What if a border wall could pay for itself?


Building an energy corridor along the border instead of just
a wall would be a ‘giant leap for mankind,’ bringing security and jobs to the region, says a Purdue University-led national consortium of engineers and scientists
Purdue University News:
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. — Instead of a wall, build a first-of-its-kind energy park that spans the 1,954 miles of the border between the United States and Mexico to bring energy, water, jobs and border security to the region.
That’s the audacious plan put forward by a consortium of 28 prestigious engineers and scientists from across the nation who propose that the two nations work together on an enormous infrastructure project: a complex train of solar energy panels, wind turbines, natural gas pipelines, desalination facilities that together would create an industrial park along the border unlike anything found anywhere else in the world.
The facilities would provide the desired border security, the researchers say, because utility facilities and infrastructure must
be well-protected. The connected energy parks would also be an economic driver, both in the construction of the facilities themselves and in the businesses that would be attracted to the region by cheap electricity and plentiful water resources. Comments from
co-authors of the proposal to build an energy-water-security corridor are available here.
Luciano Castillo, Purdue University’s Kenninger Professor of Renewable Energy and Power Systems, and lead of the consortium, says if enacted, the mega infrastructure project would have a historic positive effect for both nations.
“Just like the transcontinental railroad transformed the United States in the 19th century, or the Interstate system transformed the 20th century, this would be a national infrastructure project for the 21st century,” Castillo says. “It would do for the Southwest what
the Tennessee Valley Authority has done for the Southeast over the last several decades.”
Ronald Adrian, Regent’s Professor at Arizona State University
and a member of the prestigious National Academy of Engineering, says this proposal, although a huge undertaking, is worth serious study.
“At first blush, the idea seems too big, too aggressive, but consider the Roman aqueducts or the transcontinental railroads — enormous undertakings that gave enormous benefits. The cost of providing basic, essential infrastructure to the borderlands is tiny compared to the opportunities it creates,” he says. “I view this project as a means of creating wealth by turning unused land of little value along the border into valuable land that has power,
water access and ultimately agriculture, industry, jobs, workers
and communities. With only a wall, you still have unused land of little value.”
Carlos Castillo-Chavez, Regent’s Professor at Arizona State University, says a cooperative effort between the United States a
nd Mexico to address the issues of the border region would reinforce the cultural ties that have existed for hundreds of years.
“The USA-Mexico border is home to families with common bonds, large Spanglish-proficient communities, talented creative large pools of young people, intersecting cultural ties and more. These communities have faced day and night similar ecological, health, education, energy, water and security challenges,” Castillo-Chavez says. “They know that solutions must address these challenges across both nations. There are no effective single-territory solutions.”
The plan was first reported by Scientific American; the full proposal is available online.
Contributing to border security
The first question often raised about the proposal is about border security and, Castillo says, the energy parks would provide ample security.
“All utility plants, pipelines and other energy production facilities have security — as any infrastructure will have under any conditions,” he says. “In addition to physical security features,
such as multiple levels of fencing, these pipelines and facilities would also have electronic sensors and drone surveillance. This would allow areas for wildlife to continue to migrate while alerting officials to anyone crossing the border illegally.”
Adrian agrees: “The measures being undertaken to control the U.S.-Mexican border with a barrier ( the ‘wall’) are entirely compatible with a long bank of solar panels backed by a super pipeline — same land, similar construction issues, and the fact
that each of these systems is a barrier to some degree.”
The idea of combining the border security wall or fence with solar energy panels isn’t original — in fact, President Trump himself has floated the idea as one of many possibilities.
“This is a different kind of initiative that will solve many existing challenges while bringing people together,” Castillo says. “It will bring energy, water and education to create more opportunities
for the USA and Mexico on both sides.”
We’re always looking for stories that might interest our readers. A friend spotted this one and emailed us the link. If you come across something so interesting that it cries out to be shared, please send it along to editor@enviropolitics.com  If we agree, you’ll see it here soon. Thanks. 

