Is pro-Trump MacArthur vulnerable in mid-term election?

House Democrats like former National Security Adviser Andy Kim’s chance of upsetting pro-Trump NJ Congressman Tom MacArthur, but two Washington-based publications that track congressional races say MacArthur is a safe bet for re-election. 

Andy Kim h&s
Democrat challenger Andy Kim


Tom MacArthur h&S


Republican Congressman Tom MacArthur

WASHINGTON — House Democrats now say former National Security Adviser Andy Kim, who is challenging a pro-Trump Jersey congressman, offers one of their best chances to win a Republican-held congressional seat this fall
Kim, is wants to grab the House seat from Rep. Tom MacArthur, on Wednesday became the second New Jersey Democrat added to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s “red to blue” program.
“This national recognition highlights our race as one of the keys to taking back the House,” Kim said.
He joins Mikie Sherrill, a former Navy pilot and federal prosecutor running for the seat being vacated by retiring Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-11th Dist.; and state Sen. Jeff Van Drew of Cape May, who is trying to succeed retiring Rep. Frank LoBiondo, R-2nd Dist., on the list.
“National security expert Andy Kim has spent his life serving our country and will fight for hardworking families in New Jersey’s Third District,” said Rep. Ben Ray Lujan, D-N.M., the DCCC chairman.
Kim and Van Drew were among the latest additions to the program, bringing the number of candidates to 24, the exact number of Republican-held seats the Democrats need to win to claim a majority.
Those on the list can expect fundraising help and other assistance from the DCCC. There of them are from New Jersey, more than any other state. 
“Under Andy Kim’s watch, the United States failed to grasp the threat ISIS presented to the world and failed to formulate a strategy to stop them,” said Chris Martin, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee. “He’s just the latest flawed candidate being propped up by national Democrats.”
MacArthur, R-3rd Dist., raised $1.5 million and reported cash on hand of $932,632, both more than double his fundraising figures at the same point two years ago. President Donald Trump held a fundraiser at his Bedminster golf for him.
Inside Elections, one of the two Washington-based publications that tracks congressional races, continued to consider MacArthur a safe bet for re-election even as it moved three other New Jersey races towards the Democrats. The second publication, the Cook Political Report, said MacArthur was a strong favorite for a third term.
Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

Is pro-Trump MacArthur vulnerable in mid-term election? Read More »

Vote in NJ this week on revised PSEG nuclear bailout

Intended to prop up PSEG nuclear plants, measure has gone through drastic revisions without gaining traction with legislators

Tom Johnson reports for NJ Spotlight:

The Legislature will try to advance a controversial nuclear subsidy bill again this week — at least the fourth version of the measure drafted this year.


Designed primarily to prop up nuclear power plants operated by Public Service Enterprise Group, the legislation has gone through drastic revisions in a bid to win enough backing among lawmakers to win legislative passage. So far, it has not worked.


Many of the changes are aimed at addressing concerns raised by Gov. Phil Murphy, who wants the measure to focus more heavily on promoting his clean-energy agenda. In doing so, however, it bolstered critics’ fears that costs to utility customers — who will subsidize those efforts and pay to keep the nuclear units open — will soar.


The nuclear subsidies alone could cost $300 million annually, excluding what ratepayers may have to ante up to pay for solar and energy-efficiency projects, other goals espoused in the bill.


Ramping up rates
“What we end up with may be a $5 billion or $8 billion bill,” said Stefanie Brand, director of the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, Friday morning at a conference on nuclear energy before the latest version became public. “This is going to substantially increase rates.”


The legislation ramps up the state’s reliance on renewable energy. It will require 35 percent of the state’s electricity to come from renewable sources, such as solar and offshore wind, by 2025 and 50 percent renewables by 2030.


The new legislation, made public late Friday afternoon, will be discussed at a joint meeting of the Senate Budget and Assembly Telecommunications and Utilities Committee on Thursday. There also is a similar, but not identical, version in the Assembly on the agenda.


The new bill appears to leave much of the nuclear provisions untouched. It establishes a zero-emission credit for eligible nuclear units and retains a $0.004 per kilowatt hour charge for the credits. The credits would, for the first time, value the environmental benefits of the carbon-free electricity produced by nuclear power, which supplies more than 40 percent of the state’s electricity.


Read the full story

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

Vote in NJ this week on revised PSEG nuclear bailout Read More »

NJ bill would let your solar panels earn their keep

Strong move to encourage greater use of ‘net metering’ as advocates push for state to overhaul energy policies and critics worry about cost to ratepayers

Tom Johnson reports
for NJ Spotlight:
solar installer
New Jersey is giving solar energy a boost by expan
ding a policy that encourages homeowners and businesses to install panels.
With wide backing, the Senate Environment and Energy Committee voted to broaden the use of net metering, a system that allows owners of solar arrays to get paid for the electricity their panels produce when it is fed back into the power grid.
The move comes at a time when most clean energy advocates are strongly pushing the state to overhaul its policies to encourage the use of solar energy, while others criticize its cost to ratepayers, who paid approximately $500 million last year to subsidize its growth.
In Trenton yesterday, however, there was widespread support for net metering, an important component of the rapid expansion of solar energy in New Jersey.


Read the full story


Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >>

NJ bill would let your solar panels earn their keep Read More »

Explosive stories from The Record on DuPont pollution



From The Record of Bergen County (NJ):

Toxic Secrets: DuPont’s legacy of pollution A trove of government documents and
emails obtained by The Record and NorthJersey.com reveal that DuPont knew
cancer-causing solvents could
vaporize into Pompton Lakes homes NorthJersey.com 

>DuPont’s
neighbors suffer cancer, rare illnesses
  Pompton
Lakes residents near former DuPont site had elevated rates of kidney cancer
and lymphoma NorthJersey.com   
                                  
 >How
poisonous chemicals got under 400 NJ homes
For years, DuPont downplayed how dangerous a toxic plume
was to Pompton Lakes residents NorthJersey.com

Explosive stories from The Record on DuPont pollution Read More »

Enviro, ag and energy bills clearing committee today in NJ



The following New Jersey bills were released from committee today and now are in place for upcoming votes on the floor in the New Jersey Assembly:


A436 – Requires electric public utilities to provide priority power restoration to certain medical facilities, assisted living facilities, and nursing homes.

A792 – Authorizes issuance of multi-species depredation permit for wildlife control on farmland. (with amendments) 

A1344 – Allows electric energy produced from biofuel to be eligible as Class II renewable energy.
02/12/2018 
A2188 – Prohibits sale and distribution of mercury relays and switches under certain circumstances.
02/12/2018 
A2731 – Removes statutory limitations on number of permits that may be issued by Division of Fish and Wildlife for the taking of beaver.
02/12/2018 
A2732 – Clarifies that use of propane-powered noise making device is allowed as non-lethal method of wildlife control on farmland.
02/12/2018
A3116 – Amends definition of “existing major hazardous waste facility” in “Major Hazardous Waste Facilities Siting Act.”
02/12/2018 
A3242 – Permits certain deer control activities; prohibits deer feeding; and establishes check-off donation on hunting license applications to support venison donation program.
02/12/2018
ACR144 – Condemns EPA decision to withdraw from “once-in-always-in” policy under the Clean Air Act.



Also: NJ Dems lusting to throw off Christie’s enviro-shackles


Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

02/12/2018 

Enviro, ag and energy bills clearing committee today in NJ Read More »

NJ Dems lusting to throw off Christie’s enviro-shackles


By Frank Brill

EnviroPolitics Editor



In his eight years in office, former Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican, seemed determined to do–or not do–whatever would most offend New Jersey’s environmental activists.


Now that the state is governed by Phil Murphy, a progressive Democrat, the green community has emerged from its  bunker and is applauding the quick moves by Murphy and the Legislature’s Democratic majority, to undo Christie.


Even before his inauguration, Murphy announced that he was replacing Christie’s DEP Commissioner–businessman Bob Martin–with Catherine McCabe who had served a short term as the Environmental Protection Agency’s acting administrator in Washington, and then as the EPA’s regional administrator for Region 2, which includes New Jersey, New York and Puerto Rico. 


Within days of his swearing-in, Murphy signed a half-dozen executive orders. One of them directs the DEP and Board of Public Utilities (BPU) to prepare New Jersey for reentry into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) from which Christie had severed state ties. Another orders the BPU to drop its stall tactics that have kept the state from implementing regulations to expedite offshore wind energy.   


The new governor also has told the Attorney General to remove New Jersey from a lawsuit brought by several Republican states challenging former President Obama’s Clean Power Plan.


That’s a lot of undoing so far by the governor alone, but Democrats in the Legislature, who have endured eight years of Christie vetoes, want to be part of the action.


On Thursday, the Assembly will consider two bills that, if enacted, will enable pro-environment lawmakers to slip the shackles of the Christie the Conqueror (now Christie the Vanquished). They are:     
                     

A1212 (McKeon / Gusciora) – Specifically requires New Jersey’s participation in RGGI, and


S598 / A1929 (Smith / Greenstein) – Requires New Jersey to join U.S. Climate Alliance to uphold the Paris Climate Accord. While this is more of a ‘take that,Trump’ bill than a ‘take that,Christie’ bill, Christie critics note that he did offer at least tepid support of President Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S. from the international treaty and he certainly would have vetoed any legislation that called for New Jersey’s cooperation with the rest of the nations of the world that signed on.



Other environment legislation up for votes in the 80-member Assembly on Thursday are:


A839 (Land / Andrzejczak / Mazzeo) – Prohibits offshore oil and gas exploration, development, and production in state waters, and issuance of DEP permits and approvals for activities associated with offshore oil and gas activities.

A1053 (Houghtaling / Taliaferro / Andrzejczak) – Revises and expands laws on trespass and vandalism on agricultural and horticultural lands.



A1344 (Gusciora / Muoio) – Allows electric energy produced from biofuel to be eligible as Class II renewable energy.

ACR144 (Pinkin / McKeon) – Condemns EPA decision to withdraw from “once-in-always-in” policy under the Clean Air Act.



You’ll be seeing many more pro-environment bills in the months ahead, addressing climate, sustainable wind and solar energy, electric vehicles, and other issues. Republicans will argue that we can’t afford them. The Democrats will counter that it would be far more costly, long-term, to ignore them.


The pendulum has swung. It should be lively.

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>





NJ Dems lusting to throw off Christie’s enviro-shackles Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights