Biden draws GOP attacks with call to ‘transition’ from oil

From the Washington Post

Republicans and even some Democrats criticized Joe Biden after he said during the final presidential debate that he wanted to “transition from the oil industry” in order to fight what he called the existential threat of climate change.

When pressed by debate moderator Kristen Welker, the former vice president suggested the burning of petroleum, which adds greenhouse gases to the air, eventually has to end “because the oil industry pollutes significantly.”

“It has to be replaced by renewable energy, over time. Over time,” he added.

The comment drew attacks from both the oil and gas industry and its Republican allies, who faulted Biden for endangering energy jobs with his climate policies. But what he had to say shouldn’t shock anyone who has been following the Democratic nominee’s campaign.

And on stage in Nashville, President Trump immediate pounced in defense of an industry that has been a consistent ally, trying to score political points with voters in oil-producing states. “Basically what he’s saying is he is going to destroy the oil industry,” Trump responded. “Will you remember that Texas, will you remember that Pennsylvania, Oklahoma?”

Biden’s assertion is in line with his long-term climate goals. But it comes at a delicate moment for him and other Democrats.

His official plan for tackling climate change calls for eliminating the nation’s contributions to rising global temperatures by the middle of the century. It comes in response to U.N. scientists who say rapidly cutting greenhouse gas emissions is necessary to avoid irreversible damage to the planet. 

While Biden’s plan does not call for a ban on fossil fuels and includes measures for continuing their use by capturing their carbon emissions, the 2050 goal still cannot be achieved without significantly curtailing the burning of oil and gas. Indeed, the Democrat’s proposal includes a major subsidy for consumers to buy electric vehicles and get rid of cars that rely exclusively on petroleum-based fuels.

On the campaign trail, Biden has taken pains to repeatedly insist he will not stop one extraction technique — hydraulic fracturing, or fracking — heavily used in the crucial swing state of Pennsylvania. 

With his lead in the polls nationally, Biden may have more leeway to push a more progressive climate change agenda. But they may hurt down-ballot Democrats struggling to keep their seats.

At least two representing oil-producing districts — Reps. Kendra Horn of Oklahoma and Xochitl Torres Small of New Mexico — distanced themselves from Biden after the debate. 

On the other side of the political spectrum, climate activists once reluctant to back Biden were happy to see him voice what they saw as a strong message on global warming.

“Tonight marked a distinct shift in Biden’s rhetoric on climate: he went on offense,” said Evan Weber, political director for the youth-led Sunrise Movement. “Biden’s closing statement on what he would say to the country on Inauguration Day sounded a lot like our vision of the Green New Deal.”

Biden and Trump sparred over energy policy during a presidential debate that heavily featured climate change for the first time in years. 

As our colleagues Brady Dennis, Juliet Eilperin and Steven Mufson report, the last time there was any substantive discussion of climate change was two decades ago, during a debate between Democrat Al Gore and Republican George W. Bush.

The president also dinged Biden’s energy efficiency goals. “They want to knock down buildings and build new buildings with little, tiny windows,” he said without evidence. What Biden’s climate plan actually provides is incentives for retrofits to improve energy use in existing structures.

Trump again claimed Biden’s plan to fight climate change would cost $100 trillion — far from the former vice president’s actual proposal to spend $2 trillion over four years. The president’s exaggerated price tag most likely originates from a conservative wonk’s back-of-the-envelope calculations on Twitter more than a year ago for the Green New Deal — well before Biden rolled out his own plan.

“He kept referring back to plans of the Dem primary candidates Biden defeated (and we criticized) but didn’t touch Biden’s actual plan,” Josh Freed, head of the climate and energy program at the center-left think tank Third Way, said by email.

Trump also said Biden supports a ban on fracking — a claim his Democratic opponent has repeatedly knocked down, including on Thursday evening. “I never said I oppose fracking,” Biden said. 

Biden has sometimes fumbled over his words when describing his position on fracking on the campaign trail. He supports ending new permits for fracking and other oil and gas drilling only on federal lands out West — but not on state or private lands such as those in Pennsylvania.

