A legal challenge to the fossil fuel project faces dismissal, which would let the developer advance even as similar local pushback stifles Ohio’s solar buildout.

Aerial view of a site with fracking equipment surrounded by forest
Gas fracking in West Virginia. Waste from fracking can contain heavy metals, radioactive chemicals, and other chemical compounds. (iStock Editorial/Getty Images Plus)

By Kathiann M. Kowalski, Canary Media

Ohio is a notoriously difficult state for building renewable energy. Many counties ban wind and solar outright, but even in those that don’t, state regulators often rely on local opposition to deny permits for developers.

Fossil fuel companies, on the other hand, do not face these hurdles. This discrepancy is underscored by the fact that plans to build two fracking-waste wells in Ohio’s rural Washington County are poised to move ahead despite objections from residents, environmental groups, and nearby town governments. DeepRock Disposal Solutions aims to use these deep holes in the earth to push toxic liquid waste from fracking oil and gas into porous rock layers far underground.

Stop missing out. Get your free, 30-day EnviroPolitics newsletter trial today.

Last week, a Franklin County Court of Appeals magistrate — a court officer who handles preliminary matters as well as detailed issues in complex cases — recommended the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Buckeye Environmental Network in opposition to the wells. The group argues that the state illegally relied on outdated rules when permitting the project, which risks contaminating local groundwater supplies.

Read the full story