“Round 4” in the battle over Clean Water Act jurisdiction

The following ‘alert’ is authored by K&L Gates environmental attorneys Ankur K. Tohan, John P. Krill, Jr., Cliff L. Rothenstein, Barry M. Hartman, Tad J. Macfarlan, and Endre M. Szalay
Last month the Trump Administration announced a proposed rule that would dramatically reduce the scope of federal authority under the Clean Water Act (“Act”). If finalized in its current form, the rule would eliminate federal jurisdiction over a significant number of streams, wetlands, and other waters.
The proposed rule will impact a wide range of individuals and businesses—as well as agencies and municipalities—that engage (or have a financial stake) in land and project development activities on these areas, while reducing the time and costs associated with obtaining Army Corps of Engineers ‘dredge and fill permits.’
While the proposal would not restrict the ability of states to regulate activities in these areas, the extent to which states will step in and do so is unclear. The 60 day period for commenting on the rule will start as soon as it is published in the Federal Register.
The Clean Water Act grants to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) the authority to require federal approval before any entity discharges pollutants, including dredged or fill material, into the “navigable waters.” [2] That means that any project impacting the use of these areas requires federal approval which can be a long, arduous, and expensive process, if it is granted at all.
“Round 4” in the battle over Clean Water Act jurisdiction Read More »



