NJ lawmakers fail to advance water testing legislation

Tom Johnson reports for NJ Spotlight:
The state’s failure to establish drinking-water standards for a range of toxic contaminants, some recommended a dozen years ago, came under harsh scrutiny and criticism from legislators yesterday.
Nevertheless, the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee held a bill to require the Department of Environmental Protection to adopt new standards for 16 substances, largely on the urging of a top agency executive.
The outcome disappointed environmentalists who have been lobbying for action on the contaminants for years. They had hoped to press the Legislature to force the DEP to act, especially in the wake of reports of lead in drinking water in schools and hospitals, chromium in more than 100 water systems, and other toxics in supplies in South Jersey.
Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >>

NJ lawmakers fail to advance water testing legislation Read More »

Like eating out? Better think twice about immigration bans

In his 12-plus years as a chef, Hungry Pigeon co-owner Scott Schroeder has done dozens of collaboration dinners. He can’t think of one that came together as quickly as this.
On March 2, Schroeder’s Queen Village restaurant will host an event called “Sit Down and Eat to Stand Up for Change.”
Billed as a fundraiser to “stand in solidarity for civil rights,” from which all proceeds will be donated to the ACLU, the Hungry Pigeon dinner features food made by chefs at nine different restaurants and drinks donated by seven breweries, spirits makers and wine distributors. With all the moving parts, the whole thing took less than a week to organize.
“Everyone we asked was eager to participate and donate things,” Schroeder told Billy Penn. “It was effortless.”
In a way few other circumstances have, Donald Trump’s maneuvers in the first few weeks of his presidency have spurred the Philly hospitality industry to action.
Combined with his order stripping “Sanctuary Cities” like Philadelphia of federal funding if they don’t work with immigration officials on deportation, Trump’s order restricting travel from seven countries and revoking tens of thousands of visas was especially galvanizing.
“I love a good Facebook argument as much as the next person, but it doesn’t really do much,” said Schroeder, explaining how he and Cheu Noodle Bar co-owner Ben Puchowitz came up with the idea for the event. “We wanted to do something that actually helped.”
Tickets to the dinner run $100 per person and include all food and drink.

‘Sanctuary Supper’

For Philadelphians distraught by the Administration’s policies, going out for a nice meal can be a welcome distraction. But for chefs, restaurateurs and others in the business, it’s work — work that depends heavily on immigrant labor.
“Like many restaurants in the US, Le Virtù operates on a daily basis thanks to the dedication and hard work of immigrants,” said co-owner Francis Cratil Cretarola.
The entire kitchen staff currently working under chef Joe Cicala at the East Passyunk destination is comprised of people from Mexico, he noted, and the restaurant has also relied on employees born in Nicaragua, Canada and Italy.
So Le Virtù has also put together a fundraising dinner.

Alfonso Cretarola with co-owner Francis Cratil Cretarola: the undocumented immigrant who inspired @LeVirtuPhila 
Slated to take place on March 15, the “Sanctuary Supper” will feature dishes from both Cicala and Mexico-born sous chef Poli Sanchez. Seats run $120 per person, including wine, and funds will be donated to PAUWR (Popular Alliance for Undocumented Workers’ Rights), the organization founded by Ben Miller and Cristina Martinez.
Miller and Martinez, owners of renowned taqueria South Philly Barbacoa, have emerged as spokespeople for the rights of immigrant restaurant workers — especially those who, like Martinez, are undocumented. In the coming year, they plan to take their #right2work dinner series national.
Across the US, “eating and drinking places” employ approximately 1.8 million foreign-born people, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That number ends up meaning at least 20 percent of a restaurant’s staff is made up of immigrants, on average. In big cities like Philadelphia that number swells to something like 70 percent, according to national nonprofit Restaurant Opportunities Center United (ROC). Of those, at least one in 10 is estimated to be undocumented.
“The restaurant industry is one of the largest employers of immigrants in the nation,” said Sheila Maddali, co-director of ROC’s Pennsylvania branch and co-director of ROC’s national Tipped Worker Resource Center.
She described her organization as “an alternative to the National Restaurants Association” trade group, leaders of which recently said they were “looking forward to working with” President Trump on E-Verify.
“There’s no way to talk about the industry without talking about immigrants — of both documented and undocumented status,” Maddali said.
Based in West Philly, Maddali has recently taken on an additional role at ROC: She’s the national spokesperson for the new Sanctuary Restaurants project.
Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >>

Like eating out? Better think twice about immigration bans Read More »

If the money’s there, why no action on NJ transit projects?

Not a single step can be taken on vitally needed new transportation projects in New Jersey until a new committee meets to select which projects get funded. 


The catch? The committee doesn’t yet exist.


That’s right. Despite months of delay, as the governor and legislature wrangled over a funding source–finally settling on an increase in the state’s gas-tax–no one apparently bothered to come up with names of folks to sit on the panel and choose what projects will get the green light.


And when the committee’s members finally are appointed, expect the political horse-trading to begin in earnest. 

David Cruz has the story above for NJTV News
 

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

If the money’s there, why no action on NJ transit projects? Read More »

NJ fishing interests ignored; cuts to flounder quota coming





















David Levinsky writes for the Burlington County Times:

A proposal that likely will force New Jersey to make changes to its fishing regulations for summer flounder was advanced by a coastal fisheries management board Thursday despite strong opposition from state officials.
The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, a regional agency that helps set fishing quotas for the 15 East Coast states, voted 10-2 to adopt the controversial new flounder rule, called Addendum XXVIII, which would drastically reduce New Jersey and other coastal states’ flounder catch limits.
The vote followed nearly three hours of debate among the coastal states’ representatives and fishery managers from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which is responsible for federal fisheries management.
Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >>


New Jersey and Rhode Island were the only states to vote “no” on the proposal, which likely would force New Jersey to adopt its most stringent fishing regulations ever for anglers, such as a 19-inch minimum size limit, as well as a shortened season and reduced daily catch limit.

The exact changes likely won’t be known until spring.
Last summer, the minimum size limit for flounder, also called fluke, was 18 inches in most parts of the state, with a limit of five “keepers” per day. The season ran from May 21 to Sept. 25, which coincided with the peak tourism season.
Proponents have argued that coastal states need to tighten their regulations to compensate for overfishing and keep the stock healthy for future generations.
But New Jersey officials question the science behind the proposed changes and say the stricter limits likely would make it impossible to catch flounder off the Jersey coast, a development that could cripple marinas, charter and party boat operators and bait-and-tackle shops, as well as other tourism-related businesses.

NJ fishing interests ignored; cuts to flounder quota coming Read More »

Ex-Christie aide Mowers gets senior job at State Dept.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, with former Gov. Christie campaign aide
      Matt Mowers standing behind him,speaks to the State Department employees.

Andrew Seidman reports for Philly.com:


Matt Mowers, a former top campaign aide to Gov. Christie, has landed a senior role in the Trump administration.

Mowers is a White House adviser at the State Department, according to a department official. Mowers stood behind Secretary of State Rex Tillerson Thursday while the newly appointed secretary addressed employees at the department for the first time.

A State Department official said she could not elaborate on Mowers’ responsibilities.

Mowers ran Christie’s presidential campaign operation in New Hampshire and later joined the Trump campaign.


He cut his teeth in New Jersey politics, eventually joining the Christie administration and working on the Republican governor’s campaigns. While working in the now-defunct Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs in Trenton, Mowers was responsible for engaging with local officials in North Jersey. 



Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >>

Ex-Christie aide Mowers gets senior job at State Dept. Read More »

NJ Supreme Court extends liabilities for enviro damage

Tom Johnson reports in NJ Spotlight:


supreme court

Members of the NJ Supreme Court
The state Supreme Court yesterday ruled that insurers can be held liable for cleaning up environmental pollution at a site even though the policy was subsequently assigned without approval to a successor.
In the unanimous decision, the court upheld an appellate court ruling that found Travelers Casualty & Surety Company and other insurers were responsible for claims involving hazardous discharges at the former Givaudan Corp. fragrance manufacturing facility in Clifton.
The case involves a long history of corporate mergers and restructurings that the court ruled had no effect on the insurers’ obligations to pay under the policies, originally written for the Givaudan Corp.
The defendants had prevailed in trial court, which ruled that the assignment of the policy to Givaudan Fragrances was invalid because it added a second party to the policy, increasing the insurers’ liability. The appellate court reversed that decision.
The damages in the pollution case stem from 2006, when the state Department of Environmental Protection and later the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sued Fragrances for removal of contaminated soil and groundwater and damages for the discharge.
Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

The company was later named as a so-called responsible party in another pollution case involving dioxin contamination in the Passaic River and Newark Bay by a defendant in that litigation. Total claims against Fragrances could range in the hundreds of millions of dollars, according to some reports.

In a 41-page decision, the state’s highest court affirmed the lower court’s ruling, relying on previous trial and appellate division decisions in the state. Essentially, it found that an insurer’s risk amount could not be increased by a change in the insured’s identity.
The court found the policies at issue are occurrence policies and they provide coverage based on liability for an occurrence to which the policy applied.
“The risk of exposure that was contractually undertaken by the insurer occurred prior to the assignment, and it occurred due to the actions or inactions of the entity that the insurer insured when the loss incurred,’’ the court wrote.
The environmental contamination, the justices said, took place during the relevant policy period. The assignment does not alter the insurers’ liability for indemnifying the underlying insured event, according to the court.
“In sum, we are unpersuaded that this assignment increases the risk undertaken by the insurers for the policy periods for which they wrote coverage, in specific amounts, for occurrence-based claims pertaining to the Givaudan site in Clifton,’’ the court said.


Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >>

NJ Supreme Court extends liabilities for enviro damage Read More »