Wild turkey in Jersey City… the REAL one

Joe Shine/Jersey Journal

Most days in Jersey City, NJ, the only Wild Turkey you’ll see is the one pictured on bottles in many of the city’s numerous watering holes.

Yesterday, the real deal appeared and created quite a stir.

Read about it here

___________________________________________________
Try EnviroPolitics, our daily electronic newsletter, packed with environmental and political news, legislation and regulations for
NJ, PA and NY. Get you own trial subscription
FREE for 30 days!
___________________________________________________

Wild turkey in Jersey City… the REAL one Read More »

NJ offshore wind energy’s new gust of intrigue

There’s an intriguing new development likely to intrude into the discussion today when Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar opens an all-day session in Atlantic City on the nation’s offshore energy prospects (Interior Secretary to discuss NJ’s offshore energy)

The Philadelphia Inquirer reported on Saturday that an unexpected turf battle has sprung up in the coastal waters off New Jersey where three wind energy companies thought they had sewed up development rights.

Reporter Sandy Bauers explains:

“Last fall, the BPU selected three wind developers – Bluewater Wind, Garden State offshore Energy (a joint venture of Deepwater Wind and PSEG), and Fishermen’s Energy, a cooperative of commercial fishermen looking at new ways to harvest from the sea.

“About the same time, the governor upped the ante for the technology, setting a goal in his energy master plan of 1,000 megawatts of wind – about the amount the three proposals would generate – by 2012 and triple that by 2020. The only place to meet that, all agree, is offshore. “The main obstacle at that point was that the Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service (MMS), which has the authority to regulate offshore wind, did not have a system in place to issue permits. It was being worked on.

“So the developers waited.

“Meanwhile, Burton Hamner of Seattle, president of Grays Harbor Ocean Energy Co.,  zigged where others had zagged.

“He filed seven proposals for offshore wave farms with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which under different legislation was given authority over “hydrokinetic” projects. As in tides, currents – and waves.

“In New Jersey, what got everyone’s attention and provoked the strong reaction was that the area Hamner picked engulfed the area proposed for two of the wind farms and was near to that proposed for the third.

“Odder still, most scientists have dismissed the viability of Jersey wave energy, which typically uses buoys and turbines to extract energy from the up and down motion of the waves.”

So what’s Hamner up to? 
Is he really interested in developing his own alternative energy projects off the Jersey shore?

Or is he just a smart businessman who recognized an opportunity to stake a claim to valuable territory hoping the wind developers, under pressure to get projects up and working, would be willing to cut him into their deals or buy him out?
Or is something even more Machiavellian at work?  
Could Grays Harbor Ocean Energy Co be in cahoots with Big Oil, seeking to stall wind energy development while petroleum lobbyists press Congress and the Obama Administration for approval to drill in national waters off the east coast?  
There’s nothing in Hamner’s resume to suggest the latter. If his company’s website bio can be believed, he’s more inclined to stroll down the leafy green side of the energy street.  

A former environmental planner for the Washington Department of Ecology, Hamner produces the website, Cleaner Production, which provides information on developing green and sustainable business internationally.  He serves as chair of the Renewable Energy Committee of the Marine Technology Society and was appointed in early 2008 as an international advisor to the New Zealand Marine Energy Deployment Fund.

It appears that we’ll just have to wait and watch as this story plays out.  Starting today in Atlantic City.

It should be interesting.

 
MORE:
___________________________________________________
Try 
EnviroPolitics, our daily electronic newsletter, packed with environmental and political news, legislation and regulations for NJ, PA and NY. Get you own trial subscription  FREE for 30 days! ___________________________________________________

NJ offshore wind energy’s new gust of intrigue Read More »

Interior Secretary to discuss NJ’s offshore energy


Interior Secretary Ken Salazar is coming to Atlantic City Monday to discuss the future of offshore energy. He says he wants to know what you think, too.

It will be the Obama Administration official’s first stop on a tour of public meetings to be followed by sessions in New Orleans, Anchorage and San Francisco.

Salazar will present information from a U.S. Geological Survey-Minerals Management Service Report and will solicit public comment.

At a recent meeting, Salazar said the report on Outer Continental Shelf energy resources found huge information gaps about the location and extent of offshore oil and gas resources.

“Along the Atlantic Coast, for example, the seismic data we have is twenty-five years old,” he said. “How should we gather the information we currently lack about our offshore oil and gas resources? How do we manage the costs of gathering seismic data? Are there areas on the OCS that should be of priority for information collection?”

Can you guess from those questions how the Obama Administration hopes to frame the “discussion” that proceeds from the meeting in Atlantic City and other cities?

I’m not sure but, if I were an executive at ExxonMobil, I think I’d be a bit concerned.

No doubt some will argue on Monday that we should be moving quickly to exploit offshore concentrations of oil and natural gas to lessen dependence on foreign suppliers.

Others will contend that the nation needs to shift its investment focus to the development of offshore wind farms for a sustainable supply of electric power to serve coastal areas which contain the largest population centers.

The latter is the preference of most (but not all) environmental organizations –and, of course, the wind-power industry.

New Jersey’s major environmental lobbies–Environment New Jersey, the Sierra Club, and New Jersey Environmental Federation—joined today with two of the firms hoping to develop wind power projects off the Jersey coast —Blue Water Wind and Fishermen’s Energy–in a media release urging the public to attend the day-long hearing (9 a.m to 8 p.m.) at Atlantic City Convention Center.

“President Obama’s offshore energy decisions will be with us for decades to come,” said Matt Elliott of Environment New Jersey. “We urge New Jersey residents to attend this hearing to speak out against dirty, dangerous offshore oil drilling, and in favor of clean, renewable energy such as offshore wind, wave, and tidal power.”

No doubt where they’re coming from.

We haven’t seen a press release yet from the New Jersey Petroleum Council (API) but I don’t think the folks there will have much time to play the casino slots on Monday.

Too much at stake here for both sides. Should be interesting.

What’s your take? Use the comment block below. If it doesn’t appear, click on the tiny ‘comments’ link.

MORE:
If you plan to attend and speak, click here for guidance
Prefer to submit written testimony? Look here
You also can view the hearing via webcast
___________________________________________________
Try EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter, FREE for 30 days! ___________________________________________________

Interior Secretary to discuss NJ’s offshore energy Read More »

New Jersey DEP to release e-waste recycling rules

[This post has been updated to correct the first date in the timeline at the bottom. Thank you, Jason Springer of BlueJersey, for bringing it to our attention it. ]


A significant milestone in New Jersey’s drive to require the recycling of worn out televisions, computers and computer monitors is expected to be reached in May when the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) rolls out proposed regulations for the program.

New Jersey is one of more than a dozen states that now requires manufacturers of televisions and computers to provide for the recycling of these products when they are no longer useful and might otherwise end up in landfills or waste incinerators (electronic waste).

The state’s Electronic Waste Recycling Act (Chapter 130, 2008) requires every manufacturer of covered electronic products to submit plans to the DEP detailing how they plan to recycle their share of the devices.

The law gives manufacturers latitude in how they will reach their targets. Each manufacturer can establish its own collection centers and processing facilities (something no one company is likely to do because of cost) or join with other manufacturers in a combined recycling program.

Panasonic, Toshiba and Sharp is pursuing the latter option in several other states under an LLC named MRM (Electronic Manufacturers Recycling Management Company) which has picked up 21 additional manufacturers since it launched in October of 2008.

Manufacturers also could rely on established municipal and county recycling programs to collect the material, utilize existing commercial recycling companies in the state, or partner with nonprofits like Goodwill, which has established e-recycling operations in Texas and New Jersey.

DEP’s Assistant Commissioner Nancy Wittenberg and Recycling Bureau Chief Guy Watson invited manufacturers, commercial recyclers and county recycling officials to an informal meeting on Monday at DEP headquarters in Trenton. During the session, they provided a few broad hints as to what the regulations will contain, reviewed compliance deadlines for the program’s first year and took the pulse of the regulated community.

Representatives of several county recycling programs expressed concerns that the manufacturers might shut down their programs once they have recycled tonnages equivalent to their market shares. At that point, they say, public programs would end up shouldering the burden and the cost of electronic recycling.

When pressed for a response as to how they might utilize existing public recycling programs in New Jersey, the manufacturer reps played their cards close to the vest. A representative from Sharp said that his company has partnered with Goodwill and other community and retailer groups in other states that require e-recycling.

MRM President David Thompson said “It depends on what services the collectors are offering and whether we can establish a business relationship with them.” He added: “There are very few companies that can properly handle CRTs” (cathode ray tubes).

Watson noted that the DEP would require manufacturer plans to explain how the material would be handled at every stage of the recycling chain to assure that material does not flow to undeveloped countries where lead and other dangerous materials in the products could cause environmental and health problems without adequate safety and processing requirements.

He also warned that no manufacturer would be permitted to sell their TVs or computers in New Jersey after Oct 1, 2010 if the plans they submit are not “administratively complete.” He said that every plan would be required to offer at least one convenient collection point per county.

The Department provided the following:

Timeline for the e-recycling program’s first year

January 1, 2010
– TV manufacturers must register with DEP and pay an annual $5,000 fee

January 1, 2010
– Manufacturers and retailers may no longer sell covered electronic devices (TVs, computers and computer monitors) unless the device is labeled with the manufacturer’s brand and the label is permanently affixed and readily visible.

February 1, 2010
– Computer and computer monitor manufacturers must register with the DEP and pay a $5,000 annual fee.

April 2, 2010
– DEP provides return share data, in weight, to manufacturers.

June 1, 2010
– Registered TV manufacturers must submit plans based on market share
– Registered computer and computer-monitor manufacturers must submit plans based on
return share

January 1, 2011
– Collection and recycling programs begin.
– Disposal ban takes effect on all covered electronic devices
___________________________________________________

Try EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter, FREE for 30 days!
____________________________________________________

New Jersey DEP to release e-waste recycling rules Read More »

Black cars are cool…except maybe in California

Black cars are cool.
It’s axiomatic, hardwired into American male genes.

Black cars are powerful and dangerous…


…they leave cop cars in the dust…

…and they’re indispensable when the situation requires a noticeable arrival

Unfortunately, at least in California, black cars are…
very uncool
.

As in….

The popular blog, TechCrunch, informs us that California May Ban Black Cars.
It’s true. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is proposing environmental regulations that would effectively ban the sale of black cars.

How? By requiring all new car paint colors to have a 20% solar reflectivity by 2016 with a phase-in period starting in 2012.
(Think climate change, global warming, Ray-Bans for autos)

So, can’t paint suppliers just come up with new, less heat-absorbent dark paints?

Autoblog reports that suppliers have been testing their pigments and processes to see if it’s possible to meet CARB’s proposed mandate and things aren’t looking good.

“Apparently, when the proper pigments and chemicals are added to black paint, the resulting color is currently being referred to as “mud-puddle brown.”

Ouch. Can you imagine Mad Max driving a mud-puddle brown Interceptor?
New Jersey is usually only a half-step behind California when it comes to environmental legislation and regulations. So it may be more a question of when than if the Garden State will see a similar push.

We can already see the state’s environmental organizations getting behind it…

Your opinion? Use the block below. If it’s missing, click on the tiny “comments” link.

_____________________________________________________

Try EnviroPolitics, our daily newsletter, free for 30 days!

_____________________________________________________

Black cars are cool…except maybe in California Read More »

Verified by MonsterInsights