NJ lawmaker draws flack for outing a miserly tipper

State Sen. Declan O'Scanlon, R-Monmouth, is pictured during a voting session at the Statehouse in Trenton.
NJ Advance Media for NJ.comState Sen. Declan O’Scanlon, R-Monmouth, is pictured during a voting session at the Statehouse in Trenton.

Editor’s Note: Put us in line with those applauding Senator O’Scanlon’s action. Anyone whose income has relied on tips commensurate with the service they provide is shouting, Bravo, Senator!

Brent Johnson reports for NJ.com

Leave a skimpy tip at a restaurant, and the most you might expect to happen is your server cursing you out to other members of the waitstaff.

You probably wouldn’t expect a member of the state Senate to chide you in public. By name.

But that’s what happened this week when state Sen. Declan O’Scanlontook to Twitter on Tuesday night — and the move has drawn some backlash.

The Monmouth County Republican tweeted a photo of a $119.26 check at the Colts Neck Inn from the day before. The tip for a waitress named Ashley: a mere 74 cents. (That rounds the bill up to $120.)

On the receipt was the name of the debit cardholder who paid for the meal.

O’Scanlon, who lives in nearby Little Silver and often eats at the restaurant, said Ashley is “a great waitress and wonderful human being” — and the customer is “a jerk.”

“Live with your misplaced obnoxiousness,” the senator wrote.

Declan O’Scanlon@declanoscanlon

Wow…have to work to qualify for my calling you out specifically as a jerk. But Anthony Dierlof qualifies. Ashley is a great waitress and wonderful human being. Certainly not a malicious bone in her body. Makes Anthony…a jerk. Live with your misplaced obnoxiousness.

View image on Twitter

O’Scanlon told NJ Advance Media on Thursday he happened to visit the Inn the night after the notorious tip and it was “the talk of the restaurant.”

The senator — whom Ashley had waited on before — decided to take action.

“It was such a jerky thing,” O’Scanlon said. “If you don’t tip at all, that happens. But this guy went out of his way to make it sting, to do the math. It was an overt effort to hurt this person.”

The lawmaker added that he does not know the customer at all and has no personal vendetta against him.

“That would be a line I wouldn’t cross,” O’Scanlon said.

Still, some Twitter users were put off by O’Scanlon’s actions:

Declan O’Scanlon@declanoscanlon · Aug 13, 2019

Wow…have to work to qualify for my calling you out specifically as a jerk. But Anthony Dierlof qualifies. Ashley is a great waitress and wonderful human being. Certainly not a malicious bone in her body. Makes Anthony…a jerk. Live with your misplaced obnoxiousness.

View image on Twitter

Edward Henderson@EddieHendy

@declanoscanlon I think you are completely out of line for sharing this guy’s information and Ashley should be fired for taking a picture of the patrons receipt and information… Shame on you Declan.

Declan O’Scanlon@declanoscanlon · Aug 13, 2019

Wow…have to work to qualify for my calling you out specifically as a jerk. But Anthony Dierlof qualifies. Ashley is a great waitress and wonderful human being. Certainly not a malicious bone in her body. Makes Anthony…a jerk. Live with your misplaced obnoxiousness.

View image on Twitter

tonyphockey@Piscottas_Way

Bad move posting this. Especially for an elected official.

Others backed him up:

Declan O’Scanlon@declanoscanlon · Aug 13, 2019

Wow…have to work to qualify for my calling you out specifically as a jerk. But Anthony Dierlof qualifies. Ashley is a great waitress and wonderful human being. Certainly not a malicious bone in her body. Makes Anthony…a jerk. Live with your misplaced obnoxiousness.

View image on Twitter

barbara lesinski@BarbaraLesinski

Interesting Declan, that with all the social media crap posted by elected officials today that you received some of these comments about your post. The service industry is one of the hardest to work and the lowest paid. Tips are something they rely on the survive.

O’Scanlon brushed off the criticism.

