Plastics or people? At least 1 of them has to change

Christopher Joyce reports for WBUR (Boston)

A discarded plastic bottle lies on the beach at Sandy Hook, N.J. Packaging is the largest source of the plastic waste that now blankets our planet. (Wayne Parry/AP)
A discarded plastic bottle lies on the beach at Sandy Hook, N.J. Packaging is the largest source of the plastic waste that now blankets our planet. (Wayne Parry/AP)

The avalanche of plastic waste that’s rolling over land and sea has inspired numerous potential solutions. Some involve inventing our way out of the mess by creating new kinds of natural materials that will harmlessly degrade if they’re thrown away.

Others say it might be quicker to change people’s throwaway behavior instead.

Get the latest news Boston is talking about sent to your inbox each day. Subscribe here.

Among the first group is Stephen Mayfield. He’s a chemist who figured out how to turn various kinds of algae into raw plastic — polyurethane plastic. Then he turns it into stuff people want.

“What are the most important polyurethane products on the planet?” he asks. “Well, if you are from UC San Diego, they’re surfboards.”

Mayfield is a lifelong surfer whose lab in San Diego is walking distance from the beach. He works out of what looks like a machine shop on the University of California campus. His surfboards got him some attention (the mayor of San Diego has one), but that’s not what he really wants to make.

It was a surfing trip to the Maldives islands in the Indian Ocean that persuaded him to focus on something else. One day, he asked his local hosts to take him to their most remote island. “And when I got to the windward side of the island, it was covered with dead flip-flops,” Mayfield recalls.

Don’t miss stories like this Click to receive free updates

Flip-flops are the footwear for much of the world’s population. They’re made by the billions every year, mostly from various forms of rubber or plastic. The pile Mayfield saw in the Maldives had floated there on ocean currents from, presumably, all over the world. “And it was so sad to get there and think this is really … what we’ve done to the planet?” he says ruefully.

So Mayfield now makes flip-flops from algae grown in tanks. What makes them special is that they degrade if left out in the environment.

Replacing flip-flops is a personal mission, says chemist and fellow surfer Suri Sherman, who is the “polyurethane chef” in Mayfield’s lab. “I’ve traveled all over the world just to surf,” he says, “and I have family in India, so I’ve been out there a bunch of times. Everywhere you go there is trash all over the place, and a lot of it is flip-flops.”

Sherman starts with algae-based polymers, called polyols, then adds a catalyst and other polymers and chemicals in a gooey concoction not unlike a two-part epoxy mix. “It’s just kind of like cooking,” he says. The soupy mix goes into a mechanical spinner and then into a mold, where it’s heated for about half an hour. When it’s done, he pries it out — a bio-based polyurethane flip-flop sole.

Mayfield says there’s some traditional petroleum-based polymer in there, too. But all of the shoes will biodegrade into harmless materials. It just needs the right bacteria and moisture to break it down. “You throw them in your compost pile and they will disappear at about 3.5% to 4% per month,” he says, “meaning that within about two years that shoe will completely be gone.”

We’re always looking for stories that might interest our readers. If you come across something so interesting that it cries out to be shared, please send it to editor@enviropolitics.com  If we agree, you’ll see it here soon. 

 
Potentially two years as trash isn’t perfect, but Mayfield says it’s better than decades or even longer. The real problem, he says, is that new technology is a tough sell. Manufacturers are reluctant to take a risk on a new, unfamiliar product. “I cannot convince them,” he says. “The only thing that can convince them is the market.”

And the market is usually determined by what consumers want. So, what about changing people instead of the product? Changing their behavior, that is.

That’s Tom Szaky’s strategy. “I think the evil isn’t plastic — it’s using something once,” he says.

Szaky is founder and CEO of TerraCycle, in Trenton, N.J. He says the throwaway culture in the U.S. took shape in the mid-20th century. “There were advertisements in 1950 that talk about, ‘You don’t have to wash the dishes anymore, simply take the whole thing, — the cutlery, the dishes, the tablecloth itself — and throw it all out,’ ” he says. That disposability was made possible in large part by the invention of cheap plastic.

Szaky wants consumers to abandon the throwaway mentality and learn — or relearn — to reuse things, especially packaging, which is the largest source of plastic waste.

TerraCycle is a recycling company that’s running a pilot project called Loop. Here’s how it works: A company puts its products — say, shampoo or toothpaste — into custom-made, sturdy containers made of glass, metal or plastic. Loop packs the products into a picnic-basket-size tote bag and ships it to you. You use up the stuff, then UPS picks up the tote bag full of empties and ships it back to TerraCycle. The containers get washed, sent to consumer product companies for refilling and are sent out again to consumers.

TerraCycle’s Heather Crawford stands next to boxes of tote bags for a pilot project called Loop. The bags are filled with products in reusable containers and mailed to customers, who then return the bags and empty containers to be cleaned and refilled. (Chris Joyce/NPR)

Szaky says it isn’t the only solution to plastic waste, but it’s an inroad. He says he wants to encourage “unconscious” behavior change in consumers. “In Loop, we’re trying to say [that] it feels like throwaway,” he says, “but instead of throwing it away into a landfill or throwing it away into a recycling center, it’s going into a reuse facility.”

That facility is in a warehouse in Trenton. Boxes of consumer products line the walls. Heather Crawford, TerraCycle’s vice president of marketing and e-commerce, pulls out a sleek, metal cylinder with a brand label on the front.

“Snacks, trail mixes, raw nuts,” she says, noting they’re packed in metal instead of the usual plastic pouch. There’s containers of balsamic vinegar, shampoo, hand lotion, and juice, either in glass or heavy-duty, reusable plastic. There’s even a refrigerator with Häagen-Dazs ice cream in special insulated metal containers, frozen to minus 41 degrees Fahrenheit so it will stay that way for up to 30 hours. “That’s the very last thing to go into the tote” before it’s shipped out, Crawford says.

Read the full story

Plastics or people? At least 1 of them has to change Read More »

Fossil fuel investments cost world’s biggest fund manager $90 billion, report finds

Bob Chapman reports for the Independent

The world’s largest investment firm, managing more than $6.5 trillion (£5.4 trillion), has been accused of costing investors tens of billions of dollars in returns over the past decade by backing fossil fuel companies like Shell and ExxonMobil.

A new study suggests that New York-based fund manager BlackRock’s bets on oil and gas companies have underperformed the market to the tune of $90bn as the risks of climate change have become clearer.

Larry Fink, BlackRock CEO

BlackRock manages funds, including people’s life savings and pensions, that are worth more than the entire annual output of Japan’s economy. Its chief executive and chairman Larry Fink sends out a letter to investors each year in which he espouses the virtues of investing in with purpose and an eye on social responsibility.

But analysis of the investment giant’s holdings suggests that its rhetoric on climate change risks does not match its actions, according to the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA).

The researcher and analyst, which receives its funding from philanthropic organizations, calculated that BlackRock’s investments in oil and gas firms have dragged down returns as those companies have destroyed value by failing to properly adapt to climate change.

The study undermines arguments from some fund managers that they must invest in oil and gas firms in order to fulfill their duty to act in the best interests of investors.

Three-quarters of BlackRock’s estimated lost returns have stemmed from just four companies: ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP and Chevron, all of which have underperformed the market.

A fifth company, General Electric (GE), has lost BlackRock investors $19.1bn between 2008 and 2018, when compared to the returns it could have made by investing in shares that performed in line with the wider stock market.

BlackRock holds more than half a billion shares in GE which saw an unprecedented $193bn wiped off its stock market valuation between 2016 and 2018.

Read the full story

Fossil fuel investments cost world’s biggest fund manager $90 billion, report finds Read More »

Debate’s attempt to show candidates divided on climate finds unity instead

The Democrats may butt heads on climate policy details, but they all see growing risks to security, economy and health that the next president can’t ignore.

By Marianne Lavelle for Inside Climate News

Round two of the second Democratic primary debate, held in Detroit. Credit: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images
The second 2020 Democratic primary debate, held in Detroit, was conducted in two rounds over two nights with 10 candidates each. Climate change and environmental issues got about 21 minutes of attention. Credit: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

In two nights of debates that seemed designed to highlight divisions among the candidates, the Democratic presidential hopefuls this week managed to display remarkable unity in their proclaimed commitment to aggressive action on climate change.

Barbed questions posed by a CNN panel produced sharp wrangling over the details of universal health care, immigration and crime. But when it came to decarbonizing the economy, few hard and fast differences surfaced.

“We have all put out highly similar visions on climate,” said Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana.

Sign up for InsideClimate News Weekly

Our stories. Your inbox. Every weekend.I agree to InsideClimate News’ Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Former Vice President Joe Biden sought to fend off the charge that his plan was “middling.” Rep. Tim Ryan of Ohio envisioned a manufacturing future centered around the electric car. Sen. Kamala Harris of California called for adopting a Green New Deal and getting the country to carbon neutral by 2030.

Yes, some of the moderates don’t like the Green New Deal. And the left-leaning politicians were more vociferous in their denunciation of the fossil fuel industry, with Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont accusing the corporations of “criminal activity that cannot be allowed to continue,” and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts vowing to take on a Washington that “works great for the oil companies, just not for the people worried about climate change.”

But those differences belie the candidates’ fundamental agreement that transformative policy is needed to address climate change, including that:

  • emissions of greenhouse gases from fossil energy have to be brought to zero no later than 2050;
  • an expansive and rapid economic transformation with special attention to the needs of workers is key; and
  • trillions of dollars of federal investment will be necessary and worth the money given the scientific evidence that the alternative would be far costlier.

“I think it’s pretty clear from everyone on that stage that you can’t be serious about running for president if you are not committed to acting on the climate crisis,” said Tiernan Sittenfeld, vice president for government relations for the League of Conservation Voters, who watched the sessions live from the Fox Theatre audience in Detroit.

The first night of the two-night second debate of the Democratic presidential primary season. Credit: Scott Olson/Getty Images
Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, right, was the only new candidate on the stage who didn’t also participate in the first set of debates. The debates were held over two nights to accommodate most of the large Democratic primary field. Credit: Scott Olson/Getty Images

Read the full story

Debate’s attempt to show candidates divided on climate finds unity instead Read More »

Huge loss for political boss Norcross in his fight with NJ Gov. Murphy over EDA investigation

Gov. Phil Murphy and political rival George Norcross III are at the center of a fight over the state Economic Development Authority investigation.
Gov. Phil Murphy and political rival George Norcross III are at the center of a fight over the state Economic Development Authority investigation. Michael Mancuso and Aristide Economopoulos | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com)

By Ted Sherman | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

Efforts by South Jersey powerbroker George E. Norcross to shut down a governor’s task force investigating the state’s troubled Economic Development Authority were dealt a major blow in court Wednesday after a judge refuted arguments that the inquiry was little more than a political hit job.

Superior Court Judge Mary C. Jacobson dismissed a lawsuit brought by attorneys for Norcross and several business entities with ties to him, who charged that the task force appointed by Gov. Phil Murphy represented an illegal exercise of the governor’s power.

“To prevent the governor from investigating the EDA just didn’t make sense to me,” she said.

The judge rejected assertions by lawyers for Norcross that the work of the task force looking into the state’s tax incentive program “was not a bona fide investigation.” She was especially scathing in her criticism of their arguments in court urging her to ignore the findings of the state auditor who sparked the creation of the task force, while at the same time citing the posts of the political news website New Jersey Globe regarding the case.

“That was very telling to me. You didn’t want me to look at something that was important, but you did want me to look at a blog post,” she said. “The court does find the governor has the authority to initiate an investigation.”

