supported by the Environmental Protection Fund’s Ocean and Grant Lakes funding, the state has prioritized dedicated research to inform long-term monitoring programs and to improve science-based understanding of how interrelated components of the ocean ecosystem function off New York’s coast.


The 2019 – 2021 grant awarded projects will begin in March and represent the first of two rounds of requests for proposals (RFP) from a five-year, $1.1 million cooperative agreement between DEC and NYSG. A second RFP will fund projects in 2021-23. Goals for the research outlined below will assist in defining the relationship between human use of the ocean and the natural processes that drive the offshore environment:

  • Ocean acidification in the New York Bight: Associations with eutrophication processes and implications for shellfish populations – $195,000
    Researchers Chris Gobler, Michael Frisk, Lesley Thorne, SBU School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences (SoMAS), will investigate the impacts of ocean acidification on shellfish, crustaceans, fish, and zooplankton in the New York Bight and possible connections to oceanic eutrophication. Ocean eutrophication begins with the increased load of nutrients to coastal waters and can stimulate an explosive growth of algae (algal blooms) that depletes the water of oxygen when the algae die and are eaten by bacteria.
  • Effects of current and projected climate conditions on Atlantic Surfclam (Spisula solidissima) – $200,000
    Investigators Bassem Allam, Robert Cerrato, Emmanuelle Pales-Espinosa, Kamazima Lwiza, SBU SoMAS, will study environmental impacts to this shellfish fishery, as well as the implication for other marine life species regime shifts occurring in the New York Bight with an increase in global temperatures and potential ocean acidification.
  • Applying environmental DNA analysis to biodiversity assessment and long-term ecological monitoring across New York’s marine waters – $174,000Assessing the rich and biodiverse marine life of the New York Bight and the submarine Hudson Canyon will begin to characterize the offshore ocean ecosystem and the creatures that inhabit or visit New York ocean waters. An additional focus on outreach to communicate these findings at the New York Aquarium is the focus for researchers Elizabeth Alter, CUNY York College; and Howard Rosenbaum, Merry Camhi, Wildlife Conservation Society.

New York State Ocean Action Plan
New York’s long-understudied inshore and offshore ocean waters contain a wealth of information on the health, biodiversity, and resiliency of marine organisms and their ocean habitat. To achieve New York’s goals in ensuring the ecological integrity of the ocean ecosystem and the goods and services it provides, the state must first explore the questions pertaining to the ecosystem and collect data needed to inform future decisions on how we use the ocean environment.


Maritime commerce, commercial and recreational fishing, tourism, and other recreational business are key components to New York’s economy that rely heavily on the health of the state’s ocean and estuarine ecosystems. Understanding the current baseline conditions of the ocean ecosystem and how these are changing is a key factor as new and traditional uses of the offshore area expand with new technologies and new resources. It is imperative to measure environmental changes occurring with ocean ecosystems to understand the scope of climate change in the New York Bight, as well as the new uses designed to reduce those impacts.

Nearly $570,000 announced in NY Ocean Research Grants Read More »