What if a border wall could pay for itself? Read More »

Holy mackerel…wait, make that Atlantic Sturgeon

A pair of Atlantic sturgeon. (Courtesy of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)


Andrew Revkin reports in National GeographicCOLD SPRING, NEW YORK One day last June, two researchers were towing a special sonar system up and down the Hudson River near Hyde Park, New York, the site of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s home, when they saw something pleasantly shocking.They were helping state biologists assess whether the spawning or foraging of a fabled and endangered bottom-feeding denizen, the Atlantic sturgeon(Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus), was being disrupted when commercial vessels dropped anchor in a spot designated as a waiting area to manage ship traffic.The anchorage, established in 1999, happened to be located in a stretch of the Hudson that is one of the most important spawning grounds in its range along the coast from Florida through Canada’s maritime provinces. More anchorages were planned elsewhere in the Hudson.Not receiving our free updates? Unlike a simple depth sounder, this “side-scan” sonar sweeps high-frequency beams of sound out at angles, producing a detailed three-dimensional portrait of the river bed and any decent-size fish—and often precise enough to reveal the sturgeon’s distinctive profile, as low-slung as a Formula One car.John A. Madsen, the University of Delaware geologist running the sonar, recalled the screen was showing the expected mix of bottom features—areas where currents had sculpted “sand waves,” scrapes and furrows in the anchorage.River giantThe sonar revealed a sturgeon roughly twice as long as anything seen that day—confidently estimated at just over 14 feet from nose to tail tip. That’s a size that, even decades ago, even a century ago, was considered a rarity. But now, it was unimaginable given what this species had endured.“When I first saw it, I said, ‘You’ve got to be kidding me,’” Madsen recalled. But there was no mistaking the image. He and his colleague, Dewayne A. Fox of Delaware State University, have extensively used this sonar system in sturgeon habitat elsewhere along the Atlantic Coast and in the Republic of Georgia, home to half a dozen species of sturgeon, all deeply endangered, including Huso huso, which can reach lengths of 18 feet and is the source of Beluga caviar.Amanda Higgs, a state biologist who’s been tagging and netting Hudson sturgeon for more than a decade, was out on the water working nearby that day. As news of the sighting spread, she had a reaction echoing a famed scene in the movie Jaws.“Our boat is way too small to deal with a fish like that,” she said in an email.Biologists estimate a sturgeon that length could easily weigh 800 pounds.One exciting aspect of knowing the Hudson has female sturgeon that large is that bigger females produce vastly more eggs than smaller ones—up to 8 million at the high end. “Size matters,” said Jane Lubchenco, a marine ecologist at Oregon State and a former administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.The debate over adding anchorages along the Hudson is on hold for now after fierce opposition from environmental groups and scientists, including a cautionary 2016 letter to the Coast Guard from Madsen and Fox, who’ve been doing surveys around Hyde Park for several years.But any harm from dragging anchors would be just one of a host of far broader assaults on this species, and sturgeon worldwide, over the last century.

“The most threatened group of animals”

In 2010, the International Union for Conservation of Nature was blunt in its warning: Eighty five percent of sturgeon, one of the oldest families of fishes in existence, valued around the world for their precious roe, are at risk of extinction, making them the most threatened group of animals on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.”

Read the full story
Like this? Click to receive free updates

Holy mackerel…wait, make that Atlantic Sturgeon Read More »

New Jersey goes after ExxonMobil again over pollution

New lawsuit stands in contrast to Christie administration settlement with oil giant over former refineries in Linden and Bayonne

Tom Johnson reports for NJ Spotlight:
ExxonMobil Lail

Credit: Office of Attorney General/Tim Larsen
The 12-acre-plus Lail property where ExxonMobil is alleged liable for harmful contamination

The state is once again going after ExxonMobil to clean up and pay to restore once pristine natural areas, in this case a 12-acre site in Gloucester County where drums of industrial products and other contaminants were dumped.In a six-count lawsuit filed by the Attorney General, the state is seeking natural-resources damages against the oil giant. Previously, during the administration of former Gov. Chris Christie, New Jersey had settled an NRD suit against ExxonMobil for $225 million for causing massive pollution problems at its former refineries in Linden and Bayonne and other facilities.The latest court action is the fifth NRD case brought by Attorney General Gurbir Grewal and the state Department of Environmental Protection since the beginning of 2018 when Phil Murphy took over as governor. It marks a much more aggressive stance to force polluters to restore damages to drinking water, surface waters, and animal and marine life. No new NRD lawsuits were brought during Christie’s eight years in office.

‘…going to bring the hammer down on polluters’

“We’re going to bring the hammer down on polluters and hold them responsible for the damage they’ve caused in the Garden State,’’ Grewal said. “We have strong laws on the books to require companies to clean up their mess, and we’re going to keep using them.’’The latest litigation focuses on industrial dumping on a 12-acre property in East Greenwich and Paulsboro dating back to the 1950s. The disposal of drums containing petroleum products and other hazardous materials polluted soil, surface and ground waters, wetlands, and fish, according to the state.The contaminants included materials identified as aluminosilicate, a source of PCBs, piled nine feet thick in some areas. PCBs, or polychlorinated biphenyls, were banned in 1979 after research found the material, commonly used in manufacturing and commercial operations, caused multiple health risks, including cancer in humans and animals.ExxonMobil Lail site

Credit: Office of Attorney General/Tim Larsen
At the Lail property in Gloucester County, where ExxonMobil is alleged to have caused harmful contamination

Despite some cleanup efforts at the site over the years by ExxonMobil, there is still evidence that groundwater, soil, sediments and other ecological resources remain contaminated with the toxic compound. In its 41-page lawsuit, the state noted advisories have been issued against eating fish contaminated with PCBs in the Delaware River Basin because of elevated concentrations of the pollutant in fish tissue.ExxonMobil had a consultant do a study nine years ago to evaluate risks from the contaminant. It concluded past cleanups had eliminated the primary and ongoing source of PCBs in both soils and sediments at the site. But the consultant found that even 23 of 30 small mammals found at the site had detectable levels of PCBs in their tissues.

Christie’s settlement

The previous case against ExxonMobil settled perhaps the largest NRD case ever brought by New Jersey against a company. Initially, the state sought $8.9 billion in natural-resource damages, stemming from widespread contamination of more than 1,000 acres of marshes, waters and land at refineries in Linden and Bayonne.The Christie administration settled the case for $225 million, prompting an outcry from environmentalists, legislators and local officials. At the time, Christie officials defended the agreement as the single largest NRD settlement in state history. The administration also came under fire for diverting money from the case to help balance the state budget.Read the full storyRelated coverageN.J. sues ExxonMobil over Paulsboro plant’s PCB contamination (Philly.com)
ExxonMobil ‘surprised’ by NJ’s contamination lawsuit over Gloucester County property (Courier-Post)

New Jersey goes after ExxonMobil again over pollution Read More »

Company recycles old Mack Trucks plant in Allentown, Pa

PICTURES: Revolution RecoveryPHOTO GALLERY: Revolution Recovery – An Alternative to Landfills   (Monica Cabrera)Jon Harris   Jon Harris reports for the Morning CallThings are bustling in this old Mack Trucks plant in Allentown.Truck after truck swings by to dump piles of construction and manufacturing debris, filling the plant with the noise of back-up alarms and creating a dusty cloudiness visible near the lights along the 30-foot-high ceilings. Nearby, an orange excavator springs to life, stretching its arm and then clenching its claw around a fistful of the pile, spewing it out into a smaller line on the floor. Next, workers — dressed in neon yellow vests and hardhats, along with white dust masks strapped around their faces — jump in, sorting through the materials and throwing metals, wood and rubble into the corresponding bin.Those bins are then dumped into a larger pile of the same materials, a mountain containing familiar and interesting items — a ladder in one of the metal piles; a plastic turtle sandbox in with the plastics; and a piece of wood labeled the “Griswold Residence.” Lastly, these towering piles are baled or chipped into more accessible sizes, so they can be sold to another company to make something new, extending the material’s life.“It’s definitely an ordered chaos now,” said Shane Clark, on the special projects team of Revolution Recovery, the company behind the Allentown operation that competes in the challenging recycling industry.Revolution Recovery opened the plant — its third overall, joining facilities in Philadelphia and New Castle, Del. — last year as an alternative to landfills in the area. The company bought the 11.5-acre, century-old property at 644 S. 10th St. in December 2017 for $4 million, lured to the recycling opportunity created by the Lehigh Valley’s development boom. The region’s strength was reaffirmed this week when the area was dubbed one of the fastest-growing regions in the Northeast by Site Selection magazine.In a boost to economic growth, Lehigh Valley ranks high in Northeast, U.S. for business growthRight now, Revolution Recovery’s operations occupy 80,000-100,000 square feet of the 265,000-square-foot building. While the company plans to rent out some of the space, the additional square footage gives it space for expansion and storage as its customer base grows. As it is now, the facility processes about 200 tons of waste per day, which is eventually expected to be closer to the 500 tons the company’s other two facilities handle.The site’s employment also is expected to grow. The facility employs just under 20 people, but that number could easily hit 30 by the end of the year, said Brian Gordon, the facility’s manager. Later this year, he expects to make more use of automation in the plant, becoming more efficient with a sort line that uses conveyor belts. Right now, the most automated activity is a cardboard baler that spits out 1,500-pound bundles.Read the full storyLike this? Click to receive free updates

Company recycles old Mack Trucks plant in Allentown, Pa Read More »

DEP plans to add 300-foot buffers to 749 miles of streams

Dykman and Cullen Environmental Law Update 

On March 4, 2019, New Jersey DEP proposed amendments to its Surface Water Quality Standards which, if adopted, will upgrade 749 miles of rivers and streams throughout the State to Category One (C-1) status. The proposed C-1 designations apply to waterbodies in all regions of the State, from North to South. If adopted, they will add approximately 54,380 acres (85 square miles) of newly protected 300′ stream buffers on either side of a river or stream, within which only very limited development can occur. These are the first additions to the C-1 Waterways List since 2008. 

The proposed upgrades are based on a determination by DEP that the waterbodies in question offer suitable habitat for specified Endangered and Threatened Species, are of exceptional ecological significance, constitute exceptional aquatic communities and/or support trout populations.
  
C-1 designation has two significant consequences: First, strict anti-degradation effluent limits are placed on point source discharges. Second, 300-foot stream buffers (“Flood Hazard Riparian Zones” in DEP parlance) are imposed on either side of the waterway as measured from the top of the bank. There are no provisions for adjustments in areas where a watercourse runs through areas in which development is otherwise encouraged, such as urban centers, areas in need of redevelopment or proposed transit villages. Some limited relief is available under the Riparian Zone provisions of the Flood Hazard Regulations, but that only occurs when a Flood Hazard Permit Application is filed for a particular project; the C-1 designation itself does not change.
  
Links to the list of impacted rivers and streams, to a map showing their location and the rule proposal itself are available on DEP’s website:
  
 
The proposal is open for a 60 day public comment period. A public hearing will be held on April 8, 2019 in Hamilton Township, Mercer County.
  
You may want to consult with a qualified engineering or consulting firm to determine whether property you own or have an interest in is impacted.

 

DEP plans to add 300-foot buffers to 749 miles of streams Read More »

Manafort sentenced to 4 years for tax cheating, bank fraud

Before he joined the Trump campaign, Paul Manafort made a name for himself in the D.C. lobbying world, but his past caught up with him. 

Paul Manafort, who once served as President Trump’s campaign chairman, was sentenced to nearly four years in prison Thursday for cheating on his taxes and bank fraud — a spectacular fall for a once high-flying political consultant who told the judge he is now “humiliated and ashamed.”
Manafort had faced up to 24 years in prison under federal sentencing guidelines, but U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis called that calculation “excessive” and sentenced him instead to 47 months.
Ellis said the sentence he imposed was more in line with others who had been convicted on similar crimes.
“The government cannot sweep away the history of all these previous sentences” for similar crimes, the judge said.
Ellis noted that he must consider the entirety of Manafort’s life when issuing a sentence, noting Manafort has been “a good friend” and a “generous person” but that “can’t erase the criminal activity.” Manafort’s tax crimes, the judge said, were “a theft of money from everyone who pays taxes.”

Paul Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, leaves federal court in Washington on April 4. (Andrew Harnik/AP)
“He’s lived an otherwise blameless life,” Ellis said. The judged noted Manafort has no past criminal history and “earned the admiration of a number of people” who wrote letters to the court support Manafort.
Wearing a green jail uniform with the words “ALEXANDRIA INMATE” in block letters on the back, Manafort entered the courtroom in a wheelchair.
“The last two years have been the most difficult years for my family and I,” Manafort told the judge. “To say that I feel humiliated and ashamed would be a gross understatement.”
He asked the judge “for compassion,” adding, “I know it is my conduct that has brought me here.”

Manafort sentenced to 4 years for tax cheating, bank fraud Read More »