BILLYPENNGRAM – August 7, 2023
 |
| #BILLYPENNGRAM OF THE DAY Philly’s Fitler Square, dressed up for summer (Photo by @leslie.sllvn) |
| Want to see your photo here? Tag #billypenngram on Instagram |
BILLYPENNGRAM – August 7, 2023 Read More »
EPA Releases New Framework Addressing New Pfas and New Uses of Pfas in The Market
Graphic by Water Online
By Cliff L. Rothenstein, Dawn M. Lamparello, B. David Naidu, and Julia A. McGowan, K&L Gates
On Thursday, 29 June 2023, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a new framework (Framework) that will impact manufacturers across the country. The Framework lays out a new process for reviewing and assessing the potential environmental risks posed by new and new uses of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
This PFAS Framework establishes more stringent pre-market screening procedures for certain PFAS chemicals that may be harmful to human health or the environment. Under the Framework, the EPA will review and take appropriate action for new PFAS or significant new uses of existing PFAS through pre-manufacture notices (PMNs) and significant new use notices (SNNs) through the EPA’s authority under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
Background
PFAS are a class of fluorinated chemicals used in various consumer products and are commonly known as “forever chemicals” due to their high resistance to degradation. There are thousands of different PFAS, and only a small fraction of them have been well studied. In October 2021, the EPA announced a broad “PFAS Strategic Roadmap” aimed at researching and regulating the presence of PFAS in the environment. According to the EPA, this new PFAS Framework advances the EPA’s Roadmap through the “New Chemicals Program” mandated by TSCA Section 5.
The New Chemicals Program regulates “new chemicals” by requiring anyone who plans to manufacture them to provide the EPA with a PMN at least 90 days prior to manufacture, subject to certain exemptions. Under TSCA, a “new chemical” is any chemical that is not currently on the TSCA inventory, which is a list of chemicals that are already deemed “existing” in US commerce. Therefore, when new chemicals are created, the EPA reviews them under the New Chemicals Program to ensure their entrance into the market will not pose significant health concerns or dangerous environmental releases. Manufacturers are also subject to a 90-day notice requirement if they wish to engage in the use of a chemical that the EPA has deemed a “significant new use” from what had previously been approved by the agency under a prior PMN submission, by way of a SNUN submission.
If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.
EPA Releases New Framework Addressing New Pfas and New Uses of Pfas in The Market Read More »
It’s lights-out time for your incandescent bulbs
PA retailers are prohibited from selling light bulbs that do not match the new national standard.
By Michelle Rotuno-Johnson, Patch Staff
PENNSYLVANIA — Shopping for light bulbs today? You won’t see certain kinds on Pennsylvania shelves any more, as a Department of Energy rule against incandescent bulbs takes effect on Aug. 1 in favor of more energy-efficient lighting.
Retailers cannot sell light bulbs that don’t meet the new standards as of Tuesday, as the DOE said it will begin enforcing the rule with both businesses and manufacturers.
Keystone State residents who purchased standard incandescent bulbs in the past may still use them to light up their homes, but officials put standards in place last April to begin phasing them out.
The maximum penalty for manufacturers who violate the ban is $542 for every light bulb made out of regulation, according to a report from Nexstar.
“DOE’s enforcement office is committed to enforcing DOE’s regulations in a fair and equitable manner,” a Department of Energy spokesperson told Patch.
The rule on “general service lamps,” one of two adopted by President Biden’s administration last April, says that light bulbs must emit a minimum of 45 lumens (a measure of brightness) per watt.
This is a more energy-efficient measure than incandescent bulbs provide: Most light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs provide about 75 lumens per watt, according to a CNN Business report. In contrast, traditional incandescent bulbs provide 15 lumens per watt, according to light bulb manufacturer Philips.
Department of Energy officials said this move will help consumers save on their energy bills, and also conserve energy while reducing carbon emissions. Residential LED lightbulbs use at least 75 percent less energy than conventional incandescent bulbs, and also last up to 25 percent longer, said the DOE.
If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.
It’s lights-out time for your incandescent bulbs Read More »
NY Activists Descend on the Hamptons to Protest the Super Rich Fueling the Climate Crisis
From the airport to a golf course, museum gala and private mansions, activists confronted the extreme wealth driving global warming, and the challenges facing grassroots organizations that stand up to billionaires.
By Keerti Gopal, Inside Climate News
Sophie Shepherd has always described herself as a “rule follower,” but days before her 22nd birthday, she chose to face arrest in the middle of a Long Island driveway. Under a blazing hot July sun, two police officers sawed through the PVC pipes that connected her arms to the 13 other protesters blocking the entrance to a private airport.
“What I love about direct action is you’re actually getting in people’s faces and disrupting their way of life,” Shepherd said. “That push is what’s necessary to change the temperature in the room.”
Last month, Shepherd and around forty other climate activists from New York City and Long Island descended on the East Hampton Town Airport to heat up the conversation on how the super rich drive global warming.
As police separated and arrested the demonstrators blocking the driveway, other activists in the group surrounded them carrying plastic pitchforks and posters that read “tax the rich.” Their bright red t-shirts read, “billionaires, what are you saving up for, hell?” above a graphic of cash burning. A five-year-old holding a pitchfork and a homemade poster started a chant: “stop private jets, stop funding oil!” Behind them, in the distance, sat a few rows of private planes and helicopters.
The airport blockade was only the first of eight actions that weekend organized by New York Communities for Change (NYCC), Planet over Profit and Sunrise Movement NYC. In addition to shutting down the airport—for which Shepherd and 13 other protesters were arrested—the activists marched for a wealth tax with leaders from the Shinnecock Indigenous nation, crashed an exclusive golf course, stormed a museum gala, demonstrated outside the private homes of a Citibank chairman and a private equity billionaire and stirred up climate conversations at two high-end restaurants.
The racially and socioeconomically diverse coalition of activists sought to draw attention to the disproportionate role the ultra-wealthy play in filling the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses, advocate for a wealth tax to fund climate justice initiatives and pressure top fossil fuel beneficiaries to stop funding climate-warming activities. During their weekend together, the activists also grappled with what it takes to win lasting change in a stubborn world.
If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.
How clean is the surf at the Jersey shore?
Spencer Hughes, water sampler collector for the Cape May County Department of Health, takes samples at the beach in Wildwood Crest on Monday, July 31, 2023, as part of the county’s weekly water quality testing. The county, like others throughout New Jersey, partners with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to keep residents informed on health advisories and other information tied to the testing.Steven Rodas | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
By Steven Rodas | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
The few beachgoers on the shores of Wildwood Crest at daybreak barely notice as a pair of county health workers stop their white Ford Explorer.
In short order, the two take a water sample at the beach, put a stopper on the sterile plastic bottle, plop it into a cooler and head to the next spot.
Nine down.
More than 20 to go.
“People don’t see it, but we’re helping to protect them,” says Maryanne Mathis, a registered environmental health specialist trainee with the Cape May County Health Department, just after 6 a.m. on Monday, noting that “it feels good.”
“We’re doing the South run,” adds Spencer Hughes, a water sampler collector for the county. “We take samples from North Wildwood all the way to Cape May Point and we have another team today that’s doing our North run.”
In all, staff members in Cape May County will take small amounts of water at 61 guarded ocean beaches and 2 guarded bay beaches early Monday morning as part of weekly water quality testing. That’s part of a larger set of water samples collected at more than 200 beaches — including river and bay beaches in Cape May, Atlantic, Monmouth and Ocean counties — along New Jersey’s nearly 130 miles of coastline.
If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.
How clean is the surf at the Jersey shore? Read More »
Dewey Beach says ‘no’ to marijuana sales
Delaware beach town’s council voted unanimously to prohibit marijuana dispensaries or production facilities from being built within town limits.
By Mark Eichmann, WHYY News
The first legal marijuana sales in Delaware aren’t expected to happen until late 2024, and while it’s not clear where the new dispensaries will go, we now know where there won’t be a weed store.
Dewey Beach Town Council approved an ordinance earlier this month prohibiting marijuana sales or growing operations from being built in town. The move comes just two months after state lawmakers approved legislation legalizing recreational marijuana.
Dewey Police Chief Constance Speake spoke in support of the ban on sales at a council hearing earlier this month. She said having marijuana sales in town could lead to public use on Dewey streets.
“People just don’t read the laws. They’re going to go buy their product and then they’re going to be out on the street smoking dope,” Speake said. “You’re going to have a lot more people going up and buying their dope and then they’re going to be right on the street corner smoking dope all over town. And that’s not what we want.”
Commissioner Paul Bauer agreed and said marijuana sales wouldn’t be a fit for Dewey, which has been working to shed its image as a “party town.”
If you liked this post, you’ll love our daily environmental newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed daily with the latest news, commentary, and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.
Dewey Beach says ‘no’ to marijuana sales Read More »