If this bill passes, Tesla and GM electric car sales could get a jolt

Tesla Roadster

By Katie LoboscoCNN Business
Updated 12:25 PM ET, Thu April 11, 2019

Washington (CNN Business)General Motors and Tesla sales could get a boost if a bill introduced this week by a bipartisan group of lawmakers to expand the electric car tax credit passes Congress.

Michigan Democrats Sen. Debbie Stabenow, Sen. Gary Peters and Rep. Dan Kildee joined with Tennessee Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander and Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins to propose the legislation, which they say would increase production in electric vehicles and create jobs.

Currently, customers who buy electric cars receive a $7,500 tax credit. But it phases out after an automaker sells 200,000 vehicles.

Tesla (TSLA) was first to hit the cap last year and responded by cutting the price of its cars by $2,000. GM (GM) exceeded 200,000 vehicles sold earlier this year and has warned that sales of their plug-in cars, like the Chevrolet Bolt and Volt, could drop as the tax credit phases out.

The proposed legislation would raise the cap so that another 400,000 vehicles sold by each manufacturer will be eligible for a $7,000 tax credit. It would start phasing out after 600,000 vehicles are sold.

“At a time when climate change is having a real effect on Michigan, today’s legislation is something we can do now to reduce emissions and combat carbon pollution,” Stabenow said in a statement.

The proposal could get pushback from the Trump administration. White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said in December that the president wants to end the electric vehicle tax credit, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

If this bill passes, Tesla and GM electric car sales could get a jolt Read More »

‘Solar Bill of Rights’ advances in California Legislature

SunRun installers put panels on a home in Sunnyvale. Legislation dubbed the “Solar Bill of Rights,” aims to help customers quickly connect renewable energy projects on their sites to the grid.

J.D. Morris reports for the San Francisco Chronicle
April 10, 2019 Updated: April 10, 2019 4:06 p.m.

Clean-energy advocates advanced legislation Wednesday that aims to make it easier for Californians to use solar power despite concerns about the possible impact on customers who remain fully reliant on the electric grid.

The bill, authored jointly by state Sens. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, and Jim Nielsen, R-Gerber (Tehama County), is designed to enshrine in state law a right for homes, schools and businesses to take advantage of solar power without utilities putting up too many roadblocks.

Dubbed the “Solar Bill of Rights,” SB288 is also intended to help customers quickly connect renewable energy projects on their sites to the grid and avoid fees that the legislation’s major supporters call discriminatory.

The bill cleared the state Senate’s Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee on a unanimous vote, even as some lawmakers on the committee voiced sympathy with objections from the utility industry and ratepayer advocates.

Read the full story


Like this? Click to receive free updates

‘Solar Bill of Rights’ advances in California Legislature Read More »

GE’s cleanup of the Hudson River may be finished, EPA says, so Gov. Cuomo sues

Crews dredge the Hudson River in Fort Edward, N.Y.,
Crews dredge the Hudson River in Fort Edward, N.Y., in June 2011. The work was part of a project on the Upper Hudson to clean up areas where General Electric released PCBs. (Photo: AP )

Scott Fallon, North Jersey Record

General Electric Co. will not be forced to continue dredging toxic PCBs from the upper Hudson River unless additional studies show that the company’s $1.7 billion cleanup failed to make the river significantly cleaner, federal officials announced Thursday.

The decision by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency prompted New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo to say hours later that he will sue the agency for failing to hold GE accountable. 

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Even after GE’s cleanup in recent years, more than two-thirds of the 1.3 million pounds of PCBs dumped by the company remain in the Hudson — pollution that stretches 200 miles south to NewYork Harborand the riverfront towns of New Jersey.

The EPA will begin studying PCB pollution in the lower 160 miles of the Hudson in places like Poughkeepsie, Westchester and Rockland counties and the shores of New Jersey, although no timeline was given Thursday, agency officials said.

Officials say they need more time to determine whether GE’s dredging of PCBs from the Hudson River was thorough enough to protect human health. The agency also issued GE a certification that the PCB cleanup was conducted properly, which environmentalists say lets the company off the hook. 

In a teleconference with reporters, EPA Regional Administrator Pete Lopez said the agency “is deferring a determination about the protectiveness of the remedy” until more years of data on Hudson River fish tissue are gathered.

Lopez downplayed the certification given to GE, saying it only “confirms that the dredging, capping, habitat restoration … were properly performed.”

Mark Behan, a GE spokesman, said the EPA’s decision confirms that the company’s cleanup was a success. “EPA concluded that the dredging project was effective in reducing PCB levels and said these declines are expected to continue,” he said in a statement.

Cuomo, however, said New York State will sue the EPA, arguing that the certificate of completion could make it harder for the agency to require GE to implement more dredging or other remedial measures along the upper Hudson River.

Read the full story

GE’s cleanup of the Hudson River may be finished, EPA says, so Gov. Cuomo sues Read More »

Nuclear fallout? Acid rain? A tacky Instagram filter? Nope—plant sex. Lots and lots of plant sex.

pollen cloud

“Pollenpocalypse” descends upon Durham, NC. Jeremy Gilchrist via Facebook

On Monday, residents of Durham, North Carolina encountered what some are calling “pollmageddon,” during which an onslaught of greenish-yellow pollen blanketed the area. It covered cars and patios, and even visibly floated through the air. Photographer Jeremy Gilchrist saw the allergy apocalypse from his car and sent up his drone to document it.

He posted the eye-watering photos on Facebook, writing, “No tricks here. Yes you are looking at a green haze made up of tree pollen from the pines of central NC!”1.0001:1707:30

The region’s trees have begun mating in the warmer weather, and that means high pollen counts. The Raleigh-Durham area experienced the fifth highest pollen count in the U.S. on Wednesday, according to Weather.com. From 10 a.m. Monday to 10 a.m. Tuesday, the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality reported that the count was over 2,500 pollen grains per cubic meter.

Historically, North Carolina’s pollen levels have stayed between 1,000 and 1,500 grains per cubic meter during peak season. The highest pollen count ever recorded in the Raleigh-Durham area was 3,524 grains per cubic meter—Thursday’s count is expected to come in a close second.

Research suggests climate change could be to blame. It heightens temperatures and makes warmer weather last longer, giving plants more time to release pollen. This makes allergy seasons longer and more intense. What’s more, a 2010 study conducted by the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America found that ragweed (another source of pollen) releases more pollen at higher carbon dioxide concentrations.

Several hours after Gilchrist took the photos, residents got a much-needed break from the particles after thunderstorms rolled through the area and washed most of them out of the sky. Gilchrist captured that, too.


Down came the rain and washed the pollen out. Jeremy Gilchrist via Facebook
L

But North Carolinians aren’t out of the allergy-infested woods yet. Pollen counts through the end of this week are expected to remain very high as the trees continue their airborne courtship. Hunker down—it’s going to be a sneezy, yellow spring.


Like this? Click to receive free updates

Nuclear fallout? Acid rain? A tacky Instagram filter? Nope—plant sex. Lots and lots of plant sex. Read More »

Trump signs executive orders seeking to speed up oil and gas projects

President Trump signed on April 10 two executive orders to prevent states from blocking the construction of oil and gas pipelines.

Toluse Olorunnipa & Steven Mufson report for the Washington Post
April 10 at 6:05 PM

CROSBY, Tex. — President Trump signed a pair of executive orders on Wednesday seeking to make it easier for firms to build oil and gas pipelines and harder for state agencies to intervene, a move that drew immediate backlash from some state officials and environmental activists.

“Too often, badly needed energy infrastructure is being held back by special-interest groups, entrenched bureaucracies and radical activists,” Trump said during a visit to a union training center for operating engineers 25 miles outside of Houston. “The two executive orders that I’ll be signing in just a moment will fix this, dramatically accelerating energy infrastructure approvals.”

The executive action seeks to rein in states’ power by changing the implementation instructions, known as guidance, that are issued by federal agencies, according to one of the orders.

That order also requires the Transportation Department to change its rules to allow the shipment of liquefied natural gas by rail and tanker truck. And it seeks to limit shareholder ballot initiatives designed to alter companies’ policies on environmental and social issues. Trump’s order requires the Labor Department to examine whether retirement funds that pursue those investment strategies are meeting their responsibility to maximize returns.

A second order, focused on cross-border energy projects, would clarify that the president is solely responsible for approving or denying pipelines and other infrastructure that cross international boundaries. The secretary of state has previously played that role.

Critics said the president’s orders on pipelines would trample on authority delegated to the states under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and other congressional legislation. That authority has been upheld twice by the Supreme Court. Trump’s move would benefit, among other companies, Energy Transfer, whose chief executive, Kelcy Warren, was a major contributor to Trump’s campaign.

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Trump signs executive orders seeking to speed up oil and gas projects Read More »

Most environmentalists cheer Maryland’s new 50 percent green energy goal, but some want it vetoed

Scott Dance reports for the Baltimore Sun:

Not all environmentalists are cheering the Maryland General Assembly’s approval Monday of incentives that double down on utility customers’ investment in renewable energy.

They all agree reaching a goal of 50% green energy by 2030 would help reduce greenhouse gases and combat climate change. But some say a bill approved in the final hour of the legislature’s annual session will only magnify a wrinkle in state policy that rewards carbon-emitting trash incinerators and paper mills with millions of dollars in green energy subsidies that are funded through energy bills.

“Thank you for your efforts to move Maryland towards a clean energy economy,” Caroline Eader wrote Tuesday in an e-mail to state lawmakers.

But Eader, director of a group called Zero Waste for Zero Lost, then urged them to abandon the measure if Gov. Larry Hogan vetoes it, as some expect him to do.

“Then next year we can come together with a renewable standard that is truly clean,” she wrote.

The legislation was a central piece of environmentalists’ agenda, considered key to reversing recent declines in solar industry jobs in Maryland, and to reducing the state’s carbon footprint. It requires utilities across the state to invest increasing amounts each year in solar generation across the state and other types of renewable power projects, including wind farms, across a larger grid that covers all or part of 13 states.

Ratepayers subsidize the utility investments, subsidies that amounted to $72 million in 2017.

Supporters said this year’s legislative debate came down to a choice between standing firm on a push to end the green energy subsidies for trash-to-energy facilities, or giving it up to advance the 50% renewable energy proposal on their third try in as many years. There were also concerns among lawmakers about a loss of union jobs at those plants, and at paper mills that receive subsidies for generating power using a substance known as black liquor.

The decision became easier amid Baltimore and Montgomery County politicians’ growing resolve to close trash incinerators in their jurisdictions, said Mike Tidwell, executive director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. The Wheelabrator Baltimore incinerator near Russell Street and Interstate 95 is the city’s largest single source of industrial air pollution, while burning hundreds of thousands of tons of household waste from across the region.

“We fought as long as we could,” Tidwell said of the trash incineration subsidies, which the state Senate voted to end in March. “This is a dramatic bill. The General Assembly has passed a wonderful and aggressive plan to increase solar and wind power in our state.”

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

Most environmentalists cheer Maryland’s new 50 percent green energy goal, but some want it vetoed Read More »