Search Results for: RGGI

Scott Drew elected New Jersey LSRP Association trustee

Scott Drew, LSRP
Scott Drew, LSRP, a senior environmental scientist and an Associate of Geosyntec Consultants, has been elected to the Board of Trustees of the New Jersey Licensed Site Remediation Professionals Association (LSRPA).

The professional organization of more than 500 members incorporated in 2009 in response to the creation of the Licensed Site Remediation Professional certification under the New Jersey Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA).

The act moved the direct supervision of site remediation projects from case managers with the New Jersey Department of :Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to LSRPs.

These independent professionals are responsible for conducting site remediation projects across the state with the objective of expediting site closure. LSRPs have an obligation to protect public health and safety and the environment, as well as the authority to review and approve investigation and remediation work plans, develop closure documents, and exercise professional judgment to efficiently move sites through the assessment and remediation process to closure.
 


The mission of the LSRPA is to advance the LSRP profession, acting as an educational and technical resource and assisting its membership in the use standards of care and informed professional judgment when performing the work of a LSRP. The organization works closely with NJDEP officials and other regional stakeholders on issues related to the continued evolution of the SRRA.

Mr. Drew has been an LSRP since 2010 and has been a member of the LSRPA Steering Committee for the past two years. He has been a member of the association’s Regulatory Outreach Committee and represented the LSRPA on two NJDEP stakeholders committees. The committees were responsible for developing technical guidance on vapor intrusion investigations and the evaluation of contaminated groundwater discharges to surface water.

Mr. Drew is a frequent presenter at conferences and technical training sessions in New Jersey on the technical and regulatory aspects of conducting vapor intrusion investigations. He currently serves as an LSRP for 12 project sites.


Scott Drew elected New Jersey LSRP Association trustee Read More »

Pa residents, industry have their say on drilling rules

“Five years into Pennsylvania’s shale gas boom, the state is overhauling environmental regulations for drillers and changing the way the industry operates above ground, “reports  State Impact’s Katie Colaneri. 

A public hearing Monday night in Williamsport, Lycoming County set drillers, who argued the rules would go too far, against environmentalists who say the Department of Environmental Protection did not go far enough.  

“I understand they’re walking a fine line. It’s a hard job for an agency,” said Nadia Steinzor, a New York-based organizer with the environmental group Earthworks. “You can’t satisfy everybody, but they know enough now.”

**Like what you’re reading? Click here to subscribe to this blog**  

The rules proposed by the state Department of Environmental Protection would set new standards for running temporary pipelines, dealing with spills and storing wastes. Many of the new requirements were set by the state’s drilling law, Act 13 and will update Chapter 78 of the state code.

Click here for State Impact’s guide to the proposed regulations 

Drillers would also be required to search for abandoned wells within 1,000 feet of the path of the well bore. The DEP says it would help build a database of the hundreds of thousands of old wells that have not been plugged and can become pathways for pollution.

Companies would be responsible for plugging old wells if they are impacted during fracking.John Augustine with the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry trade group, says the industry is willing to comply with that provision, but should not be held responsible for cleaning up after old wells that were not impacted by their activities.

Read the full story here

Related environmental news stories:
DEP Chapter 78 Drilling Regulation Webinars Now Available Online
News: Environmental Quality Board opens public comment period
Public can comment on oil/gas regulation changes – Meadville Tribune
Shallow well producers decry DEP’s proposed new rules – Williamsport Sun-Gazette

Recent posts:

Pinelands Commission rejects controversial gas
pipeline

NJ scandal: Christie opens up; bridge official shuts
down
 

Capitol Hill Calendar: January 9-10, 2014  
Buchanan Ingersoll talking merger with Florida law
firm
  
NJ enviros get their day in court over RGGI
withdrawa
l

Environmental attorney
Todd Terhune gains promotion

Pa residents, industry have their say on drilling rules Read More »

Pinelands Commission rejects controversial gas pipeline

**More related news stories added at 2:20 p.m.**
**Related news stories added at 2:20 p.m.**

On a 7-7 vote this morning, the New Jersey Pinelands Commission rejected a staff-recommended natural gas pipeline that had the support of Gov. Chris Christie’s
Department of Environmental Protection and the state’s Board of Public Utilities.

