Enviro and energy bills on NJ Senate voting list – Mar 14



The following environment and energy bills are scheduled for votes on Thursday, March 14, in Trenton: 


S542 – Designates High Point State Park as High Point State Park and New Jersey Veterans Memorial.


S1606 – Permits small businesses to qualify for loans from EDA for costs of an energy audit and making energy efficiency or conservation improvements. 

S1729 – Designates Streptomyces griseus as New Jersey State Microbe.

S3040
 – Prohibits the use of products containing asbestos in building construction.


Like this? Click to receive free updates

Enviro and energy bills on NJ Senate voting list – Mar 14 Read More »

Army Corps has plan to protect Jersey Shore’s back bays but ‘viable options’ will cost billions and years to install

 

Jon Hurdle reports for NJ Spotlight

Get ready for storm-surge barriers, floodwalls, and levees to protect New Jersey’s flood-prone back bays from sea-level rise, but don’t expect them to be built for at least another decade.
That’s the latest message from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which is doing a massive multiyear study on how to defend the back bays from higher seas and bigger storms as the climate changes.
Many shore towns are seeing downward pressure on real estate prices amid growing public awareness that coastal properties are vulnerable to rising seas.
new study on how sea-level rise is affecting real estate values on the U.S. East Coast said Ocean City experienced the biggest slowdown of property prices among 20 cities studied between 2005 and 2017 — greater even than Miami Beach, which is often seen as a poster child for the vulnerability of coastal cities.
Prices in Ocean City are now an aggregate $530 million lower than they would be without sea-level rise, according to the study from First Street Foundation, a Brooklyn-based nonprofit, and Columbia University. Seven other Jersey Shore towns were among the top 20 cities for real estate losses.
Among 17 states covered, New Jersey’s real estate losses were the second highest, at $4.5 billion, after Florida with $5.4 billion, the study said.

First word from the Corps of Engineers

The Corps released an interim report on the early results of its work. It said storm-surge barriers are “viable options” at several locations including Manasquan Inlet and Absecon Inlet but probably would be wrong for some other sites because their costs would outweigh benefits, and they could cause environmental damage.
To protect places including Cape May City, Stone Harbor/Avalon, and Ocean City, flood walls and levees are “potentially viable,” the report said.
But it warned that structural measures such as flood walls could spoil the views that draw many visitors or residents to the back bays and could lead to the loss of natural habitats.


Raising the roof 

                                           Frank Brill photo
Another option would be to raise houses, as is now required for new construction in many areas of the Shore following superstorm Sandy in 2012. It also said there are environmental benefits to buying the most vulnerable coastal properties and turning the land into open space that becomes a buffer to rising seas — a policy that’s already followed by New Jersey’s Blue Acres program.
Nature-based coastal defenses like living shorelines and reefs could also play a part, it said.
And it warned that its primary focus is on managing the risk associated with storm-surges rather than so-called nuisance flooding that typically occurs because of the failure of storm sewers, which are not a federal responsibility.
Whatever options are finally chosen, they will likely be “massive in scale” and may cost “several billion dollars,” said the Army Corps, which is working with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

Army Corps has plan to protect Jersey Shore’s back bays but ‘viable options’ will cost billions and years to install Read More »

Jersey Journal: This parting gift is an abuse of taxpayers

The superintendent of the Hudson County Schools of Technology district is on a paid pre-retirement sabbatical.


The Hudson County Schools of Technology board has done county taxpayers a disservice by putting the 79-year-old superintendent of schools on a fully paid sabbatical in preparation for his retirement.



As Jersey Journal reporter Terrence T. McDonald wrote last week,
Superintendent Frank Gargiulo is receiving his full $279,494 salary even though the day-to-day running of the school district has passed to acting Superintendent Amy Lin-Rodriguez, whose salary is $201,600.



Gargiulo “has kept in communication’’ with the district during “this transition period,’’ a spokeswoman said, which is hardly worth $5,374.88 a week.



The district, by the way, consists of 2,600 students at two high schools, a middle school and several adult education programs.



Thirteen years ago, the State Commission of Investigation found that pre-retirement sabbaticals create a further burden on the already strapped state pension system by extending employees’ lengths of service.



***Like this?
Click to receive free updates***
As with so many games officials play to boost retirement payouts and pensions, it’s a legal but ethically dubious move. And it’s one we’re told the HCST board commonly employs.



There’s nothing to be done now to reverse the pricey present county taxpayers have been forced to give Gargiulo, but the HCST board must make this the last parting gift it gives on taxpayers’ behalf. As is the case in most offices, a card and a cake, maybe a luncheon and a gold watch, should suffice.



Beyond that, it bears noting that the HCST board isn’t the only one willing to throw tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars at someone headed out the door, especially when it comes to keeping well-connected political friends happy.



If Gov. Murphy and state Senate President Sweeney are serious about containing the rising cost of government, this is a place to start. The state budget that starts in July should be accompanied by legislation that closes the door to this abuse of taxpayers.



Like this? Click to receive free updates

Jersey Journal: This parting gift is an abuse of taxpayers Read More »

Notorious ‘Serial Objector’ May Have Filed His Last








Texas lawyer objects to class action settlements to extract payments. Has played a role in settlements involving Facebook, Apple

Michael J. Bologna reports for Bloomberg Law

Texas attorney Christopher Bandas has made a name for himself in the legal community, and not in a good way. Regarded as the most prolific “serial objector” in the country, Bandas routinely objects to class action settlements, hoping to leverage a payment from the settling attorneys to simply “go away.”

The business model, seen as a form of legal “extortion” among critics, has paid Bandas handsomely over the years. But two recent court rulings and revisions to the rules of civil procedure may signal an end to this much-maligned practice.
The first whiff of trouble for Bandas came on Nov. 20 last year, when an Illinois appeals court found Bandas had engaged in an unethical pattern of “rent-seeking behavior.” The appeals court judges also found Bandas had “engaged in a fraud on the court” worthy of discipline by the state.
The ruling responded to Bandas’ efforts to object to a class settlement involving the media company Gannett Co., which was accused of placing millions of robocalls to consumers in violation of federal telephone marketing statutes.
The news for Bandas got worse Dec. 1, when new class action requirements became effective under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. The new rules require side payments to class settlement objectors – transactions characterized as “greenmail” – to be approved by a district court. The new requirements seek to deter boilerplate and frivolous petitions, potentially extinguishing Bandas’ business model.
And on Jan. 17 U.S. District Court Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer issued an attention-getting order finding that Bandas had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. The order responded to Bandas’ own admission of responsibility in a lawsuit in federal court in Chicago that alleged professional misconduct. The lawsuit followed the fact pattern in the Gannett case, but portrayed it as a single chapter in an illegal racketeering scheme being replicated in jurisdictions across the country.
Pallmeyer also issued a permanent injunction that placed new limits on Bandas’ ability to object in any state or federal jurisdiction in the country.


Notorious ‘Serial Objector’ May Have Filed His Last Read More »

Time to step up to defend bees, wasps and butterflies

Nearly one third of the food we eat requires pollination. New Jersey must act now to protect pollinators from the threat of chemicals, specifically neonicotinoids

Kelly Mooij is vice president for government relations at New Jersey Audubon. Her op-ed appeared yesterday in NJ Spotlight 

kelly mooij

Kelly Mooij

Pollinators — animals that move pollen from one plant to another while feeding — enable the production of fruits and seeds through plant fertilization. This not only provides food sources crucial to native wildlife, nearly one third of the food we eat requires pollination. Most pollinators are flying insects such as bees, wasps and butterflies as well as flies and beetles, and like other wildlife, are greatly impacted by habitat loss, growing populations of invasive non-native species, a changing climate and other threats such as disease.One threat looms largest of all: chemical exposure. The class of insecticides known as neonicotinoids pose a pervasive threat across a variety of environments — from agricultural fields, to home gardens and our waterways. Based on accumulating scientific evidence, New Jersey Audubon is calling for increased scrutiny and a more limited use of these products to avoid further impacts to already imperiled pollinator populations.New Jersey beekeepers report nearly half their honeybees die off each year, significantly higher than the national average. Our wild native bees also provide pollination services to New Jersey crops; they forage in colder and wetter conditions than honeybees and significantly supplement crop production. In 2017, the Rusty Patched Bumblebee was listed as an endangered species, marking the first time a bumblebee has reached endangered status in the U.S. This species, known as an excellent pollinator of cranberries and other crops, was once commonly distributed across the East (including New Jersey) and Midwest but disappeared from 87 percent of its range.Although many causes contributed to this disappearance, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service cited neonicotinoids as a significant factor. Pollinators encounter these broad-spectrum systemic insecticides when feeding because they are readily absorbed by plants either by the roots or leaves and then transported throughout plant tissues, nectar and pollen.

Death by a thousand cuts

While certain levels of the chemicals can cause outright mortality, research shows that neonicotinoids also impact bee behavior by impairing foraging, navigation and motor function, leading to disoriented and inefficient worker bees that struggle or fail to carry out basic survival tasks. Studies also show that neonicotinoids weaken bee immune systems and thus jeopardize colony survival, as well as reduce reproductive success. Combined with other stressors encountered by pollinators, including other chemicals such as fungicides, exposure to these chemicals can culminate in death — of entire colonies — by a thousand cuts.Many studies focus on bees, but impacts to other pollinator species are also documented, such as reduced survival of butterfly and moth larva following neonicotinoid soil injections. The chemical properties of neonicotinoids allow for easy transport through our soils and to our waters and cause declines of aquatic and other invertebrates, such as mayflies, that are critical to supporting aquatic and terrestrial food webs. This reduction in prey availability has in turn reduced bird populations in areas with elevated surface water concentrations of neonicotinoids. The evidence indicating impacts to a variety of species from neonicotinoid use is not lacking. But a plan to more closely monitor and limit their use is.Read the full storyLike this? Click to receive free updates

Time to step up to defend bees, wasps and butterflies Read More »