The technique is controversial both for the risk it poses to drinking water and for the greenhouse gas emissions it causes. His stance has helped him win the support of labor groups in the energy sector. Still, during the debate, Biden emphasized he wants to reduce fracking’s environmental footprint.

On Climate Change
When asked about climate change, Mr. Trump said that “what I want is the crystal clean water, the cleanest air.” He did not mention that his administration had rolled back several environmental regulations, including the Clean Water Act. Biden responded that climate change is a serious issue.

“Climate change, climate warming and global warming is an existential threat to humanity,” Biden said. He said that his plan, which had been endorsed by major environmental and labor groups, would provide “millions of new good-paying jobs.” Biden also talked about the importance of developing solar and wind energy.

“I know more about wind than you do. It’s extremely expensive. It kills all the birds,” Mr. Trump replied. He also accused Biden of flip-flopping on banning fracking, which Biden denied.

“I do rule out banning fracking,” Biden said, but he added that “we need other industries.”

Welker also pointed out that Black people are disproportionately affected by rolling back regulations, allowing the nearby environment to be polluted.

“The families that we’re talking about are employed heavily,” Mr. Trump said, declining to directly answer the question.

“It doesn’t matter what you’re paying them, it matters how you keep them safe,” Biden said in his response, explaining that he would “transition from the oil industry” to be replaced by renewable energy over time. Mr. Trump said that this was proof that Biden wanted to “destroy the oil industry.”

Don’t miss valuable stories like this. Click to receive free EP Blog updates

Biden draws GOP attacks with call to ‘transition’ from oil Read More »

Renewables make up 63.3% of new U. S. Generating capacity

The harnessing of renewable energy for electricity generation, innovations to ditch fossil fuels and rely more wind, solar, and hydro, and energy playing a critical role in a post-Covid world

By PVBuzz editorial team

Washington DC – According to a review by the SUN DAY Campaign of data just released by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), renewable energy sources (i.e., biomass, geothermal, hydropower, solar, wind) dominated new U.S. electrical generating capacity additions in the first eight months of 2020.

Combined, they accounted for 63.3% – or 10,445 megawatts (MW) – of the 16,499 MW of new utility-scale capacity added during the first two-thirds of this year.

FERC’s latest monthly “Energy Infrastructure Update” report (with data through August 31, 2020) also reveals that natural gas accounted for 36.5% (6,029 MW) of the total, with very small contributions by coal (20 MW) and “other” sources (5 MW) providing the balance. There have been no new capacity additions by oil, nuclear power, or geothermal energy since the beginning of the year.

Read the full story

Not receiving our free EP Blog updates?

Renewables make up 63.3% of new U. S. Generating capacity Read More »

First project moving under NY Renewable Energy Growth Act

Wind Solar City
Getty Images

Northern New York Project to help avoid 1.16 million tons of CO2 emissions annually, save US$447 million in congestion costs.

By T&D World

The New York State Public Service Commission recently adopted criteria for identifying transmission projects that are needed urgently to meet the renewable energy goals of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA). As part of the recent action, the commission also identified the New York Power Authority’s (NYPA) proposed Northern New York project as a high-priority project and referred it to the NYPA for development and construction in accordance with the Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Protection Act of 2020.

“New York’s nation-leading CLCPA legislation calls for transformational quantities of renewable energy, which, in turn, requires smart new transmission to connect that power to customers,” said Commission Chair John B. Rhodes. “We have adopted well-designed new rules to specifically expedite bulk transmission investments that unbottle existing and new renewables. We also have designated the first investment under these new rules, the NYPA’s Northern New York project, to complete a critical link in our upstate grid and unbottle at least 950 to 1050 MW of renewable energy sources.”

Try our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics, FREE for a full month!

The Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Protection Act calls on the commission and the NYPA to work together when the commission determines that there is a need for expeditious action to solve a transmission need. Once such an urgent need is established, the act authorizes the NYPA to bring to bear its significant development capabilities and statewide transmission experience to ensure timely construction of the transmission solution.

The NYPA has already identified a multifaceted project that meets the criteria. The project now moving forward, known as the Northern New York Project, includes completion of the second phase of the NYPA’s 86-mile Smart Path Moses-Adirondack rebuild, rebuilding approximately 45 miles of transmission eastward from Massena to the Town of Clinton, rebuilding approximately 55 miles of transmission southward from Croghan to Marcy, as well as rebuilding and expanding several substations along the impacted transmission corridor.

Read the full story

If you’re not receiving our free updates, sign up here

First project moving under NY Renewable Energy Growth Act Read More »

NJ Transit’s power-plant switch to green

NJ Transit advances back-up power plant to keep core of system rolling.
Electric powered trains such as the Northeast Corridor train arriving at Newark Penn station would still roll after construction of NJ Transit TransitGrid back-up power plant in Kearny. Construction could start at the end of 2022.

By Larry Higgs | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

NJ Transit officials outlined a plan to find engineers and consultants with the expertise to design the $577 million Transitgrid back-up power system in Kearny in as green a way as possible, with a goal of awarding a construction contract in Dec. 2022.

However, a gas power plant is not entirely off the table, if a suitable design can’t be found, officials said.

Agency officials provided a road map on Wednesday night about how that’s going to happen, after hearing some praise from environmentalists who lobbied for a year and a half to scuttle a planned natural gas fired power plant.

Try our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics, FREE for a full month!

“We are so glad to hear your new commitment to renewable energy,” said Janet Glass of North Bergen, one of hundreds who opposed the plant. “New Jersey could be making history. Thank you for listening and I urge you to stick with it.”

The 140 megawatt generator is part of the larger NJ Transitgrid Power System, a $577 million project that would provide electricity to Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor, parts of NJ Transit’s Morris and Essex lines and the Hudson-Bergen light rail in case of a power outage. The project is partly funded with $410 million in federal Hurricane Sandy resiliency funds.

The agency is taking several steps to follow through, voting unanimously Wednesday night to create a $3 million incentive to encourage companies with expertise and experience in renewable energy to participate.

Read the full story

Don’t miss valuable information like this. Click to receive free EP Blog updates

NJ Transit’s power-plant switch to green Read More »

Why can’t Pa’s Scott Perry denounce QAnon?

The ADL wants the central Pennsylvania Republican to do the obvious. You wouldn’t think it would be this hard. 
An opinion piece from the Pennsylvania Capital Star

In a normal universe, the baseless and appalling QAnon conspiracy theory would be the plot to the worst action thriller you’ve ever seen.

If you don’t know by now, QAnon adherents subscribe to the utterly bonkers proposition that President Donald Trump is heroically fighting against a diffuse and secretive cabal of devil worshippers and child molesters scattered across the most elite levels of government, business, and the media. 

To take it to its “Sharknado-iest” extremes, the theory also posits that a violent reckoning is coming, and that such high-profile pols as Hillary Clinton will be arrested and executed for their nonexistent role in it, according to the BBC

Care to share? Use icons at bottom to share this post with your friends

But this isn’t a normal universe. It’s Donald Trump’s America, 2020. And QAnon adherents aren’t just harmless cranks. 

They’ve been legitimized by Trump. Some of their number are on the fast-track to Congress. Others have resorted to violence, with one notably sentenced to prison for opening fire in a Washington D.C. pizzeria because he wrongly believed the false argument that children were being held there against their will in a sex-trafficking ring.  

So, in what seems like a pretty basic ask, the Greater Philly chapter of the Anti-Defamation League would really appreciate it if U.S. Rep. Scott Perry, R-10th District, would disavow QAnon. And Perry, for reasons that defy all logic, absolutely cannot bring himself to do it, leaving ADL officials disappointed, but not entirely surprised. 

“For people like him and President Donald Trump to not call it out is just irresponsible,” Shira Goodman, the director of the Philadelphia regional office of the ADL, told the Capital-Star on Wednesday.
In case you missed it, Perry’s vote against a congressional resolution condemning QAnon has become an issue in his re-election race against Democratic state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale

Read the full story

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Why can’t Pa’s Scott Perry denounce QAnon? Read More »