Four previous governors opposed the proposal under which the South Jersey Gas Company would pay the Commission $8 million for environmental projects in return for an exemption to a long-standing ban on new transmission pipelines through the forest area, a zone where most development is prohibited.

**Like what you’re reading? Click here to subscribe to this blog**

Many will speculate whether the result would have been different had the vote come prior to the so-called "Bridgegate" political scandal that has engulfed the Governor, forcing him to fire a key member of his inner circle and accept the resignations of two high-level appointees at the Port Authority of NY/NJ.

What do you think? Let us know in the comment box below.

NOTE: We’ll be updating this post throughout the day with print and video stories on the vote.


Related environmental news stories:

Panel Rejects NJ Pinelands Natural Gas Pipeline – ABC News 
Pinelands pipeline plan rejected – Asbury Park Press 
Fighting a Pipeline, but Feeling and Fearing Christie’s Influence
Critics link bridge scandal to Pinelands gas pipe vote – Asbury Park Press 
Bridget Anne Kelly: The aide at the center of the storm
Pinelands pipeline rejection a rare win for N.J. environmentalists 
Rachel Maddow Presents New Chris Christie Bridge Scandal Theory 

Recent posts:
NJ scandal: Christie opens up; bridge official shuts down 
Capitol Hill Calendar: January 9-10, 2014
Buchanan Ingersoll talking merger with Florida law firm 
NJ enviros get their day in court over RGGI withdrawal   
Environmental attorney Todd Terhune gains promotion   
Hundreds of water complaints filed in fracking states 


Pinelands Commission rejects controversial gas pipeline Read More »

Capitol Hill Calendar: January 9-10, 2014

Capitol_Hill

 
Hearings on Energy and Environment Issues and Legislation

————————————————————————
 
This report is made possible by our friends at BillTrak
Signup for their free Congressional Newsletter here
 

————————————————————————-


THURSDAY, JANUARY 9, 2014


HOUSE ENERGY AND COMMERCE
Subcommittee on Health
10:00 a.m. 2123 Rayburn
Hearing entitled "The Extenders Policies: What Are They and How Should They Continue Under a Permanent SGR Repeal Landscape?"

HOUSE NATURAL RESOURCES
10:00 a.m. 1324 Longworth
Hearing entitled "Obama Administration’s War on Coal: The Recent Report by the Office of the Inspector General"


FRIDAY, JANUARY 10, 2014


HOUSE NATURAL RESOURCES
Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources
9:30 a.m. 1324 Longworth 202-225-9297
Hearing entitled "The Science behind Discovery: Seismic Exploration and the Future of the Atlantic OCS", 9:30 a.m., 1324 Longworth.








Capitol Hill Calendar: January 9-10, 2014 Read More »

Buchanan Ingersoll talking merger with Florida law firm

Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, a Pittsburgh-based law firm with more than 80 lawyers in Philadelphia and offices in 15 locations including Harrisburg, Pa., Newark and Princeton, NJ and Wilmington DE, is in merger talks with Tampa, Florida’s Fowler White Boggs, according to reports in the Philadelphia Business Journal and the Tampa Bay Business Journal.

Buchanan Ingersoll provides legal services to a wide variety of industries, including chemicals, coal, energy and real estate. The firm already has Florida locations in Miami, Fort Lauderdale and Tampa. Fowler White has almost 100 lawyers in five Florida sites, so the combined firm would have 550 lawyers.
"We have had inquiries from a number of firms wishing to expand into Florida recently," Fowler White chair and CEO Rhea Law told the Tampa Bay Business Journal. "Our discussions with Buchanan have pointed out a number of similarities between our firms – our reputation, commitment to clients, culture as well as the desire to grow in Florida."
There’s no definitive agreement, she said.

Buchanan Ingersoll talking merger with Florida law firm Read More »

What you need to know about the EPA's Gina McCarthy

Things you might like to know about Gina McCarthy:

  1. She was nominated yesterday by President Obama to be the next administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, replacing New Jerseyan Lisa Jackson.
     
  2. She is 58, a Boston-area native (has the accent to prove it) and currently heads the EPA’s air and radiation office.

  3. Her nomination requires her to gain the approval of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee where the ranking Republican, David Vitter of Louisiana and senior Republican member John Barrasso of Wyoming are solid supporters of oil and gas and do not think kindly of the EPA.

  4. But some folks you’d expect to oppose her do not. Seven unlikely supporters

  5. She served as DEP Commissioner for former Republican Gov. Jodi Rell in Connecticut. During her tenure, she helped lay the groundwork for RGGI, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. (NJ Governor Chris Christie, are you listening?) 
       
  6. She also worked for Mitt Romney when he was the Republican governor of Massachusetts. There she  helped implement strict standards to reduce carbon and mercury pollution from power plants. That was before Romney ran for president and promised to abolish the EPA.
    (Gov. Christie: Don’t worry, Mitt says you’re not to blame for his loss. No kidding)

  7. She reportedly shoots a mean game of pool and has a wicked sense of humor.

***********************************************************************************************************For thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment
***********************************************************************************************************

More on Gina McCarthy:
Gina McCarthy, EPA’s air chief, nominated to head agency – Washington Post
Gina McCarthy for EPA could be Obama’s most significant nominee 
Gina McCarthy is a fine choice to head the EPA. – Hartford Courant
Meet Obama’s EPA pick: Gina McCarthy | "Global Possibilities"
Gina McCarthy on the Fuel Economy Label -YouTube
Obama Names New Energy Secretary, EPA Director
Nomination sets stage for struggles on climate change

Our most recent environmental news posts:
Kennedy called, Cuomo waited on fracking health study 
For all you fans of the Alaskan polar bear
Start your day with some Jersey/Pennsy politics
Would NJ Highlands protection law pass if voted today?
Americans set new record for solar cell efficiency 
 

What you need to know about the EPA's Gina McCarthy Read More »

Read how money is shaping the national fracking debate

From Money to Burn published in Earth Island Journal:

The American energy industry is at a pivotal moment. New technologies like horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) have opened vast deposits of petroleum and methane that were previously inaccessible. While the glut of natural gas has helped to drive coal’s share of US electricity generation to an all-time low (and, in the process, has flattened out the country’s carbon dioxide emissions), it has also put drilling companies in a financial squeeze. Caught between low gas prices and the high costs of shale gas extraction, many companies are looking for ways to either cut corners or increase prices via a rise in demand. Natural gas producers are pressing hard for gas exports, increased reliance on natural gas for electricity generation, and subsidies for trucks and buses that run on natural gas. Oil companies, meanwhile, are demanding more shale drilling on public lands. And environmentalists, of course, are pushing back against these efforts, arguing that the drilling rush is endangering water quality and wildlife habitat and reducing the market incentives for creating the kind of renewable energy system that will further reduce CO2 emissions.
The high stakes translate into a political battle royale as the fossil fuel industry commits to spending whatever it takes to influence voters and elect politicians who are sympathetic to its interests.
The oil and gas industry has been a political juggernaut since the days of John D. Rockefeller and Standard Oil, and few sectors of society can match the industry’s influence in Washington. Since the 1970’s, when the nation’s cornerstone environmental laws were set in place, the oil and gas industry has again and again won major exclusions from environmental laws like the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Safe Drinking Water Act. Drillers’ waste is exempt from many standards on handling hazardous waste, and the so-called “Halliburton loophole,” passed in 2005, ensured that fracking lay outside of the purview of federal rules designed to protect the nation’s aquifers. The industry’s political clout is perhaps best demonstrated by the largesse it continues to receive from taxpayers – more than $55 billion in federal subsidies between 2011 and 2015 – even in an era of austerity.
In recent years, oil and gas companies have put their political machine into an even higher gear. In 2009, the American Gas Association spent more than $1.1 million on federal lobbying, nearly double the $581,000 it spent in 2006. According to a report from Common Cause, federal campaign contributions from fracking industry employees and their political action committees (PACs) have skyrocketed since the drilling rush began. In 2006, the fracking industry made about $1.6 million in campaign contributions; by 2010 that figure had grown to $4.5 million. So far in this election cycle, the oil and gas industry as a whole has made more than $30 million in campaign contributions to members of Congress and to fossil fuel PACs, putting the industry on track to break the record $37 million it spent during the 2008 election.
By comparison, as of late July alternative energy companies had made less than $1.4 million in contributions to federal campaigns.
The industry is also focused on speaking directly to voters to try to sway the outcome of the fall election. Just two industry associations – America’s Natural Gas Alliance and the American Petroleum Institute – have poured well more than $125 million into multimedia ad campaigns over the past three years. In January, the American Petroleum Institute (API) launched a saturation-style ad campaign dubbed “Vote 4 Energy.” The campaign by API features mainstream-looking people proclaiming that they are “energy voters” who support American jobs and drilling for domestic oil and gas. Jack Gerard, president and CEO of API, said during a January 4 speech: “API worked to ensure that energy issues were prominent in policy discussions in several early primary states last year, and we will ensure they remain front-and-center in all states.”
As a result of such paid media campaigns, television viewers are far more likely to see commercials extolling the benefits of natural gas than they are to see news reports on the controversy, according to an analysis by the media watchdogs at Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. Five broadcasters – ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and Fox – produced a total of nine news segments focused on fracking between January 2009 and November 2011, amounting to less than an hour of coverage. By contrast, 530 ads for “America’s oil and gas industry” or “America’s natural gas” aired on those stations during the same time period. Those 500-plus ads total four and a half hours of broadcasting.

Care to add your two-cents worth to the debate over fracking?  Use the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comments’ line.

How you can track FOIA requests pending at the EPA
Hess wins key air permit for gas power plant in Newark

Judge tosses NY Delaware River Basin fracking suit  
Decision signals death of ‘public nuisance’ climate cases 

Read how money is shaping the national fracking debate Read More »

Pa charities spending millions to keep an eye on fracking

“Citizens groups and nonprofits around the nation are asking questions about environmental and health impacts of natural gas hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and Pennsylvania charities are funding much of the debate, here and in other states.
“Foundations from Philadelphia to Pittsburgh have provided more than $19 million for gas-drilling-related grants since 2009, according to an Associated Press review of charity data. The money has paid for scientific studies, films, radio programs, websites and even trout fishing groups that monitor water quality.
“That’s led to expressions of gratitude from those who say state and federal governments aren’t doing enough on the issue, but also protests from some in the gas drilling industry, who claim there’s bias in the campaigns.
Read the full Associated Press story here.

*********************************************************************************************************** For thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment  

***********************************************************************************************************
 
 
Related

CA vineyard owners unsure of fracking effects on land
Editorial: A Check Up for natural Gas

Our most recent posts

How you can track FOIA requests pending at the EPA
Hess wins key air permit for gas power plant in Newark

Judge tosses NY Delaware River Basin fracking suit  
Decision signals death of ‘public nuisance’ climate cases 
NJ Gov. Christie delivers one-two punch to enviro bills 

Pa charities spending millions to keep an eye on fracking Read More »

How you can track FOIA requests pending at the EPA

Starting today, anyone filing requests with the Environmental Protection Agency under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) should find it easier to track the status of requests and receive agency correspondence and documents.

The new system, called FOIA Online, allows anyone to search pending FOIA requests and documents already released as the result of previous FOIA requests, submit a new FOIA request to an agency, track requests, see the status of any request and receive agency correspondence and documents all within the new system.

The Sunshine in Government Blog calls it a:

"
watershed moment in FOIA processing because it is a serious effort by the federal government to create a friendlier way for the public to exercise our right to information held by the government – and it’s a more efficient way for agencies to respond to FOIA requests."
***********************************************************************************************************

For thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment 

***********************************************************************************************************
 

Related:
FOIA Online goes live; new tool to track FOIA requests, responses 

Our most recent posts:
Hess wins key air permit for gas power plant in Newark
Judge tosses NY Delaware River Basin fracking suit 
Decision signals death of ‘public nuisance’ climate cases
NJ Gov. Christie delivers one-two punch to enviro bills
NJ lawmakers take alternative-fuel vehicles for a test run
RGGI sees fewer bidders but still raising tens of millions 

How you can track FOIA requests pending at the EPA Read More »

Hess wins key air permit for gas power plant in Newark

Hess Corp logo 

New Jersey environmental regulators have approved a key air pollution control permit
that will enable the Hess Corp. to build a 655-megawatt, natural gas-fired power plant
in Newark, NJ’s Ironbound section.


Construction is targeted to begin before the end of the year, following a 45-day EPA
air operating permit review.

Opposed by environmental groups


In May, the city’s planning board voted 7-1 to approve construction of the facility over
the objections of some neighbors and environmental groups like the Sierra Club who
argued  that the Ironbound already had more than its share of industrial facilities.


"You’re taking a community that has had more impact of pollution than almost any
other place in the United States and now you’re going to put up a power plant," Sierra
Club director Jeff Tittel said. "Instead of helping a community overcome its industrial
past and move forward, you’re throwing it backward."  

But Adam Zipkin, Newark’s deputy mayor of economic development, said that the city’s independent experts had "scrutinized the potential impact of this proposed plant on
Newark’s air quality"  and found the project “ is
likely to result in a net improvement to air quality by allowing the more polluting generators in our area — the coal and peaker plants — to run less often." 

*********************************************************************************************************** For thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment
***********************************************************************************************************

Questions about impact on taxpayers

NJBIZ
reports that “Under New Jersey’s Long-Term Capacity Agreement pilot program, or LCAPP, the Hess plant is one of three natural gas-fueled projects
eligible for payments from the state to make up the difference between price guarantees offered by the Board of Public Utilities and what utilities will pay the firms for electricity generation.


The price guarantees are meant to be incentives for the companies that build new power plants in the state, helping to lower electricity rates for residents. But critics of LCAPP are taking aim at the newly released Board of Public Utility contracts.


"It skews the marketplace significantly and will have lasting implications for decades," said Glen Thomas, president of PJM Power Providers Group. The organization aims to promote competitive wholesale electricity markets in the served PJM Interconnection Inc.‘s 13-state regional power grid.

In 2015, when a 15-year contract with CPV would begin, the state would pay the company nearly $30 million as a result of the subsidy program. That could potentially pave the way for more payments in subsequent years, as long as the market price for capacity stays below the state’s price guarantees.

For Hess, which has a contract starting in 2016, the first payout could be around $12 million, according to calculations based on data provided by the BPU. In the cases of both generators, Thomas said, "New Jersey ratepayers are now on the hook for the next 15 years to be paying what’s likely to be a very substantial premium." 

Job creation and economic benefits to Newark

The plant is expected to bring 400 new jobs during the three years of construction and 26 when it becomes operative, according to John Schultz, vice president of Energy Operations for Hess.

Hess promises to pay the city about $100 million over the next 30 years.

The Star-Ledger reports that the first $25 million will come right away in easements, environmental programs, a boiler replacement program and rehabilitation of the Ironbound Stadium.  The rest will come in payments in lieu of taxes — $2.6 million a year over the course of 30 years.

The $750 million plant would be erected near Newark Bay on a site, near a police firing range and the Essex County Correctional Facility, where Hess currently has maintains storage tanks. The property is a mile from the nearest private residence. 

Related stories
:

Newark power plant secures environmental approval
If Newark gets new power plant, do residents get shaft?

Our most recent posts: 
Judge tosses NY Delaware River Basin fracking suit 
Decision signals death of ‘public nuisance’ climate cases  
NJ Gov. Christie delivers one-two punch to enviro bills  
NJ lawmakers take alternative-fuel vehicles for a test run 
RGGI sees fewer bidders but still raising tens of millions 

Hess wins key air permit for gas power plant in Newark Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights