Groups extend Delaware Bay oysters a warmer welcome

 Oyster shells on “picking belt’ from Delaware Bay. Photo:Cody Glenn  

A shift in ocean conditions is creating warmer temperatures and higher salinity in Delaware Bay, making oyster beds off Salem County, NJ the beds of the future, according to the Partnership for the Delaware Estuary.

To take advantage of those conditions and to help restore flood damaged beds, several organizations yesterday launched an experimental restoration project. It involves moving “seed oysters,” or shells with baby oysters attached,
from the Cape May County area of Delaware Bay to storm-damaged oyster beds off
Salem County.

Floods resulting from several consecutive storms, including
Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee, devastated oysters on the northernmost
beds of Delaware Bay last year.

The impact was worse than any other storm in
almost 60 years, killing about half of the oysters in the beds that comprise some 35 percent of the oysters supporting the fishery.


“This project is a partnership between the New Jersey Chapter
of The Nature Conservancy and several members of the Delaware Bay Oyster
Restoration Task Force,” said Jennifer Adkins, executive director of the
Partnership for the Delaware Estuary. 

The partnership and Conservancy are providing $55,000 for the experimental project.
Replanting involves strategically placing shells along the
Cape Shore region, where lots of baby oysters “recruit,” or attach to shells,
but few survive unless protected from predators. These shells are then picked
up and moved to the northern beds, where the attached oysters can grow over
time.

Oysters on these northern beds are protected from predators and disease,
but they grow slower and produce fewer babies than beds to the south. That is
why, in some years in the past, oysters from these beds were moved south to
quickly grow bigger and be harvested as part of the quota set each
year.

In photo at left, Dr. Danielle Kreeger, science director of the Partnership for the Delaware
Estuary, holds a planted clam shell with juvenile oysters growing on it. The “spat” will be replanted off
Hope Creek in Salem County to restore storm-damaged oyster beds.

“Shell planting is the single most important action we can
take to rebuild and revitalize the oyster beds of Delaware Bay,” said Dr. David
Bushek, director of Rutgers University’s Haskin Shellfish Research Laboratory.
“Shell planting enhances oyster habitat, giving them a leg up on survival so we
can continue to reap both the ecological and economical benefits they
provide.”

Bob Martin, commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection, said the annual oyster harvest generates over $3.5 million for
oystermen and pumps some $20 million into the bay region’s economy. 
James Hearon, a state Fish and Game Commission representative, said 16,000 bushels of shell fragments were planted about a month ago off Reed’s Beach off Cape May County. Those shell fragments, hopefully now bearing juvenile oysters known as “spat,” will be replanted.
Hearon said estimated that up to 80 percent of the 16,000 bushels should be successfully replanted. “We’ve seen as high as 1,800 spat per bushel,” he said.

Congressman Frank LoBiondo underscored the financial return from oyster bed maintenance, putting it at almost $40 per every $1 spent.

“Who wouldn’t do that over, over and over again?” he asked.


Related environmental news stories:

Aw, shucks; program protects oyster industryOrganizations partner to save Delaware Bay oyster beds, promote sustainability 

See our latest posts:  
Rutgers prof warns: Action needed to save Barnegat Bay

Art vs Nature: Should NJDEP junk sculpture garden?
NY making the Adirondacks purchase of the century
NJDEP’s waiver rule takes effect; Armageddon at hand?
Is NJ’s Christie breaking with GOP’s anti-solar ranks? 

Groups extend Delaware Bay oysters a warmer welcome Read More »

Rutgers prof warns: Action needed to save Barnegat Bay

Press of Atlantic City graphic


The declining health of Barnegat Bay has been the focus for several years of a joint summer meeting held by the environmental committees of New Jersey’s Senate and Assembly.

At the 2012 session, conducted yesterday before a standing-room-only audience in the Ocean County shore town of Lavallette, a Rutgers University researcher told committee members that the bay continues to deteriorate and that corrective action is needed quickly
on several fronts.


Based on a recently conducted study that stretched over several years, Michael Kennish, a research professor at the Rutgers University Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, warned against inaction:

“ We really need to ramp it up. We’re nowhere near where we need to be in order to fix it.”


Outside the hearing, Kennish summarized the problem for reporters. (Click arrow for video)

Kennish urged the state to set Total Maximum Discharge Limits (TMDLs) to restrict the amounts of  nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous, that flow into the bay in runoff from roads and other paved surfaces. Similar standards have been implemented to deal with pollution problems in Chesapeake Bay.

He also recommended that more action be taken to upgrade some 2,700 storm water basins throughout Ocean County–many of which are malfunctioning and, during heavy rainstorms, fail to hold back polluted runoff that streams into the bay.


Ultimate, Kennish said that the problem of land use (development and population) would have to be addressed if the bay is to be saved.

**********************************************************************************************************
For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a 
FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment
 
**********************************************************************************************************

Senate Environment and Energy Committee Chairman Bob Smith tells reporters below that he believes Governor Chris Christie would sign legislation to implement stormwater basin repairs if Ocean County’s Republican freeholders, who have balked at the expensive proposition, get behind the idea.

NJ Sierra Club Director Jeff Tittel acknowledges that solutions to Barnegat Bay’s problem present political challenges for any governor.


 
Your thoughts on Barnegat Bay and efforts to reverse its deterioration?
Use the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking
on the tiny ‘comments’ line.  Signed comments are appreciated but
anonymous responses also are accepted.

Related environmental news stories:
Latest Study of Barnegat Bay Shows Conditions Worsening for Tarnished ‘Jewel’ 
New research shows Barnegat Bay could be declared legally ‘impaired’
 
Study says Barnegat Bay ecosystem will continue to decline unless development, runoff decreases

See our latest posts:
Art vs Nature: Should NJDEP junk sculpture garden? |
NJ enviro groups awarded CRI ‘Back to Nature’ grants
 
NY making the Adirondacks purchase of the century
 
NJDEP’s waiver rule takes effect; Armageddon at hand?
 
Is NJ’s Christie breaking with GOP’s anti-solar ranks?
 

Rutgers prof warns: Action needed to save Barnegat Bay Read More »

Art vs Nature: Should NJDEP junk sculpture garden?

Maybe it’s just a sign of how little hard news is generated in August, but a lot of attention is being paid to plans by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to rip out an outdoor sculpture that has been a fixture at its Trenton headquarters since the mid 1980s.

Credit: Athena Tacha, courtesy The Cultural Landscape Foundation

Charles A. Birnbaum, president of The Cultural Landscape Foundation writes that Green Acres, the work of respected Greek-American artist Athena Tacha,

” features crescent shaped planters with stepped seating that ring its edges. It also contains 46 slabs of green granite onto which photographs of state landscapes, plants and animals (many of them endangered species) have been sandblasted. The work, considered one of Tacha’s most important, has been praised by museum directors and art historians, is included in Meredith Bzdak’s Public Sculpture in New Jersey and is documented in the Contemporary Landscape Design Collection of Dumbarton Oaks in Washington, D.C.  a site-specific.”

Annie Knox reports in NJ Spotlight that  

“…the state sponsored the sculpture’s $417,000 construction after choosing it as the winner in a State Council on the Arts competition to honor the Green Acres land preservation program. That contest was one of 50 public arts competitions Tacha has won across the country. About 40 of those designs turned up in parks and other public spaces nationwide, she said, including Franklin Town Park in Philadelphia.” 

Praised by the arts community it may be, but the work is showing its age. Some of its slate slabs have settled unevenly, causing what the DEP claims is a risk to people walking across it (or fleeing across it should the building catch fire or a denied permit petitioner calls in a bomb threat).

The Department says it will be replaced by something less impervious, apparently something “greener” than Green Acres.

“We’re looking to take out the brick and install a rain garden… It’s the type of model that we’ve been preaching to urban communities across the state,” says NJDEP spokesman, Larry Ragonese. 


    Credit: Athena Tacha, courtesy The Cultural Landscape Foundation


The decision has triggered a rare clash between two liberal communities–artists and environmentalists. Think of it as intellectual mud wrestling for lefties.  
 

The Cultural Landscape Foundation 
wants it saved and is urging like-minded folk to sign a petition 

A Trenton Times editorial agrees, arguing “a work considered worthy to be on the National Register of Historic Places, ought to stay.”


But our friend, Wayne DeFeo, an environmental consultant, is waving goodbye to it in his blog, GreenLight:

“The problem is that the space is typical of the arrogance of the landscape architect community from that era. Put in hardscape at the expense of the living plant community.”

What do we think?

We’ve been to the DEP building dozens of times and never paid much attention to the landscape. With our philistine credentials thus well established, we won’t enter the art vs nature debate. But as a longtime observer New Jersey’s political culture, we wonder:

  1. Who gets the contract to replace the work?
  2. Will DEP invoke its new waiver rule to expedite the demo permit?
  3. How long will it take the Sierra Club to link the decision to the Koch Brothers?

What do you think?  Let us know in the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny ‘comments’ link.

Related news stories:

Without review, NJ DEP plans to dump a commissioned work of art  DEP’s plan to replace Trenton sculptural plaza with ‘rain garden’ met with furor from arts groups


See our latest posts:  

NJ enviro groups awarded CRI ‘Back to Nature’ grants

NY making the Adirondacks purchase of the century
NJDEP’s waiver rule takes effect; Armageddon at hand?
  
Is NJ’s Christie breaking with GOP’s anti-solar ranks?   
Another PSEG solar farm breaks ground; more coming   


For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a 
FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment. 

Art vs Nature: Should NJDEP junk sculpture garden? Read More »

Why no decision yet on fracking in New York State?

Two months ago, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo was reported to be considering a plan to allow fracking for natural gas in five counties near the Pennsylvania border . But the state’s moratorium, imposed in 2010, is still in effect. Why?

DEC Chief Joe Martens 

A major reason is that the state’s much-anticipated environmental report on high-volume hydraulic fracturing has grown to about 4,000 pages, according to Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Joe Martens. 

Martens told Gannett’s Albany News Bureau on Tuesday that there is still more work to be done and there is no firm timetable on when a final report may be released. 

A September draft weighed in at about 1,537 pages, including appendices. Since then, Martens’s staff has been reviewing and preparing responses to every public comment.


“It’s almost hard to comprehend, but when I tell people that we’ve been working nonstop and working really hard, people have been,” Martens said. “But all of that has to be reviewed and reviewed by executive staff who are administering the agency day-to-day, doing all of the other responsibilities they had before hydrofracking even started.”



See the full Democrat and Chronicle story here.

For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a 
FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.

Why no decision yet on fracking in New York State? Read More »

NJ enviro groups awarded CRI ‘Back to Nature’ grants

Wood frog – Blaine Rothauser photo

Five New Jersey nonprofits have been awarded a total of $10,500 in the first year of the Back to Nature Fund grants program offered by Conservation Resources Inc. (CRI).

Selected for 2012 grants were:

  • Great Swamp Watershed Association– $2500 for its Watershed Friendly Homes project
  • New Jersey Audubon Society– $1500 for restoration of a vernal pond at Scherman-Hoffman Wildlife Sanctuary
  • North Jersey Resource Conservation and Development Council– $2000 for riparian restoration projects
  • Schiff Natural Lands Trust– $2500 for wetlands restoration at Mt. Paul Preserve
  • The Willow School– $2000 for expansion and enhancement of interpretive nature trails

CRI says the program is an extension of its role as a grantmaker and conservation finance intermediary. The grants are intended to help finance ecological projects and provide financial support for
New Jersey non-profits that seek to foster the preservation and
restoration of natural areas.

Read more about CRI and its Back to Nature Fund 

For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment.

 

NJ enviro groups awarded CRI ‘Back to Nature’ grants Read More »

NY making the Adirondacks purchase of the century

Location of Former Finch Parcels

New York State is making the largest single addition in more than a century to the Adirondack State Forest.

Governor Andrew Cuomo announced Sunday that the state is buying 65,000 acres of the former Finch, Pruyn & Co. land and 4,000 acres of other Nature Conservancy lands from
The Nature Conservancy to preserve it for public use. 

The
Post-Standard reports that the land will be sold to the state in a phased five-year contract beginning this year. Using funds dedicated for these purposes in the Environmental Protection Fund, New York will pay $49.8 million over five years, with $13 million to be paid in this fiscal year. The balance will be paid in each fiscal year through 2016-17. 
The State will pay full local property and school taxes on the land. 



For  thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a FREE subscription to EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter that also tracks environment/energy bills–from introduction to enactment. 

Moose drinks along Black River Trail on western edge of Adirondack Park 


“Adding these properties to the Forest Preserve protects the incomparable and breathtaking natural resources of this region and preserves a significant portion of the Upper Hudson River watershed,” Gov. Cuomo said in a statement issued by his office. “Today’s agreement will make the Adirondack Park one of the most sought after destinations for paddlers, hikers, hunters, sportspeople and snowmobilers. Opening these lands to public use and enjoyment for the first time in 150 years will provide extraordinary new outdoor recreational opportunities, increase the number of visitors to the North Country and generate additional tourism revenue.”

NY making the Adirondacks purchase of the century Read More »