The man who wants to send Gov. Chris Christie to jail

William Brennan who has filed a criminal complaint against Gov. Christie 


Mike Kelly, columnist for The Record, writes
:

Bill Brennan was a man on a self-professed mission on that Tuesday this past September when he drove from his home in Wayne to the federal courthouse in Newark.

Inside a fifth-floor courtroom, David Wildstein, the alleged mastermind of the Bridgegate scandal was on the witness stand telling a jury that Governor Christie, who insisted he knew nothing about the gridlock that clogged Fort Lee’s streets near the George Washington Bridge during a five-day stretch in September 2013, actually was informed about the traffic jams as they were taking place.
Brennan, 50, a former Teaneck firefighter with a history of filing lawsuits and other court actions against government officials, had heard enough.
He left the courthouse and drove straight to Fort Lee, where he signed a criminal complaint charging Christie with official misconduct for not taking action to alleviate what officials in the crowded borough insist was a serious emergency. 

What seemed at the time to be little more than a quirky, Quixotic legal stunt by a man long-regarded as one of North Jersey’s most nettlesome gadflies, has now taken on a life of its own

Read the full story here

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates 
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >> 

The man who wants to send Gov. Chris Christie to jail Read More »

Late changes to 5-year EPA fracking study downplay risks

Ray Kemble holds two samples of well water from his neighborhood in Dimock, PA.
He says the water was contaminated after fracking. 
– 

Top officials of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last year made critical changes at the eleventh hour to a highly anticipated, five-year scientific study of hydraulic fracturing’s effect on the nation’s drinking water. The changes, later criticized by scientists for lacking evidence, played down the risk of pollution that can result from the well-drilling technique known as fracking.
Documents obtained by APM Reports and Marketplace show that in the six weeks before the study’s public release, officials inserted a key phrase into the executive summary that said researchers did not find evidence of “widespread systemic impacts” of fracking by the oil and gas industry on the nation’s drinking water.
Earlier draft versions emphasized more directly that fracking has contaminated drinking water in some places.
The documents also show that the news release accompanying the scientific study was changed on June 3, 2015, the day before it was made public. A draft displayed a conclusion that the EPA had identified “potential vulnerabilities” to drinking water. But the final release dated June 4, concluded: “Assessment shows hydraulic fracturing activities have not led to widespread, systemic impacts to drinking water resources and identifies important vulnerabilities to drinking water resources.”
In a conference call with reporters about the study on the day it was released, the EPA’s deputy administrator, Tom Burke, highlighted the lack of “widespread, systemic impacts” as the agency’s top finding.

In fact, scientists had found evidence in some places that fracking activity had polluted drinking water supplies.
In all, the agency identified more than two dozen instances in which hydraulic fracturing had an impact on water resources. The agency also identified hundreds of other spills, many of which reached soil and water.
It’s not clear precisely who inserted or ordered the new phrasing. But emails acquired via the Freedom of Information Act show EPA officials, including press officers, met with key advisers to President Obama to discuss marketing strategy a month before the study’s release. The emails also show EPA public relations people exchanging a flurry of messages between 4 and 11 p.m. on the eve of the study’s release.

Read the full story here 


Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates 
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >> 

Late changes to 5-year EPA fracking study downplay risks Read More »

Quanta Superfund cleanup in NJ faces yet another delay

Long-sought Edgewater cleanup faces another delay

Scott Fallon reports for The Record

Twice a day for decades, the tide from the Hudson River has pounded the deteriorated bulkhead at the Quanta Superfund site in Edgewater, pulling coal tar, arsenic and other pollution into the waterway.

It has created an underwater toxic plume 30 feet deep near the shoreline and stretching as far as 800 feet into the river. When the plume is exposed at low tide, the area surrounded by high-end condos, restaurants and stores often smells like an oil refinery.

Work that began this fall on the site promises to halt more toxic material from leaching into the river. But plans to clean up the pollution already in the Hudson have hit yet another delay.

Environmental Protection Agency officials have said they need to take more sediment samples from the river to get a better estimation of how big and toxic the plume is.

The move has puzzled some residents and environmental advocates, considering that EPA officials said in 2011 that they were going to have a cleanup plan for the Hudson ready by the next year. 

Some fear the EPA will not require a comprehensive enough cleanup of the river after it approved a plan five years ago that entombs pollution in the ground at Quanta instead of removing it.


Read the full story

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates 
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >> 


Quanta Superfund cleanup in NJ faces yet another delay Read More »

Where’s Waldo? He’s easier to find than NJ’s Water Plan

 
WaldoSince 1987, kids have searched for Waldo, the main character in a series of British children’s books created by the English illustrator Martin Handford.

Since 2012, environmentalists have been searching for New Jersey’s own version of Waldo, better known as the
Statewide Water Supply Plan.

The British Waldo appears hidden among other characters and objects in pictures at the beach, in foreign locations, and even in the past.

New Jersey’s Waldo, the vanished water supply blueprint, likely hasn’t traveled very far. Most suspect it’s hidden at the Department of Environmental Protection or in that top-secret, government inner sanctum known as the Governor’s Office.

The 2016 drought, that now spans two-thirds of the state, has given environmentalists new cause to demand Waldo’s release and they are less amused than ever by all the hide and seek.


NJ Spotlight’s Tom Johnson has the details:
As New Jersey’s drought worsens, state advisers on water supply are renewing their call on the Christie administration to release a blueprint for water planning that has not been publicly updated since 1996 despite a legal requirement to do so every five years.

The Water Supply Advisory Council, a group of water company executives, nonprofits, and water users, is expected to urge Gov. Chris Christie and Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Bob Martin to publish a new version of the Statewide Water Supply Plan that was submitted to the governor’s office in 2012 and has not been seen in public since.
Council members and many other water-supply advocates have been arguing for years that it’s not possible to plan for development without a statewide plan that anticipates where and how much water will be needed, and how its quantity and quality can be sustained for the good of consumers, businesses and the environment.
Now, advocates say the ongoing drought makes it more urgent that the state has a coordinated strategy to make it easier to avoid water shortages in affected areas, lessen impacts on water quality from sewage-treatment plants, and ease environmental stresses in areas suffering from low rainfall.
The council’s new call for publication of the plan, agreed at a meeting on November 18, follows an attempt in April 2015 which was rejected by state officials.
“We have embarrassed the executive branch on numerous occasions but they just don’t seem to care,” said Sen. Bob Smith (D-Middlesex), chairman of the Environment and Energy  Committee. “I don’t know what he’s trying to do other than avoiding reality,” he said, referring to Gov. Chris Christie.

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column – >> Smith said the lack of an updated plan makes water supply vulnerable to many changes such as saltwater intrusion, lead in school water supplies, and the presence of the toxic chemical chromium 6 in some public water systems that have become known since the last report was published 20 years ago.

“It should be the overall planning document for the expansion of water supply, for the protection of existing supply, and it should weigh up the infrastructure needs,” Smith said. “You’ve got to protect your water or human beings aren’t going to do real well.”
Smith’s committee had previously called on Gov. Christie for publication of an updated plan but to no avail, he said.
It’s unclear whether the latest version of the plan is in the governor’ office, or is undergoing another update at the DEP. Brian Murray, a spokesman for Christie, declined to say why the plan hasn’t been publicly updated since 1996; whether it is still in the governor’s office, and whether there are any plans for its release.
Murray referred questions on the plan to the DEP, whose spokesman, Bob Considine, said staff there are “still gathering the most updated data” for the plan.

“We are managing New Jersey’s water supply every day while developing the draft Water Supply Plan,” Considine wrote in an mail. “When the draft plan is complete and ready for public comment, we will release it and schedule public hearings.”

Read the full story here Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >>

Where’s Waldo? He’s easier to find than NJ’s Water Plan Read More »

Gov. Christie has a sinking feeling about the NJ Capitol

    It’s a death trap, it’s a suicide rap 
   –Bruce Springsteen, Born to Run


Was Gov. Chris Christie channeling his favorite rocker today in describing the need for a $300 million renovation of the gold-domed state capitol, portions of which he said were in danger of “catastrophic failure?”


Michael Mancuso reported for NJ.com:

“Windows are literally falling out of this building,” Christie said.


“To leave the statehouse in this condition is an embarrassment,” he said. “And quite frankly it’s shameful.”
He described how sections of the executive portion of the building, which he said hasn’t been renovated in more than six decades, are sinking into the ground and could collapse. Also, the building’s heating, cooling and ventilation is in serious disrepair, Christie said, describing how 35 percent of the executive portion lacks any HVAC.
Christie called portions of the building “a trap,” citing the lack of sprinklers and fire suppression systems and the fact that areas of the building are not up to code.
The executive portion is a near block-long section of the building that faces West State Street and houses the offices of the governor, treasurer, secretary of state, their staffs and the press corps.

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates 
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >> 

Gov. Christie has a sinking feeling about the NJ Capitol Read More »

EPA sets first 10 chemicals for TSCA reform evaluation

Asbestos insulation

Notice sent today
by the U.S. EPA Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
 
Agency answers call to move forward on
chemical reform, naming asbestos among first to undergo risk evaluation
Today, EPA is
announcing the first ten chemicals it will 
evaluate for potential
risks to human health and the 
environment under TSCA
reform.
“Under the new law, we
now have the power to require safety reviews of all chemicals in the marketplace.” said Jim Jones, assistant administrator of the of Office
of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. “We can ensure the public that we
will deliver on the promise to better protect public health and the
environment.”
The first ten
chemicals to be evaluated are:
·  1,4-Dioxane
·  1-Bromopropane
·  Asbestos
·  Carbon Tetrachloride
·  Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster
·  Methylene Chloride
·  N-methylpyrrolidone
·  Pigment Violet 29
·  Tetrachloroethylene, also known as perchloroethylene
·  Trichloroethylene
Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) as amended by the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, requires EPA to publish this list by December 19, 2016. These chemicals were drawn from
EPA’s 2014 TSCA Work Plan, a list of 90 chemicals selected based on
their potential 
for high hazard and
exposure as well as other considerations.
When the list is
published in the Federal Register it will trigger a statutory deadline to
complete risk evaluations for these chemicals within three years. 
This evaluation will determine whether the chemicals present an unreasonable risk to humans and
the environment. If it is determined that a chemical presents an unreasonable
risk, EPA must mitigate that risk within two years.
Under the newly
amended law, EPA must release a scoping document within six months for
each chemical. This will include the hazard(s), exposure(s), conditions of use,
and the potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation(s) the agency plans to
consider for the evaluation.
Additional chemicals
will be designated for evaluation, and all of the remaining Work Plan
chemicals will be reviewed for their potential hazard and exposure. For each
risk 
evaluation that EPA
completes, TSCA requires that EPA begin another. By the end of 2019, EPA must
have at least 20 chemical risk valuations ongoing at any given time.
Like this? Use form in
upper right to receive free updates 

See popular posts from the
last 30 days in right column — >> 

EPA sets first 10 chemicals for TSCA reform evaluation Read More »