The “daily” part of daily newspapers is on the way out — and sooner than you might think

Seven-day newspapers aren’t just talking about cutting out one or two days a week in print — they’re talking five or six. Is this the only way to accelerate the transition to digital or speeding their own decline?

Ken Doctor reports in NiemanLab

What do you call a daily newspaper that’s no longer a daily newspaper? “Sunday + Digital” sounds far less poetic.

That’s now more than an academic question. Many publishers — if not most — are now seriously modeling and planning for the transformation of their businesses from seven-day newspapers to something…less, numerous industry sources tell me. And not just a little less — significantly less.

Blame Google and Facebook, blame tariffs and newsprint costs, blame Amazon and Uber for hiring away would-be early-morning newspaper deliverers — it makes little difference. We are on the brink of seeing major cutbacks in daily delivery and daily printing of newspapers, as soon as 2020.

“It is one of the top topics of discussion in the boardroom,” says Peter Doucette, managing director of the Technology & Media Practice for well-used news industry consultant FTI. “The current operating model is under duress like we’ve never seen before. Our point of view is that the daily morning distribution model is no longer going to work in a three- to five-year timeline. That’s broad, of course, and dependent on market.”

RELATED ARTICLEThe L.A. Times’ disappointing digital numbers show the game’s not just about drawing in subscribers — it’s about keeping them July 31, 2019

“Publishers have been focusing on growing net new digital subscribers” — see Nieman Lab director Joshua Benton’s piece on the difficulty doing so at the L.A. Times — “but they need to think of the transformation event — cutting distribution days — and the effect of moving print subscribers to digital subscribers.”

In essence, Doucette — who joinedFTI a year ago after leaving a high-profile role as chief consumer revenue officer for The Boston Globe’s industry-leading digital subscription initiative — is urging publishers to think bigger. That’s the drama playing out in almost every city large and small: timing that inevitable “transformation event” when the seven-day daily moves into a museum somewhere.

What can publishers — under great financial pressure to make shorter-term decisions — do to make this dramatic move from print to digital something more just the next stage of decline for the business?

While dozens of newspaper titles have cut Saturdays (creating a single weekend paper, something the Europeans have done for decades) or Mondays, this next cut would be far more impactful. The big question now on many corporate tables is whether the right number of days to kill is five or six.

There’s the 7/1 model. That’s basically the Sunday print paper — where most of the ad revenue is still generated — plus digital the rest of the week. Newspapers have been pushing “Sunday + Digital” offers to readers hitting paywalls for years now, and you’re going to see it a lot more — except often as the only home delivery option, not the skimpiest one.\

There’s the 7/2 model. That’s Sunday plus one weekday — maybe a food-heavy Wednesday stuffed with supermarket ads. (That’s a phenomenon that remains in some markets but has vanished in others.)

And, more conservatively, there’s 7/6. That’s what McClatchy piloted this spring at its South Carolina paper the Myrtle Beach Sun News, which I detail below. 7/6 saves a lot less in the physical costs — newsprint, printing, trucks, delivery — but it’s a way to take one step into the transformation process rather than jumping in all at once. And it’s a test: If you break the longstanding bond between the sun rising in the east and papers hitting doorsteps, will enough advertisers and subscribers accept it to make the economics work?

Read the full story

The “daily” part of daily newspapers is on the way out — and sooner than you might think Read More »

Budd Lake, Lake Musconetcong now under NJ algal bloom advisory

Photo by Daniel Freel/New Jersey Herald – A boater travels through Lake Hopatcong on Monday, as seen from the River Styx Road bridge in Hopatcong.

By Jennifer Jean Miller New Jersey Herald

Two more lakes have been added to the state Department of Environmental Protection’s harmful algal bloom list, with Budd Lake and Lake Musconetcong both under a no-swimming advisory until further notice.

Although the DEP did not release specific bacteria counts on its website, it placed the latest two lakes on its list of those impacted by the algal bloom’s cyanobacteria, the bacteria that can cause health issues, including skin rashes, flu-like symptoms, eye irritation, respiratory and gastrointestinal problems and other health implications. DEP advisories have been issued when the bacteria reaches minimally 20,000 cells per milliliter in water sampling tests.

The Lake Musconetcong Community Association announced on its Facebook page on Thursday that the DEP notified it that there is a “confirmed harmful algal bloom present with levels quantified at or above the NJ Health Advisory Guidance.” The community association advised the public that the lake will continue to be monitored and to check back on the organization’s Facebook page for updates.

“It seems we are under the same notice as Lake Hopatcong, where boating is allowed but any contact with water is strongly discouraged,” the association announced. “Fishing seems to be allowed but fish should not be eaten. We assume use of gloves while fishing would be recommended.”

Like this? Click to receive free updates

The Budd Lake Beach, Mount Olive Recreation and Mount Olive Township Facebook pages all posted on Thursday that the algal bloom was detected in the lake and Budd Lake Beach would remain closed until test results come back during the week. The Wibit inflatable water park event scheduled for today has been rescheduled to Aug. 18. The beach had previously been closed for five days for an algal bloom incident detected on July 18.

Greenwood Lake in West Milford and New York state has remained under a no-swimming advisory since test results in early July detected the cyanobacteria. Test results from the July 31 water sampling show all sampling sites above the guidance levels. During the last aerial surveillance on Greenwood Lake on July 30 to detect the presence of the phycocyanin — the algal bloom’s greenish pigment visible from the air — the DEP noted cyanobacteria was observed on both the New Jersey and New York sides of the lake.

At Lake Hopatcong on Thursday, the DEP announced the no-swimming advisory remained in effect for all locations on the lake except for the open water areas in Henderson Cove and Indian Harbor, with all beaches throughout the lake closed. The latest water sampling from Indian Harbor on Thursday and released Friday showed the bacteria count was up again to 19,750 cells per milliliter, close to the threshold; and was 11,250 on the July 30 reading.

The DEP continues to recommend no bodily contact for humans and their pets with waters in any lake where there remains a presence of harmful algal bloom. Additionally, drinking lake water or eating fish caught from water containing the bloom also should be avoided.

Boating on a deck or pontoon-style boat is permitted. However, canoeing, kayaking, waterskiing and other sports that could promote close bodily contact to the water are discouraged under the DEP’s advisory guidelines.

Related news stories:
Star-Ledger Editorial: Heed the slimy siren from New Jersey’s algae blooms
If you thought NJDEP was rash in banning swimming in algae bloom lakes…
NJ lakes need to go on a low-phosphorous diet
_____________________________________________________________________

Not receiving our free updates

Budd Lake, Lake Musconetcong now under NJ algal bloom advisory Read More »

The U.S. heartland has been flooded for five months. Does anyone care?

About half a million acres of land in the rural Yazoo backwater area in Mississippi is underwater, a devastating blow for a poor region where agriculture is the economy’s lifeblood

Flooded farmland in the lower Mississippi delta. Photo by Rory Doyle, The Guardian

By Rory Doyle for the Guardian

Dating back to late February, about 550,000 acres of land have been underwater in the rural Yazoo backwater area of the lower Mississippi delta. About half of the acreage is farmland, creating devastating effects in a region where agriculture is the lifeblood of the economy. While flooding in the region is common, this year’s floodwater has hung around longer than ever.

A home outside of Valley Park remains surrounded by floodwater. The brown line at the bottom of the house indicates the flood level at its peak.

Carmen Hancock, James Hancock and Rodney Porter have spent the past five months helping their elderly neighbors survive in their homes surrounded by floodwater. “We’re living by the good Lord to do what’s right,” said James Hancock. “There’s a number of older people living in this neighborhood, and it’s just the right thing to do. When the going gets tough, the tough get going. That’s what I live by. You do what has to be done.”

Don’t miss stories like this Click to receive free updates

Compounding the problem was a high Mississippi River, which remained near or above flood stage for the longest span since 1927. The perfect storm of historic rainfall and a high river resulted in a backwater flood that has lingered beyond anything the region has ever seen.

Only within with the past couple weeks has the water receded, and for the first time in nearly half a year, farmers are finally beginning to see their land re-emerge.

Backwater flooding surrounds a farm in Issaquena county. Photographs by Rory Doyle,

Efforts to prevent flooding in this region date back to 1941 when Congress approved the Yazoo Backwater Project. The multifaceted plan included a system of levees, canals and drainage structures. But one crucial element was never installed – drainage pumps that would push floodwaters out of the backwater area and eventually into the Mississippi River. Due to construction delays, the pumps were never built, and in 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) vetoed the pumps, citing a threat to wetlands and wildlife in this remote part of Mississippi.

The 2019 flood has caused the EPA to review its veto decision, giving hope to many residents that the pumps will finally be installed. Situated in one of Mississippi’s most rural locations, most residents feel they have been left out of the national conversation about flooding in America.

Residents voice their concerns in Valley Park. Photograph by Rory Doyle/The Guardian

“Because no one’s died from this, and we live in such a remote place, it doesn’t seem to be important to national news,” said Paul Hollis, a farmer from Rolling Fork and a local commission for the Mississippi levee board. “We want people to know how many acres of farmland are flooded, how many houses are destroyed and how much wildlife has been impacted by this.”

As the crisis escalates…

… in our natural world, we refuse to turn away from the climate catastrophe and species extinction. For The Guardian, reporting on the environment is a priority. We give reporting on climate, nature and pollution the prominence it deserves, stories which often go unreported by others in the media. At this pivotal time for our species and our planet, we are determined to inform readers about threats, consequences and solutions based on scientific facts, not political prejudice or business interests.

More people are reading and supporting The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever before. And unlike many news organizations, we have chosen an approach that allows us to keep our journalism accessible to all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford. But we need your ongoing support to keep working as we do.

The Guardian will engage with the most critical issues of our time – from the escalating climate catastrophe to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity at its heart.

Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.

We need your support to keep delivering quality journalism, to maintain our openness and to protect our precious independence. Every reader contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support The Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you. Support The Guardian

The U.S. heartland has been flooded for five months. Does anyone care? Read More »

Build your audience by listing your fall events in our Enviro-Events Calendar

Is your company, school, university or organization planning Fall events that involve energy or environmental themes?

One of the best ways to attract your ideal audience is to post your event information in our free Enviro-Events Calendar.

Follow our style and send details to: editor@enviropolitics.com

If you don’t see your event appear within a week, pleases resend.

Build your audience by listing your fall events in our Enviro-Events Calendar Read More »

197 billion tons of water poured into the North Atlantic from the Greenland ice sheet in July alone

Extreme melt event led to the greatest single-day volume loss from the ice sheet since 1950

By Andrew Freedman and Jason Samenow, Washington Post

When one thinks of Greenland, images of an icebound, harsh and forbidding landscape probably come to mind, not a landscape of ice pocked with melt ponds and streams transformed into raging rivers. And almost certainly not one that features wildfires.

Yet the latter description is exactly what Greenland looked like this week, according to imagery shared on social media, scientists on the ground and data from satellites.

An extraordinary melt event that began earlier this week continued through August 1 on the Greenland ice sheet, and there are signs that about 60 percent of the expansive ice cover saw detectable surface melting, including at higher elevations that only rarely see temperatures climb above freezing.

[Images show staggering extent of melting on Greenland Ice Sheet due to heat wave]

On Thursday, the ice sheet saw its biggest single-day volume loss on record, with 12.5 billion tons of ice lost to the ocean from surface melt, according to computer model estimates based on satellite and other data. Records of daily mass loss date back to 1950.

“This model, which uses weather data and observations to build a record of ice and snowfall, and net change in mass of the ice sheet, is remarkably accurate,” says Ted Scambos, a senior researcher at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) in Colorado. “I would accept the result as fact. 12.5 billion tons [lost] in one day, and the highest single-day total since 1950,” Scambos said.

July 31 was the biggest surface melt day since at least 2012, with about 60 percent of the ice sheet seeing at least 1 millimeter of melt at the surface, and more than 10 billion tons of ice lost to the ocean from surface melt, according to data from the Polar Portal, a website run by Danish polar research institutions, and the NSIDC.

Melting ice forms a lake on free-floating ice jammed into the Ilulissat Icefjord during unseasonably warm weather on July 30, 2019, near Ilulissat, Greenland. (Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

According to Ruth Mottram, a climate researcher with the Danish Meteorological Institute, the ice sheet sent 197 billion tons of water pouring into the Atlantic Ocean during July.

Read the full story

197 billion tons of water poured into the North Atlantic from the Greenland ice sheet in July alone Read More »

DuPont defense: Patriotism of the past created pollution of the present

World War 1 battlefield

By Michael Sol Warren | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

They only did it to help win the war. Well, both wars.

Facing major lawsuits filed by New Jersey, chemical giant DuPont is making the argument that its toxic legacy in the Garden State was created at the behest of Uncle Sam as part of war efforts in World War I and World War II.

In court filings, the company says the federal government ordered millions of pounds of chemicals to be produced at four sites across New Jersey during the two World Wars. Because that work was done under a federal contract, DuPont argues that it does not have liability in recent lawsuits filed against the company by New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal.

The argument helped DuPont get the cased moved from state to federal court, though it’s unclear whether it will be enough to clear the company of liability in the case.

A DuPont spokesman could not be reached for comment.

Earlier this year, New Jersey sued chemical giants DuPont, 3M and Chemours for decades of pollution at four of New Jersey’s most toxic sites, from Carney’s Point to Pompton Lakes.

The resulting contamination left the sites soaked with a mess of health-threatening substances ranging from lead and mercury to volatile organic compounds and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), according to the state.

The lawsuits seek unspecified millions from the companies in natural resource damages claims — the same kind of legal action that the state took against ExxonMobil, a case settled for $225 million.

Like this? Click to receive free updates

DuPont’s federal contract defense offered a glimpse into how it will fight the suit.

In the move, which DuPont filed on July 5, the company argued that it was required to dramatically increase chemical production at all four sites as part of contracts with the U.S. government to support to war efforts in World War I and World War II. Because of this, DuPont asserts was an agent of the federal government.

Removing the cases from state court to federal court is in line with a common legal defense strategy, according to Steve Gold, an environmental lawyer who teaches at Rutgers law school.

“A lot of defendants in these cases would prefer to be in federal court,” Gold said “State courts, and in particular state court juries, many defendants view as a risk.”

A spokesman for the state Attorney General’s Office declined to comment. Among its legal options, the state could seek to have the cases remanded back to New Jersey Superior Court.

In the removal filings, DuPont also set up the defense that it is protected from liability for actions taken under government contract. The Federal Tort Claims Act restricts situations in which federal agencies, and civilian contractors acting on behalf of federal agencies, can be sued, Gold said.

This defense still leaves DuPont liable for pollution done by activities not related to a federal contract. But Gold said that the reality of figuring out just how much DuPont is liable could be tricky.

“If you have a giant contaminated mess, and if the court were to agree with DuPont on the government contractor defense, then what fraction of the total contamination ends up being DuPont’s liability and who has to prove that fraction?” Gold said. “That may be what their ultimate substantive strategy is.”

Read the full story

Don’t miss stories like this Click to receive free updates

DuPont defense: Patriotism of the past created pollution of the present Read More »