New Jersey law firm briefs – Jan. 5 2016
![]() |
| Philip McGovern |
New Jersey law firm briefs – Jan. 5 2016 Read More »
![]() |
| Philip McGovern |
New Jersey law firm briefs – Jan. 5 2016 Read More »
Did you know that every time a load of garbage is dumped at a New Jersey landfill or waste-to-energy plant a portion of the tipping fee collected goes to help enhance local recycling programs?
How does it work?
State law requires that money to go into a fund that is distributed annually in recycling grants to counties and municipalities based on how much recycling they do. So the more attention you pay as an individual, family or business to removing recyclable materials from your garbage, the more your town stands to collect.
If your collection system is ‘single stream,’ you don’t have to separate recyclable paper, cans, certain plastics and glass from your garbage. It’s done for you at a separation plant.
Reports sent by towns and recycling businesses on how much recycling they do in a given year gets collected at the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The Department then calculates how much each participating governmental unit will be awarded in recycling grants.
2015 Recycling Grants, announced last week, are based on 2013 activity.
The big winners
According to a DEP news release, municipal programs receiving the highest grant awards for 2013 recycling efforts are:
Newark (Essex County) $414,754
Jersey City (Hudson County) $290,150
Brick (Ocean County) $280,093
Vineland (Cumberland County) $255,217
Secaucus (Hudson County) $228,216
Paterson (Passaic County) $219,495
South Brunswick (Middlesex County) $179,776
Toms River (Ocean County) $174,524
North Bergen (Hudson County) $172,451
Woodbridge (Middlesex County) $167,846
Clifton (Passaic County) $166,856
Hamilton (Mercer County) $144,115
Cherry Hill (Camden County) $139.961
Middletown (Monmouth County) $118,916
Bridgewater (Somerset County) $114,698
Old Bridge (Middlesex County) $114,045
Carteret (Middlesex County) $108,392
Logan (Gloucester County) $106,705
Fair Lawn (Bergen County) $103,437
East Brunswick (Middlesex County) $102,397
Paramus (Bergen County) $101,810; and
Freehold (Monmouth County) $100,741.
State law prohibits recyclable materials from being land-filled or burned. The law does not only apply to residents. Businesses and schools also must recycle, although some still do not and local governments might turn a blind eye. If your school district or shops that you patronize are not recycling, inform them of their obligation and encourage them to get with the program.
New Jersey counties, municipalities reap what they recycle Read More »
What’s causing climate chaos across the map? Read More »
Acting New Jersey Attorney General John J. Hoffman announced earlier this month that Accutest Laboratories will pay the State $2 million to resolve allegations that it deviated from both federal and state requirements for the extraction and testing of certain compounds, thereby submitting false claims to the State and its agencies for payment.
Now, a New Jersey law firm with an active environmental practice is advising its clients and friends to check whether the settlement might affect test results provided to them by Accutest.
In a Dec. 10 news release, the AG’s office said that Accutest, based in Dayton, Middlesex County, provides an array of environmental testing services, including the testing of semi-volatile organic compounds. The State and its agencies – including the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) – have contracted with Accutest to perform a variety of environmental tests in its extraction laboratory.
The allegations central to the settlement flow from a federal qui tam or “whistleblower” lawsuit filed two years ago by a former Accutest employee. The lawsuit alleged that Accutest violated both the federal and New Jersey False Claims Acts by not following U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements in the extraction and testing of certain semi-volatile organic compounds.
Specifically, the Complaint alleged that some line-level technicians in Accutest’s extraction laboratories did not fully comply with Standard Operating Procedures or prescribed methods.
While the bulk of today’s settlement covers False Claims Act damages, a portion — approximately $920,000 — resolves alleged violations by Accutest of DEP Regulations Governing the Certification of Laboratories and Environmental Measurements. Under the agreement, Accutest admits no wrongdoing or liability.
The settlement announced today represents the largest non-Medicaid-related False Claims Act settlement entered into by the State since New Jersey’s False Claims Act took effect in March 2008.
Accutest is a member of a network of environmental testing laboratories across the nation, each with a common parent owner.
In April 2013, former employee Koroush Vaziri field a qui tam action in U.S. District Court in New Jersey alleging the failure of Accutest to follow proper protocols in both its extraction laboratory and its laboratory for the analysis of semi-volatile organic compounds.
In a Dec. 23 alert, the Scarinci Hollenbeck law firm writes of the settlement:
If your company relied upon test results that were the subject of the settlements, we suggest that you ask your environmental consultant or environmental counsel to advise whether investigations at your site(s) or project(s) were affected and whether you have any regulatory or contractual exposure relating to the use of that data.
Does this NJ enviro lab’s settlement affect your company? Read More »
There are jokes about rape and sexual assault, photos mocking African Americans and other minorities, and insults leveled at people because of their weight, their sexual orientation or their religion. At least two state Supreme Court justices and numerous officials in the office of the attorney general have been caught in the scandal that has been dubbed “Porngate.”

Porngate scandal continues to roil Pennsylvania politics Read More »
![]() |
| Jonathan Lundgren |
Suspended bee researcher receives ‘courage’ award Read More »