“It’s crap,” he said. “Give me a break. I think maybe we need more people to not hesitate to speak out and speak up on behalf of people who don’t have the reach we have.”

“Maybe if the jerks of the world knew there’d be people to call out their overt efforts to make world a darker place, maybe they’d hesitate,” the senator added.

Reached via phone by NJ Advance Media, a man identifying himself as the customer’s father declined to comment. The customer himself could not be reached.

Other critics have pointed out that O’Scanlon didn’t vote last year for a law gradually increasing New Jersey’s minimum wage to $15 an hour.

Tipped workers are paid through a combination of tips and wages that must be equal to the minimum wage. This law increased the tipped minimum wage from $2.13 an hour to $5.13 an hour by 2022. If those wages and tips don’t meet the minimum wage, the employer is supposed to make up the difference.

Declan O’Scanlon@declanoscanlon · Aug 13, 2019

Wow…have to work to qualify for my calling you out specifically as a jerk. But Anthony Dierlof qualifies. Ashley is a great waitress and wonderful human being. Certainly not a malicious bone in her body. Makes Anthony…a jerk. Live with your misplaced obnoxiousness.

View image on Twitter

Cooper River Indivisible@Indivisible_NJ1

You’ll be immediately calling for a minimum wage hike for wait staff, right? Since you now see why it’s needed.

O’Scanlon said his vote against the minimum wage hike is “totally unrelated to this” and that he’s heard from numerous servers who don’t want to be included in the minimum wage because they make more from tips than hourly wages.

“People arguing we should pay minimum wage to servers and get rid of tipping are people that don’t work in the industry,” he said. “But I’m happy to have that discussion.”

NJ lawmaker draws flack for outing a miserly tipper Read More »

Stocks losses deepen as a key recession warning surfaces

The Dow plunged more than 800 points as investors feared a recession following poor economic data from Germany and China. (Reuters)

Damian Paletta, Thomas Heath and Taylor Telford report for the Washington Post August 14 at 4:02 PM

The global economy has begun to shudder.

On Wednesday, the U.S. stock market tumbled after a reliable predictor of looming recessions flashed for the first time since the 2008 financial crisis. The Dow Jones industrial average fell around 800 points, or 3 percent, and has lost close to 7 percent in the past three weeks.

Two of the world’s largest economies, Germany and the United Kingdom, appear to be contracting. Argentina’s stock market fell nearly 50 percent in recent days, and growth in China has slowed.

Whether the events presage an economic calamity or just an alarming spasm are unclear. But unlike during the Great Recession, global leaders are not working in unison to confront mounting problems and arrest the slowdown. Instead, they are increasingly at each other’s throats.

And President Trump has responded by both claiming the economy is still thriving while dramatically ramping up his attacks on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, seeking to deflect blame.

Wednesday’s sharp selloff was caused by an unusual development in the bond market, called an “inverted yield curve,” that often foreshadows a recession.

For the first time since the run-up to the Great Recession, the yields – or returns – on short-term U.S. bonds eclipsed those of long-term bonds. Normally, the government needs to pay out higher rates to attract investors for its long-term bonds. But with so many losing confidence in the near-term prospects of the economy and rushing to buy longer-term bonds, the U.S. government now is paying more to attract buyers to its 2-year bond than its 10-year note.

This phenomenon, which suggests investor faith in the economy is faltering, has preceded every recession in the past 50 years.

“The stars are aligned across the curve that the economy is headed for a big fall,” said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at MUFG Union Bank. “The yield curves are all crying timber that a recession is almost a reality, and investors are tripping over themselves to get out of the way.”

[‘An absurdly odd world’: Why nervous banks are paying people to take loans]

It’s the latest in a string of worrisome news about the U.S. economy. The government is expected to spend roughly $1 trillion more than it brings in through revenue this year, creating a ballooning deficit. Business investment has begun to contract — largely due to the uncertainty surrounding President Trump’s trade war — and manufacturing jobs have begun to slide. The big hiring and investment announcements that piled up at the beginning of the Trump administration have ceased, as have the announcements of bonuses and pay increases that came after a tax cut law was passed in 2017.

Several White House officials have become concerned that the economy is weakening faster than expected, but they are not working on proactive plans to try and change its course. The Treasury Department has had an exodus of senior advisers in recent months, and the White House just announced a replacement for chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.

Instead of rolling out new policies, Trump and other top aides have escalated their attacks on the Federal Reserve, trying to pin much of the U.S.’s problems on what Trump alleges is elevated interest rates that are strangling growth.

In a series of Twitter posts on Wednesday, Trump appeared to try and calm investors while also unloading vicious language aimed at Powell, whom he nominated in late 2017.

“China is not our problem, though Hong Kong is not helping,” Trump wrote. “Our problem is with the Fed. Raised too much & too fast. Now too slow to cut…Spread is way too much as other countries say THANK YOU to clueless Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve. Germany, and many others are playing the game! CRAZY INVERTED YIELD CURVE! We should easily be reaping big Rewards & Gains, but the Fed is holding us back. We will Win!”

The Twitter posts reflected a growing anxiety within the White House about problems in the economy, particularly because just a few hours earlier Trump had tried to spin the inverted yield curve as a positive, saying it has occurred because “Tremendous amounts of money pouring into the United States. People want safety!

In the past, Democrats and Republicans in control of the White House have scrambled when there were signs of an economic downturn. They met and often consulted with Congress about ways to protect the economy or advance some kind of economic stimulus, either through tax cuts or spending increases.

But the Trump administration has already cut taxes and boosted spending, and there appears to be little political appetite to do more of either. White House officials have discussed a plan to make changes to the way capital gains taxes are levied, but that would only impact certain investors and has already faced criticism from Democrats for being a boon to the rich. Complicating matters, a number of investors and foreign leaders have blamed Trump’s trade war for causing a contraction in business investment and forcing companies to pull back.

The U.S. economy has shown signs of weakening in recent months, but high levels of consumer spending in the United States have helped enormously. Still, the escalating trade war between Trump and Chinese leaders has stopped many businesses from investing. And there are signs that the large tariffs he has placed on many Chinese imports is costing U.S. businesses and consumers billions of dollars.

In a rare admission of the economic consequences of his adversarial trade approach, Trump on Tuesday announced he was delaying many of the tariffs he had promised on cellphones and laptop computers until December 15. That announcement brought the stock market up sharply higher on Tuesday, but all of those gains evaporated in minutes Wednesday amid fears about the yield curve.

Aside from the drop in the Dow, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, a broader measure of stocks, was down about 2.4 percent, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq composite index dropped about 2.7 percent. Ten of the 11 market sectors were in the loss column Wednesday, with energy, consumer staples and financial services leading the way.

Bank stocks slumped off the news. Bank of America and Citigroup saw their shares sink more than 4 percent, and JPMorgan’s shares fell 3.6 percent. Gold, a safe haven for investors, rose. And the influx of investors scrambling for safety pushed U.S. 30-year Treasury yields to their lowest level ever.

Darkening skies overseas gave investors more to worry about. New data indicated Germany was slipping into recession with the country’s economy shrinking 0.1 percent between April and June. If it experienced another contraction during this quarter, Germany officially would meet the definition of a recession. Officials blamed the drop-off on the U.S.-China trade war and the looming threat of a hard Brexit. The European Stoxx 600 benchmark was down nearly 6 percent in midday trading.

Meanwhile China reported more signs of a weakening economy Wednesday, with factory output falling to a 17-year low and high unemployment. The report fed fears about a broader global slowdown as the trade conflict appears to be stalling some of the world’s most powerful economies.

[Trump finally acknowledges his tariffs could hit consumers]

Several factors have contributed to the market turbulence in recent sessions, including China’s threat to devalue its currency, massive protests in Hong Kong that could prompt a response from the Chinese government, an escalation of the U.S.-China trade war and the flight to bonds.

The trade roller coaster has fostered a feeling of uncertainty among American businesses, making it more difficult for companies to make long-term plans. The uncertainty has been felt in stock prices. The Dow is about 5 percent off its all-time high of one month ago. Trade concerns have now worked its way to the U.S. Treasury bond market.

“The big concern is around trade,” said Dan Ivascyn, group chief investment officer at Pimco. “The longer we remain in limbo, the more damage to the global economy. You already have a fragile global economy, and with this trade tension you are beginning to see people shift into safer assets with almost complete disregard for what they are earning on those assets.”

The spate of economic warning signs across the globe followed a rare moment of easing Tuesday in the U.S.-China trade war, after the White House announced that tariffs on certain consumer goods — such as laptops, cellphones and toys — would be postponed a few months to give shoppers and companies a break during Christmas shopping. Some of the tariffs on the remaining $300 billion in Chinese goods will still go into effect Sept. 1 as planned, while the items covered under the delay won’t be affected by tariffs until Dec. 15.

“Just in case they might have an impact on people, what we’ve done is delayed it so they won’t be relevant for the Christmas shopping season,” President Trump told reporters Tuesday.

It was the first time Trump has publicly acknowledged that American people and businesses bear some of the burden from his tariffs.

The delay offered a glimmer of hope in an otherwise grim outlook in U.S.-China trade policy and was announced after a phone call between trade negotiators, which Trump lauded as productive. Chinese officials are planning to come to the United States in September to continue talks.

“The delay impacts around half of the $300 billion of imports and quite clearly focuses on popular consumer products that could have made the Christmas shopping period a lot more expensive for American consumers,” Craig Erlam, an analyst with OANDA, wrote in a note to investors Wednesday. “Trump’s decision to protect consumer’s from tariffs in such an important period makes a lot of sense, but it also recognizes that 2020 could become much more expensive for them if progress is not made.”

Some White House officials have become increasingly concerned about the strength of the economy heading into the 2020 election, and they have pressed the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, which they believe will free up more money for investing.

Trump sought in his first two years to juice economic growth through a combination of tax cuts, spending increases, regulatory changes, and low-energy costs, but many critics said the steps he took were just short-term patches that did little to fix problems in the economy. Trump has said repeatedly that the economy is now the strongest in American history, but there are numerous signs that this is not the case.

The government is set to spend almost $1 trillion more than it brings in through revenue this year, an unusual occurrence when the jobless rate is low. Parts of the manufacturing sector have shown signs of contracting in recent months, and business investment has stalled.

A drop in the yield of the closely watched 10-year U.S. Treasury bond is a sign that investors are heading away from the risk of stocks and toward the safety of long-term bonds. Yields drop when bond prices rise. Some European countries also have negative bond yields. That means people are paying governments to hold their money for them. Historically, people buy government bonds and expect interest payments on those bonds as a reward for lending the government money.

Stocks losses deepen as a key recession warning surfaces Read More »

Germany cuts $39.5 million in environmental funding to Brazil

Deforestation in Brazil

Karla Mendes reports for Mongabay

A wide range of environmental and conservation projects in Brazil are at stake after the government of Germany suspended funds to the country amid the report of alarming rises in monthly Amazon deforestation rates and controversial policies adopted by the administration of far-right President Jair Bolsonaro.

On August 10, German Environment Minister Svenja Schulze reportedly announced Germany’s plans to withdraw some €35 million (US $39.5 million) to Brazil due to the Latin American country’s lack of commitment to curbing deforestation in the Amazon rainforest.

“The policy of the Brazilian government in the Amazon raises doubts as to whether a consistent reduction of deforestation rates is still being pursued,” Schulze told the Tagesspiegel newspaper.

Germany’s move came a week after the head of the Brazilian National Institute of Space Research (INPE), Ricardo Magnus Osório Galvão, was fired, raising concerns over the future of an institution recognized nationally and internationally for its cutting-edge satellite-imaging and deforestation monitoring program.

The Bolsonaro administration has intensely criticized deforestation data released by INPE showing a 2019 spike in cleared area. In July, INPE issued an alert identifying deforestation and degradation totaling some 2,072 square kilometers (800 square miles) for the month of June in Legal Amazonia — a federal designation that includes all or parts of nine Brazilian states — detected by DETER, its real-time detection system. A 2018-2019 month-to-month comparison showed Brazil’s Amazonian deforestation in June 2019 was 88 percent greater than for the same month in 2018, while deforestation in July 2019 was 278 percent higher than July 2018.

Bolsonaro immediately reacted to Germany’s announcement of funding cuts, saying that Brazil doesn’t need German funding to finance conservation projects in the country. “They can use this money as they see fit. Brazil doesn’t need it,” Bolsonaro told journalists in Brasilia on Sunday.

But experts contacted for this story told Mongabay that Bolsonaro’s statements are not accurate, as Brazil has relied for decades on funding from Germany and other countries to finance environmental projects, given the South American country’s budget shortfalls.

Click to read the full story





Germany cuts $39.5 million in environmental funding to Brazil Read More »

Is Newark’s drinking water safe or not?

Limited test of lead filters delivers an unwelcome surprise
Bottled water distributed to concerned, frustrated residents

NJTV’s Brenda Flanagan reports:
There was worry among parents in Newark over the health of their children Tuesday, after federal officials said tests showed that tap water in some city residences exceeded federal levels for lead despite the presence of faucet filters supplied by the city.

NJTV’s Michael Hill has more on the story:

Related news:
Newark addresses levels of lead in drinking water – NJ Spotlight
Lead-contaminated drinking water is threatening the health of Newark’s residents – National Resources Defense Council
Group that sued Flint over lead water now suing Newark – EP Blog
Lead is heavy, so is the cost of getting it out of New Jersey’s water pipes, DEP testifies – EP Blog

Is Newark’s drinking water safe or not? Read More »

Trump’s war on the environment. Wildlife and habitats the latest targets

The rules will shrink habitats that animals and plants rely on for survival

A grizzly bear and a cub along the Gibbon River in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming. (Frank van Manen/United States Geological Survey/AP)

Darryl Fears reports for the Washington Post
Aug. 12 at 12:22 PM

Three months after a U.N. report warned that 1 million species face extinction because of human activity, the Trump administration on Monday finalized rule changes to the Endangered Species Act that make it harder to protect plants and animals whose populations are in serious decline.

The rules were changed as part of President Trump’s mandate to scale back government regulations on behalf of businesses. In that vein, language in the act that required officials to rely heavily on science when considering whether to list a species as threatened or endangered regardless of economic impact was removed.

Potential threats to business opportunities and other costs of listing a species can now be considered and shared with the public. Officials said those considerations would not affect listing decisions.

The administration will also shrink the number of habitats set aside for threatened wildlife. Currently, land that plants and animals occupy is set aside for their protection, in addition to areas that they once occupied but abandoned.

For the threatened species, unoccupied habitat might not be protected, opening it up for oil and gas exploration or other forms of development.

Conservationists and some politicians decried the changes as a major rollback of the 46-year-old law credited with saving the bald eagle, grizzly bear, humpback whale, American alligator and Florida manatee from extinction.

“Today, the Trump administration issued regulations that take a wrecking ball to one of our oldest and most effective environmental laws, the Endangered Species Act,” Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) said in a statement. “As we have seen time and time again, no environmental protection — no matter how effective or popular — is safe from this administration.”

[One million species face extinction, U.N. report says. And humans will suffer as a result.]

In May, a U.N. report on world biodiversity found that 1 million plant and animal species are on the verge of extinction, with alarming implications for human survival.

The report, written by seven experts from universities around the world, directly linked the loss of species to human activity and showed how those losses are undermining food and water security, along with human health.

More plants and animals are threatened with extinction now than at any other period in human history, the report said.

Trump’s war on the environment. Wildlife and habitats the latest targets Read More »