Read the full story

Huge loss for political boss Norcross in his fight with NJ Gov. Murphy over EDA investigation Read More »

New Jersey legislators urged to protect sharks

New Jersey should pass its own bill against finning to take a stand and join a dozen other states — including our neighbors Delaware, Maryland, and New York — in doing its part to stop this unsustainable and abhorrent cruelty, local animal group say.
New Jersey should pass its own bill against finning to take a stand and join a dozen other states — including our neighbors Delaware, Maryland, and New York — in doing its part to stop this unsustainable and abhorrent cruelty, local animal group say

By Brian R. Hackett, Tim Dillingham and Marie Levine
(Star-Ledger guest columnists)

During 2019 Shark Week, The Humane Society of the United States, The Shark Research Institute, and The American Littoral Society, along with a broad coalition of more than 25 New Jersey businesses, environmental groups, and animal protection organizations have appealed to Speaker Craig Coughlin to advance an Assembly vote on A4845, a widely supported bill to ban the sale and trade of shark fins in New Jersey, and send an approved version of the bill to Gov. Phil Murphy’s desk.

This is the second time the bill has passed both House committees and the full Senate, and it has never had more support.

Over the last several years, Garden State residents have learned more about the horrors of shark finning — the practice of cutting the fins off sharks, often while they are still alive, and then throwing the animals overboard to slowly die. Every year, tens of millions of sharks are killed globally for their fins, which are used for shark fin soup.

false
Shark Week 2019 free Livestream: How to watch online, schedule, lineup, time
When is Shark Week 2019? The annual July and August TV event on Discovery Channel that pays homage to the toothy residents of the deep begins Sunday, July 28,

The bill is also backed by U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ), author of a federal bill to ban the purchase, possession and sale of shark fins. S. 877, the Shark Fin Sales Elimination Act of 2019, enjoys broad bipartisan support. While the act of shark finning itself is prohibited under federal law, the U.S. market for fins continues to fuel the practice in foreign and high seas that have lax shark finning bans or inadequate shark management and conservation policy.

New Jersey, as a leading coastal state, should pass its own bill to take a stand and join a dozen other states — including our neighbors Delaware, Maryland, and New York — in doing its part to stop this unsustainable and abhorrent cruelty.

Read the full op-ed

New Jersey legislators urged to protect sharks Read More »

After getting rapped for its nuclear subsidy, PSEG may settle for less in grid resiliency spending

Gas pipeline

Tom Johnson reports for NJ Spotlight:

Public Service Electric & Gas has tentatively agreed to a sharply scaled-down plan to make its gas and power grids more resilient, accepting a $842 million, four-year program instead of a $2.5 billion, five-year spending program.

In a separate proposed agreement with stakeholders, the state’s largest utility also agreed to put off a decision on its $2.8 billion energy-efficiency filing until early 2020, one of the company’s biggest priorities. Instead, PSE&G will spend $42 million on existing programs aimed at cutting energy use by hospitals and multi-family housing, and installing smart thermostats.

Both agreements need to be finalized among stakeholders — the utility itself, staff of the Board of Public Utilities, and the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel. The proposed settlements could be up for approval by the BPU at its initial September meeting.

The accords reached with regulators signal worries among regulators about spikes in customers’ bills resulting from the Murphy administration’s clean-energy goals, and its efforts to decrease power outages may be starting to resonate even though those policies already enjoy wide backing from the public and government officials.

The tentative agreements come in the wake of the administration approving a controversial $300 million subsidy to keep open three power plants operated by PSEG Power, an affiliate of the utility, this past April. Last month, the BPU also approved ratepayer subsidies to build 1,100 megawatts of offshore-wind capacity off Atlantic City, a project expected to cost $1.68 billion.

Read the full story

Don’t miss stories like this Click to receive free updates

After getting rapped for its nuclear subsidy, PSEG may settle for less in grid resiliency spending Read More »