NJ Gov-Elect Murphy introduces his DEP Commissioner

Incoming New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy, at a news conference today, introduced his pick to become the state’s next commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection, Catherine McCabe.



An attorney, McCabe has served in numerous executive environmental positions, including:

  • Assistant New York State Attorney General
  • Deputy chief of the environmental enforcement section of the federal Department of Justice
  • Deputy Assistant Administrator of the Office of Enforcement and Compliance at EPA
  • One of three judges on the EPA’s Court of Appeals
  • Deputy and Acting Administrator of EPA’s Region 2
  • Acting Administrator of the federal EPA


Murphy said that the state had lost ground in environmental protection during Gov. Chris Christie’s eight-year term, specifically noting Christie’s failure to capitalize on the opportunity presented by offshore wind development, his withdrawal from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, and his settlement of pollution claims with ExxonMobil that Murphy said amounted to ‘pennies on the dollar.’


Click on the arrow in the photo above to watch the entire news conference broadcast online by NJTV News 

What changes do you expect to see at the NJDEP under Murphy and McCabe? Use the comment box below or provide your opinion on our Facebook page.


Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>



 

NJ Gov-Elect Murphy introduces his DEP Commissioner Read More »

NJ Assemblyman sues to stop proposed state buildings

There’s a lawsuit to block a new government office building that’s about to go up in Trenton. Opponents don’t like the design or location. But what they really don’t like is the financing: $215 million in new debt from a bond issue pushed through without voter approval. One of the plaintiffs, Assemblyman Reed Gusciora, joins NJTV News Senior Correspondent David Cruz.

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>




NJ Assemblyman sues to stop proposed state buildings Read More »

Lancaster, Pa. agrees to curb sewage discharges to river



News release from the Environmental Protection Agency:

PHILADELPHIA (December 20, 2017) The city of Lancaster, Pennsylvania has agreed to comprehensive measures to end discharges of untreated sewage and other pollutants to local waterways from the City’s combined storm and sewage system, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Justice and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) announced today. 

The settlement, which was filed in federal district court in Philadelphia resolves a simultaneously filed complaint brought by the Department of Justice on behalf of the EPA and PADEP, alleging the discharge of untreated sewage into the Conestoga River in violation of the Clean Water Act.

Under the settlement, the City of Lancaster has agreed to implement measures to significantly reduce combined sewer overflows, or CSOs.  These include improving pump stations and reduction of flow through a comprehensive long-term plan to improve the ability of the entire system to handle flow.

“We are proud of the close collaboration between EPA and PADEP over the course of these investigations and negotiations,” said EPA Regional Administrator Cosmo Servidio.  “This settlement, which will improve local water quality and protect human health, was achieved in large part because of the strong cooperation between our two agencies.”

“This outcome is good for the people of Lancaster and everyone that uses the Conestoga River,” said DEP Secretary Patrick McDonnell. “Reducing sewer overflows makes our streams and rivers cleaner and better places for fish, wildlife, and people.”

The Clean Water Act complaint, filed with the proposed consent decree, alleged unlawful pollution discharges caused by numerous overflows of untreated wastewater from Lancaster’s combined sewer system.  This system carries rainwater runoff, domestic sewage, and industrial wastewater in the same sewer pipes to a wastewater treatment plant, where it is treated before discharge to a water body. 

During periods of heavy rainfall or snowmelt, the water volume exceeds the system’s capacity – causing combined sewer overflows.  The City has five CSO outfalls, which overflowed at least 392 times in the past five years, discharging nearly 3.8 billion gallons of untreated, polluted water into the Conestoga River, a tributary of the Susquehanna River and the Chesapeake Bay. These CSOs contain not only stormwater but also untreated human and industrial waste, toxic materials, and debris. 

The settlement between the Department of Justice and the city of Lancaster resulted from several years of investigation of alleged violations by EPA and PADEP, followed by extensive federal-state negotiations with city officials.

The city of Lancaster will pay a $135,000 civil penalty, split equally between the U.S. and Pennsylvania, and implement a $1.8 million supplemental environmental project.  This project involves the restoration of a 1,350-foot segment of a local waterway called Groff’s Run that will reconnect wetlands to the Conestoga River, protecting water quality and reducing localized flooding. 

For more information on CSOs, visit http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/home.cfm?program_id=5.
          
The consent decree is subject to a 30-day public comment period and court approval.  The consent decree is available for review at www.justice.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

Lancaster, Pa. agrees to curb sewage discharges to river Read More »

As vote nears on PSEG nuke subsidy, opponents fume


Some foes accuse PSEG of jiggering subsidy to reach the $300M – $350M it wanted in first place

salem nuclear plant


Tom Johnson reports for
NJ Spotlight:
With a weekend to digest a bill to prop up New Jersey nuclear plants, foes were left fuming with many objections and one key question: how did advocates come up with the surcharge on customers’ bills?
The levy appears tiny ($0.004 per kilowatt hour), but has huge implications for ratepayers. It could provide anywhere from $300 million to $350 million a year to Public Service Enterprise Group, or at least $1.2 billion in subsidies over an initial four-year period.
“Was that number plucked out of thin air?’’ asked Ev Liebman, associate director of AARP of New Jersey. “We don’t know where that number comes from and there is no justification for it in the bill.’’
The legislation (S-3560), introduced late Thursday evening after a long year of intense lobbying by PSEG, is up for a vote in two legislative committees tomorrow. Unless it obtains financial help for its nuclear units in South Jersey, the company says it will shutter them.


Secret surcharge

The surcharge provision, tucked into a single paragraph in an eight-page bill, reflects a rare legislative intrusion into setting prices in a competitive energy market the state joined nearly two decades ago. Handing out subsidies to a big player in that market is a step that rankles rivals in the energy sector and the customers who will foot the bill.

Read the full story

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

As vote nears on PSEG nuke subsidy, opponents fume Read More »

Interactive map shows who recycles most in New Jersey

Colleen O’Dea reports for NJ Spotlight:

(Interactive map of recycling activity)

Thirty years after New Jersey became the first state in the nation to mandate recycling, it still has not reached the goal of throwing away no more than half the waste generated by residents and businesses.
In fact, after getting off to a good start, and achieving a 45 percent recycling rate in 1995, eight years into the new law, the percentage of recycled municipal solid waste began dropping. The rate bottomed out in 2003 at 33 percent of paper, glass, plastic, batteries, tires, motor oil, food waste, grass, leaves, and some other items generated by homes, schools, and businesses. After remaining low for years, the rate has begun creeping back up this decade, reaching a level of 43 percent in 2015, the most recent year for which data is available from the state Department of Environmental Protection.
Still, New Jersey’s recycling rate exceeds that of the nation as a whole — 41 percent of municipal waste recycled in the state in 2014, compared with 35 percent nationally that year (2015 U.S. data are not yet available).
Critics say Gov. Chris Christie’s nearly annual diversion of funds from the state’s Clean Energy Fund to plug holes in the budget is at least partly to blame for New Jersey’s inability to reach its 50 percent recycling goal.
“Christie is stealing the recycling money,” said Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey chapter of the Sierra Club. “That money could be used for education.”
The governor, with legislative approval, diverted $236 million from the fund — about 60 percent of its total — to subsidize other spending in last year’s budget. During Christie’s tenure, more than $1.5 billion has been diverted from the fund, which is financed by a surcharge on customers’ gas and electric bills.

Interactive map shows who recycles most in New Jersey Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights