Lew Blum, the Tow-Truck King Philly Loves to Hate, Needs a Hug

Editor’s Note: If you ever lived or parked your car in the city, there’s a good chance you agree with those who call Lew Blum is the Most Hated Man in Philadelphia. After reading the story below, you may consider pinning that title on a guy with another well-known name..

Jonathan Valania writes in Philadelphia Magazine

lew blum towing
Lew Blum at the West Philly impound garage where he might have towed your car. Gene Smirnov photo

Up until September 22, 2015, it was Lew Blum’s world; we just parked in it.

From behind the steel-reinforced walls of his fortified bunker in West Philly, Blum lorded over a vast and lucrative towing empire that specializes in removing unauthorized vehicles from private parking space across the city. His name is a household word in Philadelphia, where upwards of 10,000 LEW BLUM TOWING signs hang in ubiquity on the walls adjacent to more than 3,000 private parking lots, spaces and garage doors, warding off would-be illegal parkers the way scarecrows ward off crows. When that fails, Blum’s wreckers tow away those who ignore the warning, at the behest of irked private-parking-space owners and lessees. Nothing enrages us more than taking away something that belongs to us, especially our cars, which in America is tantamount to stealing our eternal souls. Blum was good at it, so good that he became The Most Hated Man in Philadelphia in the court of public opinion. Lew doesn’t take it personally — it’s just one of the many occupational hazards of being a tow-truck-drivin’ man. Besides, somebody’s gotta be the villain in this movie.

Raised on the dog-eared mean streets of the Bottom in the middle of the 20th century, Blum was born into a burgeoning towing dynasty. Towing was the family business going back generations. His grandfather, Lew Smith, more or less invented tow-truck enforcement of private parking in this city. Blum’s uncle was George Smith — of George Smith Towing fame — and between the two of them, they split the city in half. Sure, there were other towing companies in town — Jimmy’s, Earl’s, Empire — but they mostly nibbled around the edges of Blum’s and Smith’s respective fiefdoms. And yeah, some towers ran their businesses like pirate ships, but that wasn’t Lew Blum’s problem. He’s been saying for years that the city should be singling out and cracking down on the bad actors.

Blum says that in the past two years, his $2 million towing empire has lost 80 percent of its value. He’s exhausted his life savings just trying to keep his head above water.

In recent years, getting your car out of Blum’s impoundment lot would set you back $200, and up until 2017, his wreckers were hooking 20 cars a day. He estimates the value of his business back then in excess of $2 million. But all that began to change on or about September 22, 2015. That was when now-indicted and theretofore all-powerful union boss Johnny Doc emerged from an undisclosed location to discover that his illegally parked car was “on the hook” of a wrecker from an unnamed towing company, as spelled out on page 118 of the 109-count federal indictment of Johnny “Doc” Dougherty, business manager of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98, and Philadelphia City Councilman Bobby Henon. After telling the tow-truck driver who he was, Johnny Doc shelled out the requisite $200 to get his car off the hook. Further insult was added to injury when the tow-truck driver was unable to make change and Doc was shorted $10. Shortly thereafter, according to the indictment, Doc called Bobby Henon to vent and plot his revenge.

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Lew Blum, the Tow-Truck King Philly Loves to Hate, Needs a Hug Read More »

3M, DuPont Refuse to Pay for New Jersey Chemical Cleanup

A sign outside a 3M Co. plant.Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Sylvia Carignan reports for Bloomberg

Chemours Co., 3M Co. and DuPont are taking a stand against what one company called an “unprecedented” New Jersey order, saying they won’t pay for a statewide investigation of fluorinated chemical contamination.

The companies asserted they aren’t responsible for contamination under the state’s Spill Compensation and Control Act, which prohibits hazardous substances and pollutants from being discharged and imposes liability on those who do so.

New Jersey’s Department of Environmental Protection in March ordered DuPont Specialty Products USA LLC, DowDuPont Inc., E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Chemours Co., Solvay Specialty Polymers USA LLC and 3M to tell the state where and when they manufactured, dumped, supplied, or used poly- or perfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS.

The chemicals have appeared in drinking water supplies across the country, spurring new federal legislation, state regulations and orders including New Jersey’s.

New Jersey also requested the companies set up a fund for investigating and remediating PFAS across the state, but the companies have refused, according to documents obtained by Bloomberg Environment May 9 through a state public information request. 

‘Wildly Expensive’

But even the act of estimating the costs of cleaning up PFAS across the state would be “wildly expensive,” Lanny S. Kurzweil, partner at McCarter & English LLP in Newark, N.J., wrote to the state on behalf of Chemours April 17.

Each company put up different defenses against the state’s request for funding, according to documents obtained by Bloomberg Environment May 9, but are willing to talk with state officials about PFAS chemicals near their own New Jersey facilities.

A spokesman for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection didn’t immediately respond to Bloomberg Environment’s request for comment.

Read the full story

3M, DuPont Refuse to Pay for New Jersey Chemical Cleanup Read More »

Troubled by climate change, here’s a new reason to hug a tree

Roughly 2.5 million metric tons of the carbon emissions that cause global warming are stored in New Jersey’s forests

Warinanco Park, Roselle

Tom Johnson reports for NJ Spotlight

Is New Jersey doing enough to protect its 2 million acres of forests — one of the most effective tools in ridding the atmosphere of the carbon emissions that cause global warming?

That issue is attracting the attention of legislators who are looking at how they can advance climate-change adaption policies in New Jersey, a coastal state particularly vulnerable to rising sea levels and extreme storm events.

Across the United States, the nation’s forests account for 15 percent of the carbon emissions that are pulled from the air and stored, according to Jad Daley, president and CEO of American Forests, which works to build resilient forests in rural and urban settings. “The U.S. already is delivering forests as a climate-change solution, and New Jersey is delivering, too,’’ he told legislators last month.

The question is, asked Daley, “how do we keep a good thing going?’’ His message: Retain as much forest as possible and keep what remains as healthy as possible — no small task with climate change increasing the threats to woodlands.

“If we don’t deal with the health stresses caused by climate change and forest loss, we’re going to lose this good thing we have going … ,’’ he said. Not only are forests under increased strain from infestation by insects but also from wildfires, the latter is a concern in the Pinelands where wildfires are part of the natural ecosystem.

Pulling carbon dioxide from the air

In New Jersey, roughly 2.5 million metric tons of carbon emissions are stored in forests, Daley said. That’s in line with what is happening across the nation with trees capturing carbon emissions.

Jad Daley
Jad Daley, president and CEO of American Forests










Emissions of atmospheric carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas causing climate change, are taken up by trees, grasses and other plants through photosynthesis and stored in the vegetation and soils.

Surprisingly, the largest portion of carbon sequestration occurs in New Jersey’s urban areas, according to Daley, who grew up in the state.

Why so? Because urban trees reduce the effect of heat islands in densely populated areas, serving as a natural source of energy efficiency by reducing power use in heating and cooling. The U.S. Forest Service estimates urban forests reduce energy use by 7.2 percent, saving consumers roughly $7 billion a year.

“This is a real critical opportunity for New Jersey, in particular,’’ Daley said.

Read the full story

Troubled by climate change, here’s a new reason to hug a tree Read More »

Emails show confusion, backroom deal-making in Philly public land sale

Shawn Bullard atop his waterfront condominium in 2012. ( DAVID SWANSON / Staff Photographer )
Shawn Bullard atop his waterfront condominium in 2012. ( DAVID SWANSON / Photo )

William Bender reports for the Philadelphia Inquirer

Philly developer Shawn Bullard purchased vacant public lots in North Philadelphia in 2016. The lots on Cecil B. Moore Avenue were bought at a mysterious discount — triggering a review of the sale by the city’s Inspector General.

Now, hundreds of pages of emails and other records obtained by The Inquirer show city officials scrambling unsuccessfully to determine why the price was lowered. The records shed light on the type of backroom deal-making Mayor Jim Kenney and others have been trying to eliminate when it comes to public land sales.

The emails reveal the influence Council members can exert over such sales. Bullard ultimately got the lots with the help of City Council President Darrell Clarke.

Read the full story

Emails show confusion, backroom deal-making in Philly public land sale Read More »

Proposed NYDEC Regulatory Changes – May 9, 2019

 
Proposed 6 NYCRR Part 40 – Commercial Scup  The purpose of this rulemaking is to implement the required measures to remain consistent with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries regulations. 
Comment deadline: July 1, 2019
Additional information about 6 NYCRR Part 40 proposal

Proposed Part 208, Landfill Gas Collection and Control Systems for Certain Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
Revisions to Part 208 would incorporate the new federal Emission Guideline (EG) for MSW Landfills codified under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Cf.
Comment deadline: May 29, 2019
Hearings: May 22 and May 24
Additional information about Part 208 proposal

Proposed Part 226, Solvent [Metal] Cleaning Processes and Industrial Cleaning Solvents
The revision to this rule lowers the volatile organic compound (VOC) content limit of a particular type of cleaning process called ‘cold cleaning’. It also eliminates the distinction that the rule only applies to the cleaning of metal.
Comment deadline: May 29, 2019
Hearings: May 22 and May 24
Additional information about Part 226 proposal

Proposed Part 205, Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings
The purpose of this rulemaking is to reduce emissions from AIM coatings by reducing the volatile organic compound (VOC) content limits for some coating categories.
Comment deadline: May 20, 2019
Hearings: May 6, May 13, and May 14
Additional information about Part 205 proposal

Proposed Part 227-3, Ozone Season Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Emission Limits for Simple Cycle and Regenerative Combustion Turbines
The primary goal of this proposal is to lower allowable NOx emissions from simple cycle and regenerative combustion turbines during the ozone season. 
Comment deadline: May 20, 2019
Hearings: May 13, and May 14
Additional information about Part 227 proposal

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is providing this summary of recent regulatory activity as a service to the interested public. For a complete listing of all pending regulatory changes, see  Proposed, Emergency, and Recently Adopted  Eegulations.
For a complete listing of all legal notices, please see the  Environmental Notice Bulletin.

 

 

Proposed NYDEC Regulatory Changes – May 9, 2019 Read More »