Trump’s expediters fast track a driller with a dirty record

Workers move a section of well casing into place at a Chesapeake Energy natural gas well site near Burlington, Pa., in Bradford County, on April 23, 2010.

By Audrey Carleton (Capital & Main)

An Oklahoma-based natural gas producer that was fined $1.9 million in 2021 for damaging wetlands and streams at 76 drilling sites in Pennsylvania has had more than a dozen of those sites added to a list of projects that have been ordered fast-tracked by the Trump administration to address what he calls the nation’s “energy emergency.”

In addition to the fine, Chesapeake Energy, now Expand Energy, was required to restore 55 acres of wetlands and nearly 4,500 linear feet of streams. Wetlands are considered environmentally critical, sometimes referred to as “earth’s kidneys,” because they improve water quality and filter pollutants; they also help reduce erosion and prevent flooding. Chesapeake has a history dating back to 2013 of improperly filling in wetlands by discharging drilling fluids, sand, dirt, and rocks.

Chesapeake applied for retroactive federal permits to come into legal compliance on 17 of its fracking projects in Pennsylvania. Now, the firm’s wait may be nearly over.

Chesapeake’s fracking operations are among more than 600 projects across the country that have been earmarked by the Trump administration as energy emergencies. The list includes a pipeline to be bored under Lake Michigan, a deepwater export port off the coast of Louisiana, and a controversial plan by Chevron to build a housing development atop one of its old oil fields in northern Orange County, Calif.

The projects were added to the Army Corps of Engineers’ standing list of jobs that are considered priorities — typically those impacted by natural disasters such as hurricanes, tropical storms, and floods. Such emergency work is prompted by “dire” situations that “require short cutting the normal permitting,” said David Bookbinder, director of law and policy at the nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project.

Read the full story here


If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

Trump’s expediters fast track a driller with a dirty record Read More »

NJ farmers allowed controlled burns to protect crops April 6-12

With New Jersey expected to experience cooler spring temperatures, the Department of Environmental Protection has agreed with NJDA Secretary Ed Wengryn’s request to allow farmers to do controlled open burning or use specialized torches known as smudge pots to protect flowering crops from damage beginning Sunday, April 6 through Saturday, April 12.

Temperatures are expected to drop to the 30s or below next week with varying winds through portions of the state. These expected temperatures follow warm temperatures in recent days. Damage from freezing weather now can significantly reduce yields of certain fruits and vegetables that are in the flowering stage.

The DEP and Department of Agriculture are allowing these steps to protect farmers’ livelihoods and to ensure that consumers will be able to enjoy an ample supply of Jersey produce later this year. 

Read the full story here


If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

NJ farmers allowed controlled burns to protect crops April 6-12 Read More »

Experts: Trump’s Port Fee Plan Could Bollix Up Shipping Schedules

By Ira Breskin, gCaptain

STAMFORD, CT — Shipping industry executives are considering options to address Trump administration policy changes, under consideration or enacted, that could significantly disrupt operations, speakers said here this week at the 40th annual Connecticut Maritime Association annual meeting.

Containership operators, for example, are weighing radical reconfiguration of ship schedules to avoid costly ship call-based port fees being considered by the Trump administration.

Should operators decide to reroute their vessels to major US “load center” ports, at the expense of smaller secondary ones, to reduce exposure to new fees, “it would absolutely crush us,” said Bethann Rooney, port director for the Port of New York and New Jersey. “We need to prepare to work effectively,” she said.

Related:
Trade war escalation over Trump’s tariffs sends stocks tumbling
Trump’s Trade War Escalates as China Retaliates With 34% Tariffs
Federal Reserve chief says Trump tariffs likely to raise inflation

PONY/NJ is the busiest container port on the East Coast and among the busiest in the US.

The result “would be far worse than we saw on the West Coast during the (COVID-19) pandemic,” Rooney said during a presentation on Wednesday.

Read the full story here


If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

Experts: Trump’s Port Fee Plan Could Bollix Up Shipping Schedules Read More »

University signs agreement for micro nuclear reactor on campus

Agreement to build microreactor on US university site
Rendering of the KRONOS MMR at the University of Illinois (Image: NANO Nuclear)

By World Nuclear News

US microreactor technology company NANO Nuclear Energy Inc has signed a strategic collaboration agreement with the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign to construct the first research KRONOS micro modular reactor on the university’s campus.

The agreement formally establishes the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign as a partner in the licensing, siting, public engagement, and research operation of the KRONOS MMR, while also identifying the university campus as the permanent site for the reactor as a research and demonstration installation.

The university plans to re-power partially its coal-fired Abbott power station with the KRONOS MMR, providing a zero-carbon demonstration of district heat and power to campus buildings as part of its green campus initiative. The project team aims to demonstrate how microreactor systems integrate with existing fossil fuel infrastructure to accelerate the decarbonisation of existing power-generation facilities.

Related: Westinghouse scouting sites to build micro nuclear reactors

Following initial arrangements, NANO Nuclear will begin the process of geological characterisation, including subsurface investigations, to support preparation of a Construction Permit Application (CPA) for submission to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The company said this preparatory work is essential to understanding the environmental parameters of the site, including critical inputs to safety analysis, to ensure the utmost reliability and safety of the facility, and support NANO Nuclear’s Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR) and Environmental Report (ER).

As part of the agreement, the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign will lead the regulatory engagement with the NRC as well as public engagement, support licensing activities including the PSAR and ER, and play a key role in site layout, constructability assessment, and future operator training programmes. NANO Nuclear will oversee plant design, construction, system integration, and commercial pathway development.

Read the full story here


If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

University signs agreement for micro nuclear reactor on campus Read More »

Wall Street Reels From Shock of Trump Tariffs

Stocks tumbled in the U.S., Asia and Europe. Allies and adversaries alike were weighing their responses.

By Ana Swanson, Alan Rappeport, Tony Romm and Matthew Mpoke Bigg,
New York Times, April 3, 2025, 10:17 a.m.

Wall Street opened sharply lower on Thursday, after a slump in global markets in response to President Trump’s major round of tariffs on U.S. imports. The world’s biggest economies reacted swiftly to the new levies, a significant escalation of trade tensions with the United States, and some countries warned of retaliation.

The S&P 500 opened more than 3 percent lower, a huge drop for the index, echoing sharp declines in Asia and Europe as investors balked at the tariffs. China vowed to take countermeasures to “safeguard its own rights and interests.” Its state media described the tariffs as “self-defeating bullying.”

Mr. Trump had said for weeks that he would impose “reciprocal tariffs” on allies and adversaries, but the tariffs announced on Wednesday were far higher than experts had expected, and are likely to drive up prices for American consumers and manufacturers.

In Brussels, Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, said that the bloc would be united in its response to the tariffs. “If you take on one of us, you take on all of us,” she said. The duties posed a particular threat to attempts to revive the largest economy in Europe, Germany’s, which has been stagnant.

The response from Japan, the largest overseas investor in the United States, was more restrained. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba called the tariffs “extremely regrettable.” But he refrained from talk of retaliation, saying that his government was trying to impress upon the Trump administration that Japan is helping the United States to industrialize again.

Britain also did not suggest it would immediately retaliate. Instead, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said negotiations toward a trade deal with the United States would continue.

Related:
Layoffs Hit Pandemic-Era Heights
Recycled Materials Association Statement on New Tariffs 
Senate rebukes Trump’s tariffs as some Republicans vote to halt taxes on Canadian imports

Business groups, trade experts, economists, Democratic lawmakers and even a few Republicans swiftly denounced the tariffs, while some industries scrambled to understand how they would be affected.

Mr. Trump framed his policies as a response to a national emergency, saying that tariffs were needed to boost domestic production.

Mr. Trump could have tried to fix the rules governing global trade, which he says allies have abused to the detriment of the U.S. economy and American consumers, said Eswar Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell University. Instead, he said, “Trump has chosen to blow up the system governing international trade.”

Here’s what else to know:

  • Tariff rates: The United States will subject Chinese goods to a staggering new tariff of 34 percent, on top of the tariffs that Mr. Trump had already imposed since January. The European Union’s tariff was set at 20 percent, Japan’s at 24 percent, Britain’s at 10 percent and India’s at 26 percent. Mr. Trump said little about the methodology behind those calculations.
  • Markets fall: The market reaction suggested that the scale of the tariffs had come as a surprise. Futures on the S&P 500 slumped over 3 percent, as benchmark indexes dropped more than 3 percent in Japan and nearly 2 percent in Hong Kong and South Korea. The Stoxx Europe 600 was down more than 2 percent and Brent crude, the international oil benchmark, dropped by 3 percent.
  • Loophole closed: Mr. Trump also scrapped a loophole called the de minimis rule, which has been used by many e-commerce companies to send low-cost goods to the United States from China without having to pay taxes.
  • Auto tariffs: New tariffs on all automobiles made outside the United States took effect, adding to previous tariffs on steel, aluminum and other imports that Mr. Trump has imposed since returning to office in January.

If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

Wall Street Reels From Shock of Trump Tariffs Read More »

National EPR for batteries discussion kicks off on April 7

The EPA and DOE are holding a virtual meeting on April 7 from 2 PM to 4 PM Eastern to kick off the conversations to develop a national battery extended producer responsibility (EPR) framework.

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law requires EPA and DOE to develop a national EPR framework for batteries that addresses battery recycling goals, cost structures for mandatory recycling, reporting requirements, product design, collection models, and transportation of collected materials.

EPA and DOE welcome experts across the battery life cycle, including battery producers, manufacturers of batteries and battery containing products, retailers, recyclers, and collectors or processors; states and municipalities; and others such as environmental, energy, or consumer organizations to participate in the EPR conversations.

If you like this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Please do not take our word for it, try it free for a full month

National EPR for batteries discussion kicks off on April 7 Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights